for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: NYM 2018 Expectations Thread-

Sean : 2/14/2018 8:09 am
Im starting to get spring fever. We are halfway through February & spring training is kicking off. Despite the narrative of the Mets being cheap, they were actually one of the more active teams this offseason.

Vegas has the over/under win total at 80.5 which depends mostly on health. Also, the performance of Dom Smith & Rosario are crucial.

How optimistic are we fellow Met fans?
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: Quick queetion  
pjcas18 : 2/15/2018 11:20 am : link
In comment 13833247 Shecky said:
Quote:
If Fred Wilpon is so hated by Mets fans. Why? WHY are they walking past spee freakin gammons and asking Fred for his autograph!?!?!?!?


Not sure I understand this post.

I don't hate Fred, I don't even know him, but I don't think he's a great owner and I do believe the Mets could do better with more committed owners, whose goal is for a world championship first and foremost. And I don't mean "buy" a championship with free agent signings, I mean run your organization in a manner from front office, admin, scouting, minor leagues, etc. all with the same goals and philosophy to help achieve the major league team on-field goals.
RE: Quick queetion  
Section331 : 2/15/2018 11:30 am : link
In comment 13833247 Shecky said:
Quote:
If Fred Wilpon is so hated by Mets fans. Why? WHY are they walking past spee freakin gammons and asking Fred for his autograph!?!?!?!?


Come on Sheck, like people are clamoring for Peter Gammons autograph? Who cares? Fred's record speaks for itself - an average of 80 wins per year since he bought the team, with no championships and a whopping 3 playoff appearances in 16 years.

I agree with pj, I have no hatred for the guy, I don't know him, but he's been a mediocre owner, at best, in a premium market - regardless of who wants his autograph.
Im not making a prediction until the end of spring training  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 11:36 am : link
I need to see how the starting pitchers look. Theres also still a lot of free agents available and if the SP look awful you still might still see a Cashner or a Jaime Garcia brought in.

No surprise to anyone Im sure but I like this team. Its loaded with talent. Some of that talent is trying to come back from injury (Conforto) and some of that talent is raw and young (Rosario) and we dont know how its going to go but Im excited to find out.
And one more thing  
pjcas18 : 2/15/2018 11:42 am : link
I once met David Cone in a bar in New Haven CT with a group of my friends. Split between Yankees and Mets fans. This was in 1995 or maybe early 1996 after the 1995 season when I guess the Yankees still hadn't decided between who to keep of Cone or Black Jack McDowell.

anyway, we hung out with him for a while, great guy, told us a bunch of Yankees and Mets stories and generally just fit in (I was surprised how short he was - doesn't seem 6' 1") and it was getting late and he was going to leave and said do you guys want autographs? I'm not an autograph person, but said yeah, sure and my buddies did too, and no one had anything to sign so I reached in my wallet and had all 20's, and I asked Cone to sign one. My buddies did the same.

he said, what are you nuts, don't waste a $20 bill on me, don't you guys have any 1's? None of us did, so he pulled out 4 or 5 ones from his own wallet signed them and gave them to us.

I used mine for pizza across the street, but the point is I wouldn't let Peter Gammons sign a one dollar bill, that's the interest level I, and I believe most fans, have in Peter Gammons autograph. Bad comparison.
RE: And one more thing  
Section331 : 2/15/2018 11:44 am : link
In comment 13833372 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
I once met David Cone in a bar in New Haven CT with a group of my friends. Split between Yankees and Mets fans. This was in 1995 or maybe early 1996 after the 1995 season when I guess the Yankees still hadn't decided between who to keep of Cone or Black Jack McDowell.

anyway, we hung out with him for a while, great guy, told us a bunch of Yankees and Mets stories and generally just fit in (I was surprised how short he was - doesn't seem 6' 1") and it was getting late and he was going to leave and said do you guys want autographs? I'm not an autograph person, but said yeah, sure and my buddies did too, and no one had anything to sign so I reached in my wallet and had all 20's, and I asked Cone to sign one. My buddies did the same.

he said, what are you nuts, don't waste a $20 bill on me, don't you guys have any 1's? None of us did, so he pulled out 4 or 5 ones from his own wallet signed them and gave them to us.

