practice report:
"Multiple sources tell me there were a lot of feathers ruffled when the New York Giants hired Dave Gettleman as their general manager.
Sources feel Gettleman was the favorite of former Giants general manager Ernie Accorsi and was hired based on his previous tenure and familiarity with the organization rather than the franchise doing an exhaustive search for the best person for the job.
I’m told one of the reasons Gettleman was released by Carolina was that he wasn’t a people person and really did not try to ingratiate with enough members of the organization."
Nothing that some here have not said before, but odd that this would be reported at the Shrine game. Perhaps some unhappy 2nd place finishers...or current Giants' scouts?
Tony Pauline Shrine Game report - (
New Window )
They re-hired Gettleman because they know him and the default with this team has been the familiar. Gettleman can also be an abrasive prick. Neither of these facts alone or together precludes Gettleman from being a good general manager.
If he has kicked a few of our scouts out or in the ass, good.
Exploring options is what a GM is supposed to do. If Richardson meddled in who was the target of the options, then Gettleman will be right at home here because he will get the same kind of meddling. Goes with the territory. Again, it doesn't prevent Gettleman from being a good GM unless the options he is allowed to take turn out to be lousy.
For all the statements about "sacred cows" and "sentimentality", you can only get rid of a player when you have someone better to take his place. Chuck Noll can chide himself for his sentimentality about keeping Bradshaw or Franco Harris, for example, but when the alternatives are Cliff Stoudt and Mark Malone or Greg Hawthorne, Russell Davis, Walter Abercrombie and Frank Pollard, there is not much choice to make.
Get talented players in here through the draft, FA, UDFA and none of this stuff is a problem.
The players and their agents went to Richardson and he told Gettleman not to even consider any other options that would reduce their pay of move them from the team.
I really don't see any possible way this gets turned back as a negative on Gettleman
Stress brings out the best and the worst in people. Let's see how the Giants respond. Get your big boy pants on
Gettleman just unceremoniously fired their boss, Mark Ross, almost immediately after he was hired. Gettleman is in charge of their office for now, and they all directly report to him I'm sure he has put a few golden cows on notice in the scouting department that they have to do better.
The College Scouting department hasn't been getting the job done with offensive lineman, running backs, linebackers, or cornerbacks. I'd be roughling a few feathers and kicking their asses too.
For those of you who wanted change and think Gettleman is a sign of the same ol' thing, this is a sure sign that change is happening and that it's not going to be the same o' thing.
And just let me say this: Thank god a few feathers are roughled in the College Scouting department!
I hope there are a bunch of players that end of hating Gettleman and motherfucking him as they are being shown the door.
I hope there are a bunch of players that end of hating Gettleman and motherfucking him as they are being shown the door.
All true, agreed
If memory serves, there was some grousing amongst Jaguars vets last spring about the harsh offseason program Coughlin installed
Don’t recall if we found out who, but they’re either not on the squad anymore, or now playing in the AFC championship game after beating a tough Steelers team in Pittsburgh.
Anyone thing some early negative feedback about Coughlin was a bad thing there?
I assume you are referring to Dave Gettleman. If so, I say WHO GIVES A FUCK! We don't need a people person. We need a kick-ass GM who will hold everyone accountable!