for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: Moustakas in play for Mets

CMicks3110 : 1/4/2018 10:24 pm
Quote:
Fans have every right to be cynical about this, and I have no doubt they will be, but sources with knowledge of the Mets' plans are telling me the front office will do more to improve the team this winter than is being portrayed publicly.

Nevertheless, one name I heard mentioned on Thursday was Mike Moustakas, the third baseman who hit 38 home runs for the Royals last season, and so far seems to have generated limited interest at best.

Nobody was saying the Mets are ready to swoop in and sign him, but it seems fair to say the team is monitoring his situation, well aware there aren't many potential landing spots for third baseman looking for long-term deals.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/mets/mike-moustakas-play-mets-article-1.3738534 - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
don't believe it until it happens  
Eric on Li : 1/4/2018 10:32 pm : link
and even if it does happen, it's going to be for a lot less money than anyone expects. There are some things to like about him (like the 38 homers and low strikeout numbers) but other things that aren't so hot - mainly his defense went way backwards with all the metrics and he's always been a low OBP guy. He's clearly a better player than what they have, but he's got a little bit of a Jason Bay feel.
I just read one  
pjcas18 : 1/4/2018 10:36 pm : link
"expert" suggest the Mets should trade Cespedes to free up money.

How is that productive? Cespedes, when healthy, is the Mets best or 2nd best hitter, and is not going to be replaced any free agent.
More Mets rumors that won't happen  
pjcas18 : 1/4/2018 10:54 pm : link
Quote:
Ken Rosenthal‏Verified account @Ken_Rosenthal

#Mets, #Pirates have discussed McCutchen, just as they did last off-season, sources tell The Athletic. No deal close; NYM weighing variety of moves, and FAs appear more realistic than trades given lack of depth in system. McCutchen set to earn $14.75M in final year of deal.
Should we  
Mark C : 1/4/2018 11:01 pm : link
organize a bake sale?
Is this the annual  
moespree : 1/4/2018 11:16 pm : link
Float some names to placate the fanbase with no intention of actually getting any of them? Probably.
McCutchen would be interesting depending on the price tag  
Eric on Li : 1/4/2018 11:23 pm : link
but if he's not just a rental, why not just sign Cain (who is a better defender) and save the prospects?
Cutch  
brunswick : 1/4/2018 11:26 pm : link
Has 1 year left...that's the reason
Lol, the Mets are always monitoring the situation with FAs.  
PhiPsi125 : 1/5/2018 12:06 am : link
so tired of this team.
.  
DanMetroMan : 1/5/2018 7:43 am : link
2 MLB seasons of being an average or better MLB regular. 2.9 fWAR the last 2 seasons combined. 3.7 in 2015...1.7 the previous 2 combined. Terrible target unless the market totally bottoms out for him. Potential "disaster" given the Mets willingness to move on from mistakes.
RE: Should we  
dreadedrummer : 1/5/2018 7:44 am : link
In comment 13772754 Mark C said:
Quote:
organize a bake sale?

Someone should set up a go fund me for the Mets, if nothing else maybe the story would get picked up by the media and embarrass them...
Moustakas is in play for the Mets  
Vanzetti : 1/5/2018 7:59 am : link
Like a double date with the Hadid sisters is in play for me
Just  
DanMetroMan : 1/5/2018 9:42 am : link
spoke to someone in the know. Highly unlikely they sign Moustakas. Would need the market to bottom out.
RE: .  
Eric on Li : 1/5/2018 9:43 am : link
In comment 13772877 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
2 MLB seasons of being an average or better MLB regular. 2.9 fWAR the last 2 seasons combined. 3.7 in 2015...1.7 the previous 2 combined. Terrible target unless the market totally bottoms out for him. Potential "disaster" given the Mets willingness to move on from mistakes.


I agree. Last year his slugging % spiked, maybe it was improvement maybe it was an outlier, but there's little else positive beyond that and his defensive dropoff was apparently significant. Hard pass unless it's a very low risk deal.
Interesting article here  
Metnut : 1/5/2018 9:48 am : link
The author says that Moose has shown real improvement in his late 20s, and it doesn't look like smoke and mirrors.

"Moustakass average fly ball traveled 326 feet last season, up from 308 feet in the first half of 2015 and 317 feet in the second half of 2015, when the ball is suspected to have changed. He hit 16 fly balls that averaged 332 feet of distance in his injury-shortened 2016."

