Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner
 

Archived Thread

Zeke will be suspended in 48 hours

Big Rick in FL : 8/7/2017 12:12 pm
PFT said most likely for 4 games. At least according to Cris Carter. Details in the link below.
Zeke suspension - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
Gussi41 : 8/7/2017 2:20 pm : link
In comment 13551744 Rocky369 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551737 Gussi41 said:

Quote:

... The accuser is lying about being abused...

Where did this come from?


Ha. I thought this was common knowledge. Check this site out:
DeadSpin
RE: .  
Reb8thVA : 8/7/2017 2:24 pm : link
In comment 13551652 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
And I really don't care if Dallas fans use it as an excuse if we beat them - he played in both games last year and we beat them both times. I'll take a win against Dallas any way it comes. The whole "I'd rather beat them at full strength" thing never made sense to me.


It makes sense in this way. Dwelling on whether Elliot will play or not comes across to a certain degree as weak and kind of elementary school. Why obsess over whether he plays or not? (that is not directed at you or anyone specific) We beat em twice last year. They should be more worried about solving our defense. Fuck Dallas!
was also let off  
msh : 8/7/2017 2:28 pm : link
for the whole jumping in the kettle thing any other player did that they would have been flagged/fined and possibly more people overlook the fact that deflategate was more about brady not co-operating and destroying evidence than the actual deflating if he isnt co-operating with the investigation and hiding or destroying evidence then the precedence was already set for 4 games ala brady

who is talking himself into more trouble with the whole none of your business attitude to his concussions i would say that proves he did and that the patriots covered it up i dont buy the whole playing for another 4 years crap either that comment by his wife was her calling time and the fact the patriots turned down a ton of high picks for garropollo also speaks to the patriots thinking he is maybe on his last year also

Assuming he's innocent of the original charges  
grizz299 : 8/7/2017 2:29 pm : link
there's a pattern that goes back to college and seems compulsive. The man's out of control and can be compared to Johnie Football.
there's an alleged cover up of a bar room fight last year. A bar room fight with another cover-up just a few weeks ago. Theres the appearance in the pot shop. There's even a 100 mph speeding incident in Dallas itself.
Consider: The man's under investigation for abusing a woman and he pulls another woman's blouse down and against her will exposes her breasts.
That's bad from every viewpooint, but given the background and the admonitions to keep himself clean, it's more than just revealing. With millions on the line, with a superbowl perhaps within reach, his compulsion was so strong that he couldn't stop destructive patterns. And like Manzel it seems evident that there's a substance abuse problem.
His father moved to Ohio to protect him through college.
I think mandatory counseling and a rigid set of standards offered in severe reprimand might help him, but that's what he needs, help.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
adamg : 8/7/2017 2:35 pm : link
In comment 13551829 Gussi41 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551744 Rocky369 said:


Quote:


In comment 13551737 Gussi41 said:

Quote:

... The accuser is lying about being abused...

Where did this come from?



Ha. I thought this was common knowledge. Check this site out:
DeadSpin


Lying about one alleged incident doesn't mean there is nothing to the report. Did you read through the 70+ pages of materials there and conclude it was all a hoax? Or did you read one reporter's take on one document in the set?
RE: RE: RE: We beat them twice with Elliott in the line-up  
Rory : 8/7/2017 2:38 pm : link
In comment 13551746 andrew_nyg said:
Quote:
In comment 13551663 Beezer said:


Quote:


In comment 13551659 andrew_nyg said:


Quote:


last year. I'd rather have him on the field and have the defense amped up to stop them. It's natural to let down a little when a key opponent is out...I don't want them to relax and get smacked when they least expect it.



Opening game? lol And you're talking about a "letdown?" Oy.



Try reading within the context of the statement: I wrote that "it's natural to let down a little when a key opponent is out"

The context of which is: when you have a player for whom you need to gameplan and otherwise add more focus, and that player is not on the field, it is natural for the players who usually face that player to let down a bit because the requisite focus, gameplan and attention is seemingly not as urgent with a "back-up player".

