I can see 5 WRs and 4 TEs given that Engram role will be less the traditional TE at least until he learns to block like a TE and that might be never given his skill level on the outside. Keeping the extra RB makes sense if he's a big ST player since they'll be short a WR who would be a ST player. The FB could also be a ST player or maybe McAdoo thinks that the running game really needs a FB. Keeping both, extra RB and FB is stretch though
I don't see a FB when they have Ellison. When he was signed Giants.com called him a "hybrid fullback/tight end". I'd wager that spot will go to someone who excels on specials in pre-season.
As for Kicker- I've said since April that I believe that Roberto Aguayo or Nick Folk will be our kicker in 2017.
something to Jordan about trading Will Tye, but does anyone honestly expect that a team will actually give them something in a deal acquire him? We have a tendency to overvalue our guys around here.
something to Jordan about trading Will Tye, but does anyone honestly expect that a team will actually give them something in a deal acquire him? We have a tendency to overvalue our guys around here.
Add to that 4 TEs. No way that happens. Either 3 TEs, 4 RBs or no FB.
BTW, IMHO Matt Lacosse is rapidly becoming the Jonas Seawright of the late 2010s Giants.
Darkwa or Draughn, not both.
No fullback.
Jones not Gettis.
Thomas not Bryant.
Thompson not Blake.
Pinkins makes the team.
As for Kicker- I've said since April that I believe that Roberto Aguayo or Nick Folk will be our kicker in 2017.
I'm OK with 5 WRs (it's Beckham, Marshall, Shepard and 2 JAGs or 3 JAGs if 6 WRs).
No way in hell 5 RBs AND a FB. 5 WRs, 4 RBs, 1 FB and 3 TEs or 5 WRs, 4 RBs, 0 FBs and 4 TEs. Gives 25 on offense.
Increase LBs from 5 to 6 and increase CBs from 5 to 6 for 25 on defense.
Did he proof-read his work?
Totally agree, sloppy work. Maybe he is still soured that nobody gave him head's up on the FO liking Engram and he is holding a grudge.
Wake up Ranaan...
Check this out