However, the article also says that since he's an extreme fly ball and pull hitter, his batted balls don't really profile too well at Citi Field.
Mike Moustakas Is the Former Royal You Want - ( New Window )
RE: Just  
arcarsenal : 1/5/2018 9:48 am : link
In comment 13773079 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
spoke to someone in the know. Highly unlikely they sign Moustakas. Would need the market to bottom out.


LOL, of course.

I'm not even crazy about Moustakas - I just laugh knowing that this is how the Mets operate. They need the market to "bottom out" on a player in order to sign him.

Pathetic.
RE: RE: Just  
Metnut : 1/5/2018 9:55 am : link
In comment 13773090 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13773079 DanMetroMan said:


Quote:


spoke to someone in the know. Highly unlikely they sign Moustakas. Would need the market to bottom out.



LOL, of course.

I'm not even crazy about Moustakas - I just laugh knowing that this is how the Mets operate. They need the market to "bottom out" on a player in order to sign him.

Pathetic.


LOL exactly! Dan's quote isn't exclusive to Moose, it applies to every free agent. "Mets aren't interested unless the market bottoms out"
This is what drives me crazy about the Mets...  
Chris684 : 1/5/2018 9:57 am : link
If you aren't going to improve the club and win while you have Thor and DeGrom then why not trade them?

And just so everyone knows, I want NO part of trading either one of them, I love both of them, but what's the point of keeping them and not improving the roster?

If they moved Jake this past deadline they could have cleaned out the Astros farm system and totally replenished.

It was the same with the Wright contract that was a total disaster from the day he signed it. Wright's value to a ballclub was never going to line up with the longer term plan of the years it took to groom these pitchers.

WTF is this franchise doing? Does anyone know anymore? Not spend enough to be a contender but spend enough so the blind Met fan will still buy his 10 pack season ticket plan?
Don't forget they still  
pjcas18 : 1/5/2018 10:56 am : link
have that roughly $10M to spend.

Maybe they can get some reclamation projects coming off major injury and a guy trying to resurrect his career coming back from Japan or Mexico.
LOL  
pjcas18 : 1/5/2018 12:14 pm : link
Quote:
Jeffrey Paternostro‏ @jeffpaternostro

The Mets are gonna surprise you with just how much they spend on a fourth outfielder and second LOOGy.


Quote:

Jeffrey Paternostro
‏ @jeffpaternostro
14h14 hours ago

(To be fair they do desperately need another outfielder as I think Champ Stuart is legit fourth on the depth chart if Conforto isnt ready for Opening Day)


Quote:

Jeffrey Paternostro
‏ @jeffpaternostro
14h14 hours ago

(And given that the other outfielders are Lagares, Nimmo, and Cespedes, the odds that all three are healthy on Opening Day also isnt great)
Bottom Out  
TyreeHelmet : 1/5/2018 12:24 pm : link
It's embarrassing and laughable. It's also the only reason Cespedes was signed- the only major contract they have signed since Wright.

Great point about Thor/ Degrom. You have two aces in their prime. If you're not going to try to compete now, when will you?
RE: This is what drives me crazy about the Mets...  
spike : 1/5/2018 1:04 pm : link
In comment 13773111 Chris684 said:
Quote:
If you aren't going to improve the club and win while you have Thor and DeGrom then why not trade them?

And just so everyone knows, I want NO part of trading either one of them, I love both of them, but what's the point of keeping them and not improving the roster?

If they moved Jake this past deadline they could have cleaned out the Astros farm system and totally replenished.

It was the same with the Wright contract that was a total disaster from the day he signed it. Wright's value to a ballclub was never going to line up with the longer term plan of the years it took to groom these pitchers.



WTF is this franchise doing? Does anyone know anymore? Not spend enough to be a contender but spend enough so the blind Met fan will still buy his 10 pack season ticket plan?


That IS the plan. Keep Mets fans spending
.  
arcarsenal : 1/5/2018 9:00 pm : link
Guys! We signed someone!







Jenrry Mejia!

(I'm serious - we signed him to a 1.7M deal to avoid arbitration)

LOL
.  
arcarsenal : 1/5/2018 9:01 pm : link
(And no, he's not ever going to actually pitch for us again)
RE: This is what drives me crazy about the Mets...  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/6/2018 12:33 am : link
In comment 13773111 Chris684 said:
Quote:

WTF is this franchise doing? Does anyone know anymore? Not spend enough to be a contender but spend enough so the blind Met fan will still buy his 10 pack season ticket plan?


That's exactly what they're doing.


