![]() ![]() |
|
Quote: |
not against Patricia at all, but I don't see where Leonard made his case why Patricia is now the front runner. |
Quote: |
talks to the media and that wasn't the point of my comment. My point was that Patricia was there since 2004, through most of their scandals, through BB recycling his players and changing schemes, and all reports talk about prepared he always is. But you are worried about what happens when a Mic is in his face? |
Quote: |
this article with any indication the team is leaking information. I read it as Leonard is throwing shit against a wall and hoping it will stick. |
Quote: |
no one seems to have a clue what's going on. Maybe, just maybe, the Giants have learned to keep a tight lid on things. |
Quote: |
I thought Patricia was the most intriguing candidate due to his hand on analytics. Reminded me of Belichick when he was with the Giants. |
Quote: |
In comment 13781127 Eric from BBI said: Quote: not against Patricia at all, but I don't see where Leonard made his case why Patricia is now the front runner. Perhaps Wilks chose not to pursue Giants job further. Arizona has a much better D and superstar RB, good WR's.. They just need a VET QB (Alex Smith?) to come and be good.... |
Quote: |
I thought Patricia was the most intriguing candidate due to his hand on analytics. Reminded me of Belichick when he was with the Giants. |
Quote: |
Phil in LA said: Quote: I thought Patricia was the most intriguing candidate due to his hand on analytics. Reminded me of Belichick when he was with the Giants. Exactly. I've always had a soft spot for egghead coaches in the Walsh/Belichick mode. |
Quote: |
About this. Don't think it's a coincidence that both Peter King & Leonard are talking about Patricia a few hours apart after not really hearing much about him for the last week. |
Quote: |
Here's hoping Pat's correct, but I'd agree there appears to be no real sourced info here, he's guessulating. |
Quote: |
In comment 13781390 JonC said: Quote: Here's hoping Pat's correct, but I'd agree there appears to be no real sourced info here, he's guessulating. Same. The more I read about him, the more I like him. He's my pick at this point. |
Quote: |
Read the piece, where are the signs? Other than in the writer's head. |
Quote: |
In comment 13781390 JonC said: Quote: Here's hoping Pat's correct, but I'd agree there appears to be no real sourced info here, he's guessulating. Same. The more I read about him, the more I like him. He's my pick at this point. |
Quote: |
In comment 13781189 UConn4523 said: Quote: talks to the media and that wasn't the point of my comment. My point was that Patricia was there since 2004, through most of their scandals, through BB recycling his players and changing schemes, and all reports talk about prepared he always is. But you are worried about what happens when a Mic is in his face? No wise ass. You're saying he is equipped to handle pressure and scandles becuase of issues surrounding the Pats, and I'm saying you have no way of knowing that. All we really know about the Pats staff is that Belichick can handle all of these things. None of his assitants who have left have shown that they can handle the top job or these types of pressures on their own. |
Quote: |
Here's hoping Pat's correct, but I'd agree there appears to be no real sourced info here, he's guessulating. |
Quote: |
On the other hand, this mother fucker just throws off the Belichick vibe, so that has to count for something! |
Quote: |
In comment 13781349 Phil in LA said: Quote: I thought Patricia was the most intriguing candidate due to his hand on analytics. Reminded me of Belichick when he was with the Giants. He reminded Belichick of Belichick too Link - ( New Window ) |
Quote: |
Patricia told friends that, when he arrived, Belichick was still “a pencil and paper guy,” writing film notes by hand. Patricia helped digitize the Patriots’ film review system, just as he did at Hoffman. He ran a seminar teaching Patriots rookies the video system, gave older coaches basic computer training and showed the savvier coaches how to input data into spreadsheets, analyze it and incorporate the information into their weekly game plan. Patricia told one friend that he saved Belichick “two to three hours” a day because the new system gave Belichick, a notorious film junkie, an easier way to study tape. Which gave Belichick that much more time to scheme and strategize for each week’s opponent. Belichick started taking Patricia on scouting trips, giving him a glimpse into his world. “[Matt] logged a lot of hours driving Bill around,” says former Patriots lineman Matt Light, who is friends with Patricia. “[Bill] wanted him close because he saw the value in a guy like Matt. People talk about players, but a really good coach? That may be more rare than an elite corner or quarterback or defensive end. They’re very difficult to find in this league.” |
Quote: |
Phil in LA said: Quote: I thought Patricia was the most intriguing candidate due to his hand on analytics. Reminded me of Belichick when he was with the Giants. Exactly. I've always had a soft spot for egghead coaches in the Walsh/Belichick mode. |
Quote: |
Starting growing your beards, boys! - Slade |
Quote: |
In comment 13781537 Stufftherun said: Quote: Starting growing your beards, boys! - Slade Not yet, Stuff... he's telling us that "Belichick is still in play" in one of the pinned threads. Guy is a complete clown. |
Quote: |
and hope he keeps SPAGS and ELI. Mo |
Quote: |
In comment 13781840 TMS said: Quote: and hope he keeps SPAGS and ELI. Mo Why the hell would he want to keep a coach whose defenses have been at the bottom of the league 3 out of his last 4 years he was coordinator?? Why can’t this fan base move on from 2007/08 that was the last time spags was a good coordinator |
Quote: |
So true. But if someone suggested bringing back SB winning DC Perry Fewell the board would go crazy. |
Quote: |
Quote: So true. But if someone suggested bringing back SB winning DC Perry Fewell the board would go crazy. Ironically, TMS would call it a "PC hire". |