You wrote:
I think the best player in this draft is Lamar Jackson. If he's there at 2, I'm taking him. |
What parts of LJ's game do you envision him using going forward in the NFL? Teaching him to slide is a no brainer but do you see him running as often?
Would you be willing to red shirt him for a year to learn to play under center and read defenses better?
Thanks. (Any other LJ fans may chime in.)
If I understand correctly you want 2 or 3 QBs all of the same skill set so all your eggs are not in one basket. This part I disagree with.
Chris... that's a fair point. My hope would be that Kubiak knows enough about offensive football that he can implement something to best utilize Jackson. If he can't, you replace him with someone who can. That said, I imagine that Jackson would be very effective in this type of offense. The rollouts would be devastating.
Del... Real Madrid. They're gonna be a freight train in a couple months. Man City has a real shot too. Barcelona is on borrowed time.
😎
yes, mobility is good, but NEEDING to run to be effective is not, RGIII being the perfect example.
Quote:
Just the threat of running is a good way to keep the defense honest.
yes, mobility is good, but NEEDING to run to be effective is not, RGIII being the perfect example.
Not to mention Carson Wentz. He might not have needed to run but he did anyway. QBs who regularly venture past the LOS are looking for short careers.
I'm with you on this as well. Go Terps is must-read. Even when he isn't right he's always willing to stand behind his positions.
Some people have ripped him, reducing his positions in unfair ways. This question follows up to what was a pretty solid plan he put up about what he'd do if he was the GM.
Most people here haven't put forth a more detailed plan but are content to rip on Terps.
Some posters don't like seeing sacred cows criticized.
But I was dead wrong on McAdoo. I thought he was the goods. I had us at 9-7 this year so I'm as surprised as anyone.