I know this has been discussed in the past but I couldn't find anything recent archived...
my 55" Samsung Smart plasma has a vertical line that probably can't be fixed...it's watchable but I am hoping to get a post-Christmas/January change of model deal...
questions - plasma, LED, LCD or OLED? I know Stan in LA's opinion...I have been happy with the Samsung (I have the same model a year newer in the bedroom) but it's four years old and I haven't kept up with developments...
I don't need the latest and greatest...and money is an object...
what about 4K? prices have come down on 4K's but they are still more expensive than "regular" TVs...
Smart or not-Smart? I have to admit I really haven't used the Smart TV features on my current Samsung and with all the devices out there maybe it isn't worth the extra money just to have those features available...
what say you BBI experts?
I don't know what defines "broadcasting in 4k" but I just got a 43" 4k a few months ago and the characters in TV shows are basically walking around in my living room for most shows. This difference between it and 1080 is dramatic.
Quote:
FYI. No one broadcasts in 4K
I don't know what defines "broadcasting in 4k" but I just got a 43" 4k a few months ago and the characters in TV shows are basically walking around in my living room for most shows. This difference between it and 1080 is dramatic.
That's just upscaling. It will look better but that content isn't in 4k. There is a growing library of 4K content and 4K has been around long enough now where its pretty much standard so I'd just get the TV with it. Netflix is investing in higher quality programming, i'm sure Amazon will follow - last thing you want it to regret your purchase in 6 months when you don't have 4K.
OP - Stan isn't a useful person to take advice some. You said money matters and he will still recommend a $5,000 OLED unit because that's what kind of great guy he is. I'd but the biggest screen you can within your budget that's 4k and from a reputable maker. OLED, Curve LED, etc is all a preference at this point. Plasma has been phased out and isn't an option for you.
Official Space helmet on Captain Video!
TV or not TV?? - ( New Window )
Whatever you get, at this point support for HDR is probably more important than 4k. But it's hard to find a non-4k TV that supports HDR; i don't think that option even exists in the OLED world.
Wirecutter: The Best TV - ( New Window )
I picked up a 50" Samsung TV last year for under $500 and it has been excellent. LED.
As far as Smart TV's go, it depends on how you plan on using it. Many of Smart TV's features are replicated by streaming devices, so if you have a Roku, Apple TV, or Chromecast device, it might be redundant.
I love my plasma TV's, I think the colors are much richer than other formats, but a lot depends on the amount of light into the room your TV will reside in.
Case closed.
Link - ( New Window )
You want to make sure the TV can handle HDR content, preferably both Dolby Vision and HDR10. Both standards are in wide use. I think Dolby Vision is better but HDR10 is free to use, so it's not likely to go away.
OLED TVs are gorgeous but expensive. Little-known fact: OLED can have problems with some kinds of HDR content. Quantum Dot LEDs are the next generation of display, not yet widely available, but also beautiful. QLED handles HDR better.
Re "Smart" TV: Interface and capability are important. Can it handle the highest-quality streaming available (4K and/or HDR?) If not, you'll be frustrated that you're not getting your money's worth. Do you like the interface? If not, you won't want to use the TV for streaming. My wife and I stream a lot. We have an Apple TV. I like the Apple TV interface but my wife doesn't. It's an older model, won't stream 4K.
Since we got an LG 4K TV we tend to stream through the TV, because it can stream 4K while our other streaming devices can't. We run the (5.1) TV audio out to the receiver, so we get full surround sound. LG's streaming has a pretty nice interface. Some Smart TV interfaces are better than others.
LG also has a streaming channels available through their interface, with their own channel guide. Honestly, having to go through a second channel guide is a step or two too many for us, we literally never look at it unless we turn it on by accident. If we ever cut the cord, we might look at that more.
A simple, attractive interface for controlling TV features is also important. A good phone app to control the TV is nice, but not as important as it seems, because you're mostly going to use the main remote. A good remote is important, because remotes can drive you nuts. I had a Pioneer remote that had 50 buttons and each button had multiple functions -- it was all but unusuable.
I've seen arguments that you shouldn't pay extra for things like Airplay in a receiver or streaming in a TV because those technologies evolve faster than the components, and you're probably going to buy a separate device anyway. If you're going to buy a Blu-ray player or Roku or AppleTV with streaming, the TV is redundant. But we find the proliferating remotes annoying. I'd be happier to have fewer devices with simpler controls.
Model: UN55MU6300FXZA
$599 on Best Buy. I have not had any problems with it in the 1.5 years I've owned it
LED is fine. OLED an 4k are a waste of money. The difference in picture quality is negligible. Don't hesitate to replace your plasma - the next tv you get will be lighter, thinner, and significantly more energy efficient.
Opt for something that has as many HDMI ports as possible to make space for your stereo, gaming system, Roku, blu ray player, etc. Make sure to get a TV that has at least 3 HDMI ports.
Stick with the brands you know: Sony, Vizio, Samsung, LG. There will be a huge drop off in the quality of the product if you elect to go with a lesser brand.
From there, just pick the tv that has the best price for the size you want. Don't overthink this. If you see a deal in the store make sure to compare with the price on Amazon before purchasing.