I used mine for pizza across the street, but the point is I wouldn't let Peter Gammons sign a one dollar bill, that's the interest level I, and I believe most fans, have in Peter Gammons autograph. Bad comparison.


LOL. A penny, maybe?
RE: This year's team is impossible to peg with a number  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 11:49 am : link
In comment 13832024 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
the vegas over/under is probably exactly right, but I'll optimistically take the over on that. To me the season comes down to basically 3 things:

1. General health - Cespedes/Thor/JDG/Familia need to stay healthy. Hopefully the checks to the new director of high performance cleared.

2. Starting pitching - Can someone step up and be a consistent #3 behind JDG/Thor?

3. Does anyone surprise? Last year heading into ST we thought Conforto would start the year in Vegas and he ended up the team's lone all star. Can Rosario, Lagares, Nimmo, Smith, AGon, or even 1 of the catchers have an unexpected breakout? Not much is expected of that group, just 1 of them having a 4-5 war season like Lagares did in 2014 would be huge. On the pitching side the group would include Montero, Gsellman, Lugo, and the litany of BP arms.

If they get #1 I think they can comfortably hit 80 wins. If they get #1 and #2 they can be in the wild card mix, which is what my prediction would be. To compete with the Nats they'd need the best case scenario of all 3.


This is an excellent post. I agree with this 100%. The only thing that makes it confusing is your last sentence(and it wasnt your intent). Saying we we need a best case scenario across the board makes it sound like we would need everything to go right which sounds impossible. However, all 3 of your points are already hedged. You arent saying the whole team has to stay healthy. Youre saying our top 4 core guys do (true for most teams). You arent saying Harvey, Matz, and Wheeler all have to bounce back and claim the 3 spot. You are saying one does. Finally, you arent saying we need an unexpected breakouts from Rosario, Smith, the catchers, ect. You are saying we need a breakout from one of them. I actually agree with this completely and dont think its unreasonable to expect all three. I even agree with the win/loss record in relation to this.
I wouldn't get in a bidding war  
pjcas18 : 2/15/2018 12:26 pm : link
but if he's healthy this is the kind of transaction I'd be interested in:

Quote:
Jon Heyman‏Verified account @JonHeyman

With about 15 teams confirmed to watch Tim Lincecums showcase today in Seattle, its likely that as many as 20 may attend
They may be hedged, but none of them are likely outcomes  
Eric on Li : 2/15/2018 12:35 pm : link
it's unlikely Harvey returns to form and stays healthy

it's unlikely Matz stays healthy since he never has

it's unlikely Wheeler stays healthy since he hasn't since 2014

other than Rosario none of those guys I listed is even a likely every day starter - and a Rosario "breakout" is at best 50-50

So while there are enough guys in each group that it's easy to say "1 of those guys will step up", there's still nobody likely to do so. But that's why they play the games and why we root as fans - because unlikely things happen all the time. My biggest source of optimism this year is that with Callaway/Eiland/new performance team I feel they actively did something to improve the odds of the pitchers succeeding. Not signing Reed is the only thing I'd point to as a miss in trying to improve the pitching staff.
.  
arcarsenal : 2/15/2018 12:40 pm : link
We need someone to have a breakout year in the worst way...

Rosario, one of the catchers... I don't know if I can really put Nimmo here...

But what guys like Judge and Bellinger did for their teams last year made such a huge difference. I'm not expecting that type of breakout from any of these guys but just a much higher production level than we had expected from a player or two could really change things.

Even a guy like Jose Ramirez in CLE last year - that guy really became an excellent player and he's not mentioned often.
Sickels top 20 Mets prospects  
pjcas18 : 2/15/2018 1:07 pm : link
Quote:

On SB Nation, John Sickels announced his top 20 prospects in the New York Mets farm system. As you will see below, Sickels gives the majority of these prospects a C+ grade. To that end, Sickels joins other minor league analysts in his not being bullish on the Mets farm system:

