To get players they like and are willing to give up the draft picks to do so.
To make the correlation between the Giants tipping their hand and letting teams move up above them is just absurd.
Teams trade up and down in every round.
Giants traded up in 2002 for Jeremy Shockey for two reasons. One, they wanted him. And two, they probably thought the team picking ahead of them would take him.
This idea that the Giants are telling people who they're picking and then teams are jumping them makes no sense at all.
I get it: some here will defend the organization to the death. But, last year for example, every beat writer and even Chris fucking Canty on the radio said Reese got out foxed by telegraphing his admiration for Floyd and Decker so much in draft season that he got traded up in front of by Chicago and Detroit for those 2 and had to settle for Eli Apple.
Was Conklin, not Decker, and Tennessee, not Detroit.
But the fact that Floyd and Conklin went the 2 picks prior to Apple via trade up, cements the notion that teams knew Reese's intentions.
You have to love that it's stated as fact that the Giants
tipped their hand - and yet, not a single factual statement to support it.
What really happened - players went in draft slots commensurate to where they were expected to be drafted in mock drafts leading up to it. Teams leapfrogged the Giants because they knew the Giants were likely takers - not because of some sinister leak, but because of obvious holes on the roster and the plain as the nose on your face approach of drafting for a combo of need and value.
So when the player basic mock drafts had evaluated as the #11 overall player in the draft ends up going, uh, 11th overall, to a team needing an OT, a few picks before the Giants - since the Giants had a need at OT, it very obviously means there was a leak.
Don't quit your day jobs.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The whole report is just stupid...
[
quote]
Teams knew they had the hots for Taylor Lewan, Taylor Decker, Leonard Floyd, etc and traded in front of them to get them. [/quote]
You guys spout conjecture and pretend it is fact.
What you don't seem to grasp is that your statement based on your "knowledge" is pure conjecture. You don't know what player they wanted. You don't. Let that sink in. You DON'T KNOW.
Just because some dumbfuck beat writer tweets they are interested in a player doesn't mean it is a fact that he is their first choice.
It could mean that he is one of many players they like. It could be a false lead. It could be bullshit.
At any rate any team would be foolish not to suspect they liked and needed Conklin. The Titans traded up to get him. It happens.
What you schmucks can't understand is that even if the interest in Conklin wasn't reported the Titans would have likely felt we were a huge threat to pick him and made that move.
Also, any team has contingency plans in place. They have this thing called a "draft board", and if the 1st player they want is gone they pick a different guy. It's not like when Conklin was gone they had no plan in place and picked out of a fucking hat.
This entire argument is meaningless and asinine but some posters keep repeating it even after several of us explain to you that it is foolish.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The whole report is just stupid...
[
quote]
Teams knew they had the hots for Taylor Lewan, Taylor Decker, Leonard Floyd, etc and traded in front of them to get them.
You guys spout conjecture and pretend it is fact.
What you don't seem to grasp is that your statement based on your "knowledge" is pure conjecture. You don't know what player they wanted. You don't. Let that sink in. You DON'T KNOW.
Just because some dumbfuck beat writer tweets they are interested in a player doesn't mean it is a fact that he is their first choice.
It could mean that he is one of many players they like. It could be a false lead. It could be bullshit.
At any rate any team would be foolish not to suspect they liked and needed Conklin. The Titans traded up to get him. It happens.
What you schmucks can't understand is that even if the interest in Conklin wasn't reported the Titans would have likely felt we were a huge threat to pick him and made that move.
Also, any team has contingency plans in place. They have this thing called a "draft board", and if the 1st player they want is gone they pick a different guy. It's not like when Conklin was gone they had no plan in place and picked out of a fucking hat.
This entire argument is meaningless and asinine but some posters keep repeating it even after several of us explain to you that it is foolish. [/quote]
No it's not foolish at all. If Reese and his staff were competent. perhaps I'd be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he sucks the cak, so I'm going to believe the folks who get paid to follow and report on my team as opposed to the " always sunny blue sky and rainbow" crew on BBI.
