Or are you saying Juju should only have been suspended half a game?
I do agree with some of the media comments last 24 hours that the NFL needs to start ejecting guys... in college the booth performs targeting reviews. I dont see why the NFL cant do something similar.
LOL.. First thing.. Is it really that serious that you get upset over a comment on a football forum?
You might need help.
.. or a woman..
If you guys really don't know what I'm referring to when I say "they", just say so and after I check back here in a couple hours, I'll answer it for you..
LOL.. First thing.. Is it really that serious that you get upset over a comment on a football forum?
You might need help.
.. or a woman..
If you guys really don't know what I'm referring to when I say "they", just say so and after I check back here in a couple hours, I'll answer it for you..
was legal not that long ago. He launched, but didn't leave his feet technically and he led with his shoulder and 99% of the contact was Burfict's chest. I honestly don't know Burfict didn't see him peripherally. I think a fine would be more appropriate. What Gronk did was intentionally dirty and was done after the play. His only intent was to hurt someone.
He lined up the guy. Hit him on a peel back block. He dropped his head and lead head first and nailed him in the chin. HUGE impact shot to the head.
Gronk is an asshole for his move. He looks like a big dope. But Smith could have done a lot more damage which is why they don't want to see these plays.
In today's NFL, SMith deserves the suspension.
NFL should adopt the college targeting rule and toss guys. If they are serious about limiting head shots this would do it. If this was a college game Smith would have been tossed from the game.
and sit out the 1st half of the next game . . . Automatically - no league review necessary. That's one of the reasons why the college game is so much better than the NFL.
JuJu's hit was a legal hit, it's not now. Fine I get that. Gronk's his was never legal.. Not Sunday, 10 years ago, or in the 70's..
But we got people here telling me that a live action, bang bang play in the end-zone is just as bad as one guy dropping the people's elbow on another player lying down..
LOL.. First thing.. Is it really that serious that you get upset over a comment on a football forum?
You might need help.
.. or a woman..
If you guys really don't know what I'm referring to when I say "they", just say so and after I check back here in a couple hours, I'll answer it for you..
OMG hurry back, I'll be dying in anticipation!
I didn't know BBI had post notifications..
I said a couple hours, you didn't waste 4 minutes responding to my post. Sheesh!!!!
and it is not a clean play anymore. Plus the jackass taunted him after that hit by standing over him. There is no need for that at all. Both plays deserve a game. It doesn't matter what is worse.
Unnecessary maybe but still clean. And couldn't have happened to a nicer scumbag than Burfict.
Interesting definition of clean. Schuster led with his helmet and planted it right under the chin strap. It’s been clear for years now - if you lower or lead your helmet and make helmet to helmet contact you’re done. And Schuster knew damn well he did it because he stood over Burfict with defiance.
and it is not a clean play anymore. Plus the jackass taunted him after that hit by standing over him. There is no need for that at all. Both plays deserve a game. It doesn't matter what is worse.
The taunting part I have no arguments with, especially with what took place earlier in that game.. As for the block itself, a rule is a rule..
My argument is how does, a rookie w/o history of doing things like this get the same punishment as a veteran who, according to the NFL, got 1 game because he has not history of things like this.. LOL....
Only an fucking idiot would look at the 3 incidents, Juju, Gronk, and that safety, and come away with Gronk being the least offensive..
The they that say
I do agree with some of the media comments last 24 hours that the NFL needs to start ejecting guys... in college the booth performs targeting reviews. I dont see why the NFL cant do something similar.
LOL.. First thing.. Is it really that serious that you get upset over a comment on a football forum?
You might need help.
.. or a woman..
If you guys really don't know what I'm referring to when I say "they", just say so and after I check back here in a couple hours, I'll answer it for you..
Quote:
they say, "They say that....". WTH is they?
LOL.. First thing.. Is it really that serious that you get upset over a comment on a football forum?
You might need help.
.. or a woman..
If you guys really don't know what I'm referring to when I say "they", just say so and after I check back here in a couple hours, I'll answer it for you..
OMG hurry back, I'll be dying in anticipation!
One possibility. We better figure out what he me meant before he gets back from running errands or feel the end of his rapier-like insults.
He lined up the guy. Hit him on a peel back block. He dropped his head and lead head first and nailed him in the chin. HUGE impact shot to the head.
Gronk is an asshole for his move. He looks like a big dope. But Smith could have done a lot more damage which is why they don't want to see these plays.
In today's NFL, SMith deserves the suspension.
NFL should adopt the college targeting rule and toss guys. If they are serious about limiting head shots this would do it. If this was a college game Smith would have been tossed from the game.
But we got people here telling me that a live action, bang bang play in the end-zone is just as bad as one guy dropping the people's elbow on another player lying down..
You really can't make this up..
Quote:
In comment 13726358 mrvax said:
Quote:
they say, "They say that....". WTH is they?
LOL.. First thing.. Is it really that serious that you get upset over a comment on a football forum?
You might need help.
.. or a woman..
If you guys really don't know what I'm referring to when I say "they", just say so and after I check back here in a couple hours, I'll answer it for you..
OMG hurry back, I'll be dying in anticipation!
I didn't know BBI had post notifications..
I said a couple hours, you didn't waste 4 minutes responding to my post. Sheesh!!!!
"They" means the NFL..
when WHO says "They say that..." ?
Interesting definition of clean. Schuster led with his helmet and planted it right under the chin strap. It’s been clear for years now - if you lower or lead your helmet and make helmet to helmet contact you’re done. And Schuster knew damn well he did it because he stood over Burfict with defiance.
The taunting part I have no arguments with, especially with what took place earlier in that game.. As for the block itself, a rule is a rule..
My argument is how does, a rookie w/o history of doing things like this get the same punishment as a veteran who, according to the NFL, got 1 game because he has not history of things like this.. LOL....
Only an fucking idiot would look at the 3 incidents, Juju, Gronk, and that safety, and come away with Gronk being the least offensive..
Riddick slams NFL for inconsistent punishments - ( New Window )