#1 SS Andres Gimenez
Grade: B/B+
MMN Rank: 1

#2 LHP David Peterson
Grade: B/B+
MMN Rank: 2

#3 1B Peter Alonso
Grade B-/B
MMN Rank: 3

#4 3B Mark Vientos
Grade: B-
MMN Rank: 4

#5 SS/2B Luis Guillorme
Grade: B-
MMN Rank: 10

#6 LHP Thomas Szapucki
Grade: B-/C+
MMN Rank: 5

#7 RHP Chris Flexen
Grade: B-/C+
MMN Rank: 7

#8 RHP Marcos Molina
Grade: B-/C+
MMN Rank: 15

#9 OF Desmond Lindsay
Grade: C+/B-
MMN Rank: 8

#10 C Tomas Nido
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 9

#11 RHP Corey Oswalt
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 12

#12 3B David Thompson
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 20

#13 RHP Jamie Callahan
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 30

#14 RHP Tyler Bashlor
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 14

#15 RHP Gerson Bautista
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 16

#16 SS Ronny Mauricio
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 11

#17 1B/3B Jhoan Urena
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 32

#18 LHP Anthony Kay
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 13

#19 RHP Jordan Humphreys
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 18

#20 RHP Justin Dunn
Grade: C+
MMN Rank: 6


Link from mets minors - ( New Window )
.  
arcarsenal : 2/15/2018 1:09 pm : link
That's one ugly list.

Yikes.
Bad  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 1:13 pm : link
list and dumb writeups.
RE: .  
Eric on Li : 2/15/2018 1:47 pm : link
In comment 13833452 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
We need someone to have a breakout year in the worst way...

Rosario, one of the catchers... I don't know if I can really put Nimmo here...

But what guys like Judge and Bellinger did for their teams last year made such a huge difference. I'm not expecting that type of breakout from any of these guys but just a much higher production level than we had expected from a player or two could really change things.

Even a guy like Jose Ramirez in CLE last year - that guy really became an excellent player and he's not mentioned often.


Obviously Rosario is the guy who has that potential and if he can hit and get on base enough to take control of the leadoff spot that would have a massive impact on the entire lineup. If he can post an OBP around .330 (about 30 points higher than steamer projection) that would be huge.

It's kind of interesting how there's not a ton of hype around him even among Met fans. We're all pretty much expecting him to hit 8th whereas Lindor for example has pretty much hit 1/2/3 since day 1. He has less than 10 total AB's in his entire career below the 3 spot. I'm glad there aren't high expectations for Rosario but considering he was the #1 prospect in all baseball it's definitely not impossible that he's ready for more than the 8th spot pretty early on.
RE: Bad  
Mike in NY : 2/15/2018 1:49 pm : link
In comment 13833502 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
list and dumb writeups.


Sickels always has a different view of prospects - he tends to favor stats over tools. I do appreciate that he is easy to talk to and willing to discuss differing viewpoints without getting defensive.
Lindor  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 1:51 pm : link
was so much more polished than Rosario that it's hard to compare. The surprise with Lindor was the power. The glove was the best (or close to it) for any SS prospect this decade, they knew he could hit, didn't strike out, the power was the surprise.
RE: RE: .  
arcarsenal : 2/15/2018 1:54 pm : link
In comment 13833551 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
In comment 13833452 arcarsenal said:


Quote:


We need someone to have a breakout year in the worst way...

Rosario, one of the catchers... I don't know if I can really put Nimmo here...

But what guys like Judge and Bellinger did for their teams last year made such a huge difference. I'm not expecting that type of breakout from any of these guys but just a much higher production level than we had expected from a player or two could really change things.

Even a guy like Jose Ramirez in CLE last year - that guy really became an excellent player and he's not mentioned often.



Obviously Rosario is the guy who has that potential and if he can hit and get on base enough to take control of the leadoff spot that would have a massive impact on the entire lineup. If he can post an OBP around .330 (about 30 points higher than steamer projection) that would be huge.

It's kind of interesting how there's not a ton of hype around him even among Met fans. We're all pretty much expecting him to hit 8th whereas Lindor for example has pretty much hit 1/2/3 since day 1. He has less than 10 total AB's in his entire career below the 3 spot. I'm glad there aren't high expectations for Rosario but considering he was the #1 prospect in all baseball it's definitely not impossible that he's ready for more than the 8th spot pretty early on.


If Conforto was 100% now, I think I'd be a lot more excited.

I just can't shake the feeling that he's going to be hampered all year and just never get himself right.

Rosario can absolutely be the guy who has a breakout year - he'd be most likely, IMO. We need a positional prospect to come up and become a star so badly. It can happen with Conforto or Rosario - I just worry about Conforto staying healthy.
RE: Bad  
Eric on Li : 2/15/2018 2:05 pm : link
In comment 13833502 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
list and dumb writeups.


The Dunn ranking is odd but in the comments he said all the C+ guys were basically interchangable and at one point he had him up at 10.
RE: RE: Bad  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 2:07 pm : link
In comment 13833587 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
In comment 13833502 DanMetroMan said:


Quote:


list and dumb writeups.



The Dunn ranking is odd but in the comments he said all the C+ guys were basically interchangable and at one point he had him up at 10.


Anthony Kay at 18? Really? Law had him #6, Dunn at 3. Guillorme as a lock top 5 guy for him is absurd as well. Law had him #13, BA had him 10 and over at NYFS we had him 8th.
RE: Lindor  
Eric on Li : 2/15/2018 2:09 pm : link
In comment 13833563 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
was so much more polished than Rosario that it's hard to compare. The surprise with Lindor was the power. The glove was the best (or close to it) for any SS prospect this decade, they knew he could hit, didn't strike out, the power was the surprise.


Yeah I know Callaway made the comparison but I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to a guy who was that good right away. I guess my point is just that even if that's the absolute best case and likely unrealistic, there's might be a lot of realistic middle ground outcomes between that and just hitting 8th. I'm personally hoping he can just post an OBP around .330 because I think that's good enough to warrant batting leadoff.
RE: They may be hedged, but none of them are likely outcomes  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 2:14 pm : link
In comment 13833445 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
it's unlikely Harvey returns to form and stays healthy

it's unlikely Matz stays healthy since he never has

it's unlikely Wheeler stays healthy since he hasn't since 2014

other than Rosario none of those guys I listed is even a likely every day starter - and a Rosario "breakout" is at best 50-50

So while there are enough guys in each group that it's easy to say "1 of those guys will step up", there's still nobody likely to do so. But that's why they play the games and why we root as fans - because unlikely things happen all the time. My biggest source of optimism this year is that with Callaway/Eiland/new performance team I feel they actively did something to improve the odds of the pitchers succeeding. Not signing Reed is the only thing I'd point to as a miss in trying to improve the pitching staff.


As far as the starters, again, any of them by themselves? Yes. All of them together having one emerge or bounce back? Completely different. And yes a 24 year old Gsellman, ect can be added to that group. We have 6 guys competing for 3 spots. As for breakouts... every year somebody breaks out. It doesnt have to be Rosario. It could be Nimmo or Corey Oswalt for all we know. I think one breakout is VERY likely actually.
RE: RE: Lindor  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 2:14 pm : link
In comment 13833594 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
In comment 13833563 DanMetroMan said:


Quote:


was so much more polished than Rosario that it's hard to compare. The surprise with Lindor was the power. The glove was the best (or close to it) for any SS prospect this decade, they knew he could hit, didn't strike out, the power was the surprise.



Yeah I know Callaway made the comparison but I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to a guy who was that good right away. I guess my point is just that even if that's the absolute best case and likely unrealistic, there's might be a lot of realistic middle ground outcomes between that and just hitting 8th. I'm personally hoping he can just post an OBP around .330 because I think that's good enough to warrant batting leadoff.


Not knocking Callaway but it's clear he plays fast and furious with the hyperbole. What exactly is he going to say "Lindor is better but Rosario is very talented?". Rosario could be very, very good but Lindor looked 100% ready to come in and at least produce (and play ++ defense). Rosario is very raw for a top guy (not even knocking him) but to go from swinging at THAT many pitches out of the zone to being Lindor (or close) right away is probably pretty unlikely to happen. But who knows? The world expected Swanson to be a beast this year and he stunk
Little to none  
giantsfan227B : 2/15/2018 2:26 pm : link
on expectations.
RE: RE: RE: Lindor  
Eric on Li : 2/15/2018 2:34 pm : link
In comment 13833607 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
In comment 13833594 Eric on Li said:


Quote:


In comment 13833563 DanMetroMan said:


Quote:


was so much more polished than Rosario that it's hard to compare. The surprise with Lindor was the power. The glove was the best (or close to it) for any SS prospect this decade, they knew he could hit, didn't strike out, the power was the surprise.



