Yes, his record as a head coach is not good (33–47 .413) but he didn't exactly have talented teams. He knows football and he just might have learned enough to succeed in his next go 'round. He's only 46 and he'd inherit a group of vets - including Eli - who he might be able to turn around right away.
Opinions?
So I'll just say, dumbest idea ever expressed on BBI.
Congrats
Tom: If you think this is the stupidest idea ever expressed on BBI then you haven't read much BBI.
You guys don't know that he sucks. You know his teams haven't done well but they weren't good teams.
He's intelligent and at 46 he's probably hungry for another shot.
You guys wouldn't have wanted Little Bill after Cleveland either.
He's worth an interview and evaluation.
LOL, I love that gif
People said that no players would come and play for Coughlin because players hated him too. Coughlin evolved into a click below a "players coach" and won 2 Super Bowls.
I'm going to put it out there and say that his name comes up at some point.
We'll see.
Post of the day!
He shouldn't have been hired by the Browns that soon and really hasn't had too much success since then.
Smart guy and served under Marchibroda, Parcells, Belichick and Harbaugh so there is a lot of knowledge there.
As a head coach at this point under a flagship franchise (hopefully we are that), I would say no. As a DC, I would be ok with.
He is worth considering.
What does this even mean? I wish it was as easy as simply choosing to pick from the "GM/coaching combo that fosters in excellence" catalog.