You stated it as fact - and yet can't provide a single piece of factual evidence that supports your position that the FO was tipping picks.
That was before you turned to ass fantasy, which I'm guessing golf course busboys have a lot of time to spend on. Must have something to do with those plaid pants.
You start the rookie. Eli is only going to be more washed up next year.
Eli would still likely give the Giants the best chance to win next year over any rookie they draft. Rookie QBs rarely have great rookie campaigns.
If the Giants draft a top QB this year Eli still starts. If the Giants look like they're going nowhere then and only then do they play the rookie QB (just like Warner / Eli in 2004.)
I wouldn't liken it to Warner/Eli - more to Favre/Rodgers
Warner was always meant to be a placeholder (they wanted KC to stay to do that, but he balked).
In this case, because of your draft position you draft the guy of the future, and even if he sits for 2-3 years you're OK with it (especially now with the rookie slotting and lower cost for high draft picks).
Of course, you'd hope Eli is no Favre when it comes to hanging them up, but it's hard to believe he would be.
You stated it as fact - and yet can't provide a single piece of factual evidence that supports your position that the FO was tipping picks.
That was before you turned to ass fantasy, which I'm guessing golf course busboys have a lot of time to spend on. Must have something to do with those plaid pants.
Tell you what dick, if I run into Rapoport on the grounds before the end of the golf season, I'll ask him about Reese's reputation throughout the league. He's already told me that in the media at least, the perception is Beckham saved his job.
tipped their hand - and yet, not a single factual statement to support it.
What really happened - players went in draft slots commensurate to where they were expected to be drafted in mock drafts leading up to it. Teams leapfrogged the Giants because they knew the Giants were likely takers - not because of some sinister leak, but because of obvious holes on the roster and the plain as the nose on your face approach of drafting for a combo of need and value.
So when the player basic mock drafts had evaluated as the #11 overall player in the draft ends up going, uh, 11th overall, to a team needing an OT, a few picks before the Giants - since the Giants had a need at OT, it very obviously means there was a leak.
Don't quit your day jobs.
No offense but the Giants did tip their hands, 16 weeks during the regular season!
knows who were going to take that went ahead of us, but not who we actually took. They give us, five, sometimes 10 players we might take yet neither Engram nor Apple were on any of those lists.
I mean seriously.. yeah SF has Jimmy G but that's not going to stop them from taking a top QB or at the very least trading the pick to someone who does want a QB and wants to jump us like we get jumped every fucking year.
I think we are basically locked in for a top 3 pick if we lose this Sunday. Looking at 9ers and Browns remaining schedule and our remaing schedule we need to lose this Sunday to have a shot at that number one overall pick.
best case scenario, if the cap can be managed, is Eli is the QB in 2018 and he continues to mentor Webb and the new QB. Come 2019, you hand the reigns to the winner of that battle (think Dave Brown vs. Kent Graham....but with actual good QBs). Giants can then have 2 good, young QBs go forward. With the potential of trading one of them down the (more likely Webb) for 2nd rounder or better. That was the old Jacksonville and Philly plan back in the 1990s and early 2000s.
The problem is reps. The practice restrictions these days make it very difficult to groom QB's especially if they're the 3rd string, there's just no enough practice reps.
Teams recognized the Giants needs and tendencies, and at the top of the draft it's not hard to predict to an accurate degree how picks will unfold, or whom you might have to leapfrog to pick a coveted target.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
Teams recognized the Giants needs and tendencies, and at the top of the draft it's not hard to predict to an accurate degree how picks will unfold, or whom you might have to leapfrog to pick a coveted target.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
1. The Giants are going to look closely at every player in the top few dozen and even more closely at those ranked in the top 12 because they will be picking in that group. So Ranaan's report is not news.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
Yeah, because with a 36 going on 37 year old QB with 2 years left on his contract it should be top secret news that the Giants are scouting QBs. Really?
The level of stupidity on here is incredible sometimes. And I love how everyone knew we were drafting Engram last year. Or Apple the year before.