I don't believe te team will let down, but let's say the back up RB is juiced up for this opportunity behind their OL and decides to ball out...it's natural that the defense may not be expecting such a performance.


pretty sure the Giants will be juiced to play their first game against a div rival who always seems to get the press and the headlines. let down a little ? not gonna happen dude
4 games? He will miss the rest of the pre-season!  
Reale01 : 8/7/2017 2:39 pm : link
Seriously, I have said several times that the CB will appeal and the appeal will not be decided until after week 1. To me the most significant element is that this is strike one. Further problems could lead to significant issues for the CB.
RE: RE: .  
allstarjim : 8/7/2017 2:41 pm : link
In comment 13551838 Reb8thVA said:
Quote:
In comment 13551652 arcarsenal said:


Quote:


And I really don't care if Dallas fans use it as an excuse if we beat them - he played in both games last year and we beat them both times. I'll take a win against Dallas any way it comes. The whole "I'd rather beat them at full strength" thing never made sense to me.



It makes sense in this way. Dwelling on whether Elliot will play or not comes across to a certain degree as weak and kind of elementary school. Why obsess over whether he plays or not? (that is not directed at you or anyone specific) We beat em twice last year. They should be more worried about solving our defense. Fuck Dallas!


I just think it means we are competing for the most amount of wins possible by the end of the regular season, so any development that enhances our chances of getting a win I'm in favor of. Nobody will care come playoff time if Zeke played in week 1 or not. And yes, they should be more worried about solving our defense, but that doesn't mean taking away their best player doesn't help us.

But, it is kind of ridiculous to obsess over it...either way, none of have any control over what happens so anytime anyone anywhere obsesses over something they have no control over it's a waste of energy.
I don't think..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 8/7/2017 2:41 pm : link
strike 1 matters for DV. Adrian Peterson and Ray Rice weren't known as repeat offenders. Nor was Greg Hardy.
RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
Beezer : 8/7/2017 2:42 pm : link
In comment 13551719 Gussi41 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551660 Beezer said:


Quote:


In comment 13551658 Gussi41 said:

Quote:
Giants fan or not, the NFL is overstepping on this...

Overstepping ... how?



With regards to the DV case..

Not even going to mention that the case is dismissed..

The allegation is BS.. The "victim" is lying.. Not just me saying this. It's in court documents that she told her GF to tell the investigators that Zeke pushed her out of a moving car and hit her, etc.. Something to that effect..


Oh.

Well, since you have this all locked down, Elliott shouldn't be concerned.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
Gussi41 : 8/7/2017 2:43 pm : link
In comment 13551852 adamg said:
Quote:
In comment 13551829 Gussi41 said:


Quote:


In comment 13551744 Rocky369 said:


Quote:


In comment 13551737 Gussi41 said:

Quote:

... The accuser is lying about being abused...

Where did this come from?



Ha. I thought this was common knowledge. Check this site out:
DeadSpin



Lying about one alleged incident doesn't mean there is nothing to the report. Did you read through the 70+ pages of materials there and conclude it was all a hoax? Or did you read one reporter's take on one document in the set?


No.. I read the part about telling her GF she lied and the part about the DA dropping the case.. I'm sure they read the 70+ pages..
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
speedywheels : 8/7/2017 2:48 pm : link
In comment 13551829 Gussi41 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551744 Rocky369 said:


Quote:


In comment 13551737 Gussi41 said:

Quote:

... The accuser is lying about being abused...

Where did this come from?



Ha. I thought this was common knowledge. Check this site out:
DeadSpin


You do realize that a suspension - if it actually occurs - would be based more on just this incident, right?
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
adamg : 8/7/2017 2:48 pm : link
In comment 13551872 Gussi41 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551852 adamg said:

No.. I read the part about telling her GF she lied and the part about the DA dropping the case.. I'm sure they read the 70+ pages..


Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.
The "I want us beat them at full strength" crowd  
B in ALB : 8/7/2017 3:06 pm : link
is hilarious.

1. You're not on the team

2. If you were on the team, you'd be happy as hell that one of their best players is out.

C. You're not on the team.
RE: The  
Big Blue '56 : 8/7/2017 3:09 pm : link
In comment 13551904 B in ALB said:
Quote:
is hilarious.

1. You're not on the team

2. If you were on the team, you'd be happy as hell that one of their best players is out.

C. You're not on the team.


New Math? 1, 2 and C? 😎
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
Gussi41 : 8/7/2017 3:12 pm : link
In comment 13551883 adamg said:
Quote:
In comment 13551872 Gussi41 said:


Quote:


In comment 13551852 adamg said:

No.. I read the part about telling her GF she lied and the part about the DA dropping the case.. I'm sure they read the 70+ pages..



Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.


Yes and the like you said, I know about as much as anyone.. Funny I didn't see anybody else mentioning that article pointing out, what you deemed, a "minor little detail".. I'll also in add in the fact the the DA threw out the case..

You can only choose one side here.. Zeke or the accuser..

Just so I understand this.. You're telling me that even after confirmation that she made up a story about getting dragged out of a car and involving her GF in that lie and the DA dropping the case because of "inconsistent information across ALL incidents", you're still siding with the accuser??

Remarkable..
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
Gussi41 : 8/7/2017 3:22 pm : link
In comment 13551883 adamg said:
Quote:
In comment 13551872 Gussi41 said:

Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.


... and you mentioned preaching.. I don't know ya'll from a hole in the wall plus I'm not in the business of trying to convince NOBODY. I'm just pointing out that "minor" detail..

We're not talking about falsifying your job application. We're talking about an accusation that could put you in JAIL.. Forget football suspension.. Prison..

I'm sorry, I can't dismiss that as a "minor" incident, brushing it aside as a mistake and continue to move in the direction that he actually did something..

It's funny to me, there's 2 (maybe 3) sides to every story, but it seems that we never seem to believe that its even remotely possible that the accuser is the one that is lying..
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
adamg : 8/7/2017 3:36 pm : link
In comment 13551910 Gussi41 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551883 adamg said:


Quote:


In comment 13551872 Gussi41 said:


Quote:


In comment 13551852 adamg said:

No.. I read the part about telling her GF she lied and the part about the DA dropping the case.. I'm sure they read the 70+ pages..



Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.



Yes and the like you said, I know about as much as anyone.. Funny I didn't see anybody else mentioning that article pointing out, what you deemed, a "minor little detail".. I'll also in add in the fact the the DA threw out the case..

You can only choose one side here.. Zeke or the accuser..

Just so I understand this.. You're telling me that even after confirmation that she made up a story about getting dragged out of a car and involving her GF in that lie and the DA dropping the case because of "inconsistent information across ALL incidents", you're still siding with the accuser??

Remarkable..


Don't misattribute shit to me please. Don't lie about what I said. Re-read my posts before responding with this shit post.
How many career wins does Zeke  
averagejoe : 8/7/2017 3:39 pm : link
have vs Gmen ???


RELAX. It's more fun beating Dallas at full strength.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
chopperhatch : 8/7/2017 3:42 pm : link
In comment 13551910 Gussi41 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551883 adamg said:


Quote:


In comment 13551872 Gussi41 said:


Quote:


In comment 13551852 adamg said:

No.. I read the part about telling her GF she lied and the part about the DA dropping the case.. I'm sure they read the 70+ pages..



Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.



Yes and the like you said, I know about as much as anyone.. Funny I didn't see anybody else mentioning that article pointing out, what you deemed, a "minor little detail".. I'll also in add in the fact the the DA threw out the case..

You can only choose one side here.. Zeke or the accuser..

Just so I understand this.. You're telling me that even after confirmation that she made up a story about getting dragged out of a car and involving her GF in that lie and the DA dropping the case because of "inconsistent information across ALL incidents", you're still siding with the accuser??

Remarkable..


You obiously didnt read thw ehole thing. Regarding the text messages:

"Included in the documents released by the prosecutorís office are images of text messages. Itís hard to tell exactly who is communicating with whom based on the images, "


The prosecutor dropped the charges because the case would have been impossible to prove and it probably wasnt worth the time.

Also, calling that article an example of "common knowledge" is just inaccurate.

Not saying he did beat her up or didnt, but you make it sound like he was cleared of any wrong doing. He wasnt. Prosecutor just didnt have a case.