Yeah I know Callaway made the comparison but I don't think it's fair to compare anyone to a guy who was that good right away. I guess my point is just that even if that's the absolute best case and likely unrealistic, there's might be a lot of realistic middle ground outcomes between that and just hitting 8th. I'm personally hoping he can just post an OBP around .330 because I think that's good enough to warrant batting leadoff.



Not knocking Callaway but it's clear he plays fast and furious with the hyperbole. What exactly is he going to say "Lindor is better but Rosario is very talented?". Rosario could be very, very good but Lindor looked 100% ready to come in and at least produce (and play ++ defense). Rosario is very raw for a top guy (not even knocking him) but to go from swinging at THAT many pitches out of the zone to being Lindor (or close) right away is probably pretty unlikely to happen. But who knows? The world expected Swanson to be a beast this year and he stunk


Exactly. Smaller first year sample, but Judge went from the interstate to the best hitter in baseball. Guys with elite tools can just have it 'click' sometimes.
Cashner  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 2:46 pm : link
2 for 18 with Baltimore, had ZERO interest in him anywhere near that.
RE: Cashner  
Metnut : 2/15/2018 3:22 pm : link
In comment 13833665 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
2 for 18 with Baltimore, had ZERO interest in him anywhere near that.


Solid deal for Cashner. Wasn't a fit here at anywhere near that price. Would've loved to add Bud Norris for the price he signed at.
Puma saying Mets still interested in  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 3:24 pm : link
Garcia/Vargas. Minor league deals please...
Link - ( New Window )
I hope they get Garcia  
Eric on Li : 2/15/2018 3:25 pm : link
I wouldn't hate Vargas either, he had a good year last year. Either one would add a lefty to the mix who can at least make 10-20 starts (or get cut) if need be.
If anything the Cashner deal  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 3:25 pm : link
Proves the market for pitchers never really crashed. Guys are still getting big bucks this offseason regardless of how long theyve been holding out.
RE: I hope they get Garcia  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 3:27 pm : link
In comment 13833735 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
I wouldn't hate Vargas either, he had a good year last year. Either one would add a lefty to the mix who can at least make 10-20 starts (or get cut) if need be.


Im kind of hoping they will be available in 2 weeks still only because Im frothing at the mouth to see how Harvey, Wheeler, Matz look with full offseasons, ect but they probably wont be there still.
I'd  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 3:29 pm : link
be blown away if Vargas settles for a minor league deal
RE: If anything the Cashner deal  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 3:30 pm : link
In comment 13833737 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
Proves the market for pitchers never really crashed. Guys are still getting big bucks this offseason regardless of how long theyve been holding out.


He's still only getting paid as a SP good for 1.0 fWAR or so per season. In theory he's a significant upside play at that rate. I don't think people are going to have their minds blown if he puts up 4.0ish fWAR over the next 2 with a value of over 30 million.
RE: RE: If anything the Cashner deal  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 3:34 pm : link
In comment 13833754 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
In comment 13833737 ZGiants98 said:


Quote:


Proves the market for pitchers never really crashed. Guys are still getting big bucks this offseason regardless of how long theyve been holding out.



He's still only getting paid as a SP good for 1.0 fWAR or so per season. In theory he's a significant upside play at that rate. I don't think people are going to have their minds blown if he puts up 4.0ish fWAR over the next 2 with a value of over 30 million.


True. I just think this late in the offseason youd think costs would be dropping but Darvish, Cashner, ect are still getting pretty much what was expected all along. I really hate Cashners peripherals so Im glad we stayed away.
Based off WAR  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 3:36 pm : link
Frazier is a 21 million AAV player. Just seems like the market for hitters has completely bottomed out (JD Martinez reportedly being offered a third of what he originally wanted) but pitchers are still getting fairly big bucks.
RE: If anything the Cashner deal  
Jay on the Island : 2/15/2018 3:39 pm : link
In comment 13833737 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
Proves the market for pitchers never really crashed. Guys are still getting big bucks this offseason regardless of how long theyve been holding out.

Nope and this is exactly why guys are waiting for better deals. They know once spring training begins that teams will be willing to offer more due to injury and poor performance.
RE: Based off WAR  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 3:43 pm : link
In comment 13833761 ZGiants98 said:
Quote:
Frazier is a 21 million AAV player. Just seems like the market for hitters has completely bottomed out (JD Martinez reportedly being offered a third of what he originally wanted) but pitchers are still getting fairly big bucks.


Frazier is 32 years old. Based on his last 2 seasons he was worth 44 million however the expectation is a 32 year old is in decline or headed there. He's also a low average player which the market very rarely rewards.
I  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 3:44 pm : link
didn't want Cashner at all but he's been league average 3 of the last 4 seasons. His K rate this year is a major, major red flag but as I said he very possibly gives the Orioles 4ish fWAR for their 18 million
Also  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 3:47 pm : link
worth noting the Orioles #3 starter before signing Cashner was... Gabriel Ynoa. So if Cashner is a paper weight so be it.
Justin Dunn  
spike : 2/15/2018 3:57 pm : link
what a bust first rounder
RE: Justin Dunn  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 4:09 pm : link
In comment 13833790 spike said:
Quote:
what a bust first rounder


Still time to turn it around but yeah his 2017 was remarkably bad. Huge 2018 for him.
Callaway preparing to name Plawecki the starter?  
Shecky : 2/15/2018 4:13 pm : link
Only kidding, but wonder why TDA is playing 2B
.  
DanMetroMan : 2/15/2018 5:09 pm : link
Toronto 1 year 8 Garcia, excellent move at that price
RE: .  
Jay on the Island : 2/15/2018 5:28 pm : link
In comment 13833887 DanMetroMan said:
Quote:
Toronto 1 year 8 Garcia, excellent move at that price

Absolutely, he is underrated and a very solid back of the rotation SP especially at that price.
That 2 mil for Reyes might now look like an overpay  
spike : 2/15/2018 6:01 pm : link
When we couldve kept Reynolds as the cheap util guy so we can pay for a #3/4 starter
Theres plenty of SP depth, no need to burn a roster spot  
Shecky : 2/15/2018 6:04 pm : link
Just need to go bottom fishing for some failed starters to stash in AAA for the year.
RE: Theres plenty of SP depth, no need to burn a roster spot  
ZGiants98 : 2/15/2018 6:08 pm : link
In comment 13833935 Shecky said:
Quote:
Just need to go bottom fishing for some failed starters to stash in AAA for the year.


100% agree at this point.
RE: Theres plenty of SP depth, no need to burn a roster spot  
PhiPsi125 : 2/15/2018 6:11 pm : link
In comment 13833935 Shecky said:
Quote:
Just need to go bottom fishing for some failed starters to stash in AAA for the year.


Lol, was there plenty of SP depth last season?
Let me ask this  
Shecky : 2/15/2018 6:27 pm : link
If 6 of our top 7 SPs go down. Who is out there you want the Mets to sign as depth today? Reality is, if what happened last year happens again, its a top ten draft pick again. I think that goes for any team, in any sport realistically.
Ill follow that up too  
Shecky : 2/15/2018 6:28 pm : link
Who do you want to see the Mets cut ties with today from the 40 man, in order to sign a player to a real contract? BBI whipping boy Matt Reynolds is already gone. So who gets cut?
Hector Santiago as an example  
Shecky : 2/15/2018 6:34 pm : link
Blew it and missed out. Sign a bunch of those types, if you can being the key. Sign 2 arms like that, a C like that, and a utility like that and call it a winter.
RE: Ill follow that up too  
arcarsenal : 2/15/2018 6:52 pm : link
In comment 13833958 Shecky said:
Quote:
Who do you want to see the Mets cut ties with today from the 40 man, in order to sign a player to a real contract? BBI whipping boy Matt Reynolds is already gone. So who gets cut?


Jamie Callahan?
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner