A comparison:
Hardaway 17 ppg, 16 PER
Waiters (the other player we considered last summer) 15 ppg, 10 PER
Some comments:
1) This is not a criticism of Frank but i wonder if he could progress better with some time in the G league where he could have the freedom and lesser caliber opponent necessary to develop his offense. The unfortunate counterargument would be the "optics" associated with such a move. Don't get me wrong, Frank has contributed nicely to several wins, but his offense (handles, ability to get from point a to b, create how own shot, have an NBA caliber array of shots) are all in need of development. Is 20 min a night where he is outclassed on that side of the court ideal for that development.
2) KOQ hasn't played that well of late. However, I bet the plan is to maintain his minutes until they trade him in Feb for a pick between 25-40 or a young player i.e. Semi Ojeleye. Still, its frustrating that Hernangomez is an afterthought until then.
2 year deal-Good deal
3 year deal-pushing it and too much risk
4 year deal-a big problem
I was definitely on board for seeing what Noah had, but it had to be a short term deal and we are now seeing why. It's a devastating contract for the Knicks right now. Of course we probably wouldn't have that space if we didn't sign Noah, we would have just spent it on someone else.
Quote:
Thx sunshine. Phil gave us KP. Best knick since Ewing. Phil the savior. Say it with me.
Fuck off.
we really need to keep a running list of just how many times you've been dead wrong on a Knick trade or free agent signing. It's remarkable how often it happens. You'd think you might get one right once in a while just by accident.
Dude you really took this to another level. Good job.
I know I was right about KP. Check the archives.
I don't keep score on internet message board debates. I know I am a pretty smart person overall, sports or in general. I get some wrong. Some right.
Thanks for taking this to another place. Kindly ignore me.
2 year deal-Good deal
3 year deal-pushing it and too much risk
4 year deal-a big problem
I was definitely on board for seeing what Noah had, but it had to be a short term deal and we are now seeing why. It's a devastating contract for the Knicks right now. Of course we probably wouldn't have that space if we didn't sign Noah, we would have just spent it on someone else.
Yup (while I didn't particularly want Noah because of his injury stuff). 1-2 years would have been fine (though if people recall the rumor was the Wizards were going to offer him 4 years and "max" money and people were going nuts with laughter, people found the idea preposterous). The Noah deal is and always will be because Phil thought he was smarter than the room, nothing less nothing more. 1-2 years "why not? we stink, lets change the culture" whatever. 4 years was wild.
Maybe it's a generational thing, kind of how so many younger baseball fans often seem to prefer to discuss sabermetrics more than some of the older fans do.
I'm not saying either is wrong and any fan should be able to enjoy watching/following his teams however he most enjoys. But clearly some people enjoy analyzing salaries more where other fans prefer to just talk more about the play occurring on the court.
Personally I don't mind discussing salaries when it matters and the team is actually making decisions and moves, but I kind of agree that when the season is happening I am more caught up in the games and who is doing what. Then at whatever point when a move is being made I am interested in how it shapes the team. Constant evaluating the exact same thing over and over for each game gets a little redundant for me.
Maybe it's a generational thing, kind of how so many younger baseball fans often seem to prefer to discuss sabermetrics more than some of the older fans do.
I'm not saying either is wrong and any fan should be able to enjoy watching/following his teams however he most enjoys. But clearly some people enjoy analyzing salaries more where other fans prefer to just talk more about the play occurring on the court.
Personally I don't mind discussing salaries when it matters and the team is actually making decisions and moves, but I kind of agree that when the season is happening I am more caught up in the games and who is doing what. Then at whatever point when a move is being made I am interested in how it shapes the team. Constant evaluating the exact same thing over and over for each game gets a little redundant for me.
I can only speak for myself, but trust me, I wish I didn't have things like "base year compensation" and "traded player exception" floating around in my head. The NBA CBA is the most unnecessarily complicated thing in all of sports. But it's impossible to have an informed discussion about the NBA without a basic understanding of cap rules and contracts.
I'm guilty of it too. When we traded Melo, I was all about trading Kanter immediately, but I am so glad we didn't. He can potentially be a building block for this team.
Have you missed the last 10+ games?
Also, relatively speaking, 4y/$71mm is not a huge contract.
I agree with this, but maybe they feel he's better off practicing against guys like Kanter and Noah? They've had a ton of home games, so maybe there's been more practices than usual.
Hayes 17 and 7, 1 steal 53% from the field 48% from 3 (didn't look like an NBA athlete to me during the summer but has played well)
Kornet 14 and 6, 42% from the field, 36% from 3
Burke 23 and 6 with 2 steals, 4 boards 49% from the field, 39% from 3. Burke just needs to be patient, odds are Jack doesn't last all season and Burke presumably is "next" in the PG pecking order unless they go with Baker...
Quote:
should be sent to the G-League. There isn't much to be gained with him not playing at all.
I agree with this, but maybe they feel he's better off practicing against guys like Kanter and Noah? They've had a ton of home games, so maybe there's been more practices than usual.
I just think at some point playing against actual competition has value. It's not as if he can't be around the team, they have shuttled guys before. Hard to imagine he'd even have the cardio to go 20-25 per night if he's not playing in games soon.
Quote:
In comment 13700716 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
should be sent to the G-League. There isn't much to be gained with him not playing at all.
I agree with this, but maybe they feel he's better off practicing against guys like Kanter and Noah? They've had a ton of home games, so maybe there's been more practices than usual.
I just think at some point playing against actual competition has value. It's not as if he can't be around the team, they have shuttled guys before. Hard to imagine he'd even have the cardio to go 20-25 per night if he's not playing in games soon.
if they ever get around to activating Noah, then they almost need to send Wily there. Is there somewhere lower than the G-League where they can send Baker?
Quote:
Two more years of Noah's annoying contract won't sink this franchise to unrecoverable depths. It sucks but whatever, move on. Knicks will recover.
Again, no disrespect intended but this is where your view and most people's views diverge. Imagine what this team looks like right now with a "legit" 18 million dollar player replacing Noah? Or 2 9 million dollar players? His contract absolutely impacts what the Knicks look like now and going forward.
Never said his contract didn't impact things. It sucks. I've said that.
Forget it. You guys took my comments as if I was shitting all over salary cap talk. I don't necessarily love "cap talk" but I get it. The cap dynamic is the very fabric of successful NBA play.
I should have prefaced my comments with one key point: I HATE SALARY CAPS.
That's all. You guys are great. I learn more from most of you on here than I care to admit. Even you enzo.
take away the first three games and he is at 20 ppg
take away the first three games and he is at 20 ppg
He's going to be polarizing. He's a scorer who is an averageish defender and at times can have questionable shot selection. He's been hot and cold at times but overall he's been good. That said he was paid what he was paid with the idea last year was the beginning of a breakout not "all he is". If he "only" plays this well then his contract is fine, but the hope is there is more there, an additional level. His 3point % should rise but (and I'm not looking to knock him) but he does take really really maddening 3's at times for a guy who isn't a deadeye long range shooter.
That ability has helped them already this season in games where they their shooting was off and they desperately needed a basket or two. And while he can sometimes force it he has had the knack for hitting some important 3's
I hate going to bed angry. Olive branch, although honestly I didn't start this he brought it to another level. Thing is questioning my intelligence or sports smarts doesn't threaten me. I know I'm brilliant.
My issue with the Knicks is that they never hold their ground and agree to "team friendly" deals. Did Ron Baker need a player option ( let alone any guaranteed money)? Lance Thomas 4 years guaranteed? Even Hardaway getting a player option or trying to sign him for 60 mill instead of 72. Every dollar counts in the NBA, just look at Celtics this offseason.
But for the people saying Hardaway has been mediocre or disappointing? You must not be watching the games. I wasn't a fan of the contract or the player, but I've been wrong so far. He's been very good for the Knicks and a big reason why they are winning games. And he's getting paid as the 16th highest SG in the NBA and providing good value for that.
Shot selection and defensive focus definitely need improvement. A guy that athletic shouldn't be getting beat backdoor and should at least be an average defender. But those things can be improved. It's not asking Kidd Gilchrist to become a 20point scorer or some other unrealistic improvement/ projection.
Quote:
is that an olive branch you just extended or a knife that looks camaflouged to look like an olive branch?
I hate going to bed angry. Olive branch, although honestly I didn't start this he brought it to another level.
what level is that? The level where reasonable and informed discussions take place?
It's an interesting question (at least to me) regarding what position(s) we'd ideally like to land in the draft. A C? SG? SF? I guess just talent, no matter at what position, huh?
so dermar derozan is simply not very good?
Raptors rising - ( New Window )
how many Knick games have you even watched this season?
I already know.
B****.
What a joke.
I already know.
B****.
What a joke.
What?
Quote:
Come out come out wherever you are...
I already know.
B****.
What a joke.
What?
Somebody complained to the mods about me using the C word (which, as we all know has been thrown around liberally for years). All of a sudden.
And I know exactly who the little chickenhawk is on bbi. But he is too much of a bitch to come out and admit it.
Fact is, I worked his illiterate ass the other day and he's bitter. C*o*n.
I should be awarded a Pulitzer. Not issued a warning.
That gave me a good chuckle!
No need to be a smarty pants.