It is common knowledge that in various drafts teams knew what our plans were.
Hopefully the next FO doesn't telegraph their first rounders like this incompetent group has done as of late.
have they? you knew they were going to draft flowers, beckham or apple?
As much as I think the whole telegraphing of draft interest nonsense is silly, it's not really appropriate to use Apple as an example that disproves those who feel that the Giants telegraph their picks because the way it played out, with Conklin and Floyd going right before the Giants' pick, is actually what the telegraph crowd points to.
Teams recognized the Giants needs and tendencies, and at the top of the draft it's not hard to predict to an accurate degree how picks will unfold, or whom you might have to leapfrog to pick a coveted target.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
No one knew we were picking Engram either. Or Beckham.
1. The Giants are going to look closely at every player in the top few dozen and even more closely at those ranked in the top 12 because they will be picking in that group. So Ranaan's report is not news.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
Yeah, because with a 36 going on 37 year old QB with 2 years left on his contract it should be top secret news that the Giants are scouting QBs. Really?
The level of stupidity on here is incredible sometimes. And I love how everyone knew we were drafting Engram last year. Or Apple the year before.
It is common knowledge that in various drafts teams knew what our plans were.
Hopefully the next FO doesn't telegraph their first rounders like this incompetent group has done as of late.
have they? you knew they were going to draft flowers, beckham or apple?
As much as I think the whole telegraphing of draft interest nonsense is silly, it's not really appropriate to use Apple as an example that disproves those who feel that the Giants telegraph their picks because the way it played out, with Conklin and Floyd going right before the Giants' pick, is actually what the telegraph crowd points to.
Especially when they had us picking Vernon hargreaves as a back-up. And had us picking Njoku last yr, who went after Engram.
as was Mahomes and McCaffrey, info absolutely does leak out. The leak isn't typically Reese himself. Leave it at that.
But, it's not always the case there's a leak. Even if no leak is in play, professionals could easily decipher through mock draft repetition and team needs and tendencies whom the Giants would target at #10, as jcn outlined.
Teams recognized the Giants needs and tendencies, and at the top of the draft it's not hard to predict to an accurate degree how picks will unfold, or whom you might have to leapfrog to pick a coveted target.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
No one knew we were picking Engram either. Or Beckham.
I put the names of Engram and OB here on those respective draft nights.
1. The Giants are going to look closely at every player in the top few dozen and even more closely at those ranked in the top 12 because they will be picking in that group. So Ranaan's report is not news.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
The one good thing about being this bad is that the Giants don't really have to worry about teams trading up to take their guy this year. If they lose to SF, they are in the drviers seat for the #2 pick behind only the Browns, and we know the Browns likely won't get it right with their pick.
appear to have been errant guesses by the media, but info was out there NYG had CB in play at #10, just no accurate names surfaced before Apple was picked.
There was considerable chatter about OB that began
1. The Giants are going to look closely at every player in the top few dozen and even more closely at those ranked in the top 12 because they will be picking in that group. So Ranaan's report is not news.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
The one good thing about being this bad is that the Giants don't really have to worry about teams trading up to take their guy this year. If they lose to SF, they are in the drviers seat for the #2 pick behind only the Browns, and we know the Browns likely won't get it right with their pick.
With our luck, this year they do.
They too might blow the entire operation up.
RE: There was considerable chatter about OB that began
There are rumors - and rumored interest is silly because there are 32 teams focused in on the same set of limited players, especially the blue chip prospects at the top of the draft that are essentially limited to no more than 15 names at premium positions that just about all teams try to fill.
For all the rumors out there - nobody seems to accurately peg who we're going to pick ahead of time, which given the limited set of prospects should be relatively easy with inside info.
None of this means that leaks do not exist, or that anyone operates a completely tight ship. Just that there is no evidence to support that there is a known problem with leaks in the Giants org.
for obvious reasons, we all have to accept conjecture, rumor, fluidity, and deception etc as part of the process.