Also, the league sees a trend in behavior and acts accordingly. They are not bound by the same statute of limitations as the courts just as any other employer isnt. You would run the risk of losing your job if wind of these three incodents that you may or may not have been involved with got back to your boss.
I dont get people being upset  
Glover : 8/7/2017 3:46 pm : link
about Zeke possibly being suspended. Someone said NFL is overstepping their boundaries? NFL is a 9+ billion dollar a year industry and they also happen to have a problem (not just an image problem) with their employees engaging in domestic violence. They need to do whatever they want to stem this problem. It's in the bargaining agreement. Some states are Right to Work states. They can fire an employee without any cause. Roger Goodell has the power to possibly suspend Zeke, and he wouldnt do that if there was not some pretty hard evidence that it happened. He had the right to throw the book at Sean Payton, Gregg Williams and the Saints players for having locker room bounties for knocking players out, had the right to insist that it was not OK for even the biggest star in the game, Tom Brady, to violate what many thought was an insignificant rule. The guy has the power, and I have no problem with that. Has he fucked up along the way? Sure. But I dont mind the top guy in the league handling situations as they present themselves. He would have benefitted from some more sage advice at times, but it is what it is, and thats the way it's going to be for the foreseeable future.
RE: RE: RE: RE: We beat them twice with Elliott in the line-up  
andrew_nyg : 8/7/2017 3:53 pm : link
In comment 13551861 Rory said:
Quote:
In comment 13551746 andrew_nyg said:


Quote:


In comment 13551663 Beezer said:


Quote:


In comment 13551659 andrew_nyg said:


Quote:


last year. I'd rather have him on the field and have the defense amped up to stop them. It's natural to let down a little when a key opponent is out...I don't want them to relax and get smacked when they least expect it.



Opening game? lol And you're talking about a "letdown?" Oy.



Try reading within the context of the statement: I wrote that "it's natural to let down a little when a key opponent is out"

The context of which is: when you have a player for whom you need to gameplan and otherwise add more focus, and that player is not on the field, it is natural for the players who usually face that player to let down a bit because the requisite focus, gameplan and attention is seemingly not as urgent with a "back-up player".

I don't believe te team will let down, but let's say the back up RB is juiced up for this opportunity behind their OL and decides to ball out...it's natural that the defense may not be expecting such a performance.



pretty sure the Giants will be juiced to play their first game against a div rival who always seems to get the press and the headlines. let down a little ? not gonna happen dude


I'm glad you're so certain that they'll be equally fired up to stop a back-up running back as they would be Elliott (who BTW is pretty much the center of all the press and headlines these days).

All the same, I'd rather they played against him and won.
Goodell  
pjcas18 : 8/7/2017 3:56 pm : link
said today at Giants camp that no decision has been made re: Elliott.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
Gussi41 : 8/7/2017 3:59 pm : link
In comment 13551952 chopperhatch said:
Quote:
In comment 13551910 Gussi41 said:


Quote:
You obiously didnt read thw ehole thing. Regarding the text messages:

"Included in the documents released by the prosecutorís office are images of text messages. Itís hard to tell exactly who is communicating with whom based on the images, "


Actually, I did read the whole thing but everything else you said was fair.

What can make me say that is you said "Not saying he did beat her up or didnt".. You at least gave him that benefit of the doubt..

Also, I really thought it this info was common knowledge.. Reading some of the responses here, convinces me that I couldn't have been more wrong.. Definite mistake on my part.

One more thing and I'm done, maybe, with this.. Women beaters DISGUST me. Let me just get that out the way before people think I'm defending a known worm. This is from a father of 2 beautiful young women BUT, I'm also a father of a wonderful young man AND in my early 20's, I was accused of serious incident.

I can tell you from first hand experience that there is NOTHING WORSE in life than having been accused of something that ONLY you and God KNOW is a lie.. I learned at a young age that they females lie too and have no problems shedding tears at the snap of a finger..

It's sickening feeling watching that play out..
RE: Fellas, whether he misses  
Milton : 8/7/2017 4:00 pm : link
In comment 13551634 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
opening day or not, that OL, even with 2 new starters, is still quite formidable.
What makes you say that? An OL is only as strong as its weakest link. Cooper at the top of the OLG depth chart is not something he earned, but something he was handed. And he flopped with three other teams, so no reason as yet to believe he isn't a liability. And Collins is still very much unproven. He was well thought of coming out of college, but has proven nothing in his first two years in the league. It's not as if he was getting rave reviews before being lost for the season to injury last year. He was still very much a work-in-progress.
RE: The  
Mr. Bungle : 8/7/2017 4:06 pm : link
In comment 13551904 B in ALB said:
Quote:
is hilarious.

1. You're not on the team

2. If you were on the team, you'd be happy as hell that one of their best players is out.

C. You're not on the team.


4. The Giants are usually not at full strength for most of these games, either. So why insist that the opponent be?
Our results against Zeke and Dak last year  
Big Blue '56 : 8/7/2017 4:26 pm : link
are absolutely meaningless as it pertains to this year. In fact, we EASILY could have lost both, so this, "we beat them twice last year with Zeke, so we could/should do it again with him playing this year," is silly, imo
RE: Fellas, whether he misses  
BMac : 8/7/2017 4:30 pm : link
In comment 13551634 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
opening day or not, that OL, even with 2 new starters, is still quite formidable, which means that any back or backs by committe that step(s) in are capable of putting up a buck twenty-five


True, but our DL ain't chopped liver.
RE: The  
SFGFNCGiantsFan : 8/7/2017 4:33 pm : link
In comment 13551904 B in ALB said:
Quote:
is hilarious.

1. You're not on the team

2. If you were on the team, you'd be happy as hell that one of their best players is out.

C. You're not on the team.


The 'I want them @ full strength' line never ceases to make me laugh.
RE: Guilt seems..  
BMac : 8/7/2017 4:40 pm : link
In comment 13551727 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
to be subjective with DV cases:



Quote:


4 games suspension. I'll take it the cheap way only because its Dallas
est1986 : 12:59 pm : link : reply
But has he been proven guilty of anything? And if not aren't you innocent until proven guilty? It seems a little unfair to Zeke, not that I care so much, he is a Cowboy but I have to say iI would be pissed if Eli got suspended for the memorabilia thing without any proof of guilt.



Josh Brown wasn't proven guilty, but more than enough people not only wanted him run out of town, but insinuated that Mara and McAdoo were scumbags for having him around as long as they did.


Innocent until proved guilty doesn't apply. The NFL isn't a courtroom and he appears to have violated a contract point. Appearance alone is all the NFL needs to lay the wood.
Elliot playing with a suspension and the distraction  
joeinpa : 8/7/2017 5:36 pm : link
And resentment it might cause for that team, might be a bigger advantage for the Giants then him missing the game.

Teams have used the loss of key personal before to come together and play better.
RE: Our results against Zeke and Dak last year  
ZogZerg : 8/7/2017 7:35 pm : link
In comment 13552030 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
are absolutely meaningless as it pertains to this year. In fact, we EASILY could have lost both, so this, "we beat them twice last year with Zeke, so we could/should do it again with him playing this year," is silly, imo


^
Exactly BB56. Some people just never learn.
And, the D having a let down because Zeke isn't playing - LOL! People actually believe this shit? It's the fucking Cowboys on opening day.
Good  
PatersonPlank : 8/7/2017 8:14 pm : link
I hope he's out for a long time.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: This is BULLSHIT!!!!  
adamg : 8/7/2017 10:47 pm : link
In comment 13551924 Gussi41 said:
Quote:
In comment 13551883 adamg said:


Quote:


In comment 13551872 Gussi41 said:

Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.



... and you mentioned preaching.. I don't know ya'll from a hole in the wall plus I'm not in the business of trying to convince NOBODY. I'm just pointing out that "minor" detail..

We're not talking about falsifying your job application. We're talking about an accusation that could put you in JAIL.. Forget football suspension.. Prison..

I'm sorry, I can't dismiss that as a "minor" incident, brushing it aside as a mistake and continue to move in the direction that he actually did something..

It's funny to me, there's 2 (maybe 3) sides to every story, but it seems that we never seem to believe that its even remotely possible that the accuser is the one that is lying..


I have a big problem with you putting quotes around things I never said. You should apologize for misattributing statements to me. I never said anything was "minor". Search this whole fucking dialogue and you're the only one saying that. Really... gfy.
Yes, but  
grizz299 : 8/8/2017 7:58 am : link
[quote)I can tell you from first hand experience that there is NOTHING WORSE in life than having been accused of something that ONLY you and God KNOW is a lie.. I learned at a young age that they females lie too and have no problems shedding tears at the snap of a finger..

It's sickening feeling watching that play out..[/quote]

Yes, but being victimized by some rich kid whose money and Dad (JJ) buy him out is pretty traumatic too.
But it's not the original charge, but rather an accumulation of incidents and cover-up's that are threatening the spoled and indulged child.

A poster says he'd rather beat them at full strength and has to endure being mocked and having his statement distorted.
He never said he played for the NY Giant. He said that as a fan he'd rather beat them at full strength. It seems to me to be reasonable and a personal preference.
Even if someone disagrees, Why does it provoke an attack and misrepresentation? Attacks like this are always on the attacker and reveal someone living a sad life trying to feel better about himself.
Sure, I'd love it if we were so good  
UConn4523 : 8/8/2017 8:27 am : link
that we can beat every team at full strength. If you guarantee the win than I'm all for it. But the notion that you'd rather go into a game as a fan knowing that you have the option to not have your team face the opponent with their best player, but somehow not want that advantage is mind boggling.

I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
RE: Sure, I'd love it if we were so good  
Big Blue '56 : 8/8/2017 8:35 am : link
In comment 13552412 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
that we can beat every team at full strength. If you guarantee the win than I'm all for it. But the notion that you'd rather go into a game as a fan knowing that you have the option to not have your team face the opponent with their best player, but somehow not want that advantage is mind boggling.

I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?


I had no problem with Gronk being seriously 'impaired' in XLVI
me neither  
UConn4523 : 8/8/2017 8:37 am : link
if he played and we still won, we don't get a bonus trophy.
RE: Sure, I'd love it if we were so good  
therealmf : 8/8/2017 9:38 am : link
In comment 13552412 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
that we can beat every team at full strength. If you guarantee the win than I'm all for it. But the notion that you'd rather go into a game as a fan knowing that you have the option to not have your team face the opponent with their best player, but somehow not want that advantage is mind boggling.

I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?


I'd be fine with either of them sitting out the game. Both would be even better.
RE: Sure, I'd love it if we were so good  
Rocky369 : 8/8/2017 10:49 am : link
In comment 13552412 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?


This one is an exception, I think. I don't care about Gronk playing, let him sit and weaken the Patriots. Play them in a Super Bowl without Brady? Despite history, Eli/Giants only beat the Patriots (for a third time) because Brady wasn't playing. No thanks.
I am laughing at comments made...  
EricJ : 8/8/2017 11:22 am : link
on various other internet pages that are covering this story. Things like the NFL is a racist league to "he didn't do anything", etc.

It is entertaining to see some of the idiots chime in.
Guy's a friggen  
Bluesbreaker : 8/8/2017 8:29 pm : link
idiot I just stumbled over first take talking about him
when Skip Bayless is bashing the golden boy there's some
deep problems .
Cowboys run game will function fine without him but I am
glad if they suspend him for the opener .
Bump  
WideRight : 8/9/2017 11:27 am : link
48 hrs?
imminent?  
YAJ2112 : 8/9/2017 11:33 am : link
I think Baalke works for the league now so that could be part of the hold up
RE: Bump  
pjcas18 : 8/9/2017 11:34 am : link
In comment 13553771 WideRight said:
Quote:
48 hrs?


Need to get Reggie Hammond back to prison.

.  
arcarsenal : 8/9/2017 12:56 pm : link
Balki is throwing a wrench in this whole thing
When does the 48 hours start?  
BigBlueShock : 8/9/2017 2:05 pm : link
Opening day?
Yeahhh, I don't think he's getting suspended at this point.  
Dave in Hoboken : 8/9/2017 2:06 pm : link
.
Chris Carter is now officially shocked!  
WideRight : 8/9/2017 7:26 pm : link

.
Another 48hrs?  
trueblueinpw : 8/9/2017 7:49 pm : link
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner