Every year here for a few years people comment that the Giants will be losing talent on cut down day even though the team was not any good. This year looks like it will happen unless a bunch of guys will find their way to the PS. And even then, some veterans not eligible will probably be cut.
I don't remember how cut down went in the years after the 2 last Super Bowls. Did we lose anybody we wanted to keep? I think this year just might be the most talented in a long time except for the OL but that's a different thread.
Tye, while reliable, is a bubble player. The WRs are flawed after our first 4
We don't have enough depth at CB, S or LB for it to be a worry
LaCosse -- eh maybe
RBs -- no
OLine - no
QBs -- not really
Can't see them adding to LB. After the top 4 of Kennard, Goodson, Castillas and Robinson there isn't much. Two of Herzlich, Thomas, Skinner and Munson but why add another.
I wish they would only keep 2 QB's.
If Manning goes down we are not winning with any of the current back ups so just keep the kid and free up a spot for another position.
The cuts will only be hard in the sense, those those cut are close in talent to those that manage to survive....
I wish they would only keep 2 QB's.
If Manning goes down we are not winning with any of the current back ups so just keep the kid and free up a spot for another position.
This is one thing that will make the preseason interesting -- if Webb can be effective not only out of the shotgun.
I wish they would only keep 2 QB's.
If Manning goes down we are not winning with any of the current back ups so just keep the kid and free up a spot for another position.
Maybe LB but TE and RB! Really? TE might have the best depth on the team and Perkins, Vereen, Gallman and Darkwa and similarly deep. You could make a better case for needing depth at WR or S.
And sure if Eli is gone so is the season but what about gone for only one or two games. A decent backup might win one instead of giving that away with a rookie. That's all they would need.
You probably have to be Italian to understand how that saying applies to this post ;-)
(Nona Jerry is saying "Mangia, Mangia; don't blame ME if you go away hungry!")
The cuts will only be hard in the sense, those those cut are close in talent to those that manage to survive....
As I mentioned above this is just nonsense. There is some very good depth on this team. The WR with King go 5 deep, the TE go 4 deep, RB 4 deep as well. The D is even more well stocked. The DE go 5 deep and may keep 6, the DTs are 4 deep, at CB 4 deep as well. At S last year's starter is a backup so at least 3 deep there. Heck, given they play with 2 LBs the great majority of the time having 4 that can play isn't that bad either. If this team isn't considered reasonably deep no team in the league is.
The cuts will only be hard in the sense, those those cut are close in talent to those that manage to survive....
Really. TE Is deep. First time in years DE is very deep. Or since they had Osi Tuck and MS have they been this deep.
CB. ? Two All Pro types a Apple looking like a stud and Hunter doing very well by all accounts how many teams have that level of depth there.
And not many teams have depth beyond one or two guys begin the starters?
Based on draft status and unspectacular athleticism, it is unlikely that a waiver claim would be made.
I also don't get the love for Lewis. I am not enamored with his speed because that is his only plus. He has shown inconsistent to bad hands, still needs a lot of work running routes, and also struggles with making adjustments. I am 100% fine letting him go. He is another one who isn't going on to start for anyone.
Other than TE, a shocking change, and DL, I don't see the angst. Agree with poster above (Bill, or SGMan?) that OO is likely gone, just a host of issues, injury prone, little improvement (in part due to not being able to stay on the field), and whatever personal issues he is fighting through. Take time off young man for yourself.
And Jones vs Gettis and rest of the OL backups, we just hope that the coaching staff reads it right as to who develops over time, but it's not as if there clearly is a budding star we'd hate to lose.
We are finally behind all of those awful post-Super Bowl drafts and the roster is clearly improved at the starter level, as well as pretty good a few rungs down at a bunch of positions. But to get to 53 it seems like the Coaches, imv, only have "tough" decisions at maybe:
- Defensive End: which of these backups are contenders vs pretenders
- Wide Receiver: who can continue to develop while sitting
- Cornerback & Safety: who would be the least embarrassing if they had to play
- Linebacker: needs changeover concentrated to youth