That's fine Jon - but it doesn't excuse people from running around accusing the Giants FO of tipping picks as fact. Conklin was rising up draft boards as one of the top tackles just before the draft. Plenty of mocks had us not picking the guy at all, and him going in the mid-teens, and nobody figured Tunsil would drop and elevate his status. Suddenly, the Titans trade up for him, and it's because those sad sack Giants let everyone know they needed a tackle.
As if you needed a leak or Kreskin's ESP to figure out that the Giants needed a tackle.
for obvious reasons, we all have to accept conjecture, rumor, fluidity, and deception etc as part of the process.
That's fine Jon - but it doesn't excuse people from running around accusing the Giants FO of tipping picks as fact. Conklin was rising up draft boards as one of the top tackles just before the draft. Plenty of mocks had us not picking the guy at all, and him going in the mid-teens, and nobody figured Tunsil would drop and elevate his status. Suddenly, the Titans trade up for him, and it's because those sad sack Giants let everyone know they needed a tackle.
As if you needed a leak or Kreskin's ESP to figure out that the Giants needed a tackle.
Teams recognized the Giants needs and tendencies, and at the top of the draft it's not hard to predict to an accurate degree how picks will unfold, or whom you might have to leapfrog to pick a coveted target.
"At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd."
-JonC half the page above
You start the rookie. Eli is only going to be more washed up next year.
Eli would still likely give the Giants the best chance to win next year over any rookie they draft. Rookie QBs rarely have great rookie campaigns.
If the Giants draft a top QB this year Eli still starts. If the Giants look like they're going nowhere then and only then do they play the rookie QB (just like Warner / Eli in 2004.)
Have you watched Eli play this year? His skills arent going to improve.
Prescott and Watson seemed to be fine the past two years.
Quote:
To get players they like and are willing to give up the draft picks to do so.
To make the correlation between the Giants tipping their hand and letting teams move up above them is just absurd.
Teams trade up and down in every round.
Giants traded up in 2002 for Jeremy Shockey for two reasons. One, they wanted him. And two, they probably thought the team picking ahead of them would take him.
This idea that the Giants are telling people who they're picking and then teams are jumping them makes no sense at all.
I get it: some here will defend the organization to the death. But, last year for example, every beat writer and even Chris fucking Canty on the radio said Reese got out foxed by telegraphing his admiration for Floyd and Decker so much in draft season that he got traded up in front of by Chicago and Detroit for those 2 and had to settle for Eli Apple.
Was Conklin, not Decker, and Tennessee, not Detroit.
But the fact that Floyd and Conklin went the 2 picks prior to Apple via trade up, cements the notion that teams knew Reese's intentions.
What really happened - players went in draft slots commensurate to where they were expected to be drafted in mock drafts leading up to it. Teams leapfrogged the Giants because they knew the Giants were likely takers - not because of some sinister leak, but because of obvious holes on the roster and the plain as the nose on your face approach of drafting for a combo of need and value.
So when the player basic mock drafts had evaluated as the #11 overall player in the draft ends up going, uh, 11th overall, to a team needing an OT, a few picks before the Giants - since the Giants had a need at OT, it very obviously means there was a leak.
Don't quit your day jobs.
quote]
Teams knew they had the hots for Taylor Lewan, Taylor Decker, Leonard Floyd, etc and traded in front of them to get them. [/quote]
You guys spout conjecture and pretend it is fact.
What you don't seem to grasp is that your statement based on your "knowledge" is pure conjecture. You don't know what player they wanted. You don't. Let that sink in. You DON'T KNOW.
Just because some dumbfuck beat writer tweets they are interested in a player doesn't mean it is a fact that he is their first choice.
It could mean that he is one of many players they like. It could be a false lead. It could be bullshit.
At any rate any team would be foolish not to suspect they liked and needed Conklin. The Titans traded up to get him. It happens.
What you schmucks can't understand is that even if the interest in Conklin wasn't reported the Titans would have likely felt we were a huge threat to pick him and made that move.
Also, any team has contingency plans in place. They have this thing called a "draft board", and if the 1st player they want is gone they pick a different guy. It's not like when Conklin was gone they had no plan in place and picked out of a fucking hat.
This entire argument is meaningless and asinine but some posters keep repeating it even after several of us explain to you that it is foolish.
quote]
Teams knew they had the hots for Taylor Lewan, Taylor Decker, Leonard Floyd, etc and traded in front of them to get them.
You guys spout conjecture and pretend it is fact.
What you don't seem to grasp is that your statement based on your "knowledge" is pure conjecture. You don't know what player they wanted. You don't. Let that sink in. You DON'T KNOW.
Just because some dumbfuck beat writer tweets they are interested in a player doesn't mean it is a fact that he is their first choice.
It could mean that he is one of many players they like. It could be a false lead. It could be bullshit.
At any rate any team would be foolish not to suspect they liked and needed Conklin. The Titans traded up to get him. It happens.
What you schmucks can't understand is that even if the interest in Conklin wasn't reported the Titans would have likely felt we were a huge threat to pick him and made that move.
Also, any team has contingency plans in place. They have this thing called a "draft board", and if the 1st player they want is gone they pick a different guy. It's not like when Conklin was gone they had no plan in place and picked out of a fucking hat.
This entire argument is meaningless and asinine but some posters keep repeating it even after several of us explain to you that it is foolish. [/quote]
No it's not foolish at all. If Reese and his staff were competent. perhaps I'd be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. But he sucks the cak, so I'm going to believe the folks who get paid to follow and report on my team as opposed to the " always sunny blue sky and rainbow" crew on BBI.
Busboy logic at it's finest.
Busboy logic at it's finest.
Busboy?
Almost as laughable as your reputation here.
Right after you shove a splintered broomstick up your ass.
Quote:
the giants could be leaking their interest hoping darnold is intrigued and comes out
Why would he be intrigued at coming to this shit storm?
Giants are in a much better spot than other teams that usually pick 1-3. We were 11-5 last year, after all.
Quote:
Now, if I were you I'd get after table 12 I hear they leave 20s.
Right after you shove a splintered broomstick up your ass.
OK, mental note - busboy has odd sodomy fantasies. Duly noted.
Quote:
In comment 13681798 jcn56 said:
Quote:
Now, if I were you I'd get after table 12 I hear they leave 20s.
Right after you shove a splintered broomstick up your ass.
OK, mental note - busboy has odd sodomy fantasies. Duly noted.
another winning zinger from this loser.
You stated it as fact - and yet can't provide a single piece of factual evidence that supports your position that the FO was tipping picks.
That was before you turned to ass fantasy, which I'm guessing golf course busboys have a lot of time to spend on. Must have something to do with those plaid pants.
Eli would still likely give the Giants the best chance to win next year over any rookie they draft. Rookie QBs rarely have great rookie campaigns.
If the Giants draft a top QB this year Eli still starts. If the Giants look like they're going nowhere then and only then do they play the rookie QB (just like Warner / Eli in 2004.)
In this case, because of your draft position you draft the guy of the future, and even if he sits for 2-3 years you're OK with it (especially now with the rookie slotting and lower cost for high draft picks).
Of course, you'd hope Eli is no Favre when it comes to hanging them up, but it's hard to believe he would be.
You stated it as fact - and yet can't provide a single piece of factual evidence that supports your position that the FO was tipping picks.
That was before you turned to ass fantasy, which I'm guessing golf course busboys have a lot of time to spend on. Must have something to do with those plaid pants.
Tell you what dick, if I run into Rapoport on the grounds before the end of the golf season, I'll ask him about Reese's reputation throughout the league. He's already told me that in the media at least, the perception is Beckham saved his job.
What really happened - players went in draft slots commensurate to where they were expected to be drafted in mock drafts leading up to it. Teams leapfrogged the Giants because they knew the Giants were likely takers - not because of some sinister leak, but because of obvious holes on the roster and the plain as the nose on your face approach of drafting for a combo of need and value.
So when the player basic mock drafts had evaluated as the #11 overall player in the draft ends up going, uh, 11th overall, to a team needing an OT, a few picks before the Giants - since the Giants had a need at OT, it very obviously means there was a leak.
Don't quit your day jobs.
No offense but the Giants did tip their hands, 16 weeks during the regular season!
...and perhaps who it was leaked to and who they work for(?).
I mean seriously.. yeah SF has Jimmy G but that's not going to stop them from taking a top QB or at the very least trading the pick to someone who does want a QB and wants to jump us like we get jumped every fucking year.
I think we are basically locked in for a top 3 pick if we lose this Sunday. Looking at 9ers and Browns remaining schedule and our remaing schedule we need to lose this Sunday to have a shot at that number one overall pick.
The problem is reps. The practice restrictions these days make it very difficult to groom QB's especially if they're the 3rd string, there's just no enough practice reps.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
Boom.
Thank you.
Him, Jackson, and Rudolph are the 3 guys I don't want.
I'd be happy/content with any of Allen, Rosen, or Darnold.
I heard Tunsil was already off their board.
Quote:
In comment 13681647 EricJ said:
Quote:
In comment 13681639 2ndroundKO said:
Quote:
In comment 13681633 EddieNYG said:
Quote:
In comment 13681627 EricJ said:
Quote:
1. The Giants are going to look closely at every player in the top few dozen and even more closely at those ranked in the top 12 because they will be picking in that group. So Ranaan's report is not news.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
Yeah, because with a 36 going on 37 year old QB with 2 years left on his contract it should be top secret news that the Giants are scouting QBs. Really?
The level of stupidity on here is incredible sometimes. And I love how everyone knew we were drafting Engram last year. Or Apple the year before.
It is common knowledge that in various drafts teams knew what our plans were.
Hopefully the next FO doesn't telegraph their first rounders like this incompetent group has done as of late.
have they? you knew they were going to draft flowers, beckham or apple?
As much as I think the whole telegraphing of draft interest nonsense is silly, it's not really appropriate to use Apple as an example that disproves those who feel that the Giants telegraph their picks because the way it played out, with Conklin and Floyd going right before the Giants' pick, is actually what the telegraph crowd points to.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
No one knew we were picking Engram either. Or Beckham.
A QB, Barkley, Arden Key are all in play 1-5.
If it was me the Notre Dame Guard (if it's true he projects as generational talent) would be in play as well.
Quote:
In comment 13681656 The_Boss said:
Quote:
In comment 13681647 EricJ said:
Quote:
In comment 13681639 2ndroundKO said:
Quote:
In comment 13681633 EddieNYG said:
Quote:
In comment 13681627 EricJ said:
Quote:
1. The Giants are going to look closely at every player in the top few dozen and even more closely at those ranked in the top 12 because they will be picking in that group. So Ranaan's report is not news.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
Yeah, because with a 36 going on 37 year old QB with 2 years left on his contract it should be top secret news that the Giants are scouting QBs. Really?
The level of stupidity on here is incredible sometimes. And I love how everyone knew we were drafting Engram last year. Or Apple the year before.
It is common knowledge that in various drafts teams knew what our plans were.
Hopefully the next FO doesn't telegraph their first rounders like this incompetent group has done as of late.
have they? you knew they were going to draft flowers, beckham or apple?
As much as I think the whole telegraphing of draft interest nonsense is silly, it's not really appropriate to use Apple as an example that disproves those who feel that the Giants telegraph their picks because the way it played out, with Conklin and Floyd going right before the Giants' pick, is actually what the telegraph crowd points to.
Especially when they had us picking Vernon hargreaves as a back-up. And had us picking Njoku last yr, who went after Engram.
But, it's not always the case there's a leak. Even if no leak is in play, professionals could easily decipher through mock draft repetition and team needs and tendencies whom the Giants would target at #10, as jcn outlined.
Quote:
Teams recognized the Giants needs and tendencies, and at the top of the draft it's not hard to predict to an accurate degree how picks will unfold, or whom you might have to leapfrog to pick a coveted target.
At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd. I had Flowers name here on BBI myself a couple weeks before the draft, and knew they were monitoring Landon Collins status. The fact they picked Apple suggests that name wasn't out there. I for one never heard his name including when they were on the clock, which is when I get a name virtually every year. It was crickets.
Lewan was reportedly not on their target short list, there were character red flags, as it was with Tunsil.
No one knew we were picking Engram either. Or Beckham.
I put the names of Engram and OB here on those respective draft nights.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
The one good thing about being this bad is that the Giants don't really have to worry about teams trading up to take their guy this year. If they lose to SF, they are in the drviers seat for the #2 pick behind only the Browns, and we know the Browns likely won't get it right with their pick.
Quote:
1. The Giants are going to look closely at every player in the top few dozen and even more closely at those ranked in the top 12 because they will be picking in that group. So Ranaan's report is not news.
2. It would be typical of Reese (if he truly does have SERIOUS interest in Darnold) to let that out before the draft. I think every team in the league knew what the Giants wanted and in some instances traded up in front of them and snatched the player.
The one good thing about being this bad is that the Giants don't really have to worry about teams trading up to take their guy this year. If they lose to SF, they are in the drviers seat for the #2 pick behind only the Browns, and we know the Browns likely won't get it right with their pick.
With our luck, this year they do.
They too might blow the entire operation up.
So would you consider this a leak outside of what's the norm for other teams?
Quote:
a few days before the draft, none of us who heard his name believed it, but it was out there.
So would you consider this a leak outside of what's the norm for other teams?
Probably not. I think NYG has had some bad and good luck on draft nights.
For all the rumors out there - nobody seems to accurately peg who we're going to pick ahead of time, which given the limited set of prospects should be relatively easy with inside info.
None of this means that leaks do not exist, or that anyone operates a completely tight ship. Just that there is no evidence to support that there is a known problem with leaks in the Giants org.
Who would you propose look into it...the replacements the Giants haven't hired yet?
That's fine Jon - but it doesn't excuse people from running around accusing the Giants FO of tipping picks as fact. Conklin was rising up draft boards as one of the top tackles just before the draft. Plenty of mocks had us not picking the guy at all, and him going in the mid-teens, and nobody figured Tunsil would drop and elevate his status. Suddenly, the Titans trade up for him, and it's because those sad sack Giants let everyone know they needed a tackle.
As if you needed a leak or Kreskin's ESP to figure out that the Giants needed a tackle.
Quote:
for obvious reasons, we all have to accept conjecture, rumor, fluidity, and deception etc as part of the process.
That's fine Jon - but it doesn't excuse people from running around accusing the Giants FO of tipping picks as fact. Conklin was rising up draft boards as one of the top tackles just before the draft. Plenty of mocks had us not picking the guy at all, and him going in the mid-teens, and nobody figured Tunsil would drop and elevate his status. Suddenly, the Titans trade up for him, and it's because those sad sack Giants let everyone know they needed a tackle.
As if you needed a leak or Kreskin's ESP to figure out that the Giants needed a tackle.
Teams recognized the Giants needs and tendencies, and at the top of the draft it's not hard to predict to an accurate degree how picks will unfold, or whom you might have to leapfrog to pick a coveted target.
"At the same time, I think it's clear the interest in Floyd and Conklin was out there, hell I was told it flowed through the grapevine John Mara wanted Conklin and the scouts wanted Floyd."
-JonC half the page above
Let's just say we're both right and move on
Quote:
You start the rookie. Eli is only going to be more washed up next year.
Eli would still likely give the Giants the best chance to win next year over any rookie they draft. Rookie QBs rarely have great rookie campaigns.
If the Giants draft a top QB this year Eli still starts. If the Giants look like they're going nowhere then and only then do they play the rookie QB (just like Warner / Eli in 2004.)
Have you watched Eli play this year? His skills arent going to improve.
Prescott and Watson seemed to be fine the past two years.