For the record Moustakas  
ZGiants98 : 1/6/2018 2:37 am : link
was coming off a knee injury and was much worse defensively over the first half (rust?) than over the second half. I highly doubt a 29 year old (assuming a healthy knee) is going to be a poor defensive player over the next few years going forward. His DRS was positive over the second half of 2017 after it was atrocious to start off.
I also think it's hilarious  
ZGiants98 : 1/6/2018 2:56 am : link
that Sandy waited out the market the exact same way last year and signed his two biggest free agents (Cespedes and Blevins) extremely late in the offseason. It's like it's a complete shock that this is how this guy operates? Why? I believe this article and that most of the money issues are smoke to leverage negotiations and Sandy will still sign a couple guys late in the offseason once he gets them at "his" price. Still plenty of good players in play.
They resigned Cespedes in November last year  
Eric on Li : 1/6/2018 9:52 am : link
and outside of twice resigning Cespedes I don't think Sandy's previous offseasons have ever been models of success.
Never  
DanMetroMan : 1/6/2018 10:13 am : link
knew this but even if the Wilpons sold a majority stake, Fred/Jeff would remain in charge which means even selling off 75% wouldn't help the Mets.
Wanted him:(  
DanMetroMan : 1/6/2018 10:14 am : link
Heyman: sources: japanese pitcher kazuhisa makita has an agreement with the padres. 2 years, close to $4M. gives them another nice bullpen arm. submariner. @JeffPassan mentioned likelihood 1st.
RE: I also think it's hilarious  
arcarsenal : 1/6/2018 10:15 am : link
In comment 13774600 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
that Sandy waited out the market the exact same way last year and signed his two biggest free agents (Cespedes and Blevins) extremely late in the offseason. It's like it's a complete shock that this is how this guy operates? Why? I believe this article and that most of the money issues are smoke to leverage negotiations and Sandy will still sign a couple guys late in the offseason once he gets them at "his" price. Still plenty of good players in play.


He signed Cespedes because the market fell apart for him. Thats literally the only reason.

If that's our strategy, we're fucked. Because that's not how winning teams operate.
RE: .  
pjcas18 : 1/6/2018 10:20 am : link
In comment 13774410 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
(And no, he's not ever going to actually pitch for us again)


He's also not going to collect any of that money. Player on drug suspensions don't get paid.

I wonder if the Mets though will count this money in their payroll numbers.
RE: RE: I also think it's hilarious  
spike : 1/6/2018 2:44 pm : link
In comment 13774729 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13774600 ZGiants98 said:


Quote:


that Sandy waited out the market the exact same way last year and signed his two biggest free agents (Cespedes and Blevins) extremely late in the offseason. It's like it's a complete shock that this is how this guy operates? Why? I believe this article and that most of the money issues are smoke to leverage negotiations and Sandy will still sign a couple guys late in the offseason once he gets them at "his" price. Still plenty of good players in play.



He signed Cespedes because the market fell apart for him. Thats literally the only reason.

If that's our strategy, we're fucked. Because that's not how winning teams operate.


last championship 1986. We will keep counting that championship anniversary for decades
RE: They resigned Cespedes in November last year  
ZGiants98 : 1/7/2018 12:39 pm : link
In comment 13774713 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
and outside of twice resigning Cespedes I don't think Sandy's previous offseasons have ever been models of success.


His last two offseasons weren't models of success? Going to the WS, postseason, and into a year that every person on earth predicted 90-ish wins screamed failure to you? interesting.
.  
arcarsenal : 1/7/2018 12:45 pm : link
Fan projections shouldn't be proof of a good offseason.

The reality is that the 2017 Mets sucked and were out of contention by the 4th of July.

No matter what people thought going into the season, the team wound up being awful. Sandy gets a pass on that just because it was less expected?

We've done nothing but go backwards since the WS so far and it looks like we're still moving in the wrong direction.
Well if that's the case  
ZGiants98 : 1/7/2018 12:49 pm : link
his previous two offseasons should be measured as successes if the postseason is the baramoter. I don't expect everyone to feel the same way but Sandy absolutely gets a pass from me. His whole team was on the DL and we were 2 games under .500 at the deadline. Last year was just one of those "everything that could go wrong did" type years.
RE: RE: I also think it's hilarious  
ZGiants98 : 1/7/2018 12:51 pm : link
In comment 13774729 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13774600 ZGiants98 said:


Quote:


that Sandy waited out the market the exact same way last year and signed his two biggest free agents (Cespedes and Blevins) extremely late in the offseason. It's like it's a complete shock that this is how this guy operates? Why? I believe this article and that most of the money issues are smoke to leverage negotiations and Sandy will still sign a couple guys late in the offseason once he gets them at "his" price. Still plenty of good players in play.



He signed Cespedes because the market fell apart for him. Thats literally the only reason.

If that's our strategy, we're fucked. Because that's not how winning teams operate.


I believe it is his strategy. Not to overpay plain and simple. Ill wait until the offseason is over before I comment on whether it worked out this year or not.
.  
arcarsenal : 1/7/2018 12:53 pm : link
The whole team was on the DL because he brought back most of the same injury-prone players. It shouldn't have surprised anyone.

This team is nowhere near a contender right now. Not even close.

Unless he gets really creative, it's going to be another long season for us.
RE: .  
ZGiants98 : 1/7/2018 12:55 pm : link
In comment 13776257 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
The whole team was on the DL because he brought back most of the same injury-prone players. It shouldn't have surprised anyone.

This team is nowhere near a contender right now. Not even close.

Unless he gets really creative, it's going to be another long season for us.


Disagree. The two biggest losses that sank our season were Syndergaard and Familia in early April and neither had any previous injury history. At least nothing, major. Cespedes was pretty much useless all year too and we would have never signed him to a 100 million plus deal if we thought he would have been injured all year.

I do agree the roster is worse now though after losing Grandy, Bruce, Walker, Reed, Duda, ect. He absolutely needs to add more talent.
.  
arcarsenal : 1/7/2018 1:02 pm : link
Well, he's got a lot of work to do - because as it stands right now, this is probably a 75-80 win team.

And I don't have a whole lot of faith in this turning into a contender when we have about 10M total to fix it.
I dont know what this team is... Could be 70. Could be 90  
ZGiants98 : 1/7/2018 1:08 pm : link
This team as currently constructed is depending on Nimmo, Rosario, and Smith to turn into solid everyday players immediately. Could that happen? Sure. Nimmo held his own last year and Smith and Rosario were huge prospects. Is it likely? All in the same year? I doubt it which is why I would hedge my bets better. Push Nimmo back to the 4th OF role and add a solid bat in the infield to take some pressure off the kids.

As for the rest of the team we need key players to return to health and stay healthy. I'm not talking about lost causes like Wheeler and Harvey.

Im talking about Cespedes, Conforto, Syndergaard, and Familia. The cornerstones of the roster.
RE: RE: They resigned Cespedes in November last year  
Eric on Li : 1/7/2018 4:21 pm : link
In comment 13776240 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
In comment 13774713 Eric on Li said:


Quote:


and outside of twice resigning Cespedes I don't think Sandy's previous offseasons have ever been models of success.



His last two offseasons weren't models of success? Going to the WS, postseason, and into a year that every person on earth predicted 90-ish wins screamed failure to you? interesting.


The WS year they were under .500 at the deadline despite having the best pitching in baseball because they didn't do what they needed to in the offseason. Forget Cespedes, Uribe, KJ and Clippard were enormously important acquisitions for roles that were mindlessly ignored in the offseason after lighting money on fire to signing Cuddyer and "the best pinch hitter in baseball" John Mayberry.

The WC year they were around .500 at the deadline, and actually under .500 in early August. Then they went on a run in large part thanks to Lugo and Gsellman.

Last year he stood pat with almost the exact same roster as the Wild Card year to obviously terrible results.

So resigning Cespedes aside, since that was just a function of market prices, which one of those offseasons was Sandy's best in your mind? The WS year he signed Cuddyer for $25M and gave up a first round pick day 1? The year he let Murphy go for almost nothing? Or last year when he mindlessly blew his entire budget signing Walker for $17M?
I'd offer the Marlins  
pjcas18 : 1/7/2018 4:30 pm : link
Rosario+ (plus may be a lot) for Yelich, Realmuto and Prado. Maybe even have to take on Chen and or Castro.



On 2nd thought ignore my last post, I don't want to argue with you  
Eric on Li : 1/7/2018 4:31 pm : link
the reality of this franchise the last several years is painfully obvious to everyone other than you. Cespedes aside, Sandy has acquired flawed players few others want because that's all he can afford within his budget. We all know we were only lucky to resign Cespedes back because he had a cold market. He got good results with a few (Granderson, Cabrera, Colon) and bad luck with a few (Bastardo, Cuddyer, Walker) - but by no means has ever built a solid roster around a very talented group of pitchers who deserved better. Bargain bin stop-gaps year after year leading to mediocre results and mediocre records. 2 outlier months in 2015 thanks to deadline rental acquisitions at the deadline don't change that.
RE: I'd offer the Marlins  
Eric on Li : 1/7/2018 4:34 pm : link
In comment 13776745 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
Rosario+ (plus may be a lot) for Yelich, Realmuto and Prado. Maybe even have to take on Chen and or Castro.




I'd offer them anything they want other than Rosario for Yelich and Prado. Dom Smith, Gimenez, and whoever they want as the 3rd prospect (and 4th prospect if nec). That package would be reasonably comparable talent level-wise to what STL put together for Ozuna. Obviously Yelich has a better contract than Ozuna but having to take on Prado's $30M diminishes that.
RE: RE: I'd offer the Marlins  
pjcas18 : 1/7/2018 4:38 pm : link
In comment 13776759 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
In comment 13776745 pjcas18 said:


Quote:


Rosario+ (plus may be a lot) for Yelich, Realmuto and Prado. Maybe even have to take on Chen and or Castro.






I'd offer them anything they want other than Rosario for Yelich and Prado. Dom Smith, Gimenez, and whoever they want as the 3rd prospect (and 4th prospect if nec). That package would be reasonably comparable talent level-wise to what STL put together for Ozuna. Obviously Yelich has a better contract than Ozuna but having to take on Prado's $30M diminishes that.


If you can get it done without Rosario obviously preferable, but I doubt it. That's why I added in Realmuto though.

He's still young-ish and a top 5 catcher the past two years.

I'd prefer Castro over Prado.
Castro and Prado are similar, but I assume they view Castro's value >  
Eric on Li : 1/7/2018 5:00 pm : link
which is why I'd prefer to take the bigger negative value to save on the prospect side if that makes sense.

Truthfully though, the most sensible thing for the Mets to do would be sign Cain and just trade Lagares for a 2B like Kipinis. Yes it's a risk because he's older, but Cain and Yelich are extremely similar players. Cain's contract would hopefully be somewhere in the range of what they gave Granderson 4 years ago and they'd get to save all their prospects to not further decimate the system.

----------------Cain ---- Yelich
Career BA-----.290------.290
2017 BA ------.300------.282
Career OBP---.342------.369
2017 OBP-----.363------.369
Career K%-----18%------20%
Career BB%----7%-------11%
Career SLG%--.421-----.432%
2017 SLG%----.440%---.439%

Last year Cain had 26 steals to Yelich's 16 and played better defense. Over their career's Cain's defense has been much better, but since he's older it's probably going to be similar going forward. Again, all things equal I'd prefer Yelich by a solid margin but considering 1 of them is a FA that costs nothing but money...it should be a no brainer for a NY team.
If you want to look at things in a vacuum and say that Sandy gets  
PhiPsi125 : 1/7/2018 7:06 pm : link
a pass because they got to the post season in two straight years, then thats fine.

They made the WS in 2015. I cant take that away. Reality is that it was still a deeply flawed team that got hot at the right time, took advantage of an imploding better team (Nationals) only to then turn back into a pumpkin in the WS. This was the time to build off the WS roster but this never actually happened.

2016 was a step backwards. Another mediocre season only to AGAIN turn it on at the very end of the season, end up 8 games out of first place, but secure a wild card to earn the opportunity to GET INTO the playoffs. Which didnt actually happen.

They won 90 and 87 games, respectively. Hardly a powerhouse. Reality is that they have been a thoroughly mediocre (if not bad) team that were lucky to even sniff the success they had those two years. But Sandys true team eventually showed up.

2017 was an abortion of a season. From top to bottom. Lack of oversight with their star players training methods (which clearly led to their eventual injuries), short sighted view with their starting staff, same reliance on HRs while not improving their glaring flaws, crappy defense, horrible leadership.

Nobody WANTS to overpay players but I hate to tell you...its a part of the game and how successful teams are built. But Sandys plan is clearly working. We are in great shape.
Mets seem dysfunctional  
xman : 1/7/2018 8:09 pm : link
top to bottom but it can turn around for the better fast. Look at the Yanks
RE: Mets seem dysfunctional  
arcarsenal : 1/7/2018 8:18 pm : link
In comment 13777271 xman said:
Quote:
top to bottom but it can turn around for the better fast. Look at the Yanks


Yeah, except for the fact that the Yankees are willing to spend money.
95% of the roster problems are easily fixed w a top 10 payroll ($180M)  
Eric on Li : 1/7/2018 8:58 pm : link
Sign Reed.
Sign Cain.
Trade for Kipinis or Gordon at 2nd.

And those are just the simplest, easiest, least creative additions ~8 WAR possible for about $40M.

And to be clear, I don't blame Sandy for not having the extra $40M. That's 100% ownership, not him. I just think it's comical to act like Sandy has perfected some brilliant marketplace strategy within that constraint. He paid Neil Walker coming off back surgery more money last year than his entire budget for this year.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner