for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Why Character Matters

Painless62 : 11/1/2017 9:34 am
The Giants are a perfect example of why pure talent doesn't always or actually seldom, works in the NFL. Football is the ultimate team game. No matter how talented a team may be, me first players, behavior problems and the like preclude ultimate team success. This is one reason why a team like NE is successful. They weed these types out. Furthermore, a common culture that is instilled on a properly selected draft choice just adds to the team concept and success. This is why free agency used to the max like the Giants did, is also seldom successful. No common upbringing or even worse, an upbringing by a dysfunctional team can make many FA's fools gold.. These dysfunctional teams can be a source of talented but weak character FA's (see Janoris Jenkins for example ). The Giants need to clean house, get a new GM and coach, keep the appropriate players and rebuild their corporate culture and talent intelligently. As the Eagles have shown, a smart GM can do this quickly. I must say, having rooted for the Giants since 1970, this is the most unlikable group from management down through the coach and many of the players that I have endured. Many of them embody many things I detest in people ranging from arrogance to stupidity to lack of effort. It does piss me off that all rooting interests aside, both the Eagles and to an extent the Cowboys ( several players to be excluded ), are more likeable than the Giants.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: Fatman  
UConn4523 : 11/1/2017 1:59 pm : link
In comment 13672013 Now Mike in MD said:
Quote:
when you literally see OBJ shedding tears over games, I think it's a fair assumption he hates losing, and I never mentioned anything about Vernon, DRC, or Jenkins. I have no idea and wouldn't hazard a guess. I mention JPP because people on this site who are close to the team have mentioned his motor just not being consistent. And did he rehab his hand because he wants to win or knew this contract would likely be his last chance at a big paycheck. Do you think it's a coincidence that JPP has now been paid but isn't putting up the same season as he did last year when theoretically at least he should be better because he is another year removed from getting used to playing with these physical limitations.


So if that's the case with JPP, then why Landon Collins who's still on his rookie deal?

The logic doesn't add up.
RE: RE: Fatman  
Now Mike in MD : 11/1/2017 2:09 pm : link
In comment 13672028 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
In comment 13672013 Now Mike in MD said:


Quote:


when you literally see OBJ shedding tears over games, I think it's a fair assumption he hates losing, and I never mentioned anything about Vernon, DRC, or Jenkins. I have no idea and wouldn't hazard a guess. I mention JPP because people on this site who are close to the team have mentioned his motor just not being consistent. And did he rehab his hand because he wants to win or knew this contract would likely be his last chance at a big paycheck. Do you think it's a coincidence that JPP has now been paid but isn't putting up the same season as he did last year when theoretically at least he should be better because he is another year removed from getting used to playing with these physical limitations.



So if that's the case with JPP, then why Landon Collins who's still on his rookie deal?

The logic doesn't add up.


I never said anything about Collins. What about Collins?
RE: It really isn't..  
family progtitioner : 11/1/2017 2:15 pm : link
In comment 13671998 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
a great post. It is assuming that OBJ abhors losing, but JPP is just cashing a check.

Again - speculative assumptions about players. JPP is so de-motivated that he rehabbed half a hand to come back and play - and play well.

Christ, we have taken guys like Jenkins, Vernon, JPP and DRC who have played well in the past and now are making them out to be low character guys who don't mind losing.


I should clarify I like the 1st paragraph. It's true, the great ones have typically hated losing more than being "character" guys, whatever that means.

Winning sweeps these issues under a rug and losing puts a spotlight on them.
RE: RE: RE: Fatman  
UConn4523 : 11/1/2017 2:21 pm : link
In comment 13672039 Now Mike in MD said:
Quote:
In comment 13672028 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


In comment 13672013 Now Mike in MD said:


Quote:


when you literally see OBJ shedding tears over games, I think it's a fair assumption he hates losing, and I never mentioned anything about Vernon, DRC, or Jenkins. I have no idea and wouldn't hazard a guess. I mention JPP because people on this site who are close to the team have mentioned his motor just not being consistent. And did he rehab his hand because he wants to win or knew this contract would likely be his last chance at a big paycheck. Do you think it's a coincidence that JPP has now been paid but isn't putting up the same season as he did last year when theoretically at least he should be better because he is another year removed from getting used to playing with these physical limitations.



So if that's the case with JPP, then why Landon Collins who's still on his rookie deal?

The logic doesn't add up.



I never said anything about Collins. What about Collins?


How do you determine JPP's play is due to already getting paid but not a player who hasn't been paid yet?

These are such arbitrary and unmeasurable claims.
RE: It's not the character of the individual  
DC Gmen Fan : 11/1/2017 2:34 pm : link
In comment 13672016 AnnapolisMike said:
Quote:
It is the character of the team.

Take the Steelers. . . Ben Roethlisberger is a massive piece of shit. But he is a winning football player. But the Steelers are usually a winning football team.


True statement. Taking it further, true character often comes out when faced with adversity.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Fatman  
Now Mike in MD : 11/1/2017 2:44 pm : link
In comment 13672060 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
In comment 13672039 Now Mike in MD said:


Quote:


In comment 13672028 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


In comment 13672013 Now Mike in MD said:


Quote:


when you literally see OBJ shedding tears over games, I think it's a fair assumption he hates losing, and I never mentioned anything about Vernon, DRC, or Jenkins. I have no idea and wouldn't hazard a guess. I mention JPP because people on this site who are close to the team have mentioned his motor just not being consistent. And did he rehab his hand because he wants to win or knew this contract would likely be his last chance at a big paycheck. Do you think it's a coincidence that JPP has now been paid but isn't putting up the same season as he did last year when theoretically at least he should be better because he is another year removed from getting used to playing with these physical limitations.



So if that's the case with JPP, then why Landon Collins who's still on his rookie deal?

The logic doesn't add up.



I never said anything about Collins. What about Collins?



How do you determine JPP's play is due to already getting paid but not a player who hasn't been paid yet?

These are such arbitrary and unmeasurable claims.


Admittedly, it's an assumption, but it is based on (1) JPP having a history of running hot and cold and those up and downs coinciding with contracts; (2) people on this site who are close to the Giants noting this same phenomenon; (3) to me, aside from the INTs, I don't see that significant a difference in Collins. He seems to be playing at a very high level and to the extent he has had any drop off, I would write that off to the ankle injury.
Jenkins  
WillVAB : 11/1/2017 3:11 pm : link
Spent his entire career on losing teams (until last year), and there were never any reports of this type of behavior in St. Louis. Did he develop bad character over the last 8 weeks? Doubt it. The issue is the leadership with this organization right now.
You'd rather look good and lose...  
CBoss7 : 11/1/2017 5:13 pm : link
than look bad and win
it Is starting to appear that more successful organizations don’t  
Ivan15 : 11/2/2017 2:21 pm : link
have the HC working under the GM. This has become more obvious with the JAGs for example where Both the GM and HC answer to TC. Other teams may be set up differently but basically the GM is an equal with the HC and both are equally answerable to the next highest level of management.

The Giants still operate in a top down structure, at least it appears that way to someone on the outside. Reese has or should have the authority to hire and fire the HC.
Wait a minute...  
FatMan in Charlotte : 11/2/2017 3:06 pm : link
the Jags are now considered a successful franchise??

Please go back and look at the structure of most teams in the league. The HC often reports the same way the Giants have it in place, including most of the Super Bowl teams in this decade.
RE: Wait a minute...  
Greg from LI : 11/2/2017 3:17 pm : link
In comment 13673420 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
the Jags are now considered a successful franchise??


Greatest 4-3 team in the history of the NFL - nay, in the history of all organized sports!
.  
arcarsenal : 11/2/2017 3:42 pm : link
It's funny when people blame Beckham for the entire state of the locker room and claim he's the reason it got out of control. It wasn't all that long ago when the argument was that his teammates disliked him or would just say good things about him in public because they were supposed to.

But now they're all suddenly following his example and are so influenced by him.

Gotta keep on moving those goalposts. Nary a peep about character when the Giants were winning games last year.

But hey - let's make sure we pass on guys of Beckham's caliber going forward and opt for the college captains who are high motor guys and try really hard. That worked awesomely for us the last time.
Were there character concerns with Beckham in school?  
Go Terps : 11/2/2017 4:08 pm : link
I don't remember hearing them. He appears to have become a douchebag once he turned pro.
RE: Were there character concerns with Beckham in school?  
Sean : 11/2/2017 4:16 pm : link
In comment 13673499 Go Terps said:
Quote:
I don't remember hearing them. He appears to have become a douchebag once he turned pro.


You probably can point to the Dallas catch in 2014. A game which the Giants were 3-7 at the time & ultimately lost.
.  
arcarsenal : 11/2/2017 4:16 pm : link
What would the "character concerns" be if he was this same person when he was drafted? (I don't think he's changed much at all, he's just under a giant spotlight now whereas he wan't @ LSU)

He's never been in legal trouble, he's not a locker room issue.

He had one really out of control day against Carolina in 2015 - beyond that, I'm not sure there's really anything he does that falls under the category of character issues. Too demonstrative? Who cares.

Andre Johnson lost his cool against Cortland Finnegan once too. If that's all a guy needs to do to get pegged for poor character, I'm not sure it's a fair barometer.
arc..  
Sean : 11/2/2017 4:27 pm : link
I get what you’re saying & he’s an incredible talent. But for me, I’m tired of the drama & I want to see the Giants get back to running the ball & dominating at the LOS.
RE: RE: The roots of this teams circus act  
DisgruntledGiantsfan : 11/2/2017 11:45 pm : link
In comment 13671932 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
In comment 13671744 Blue Moon said:


Quote:


Started with the drafting of OBJ. His on field mental disorder and the coach's not dealing with it by looking the other way gave the rest of the players free will to do what they want.

The fact that Reese drafted him instead of Zach Martin when we had a crying need on the O line should be grounds alone for him to be fired.


You should never be allowed to post again after this disaster.


Thank you.
Not character - this was a possibility some of us called out early on  
TD : 11/3/2017 12:44 am : link
The OL was so bad and such a gamble coming into the year that it had the potential to derail the entire O and possibly the team. With all the new weapons on O, there was the chance that the OL would be so bad that we wouldn't beable to utilize our new (or old) talent on O and our O would be grounded. This also meant there was a chance our D would break down or simply lose faith in the system.

I think that's what happened, although the D has taken a bigger step back than expected.

Bottom line, Reese gambled on the OL and lost. That ended up disrupting the entire O and, ultimately, team.

My .02.

Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner