Curious as to where some people's priorities are on this forum.
Would you rather:
Have Odell for the entirety of his 10-12 year career, which results in him being a HOFer and one of the best WRs of all time, BUT not win a Super Bowl.
OR
Trade Odell before next season, and guarantee yourself a Super Bowl in the next 10-12 years?
This is TOTALLY HYPOTHETICAL and obviously has no bearing on what would/could actually happen.
You're essentially asking people if they care more about one player than the success of the team he plays for.
Why would any Giants fan on the planet choose scenario 1?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
Quote:
In comment 13682274 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
yeah...... once again, that wasn't the question. I'll just assume your lack of reading comprehension skills makes you incapable of answering a hypothetical question. Either that or you're horrified to give your opinion and be crushed for it.
Quote:
In comment 13682296 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682274 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
yeah...... once again, that wasn't the question. I'll just assume your lack of reading comprehension skills makes you incapable of answering a hypothetical question. Either that or you're horrified to give your opinion and be crushed for it.
Eh my opinion is out there plenty, you're the one who follows me on Twitter.
You can play with your make believe questions, I'll stick to discussing how this team becomes better.
I chose my memories of LT's plays. They brought me unbelievable joy week in and week out for a decade - and memories that last a lifetime. For the rest of my life I will always be thankful I had the opportunity (and joy) of watching every single snap played by the greatest athlete of any sport in my lifetime.
Quote:
In comment 13682319 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682296 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682274 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
yeah...... once again, that wasn't the question. I'll just assume your lack of reading comprehension skills makes you incapable of answering a hypothetical question. Either that or you're horrified to give your opinion and be crushed for it.
Eh my opinion is out there plenty, you're the one who follows me on Twitter.
You can play with your make believe questions, I'll stick to discussing how this team becomes better.
Its cool just keep not answering the question. Anyone with a brain can clearly see through you.
You actually prioritize rooting and supporting one player over winning. Some Giants fan.
Quote:
In comment 13682329 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682319 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682296 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682274 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
yeah...... once again, that wasn't the question. I'll just assume your lack of reading comprehension skills makes you incapable of answering a hypothetical question. Either that or you're horrified to give your opinion and be crushed for it.
Eh my opinion is out there plenty, you're the one who follows me on Twitter.
You can play with your make believe questions, I'll stick to discussing how this team becomes better.
Its cool just keep not answering the question. Anyone with a brain can clearly see through you.
You actually prioritize rooting and supporting one player over winning. Some Giants fan.
See you actually know nothing about me. Stupid hypotheticals like this don't lead to any constructive discussion.
You got so frustrated that I didn't answer your question on Twitter that you had to come here and make a thread so you could get your satisfaction.
Quote:
In comment 13682334 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682329 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682319 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682296 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682274 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
yeah...... once again, that wasn't the question. I'll just assume your lack of reading comprehension skills makes you incapable of answering a hypothetical question. Either that or you're horrified to give your opinion and be crushed for it.
Eh my opinion is out there plenty, you're the one who follows me on Twitter.
You can play with your make believe questions, I'll stick to discussing how this team becomes better.
Its cool just keep not answering the question. Anyone with a brain can clearly see through you.
You actually prioritize rooting and supporting one player over winning. Some Giants fan.
See you actually know nothing about me. Stupid hypotheticals like this don't lead to any constructive discussion.
You got so frustrated that I didn't answer your question on Twitter that you had to come here and make a thread so you could get your satisfaction.
You mean stupid hypotheticals like, "So if the Steelers don't win a Super Bowl this year it's because Brown is a diva?"
Trust me I am totally content. Just felt like exposing an Odell Fan boy that's posing as a Giants fan.
You're exposing something, but it's not what you think.
Quote:
In comment 13682345 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682334 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682329 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682319 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682296 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682274 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
yeah...... once again, that wasn't the question. I'll just assume your lack of reading comprehension skills makes you incapable of answering a hypothetical question. Either that or you're horrified to give your opinion and be crushed for it.
Eh my opinion is out there plenty, you're the one who follows me on Twitter.
You can play with your make believe questions, I'll stick to discussing how this team becomes better.
Its cool just keep not answering the question. Anyone with a brain can clearly see through you.
You actually prioritize rooting and supporting one player over winning. Some Giants fan.
See you actually know nothing about me. Stupid hypotheticals like this don't lead to any constructive discussion.
You got so frustrated that I didn't answer your question on Twitter that you had to come here and make a thread so you could get your satisfaction.
You mean stupid hypotheticals like, "So if the Steelers don't win a Super Bowl this year it's because Brown is a diva?"
Trust me I am totally content. Just felt like exposing an Odell Fan boy that's posing as a Giants fan.
See anyone with a brain would realize that that is not a hypothetical. You said diva WR's don't Super Bowls. Which means if the Steeler's dont win a Super Bowl this year Antonio Brown is a part of the problem.
And that's where you're totally wrong. Was a Giants fan long before Odell got here, and will be long after he's gone. Nobody was a bigger Eli supporter in the early 2000's than me, but now it's time to move on.
Got Eeem
Literally LOL at this.
Good stuff.
Quote:
In comment 13682296 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682274 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682269 CBoss7 said:
Quote:
In comment 13682227 ajr2456 said:
Quote:
at me yesterday?
It's a stupid hypothetical. You win Super Bowls by having talented players. There's no correlation to diva pass catchers not winning Super Bowls, it's coincidence.
ajr: Decided to further explore the situation since you refused to answer the question.
However stupid the hypothetical is (which is indeed very stupid i acknowledge this), you still refuse to answer the question.
Third time I've asked you now.
I don't deal in hypotheticals. Why are you so hung up on this question? Do you want me to say I'd rather have Odell? You seem to have some ax to grind with Odell.
I want you to say what you would choose. That's all.
The logical answer: The Giants are in a better position to win Super Bowls with Odell Beckham than without him.
yeah...... once again, that wasn't the question. I'll just assume your lack of reading comprehension skills makes you incapable of answering a hypothetical question. Either that or you're horrified to give your opinion and be crushed for it.
There isn't one single living real nyg fan that would choose Beckham over a super bowl. Not one. If they say they'd rather have beckham's fun career here over a super bowl title I assure you that person isn't a die hard Giants fan. People are fucking with you because you asked the dumbest question possible. There's your answer.