for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: James Dolan: Defendant in Anti-Weinstein Lawsuit

Mr. Bungle : 12/6/2017 1:45 pm


link - ( New Window )
Hmm  
DennyInDenville : 12/6/2017 1:48 pm : link
Seems like an indirect lawsuit where Dolans investments are being sued??

I have no idea tho I'm not an expert on litigation literature
Looking at the caption  
Mike from SI : 12/6/2017 1:53 pm : link
tells you nothing other than the fact he's being sued.
Added to the suit as a defendent because he knew what Weinstein  
11 to 89 : 12/6/2017 2:20 pm : link
was doing according to this article.
BR article - ( New Window )
Don't think there is enough here to for Silver to  
LawrenceTaylor56 : 12/6/2017 2:25 pm : link
intervene and ban him

I'm confused  
MetsAreBack : 12/6/2017 2:32 pm : link
so what if he knew? I mean, its not morally responsible of Dolan if true, but this makes him liable how?
The article I linked  
11 to 89 : 12/6/2017 3:04 pm : link
says that he was a Director in Weinstein's company. I guess they are saying that he should have fired him if he knew what the guy was doing.
They're just casting a wide net  
BillT : 12/6/2017 3:31 pm : link
SOP. Anyone formally connected that might be part of a joint and several liabilities judgement. Makes for deeper pockets but it's not likely to mean much.
He may have been an investor in some Weinstein projects.  
Section331 : 12/6/2017 3:35 pm : link
It is common practice for civil suits to include anyone who had even tangential connections to the defendant and/or the event. I doubt there is anything more to this than that.
The plaintiffs are just loser alcoholics  
NoPeanutz : 12/6/2017 4:20 pm : link
The sooner they get help the sooner they can pick up the pieces and get their lives together. Wish them well, and lifetime ban from the Garden.
"Ear rape" must now be a thing  
GentleGiant : 12/7/2017 11:09 am : link
Back to the Corner