for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

We should consider trading Olivier Vernon.

Big_Pete : 2/23/2018 5:30 pm
Firstly let me say that I really like Olivier Vernon. He is a good player. But looking at the business side of things, I think we should consider trading Olivier Vernon and here is why.

I don't think it is sustainable long term to have Vernon and JPP; both are signed through 2020.
Cap Numbers:
Olivier Vernon: $17m in 2018, $19.5m in 2019 and $19.5m in 2020
Jason Pierre-Paul: $17.5m in 2018, $19.5m in 2019 and $17.5m in 2020

Given JPP's guaranteed money, Vernon is the only realistic candidate to move. I think either player could move to a Chandler Jones style role at OLB (while Vernon has experience, the Cardinals chased JPP strongly before bringing in Chandler Jones).

If we traded Vernon, we would get an additional $5m in cap room. The key however, will be clearing $19.5m in 2019 and 2020. That will help considerably in affording the future contracts of Beckham and Landon Collins and provide resources to help reload the roster to better suit what Shurmur and Bettcher want to do.

Given the limited availability of top end DEs in either free agency or the draft. I would expect that we could likely get a day 2 pick. The Jets got a second round and WR for Sheldon Richardson, I would expect Olivier Vernon would at least comparable value, particularly in a year where the top tier options in free agency and the draft are limited.

As far as teams picking up Vernon's contract, there is plenty of money around.
...  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 2/23/2018 5:37 pm : link
Doing so would be $12 million in dead cap...doable but very expensive.
Vernon is the highest paid de in the nfl  
Giantsfan79 : 2/23/2018 5:49 pm : link
No team is going to give anything of value for the privilege of paying him too. It would be easier for them to target a free agent or use a draft pick instead.
I hope you realize..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/23/2018 5:51 pm : link
that even if teams pick up Vernon's contract, we still take the cap hit.

There's really not a good reason to get rid of him, especially if he is healthy.
How about give the guy a breather  
UConn4523 : 2/23/2018 5:57 pm : link
before deciding to ship him out? He’s a very good player, and I like a lot of what he brings to the table. His replacement won’t be cheap either, remember that.
As for Beckham and Collins  
UConn4523 : 2/23/2018 5:59 pm : link
paying hem won’t be a problem. Eli will be off the books, we don’t need to start cutting other core players.
Bite the bullet in 2018  
mrvax : 2/23/2018 6:10 pm : link
and set sail to Eli & JPP in 2019. That alone saves $29M in cap money.

Deep issues like linebacker and Oline can't be resolved in just 1 year. By the 2019 season, the Giants should be in good shape.
No way to trade Vernon  
giantstock : 2/23/2018 6:14 pm : link
There is a lot of cap room NOW for players and if you don't sign Eli and cut Marshall you have a ton of cap room to not have to worry one bit about the Giants number 1 pass rusher.

You want to trade our number 1 pass rusher for a team that can't really rush the QB other than him?
That's not how the salary cap works.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 2/23/2018 6:14 pm : link
.
Do you have a trade partner in mind?  
SterlingArcher : 2/23/2018 6:19 pm : link
.
RE: ...  
Big_Pete : 2/23/2018 6:26 pm : link
In comment 13840877 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
Doing so would be $12 million in dead cap...doable but very expensive.


I agree, it still adds $5m this year. The key through is getting the contract off the books to enable future deals like OBJ, Landon Collins etc
They're not in any difficulty to pay those guys when it's time  
Ten Ton Hammer : 2/23/2018 6:31 pm : link
.
RE: Do you have a trade partner in mind?  
Big_Pete : 2/23/2018 6:35 pm : link
In comment 13840914 SterlingArcher said:
Quote:
.


I think Tampa Bay would be very interested, they need a DE badly and they have over $70m in camp space right now.

The Lions could be in play if Ansah leaves.

I could even see the Browns being interested if they want a quality bookend for Garrett. Ogbah and Nassib only got 7 sacks between them last year.
RE: As for Beckham and Collins  
Big_Pete : 2/23/2018 6:39 pm : link
In comment 13840904 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
paying hem won’t be a problem. Eli will be off the books, we don’t need to start cutting other core players.


While I understand your position, I think that is very premature.

Eli currently has a cap number of $23.2m in 2019. If the Giants do rebound in a big way, he may be hard to cut to trade. I am not convinced Eli is guaranteed to be done after this season.

The other factor of course is whether we have the next guy in the building and that he is ready to take over.
He'll be 40 in 2019.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 2/23/2018 6:48 pm : link
Regardless of what the team does outside of wild scenarios like winning another super bowl there's very little possibility that he remains with the team at anywhere near that salary.

And why is any team giving up anything for a very expensive DE that has frankly not produced anywhere near his contract number? That math doesn't add up. A team that needs a DE can get Vernon's production for a lot less money elsewhere.
Don’t we have to  
NikkiMac : 2/23/2018 6:55 pm : link
Pay OBJ this year because I don’t think he’s going to play for 8 million a year ?
RE: RE: As for Beckham and Collins  
UConn4523 : 2/23/2018 6:57 pm : link
In comment 13840927 Big_Pete said:
Quote:
In comment 13840904 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


paying hem won’t be a problem. Eli will be off the books, we don’t need to start cutting other core players.



While I understand your position, I think that is very premature.

Eli currently has a cap number of $23.2m in 2019. If the Giants do rebound in a big way, he may be hard to cut to trade. I am not convinced Eli is guaranteed to be done after this season.

The other factor of course is whether we have the next guy in the building and that he is ready to take over.


Why will Eli be hard to cut next year if we do not rebound? His cost doesn’t change based on our record...
other options  
Big_Pete : 2/23/2018 6:58 pm : link
There are other options available with Olivier Vernon.

We could cut him with the June 1 designation. That would clear up $13m in 2018, $15.5 in 2019 and 2020.

That kind of money would be enough to sign a free agent such as G Andrew Norwell for example.

I am not sure I am on board with this approach, but it could be something to consider.

I actually like Olivier Vernon quite a bit. However, given how much retooling we need to do and needs elsewhere, having the two of the top DE/OLB contracts in NFL is sustainable (only Von Miller ($19m) and Muhammad Wilkerson ($17.2m) average more than the $17m per year we are paying JPP and OV.
No  
Rjanyg : 2/23/2018 7:14 pm : link
Next question
RE: other options  
section125 : 2/23/2018 7:25 pm : link
In comment 13840941 Big_Pete said:
Quote:
There are other options available with Olivier Vernon.

We could cut him with the June 1 designation. That would clear up $13m in 2018, $15.5 in 2019 and 2020.

That kind of money would be enough to sign a free agent such as G Andrew Norwell for example.

I am not sure I am on board with this approach, but it could be something to consider.

I actually like Olivier Vernon quite a bit. However, given how much retooling we need to do and needs elsewhere, having the two of the top DE/OLB contracts in NFL is sustainable (only Von Miller ($19m) and Muhammad Wilkerson ($17.2m) average more than the $17m per year we are paying JPP and OV.


And so, what do they do for DEs? Pete I would not trade Vernon or JPP this year. Wait and see what happens this year. See what Bettcher devises for a defense. The Giants, according to Abrams, are not restricted in anyway on signing players..
He's played well the last two years  
djm : 2/23/2018 8:19 pm : link
Who plays de or 3-4 outside lb if the Giants trade Vernon? Never mind that the any trade is an impossibility...

Why? Oh because of his contract. Great... love these discussions.
lol why are you CUTTING Vernon?  
djm : 2/23/2018 8:21 pm : link
We have cap room!

I give up.
It's shit like this that prompts me to say  
djm : 2/23/2018 8:39 pm : link
That money and contracts have ruined much of the objective fan talk on player and team building debates. We just aren't objective anymore. Yes contracts are key to the current cap landscape but there's this misconception that you can't win with "overpaid" players. This is flat out false. Not only false but impossible. You don't want too many so called overpaid players on your roster but sometimes you just have to pay the FAs, your own or outsiders, big big bucks. You have to overpay at times. And some of these overpaid vets may not maintain that elite production that you initially paid for. You need to balance the overpaid guys with enough underpaid stars and hope your team breaks through during that window of opportunity.

The Giants will cut Vernon if and when they feel he can't play anymore or is a negative presence here. He's a good player by every metric. Forget his salary. The Giants will worry about that when the time comes.
Why are people acting..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/23/2018 8:52 pm : link
as if we have cap issues. We are in really good shape and the idea that trading Vernon "saves" $5M is semantics and also useless because we are in good shape with the cap.

Vernon and/or JPP are very affordable to get rid of next year if the team so chooses and if they perform decently, we can actually keep them at a reasonable cost.

We are not in cap trouble.
djm..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/23/2018 8:54 pm : link
to a certain extent this is true:

Quote:
It's shit like this that prompts me to say
djm : 8:39 pm : link : reply
That money and contracts have ruined much of the objective fan talk on player and team building debates.


What is more likely true is that posters like the OP just don't understand the cap all that well or people think the cap operates like it did in the 90's where constraints were real and problematic.

I think the OP is under the impression that trading Vernon gets his salary off the books, especially when he says it "saves" us $5M
Yeah that too  
djm : 2/23/2018 9:03 pm : link
But I just don't agree with the notion that an overpaid player is a bad player to have on a team. The overpaid thing can be an overstatement and quite often is. Even if that player isn't truly performing "up" to everyone's standards. That doesnt mean you can't win with that player or that subtracting that player from the team is a necessity. Vernon makes the Giants a better team. He's a talented player at an important position. So he makes x million more a year than he probably should, based on whatever, that over pay amount isn't that crippling on a team's cap.

And yes the op is completely impossible.

27 years old  
bigbluehoya : 2/23/2018 9:25 pm : link
I’d like to think he’s entering his prime.

If you trade him, you better be getting something good back, because you’re handing your trading partner a 3 year $45m contract with virtually no guarantees for a guy with pretty great upside. That’s not a salary dump.

Truth of the matter is that you don’t see a lot of trades like this. It may not be as stupid as some here would have you believe, but it all depends on the return.
Give him a chance with a new defense  
larryflower37 : 2/23/2018 11:01 pm : link
Before you give up on him.
Both JPP and Vernon are good 2 way ends that are hard to find
Vernon, snacks, Tomlinson, and JPP is a top D-line in the right defense.
RE: He'll be 40 in 2019.  
mrvax : 2/23/2018 11:17 pm : link
In comment 13840932 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
...


Eli is 37 now. Jan 3rd 2019 he turns 38.
Most important  
mrvax : 2/23/2018 11:21 pm : link
is that the Giants have Moss or Okwara playing well enough to give Vernon & JPP some rest. Too many snaps for both of them, 2 years in a row. These guys are beat!
You cut Vernon  
Doomster : 2/23/2018 11:46 pm : link
and save 5M.....but then you have to replace him....think you can replace him for 5M?

You keep him and make the decision on him and JPP next year, based on how they played this year...
RE: ...  
allstarjim : 2/24/2018 1:02 am : link
In comment 13840877 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
Doing so would be $12 million in dead cap...doable but very expensive.


/end thread
.  
arcarsenal : 2/24/2018 1:33 am : link
First off, you don't seem to understand the cap ramifications at all.

Second, Olivier Vernon isn't a scrub. The guy is really good. He plays the run and he can rush the passer.

He actually had a fantastic 2016 and he played with a fucked up hand for a good portion of that season.

He's an excellent football player. I have no idea why people are in a rush to get rid of him.

It makes no sense cap-wise or for the Giants in general.
The salary cap used to be part of the fun of evaluating off-season  
SB 42 and 46 and ? : 2/24/2018 1:42 am : link
roster moves. The fact that the cap was so mind-numbingly complex led to some of the heated debates at who should be kept and who should go.

But fans are going to have to used to the idea that the cap isn't what it used to be. The League over the last three seasons has raised the cap by about $10, $10 and $12 million dollars. They have told people to expect another $10 to $12 million dollar increase for 2018.

It's much harder to get into cap problems when the cap is increasing annually by so much. And the Giants start the offseason a healthy $24 million under, and with the player who consumes the most cap space by far, Eli, coming off the salary list if not this year then next year.

The team can always, if necessary, borrow against next year's cap, knowing that Eli's huge salary cap hit will be gone by 2019, presumably to be replaced by a rookie QB salary.

So the Giants see no problem with the cap and being able to sign the players whom they want to sign. Fans are going to have to reconcile themselves to the fact that the salary cap is just not the great ogre it used to be, or there's going to be a lot of wasted ink here over the next months.
Giants  
Dragon : 2/24/2018 8:02 am : link
Are a prime example of a CAP problem team but because some feel the CAP increases each year they are not. Look fact not fiction going forward OBJ is the next big contract that almost everyone agrees we have to sign. Other than that there is no one presently on the roster to include Collins worthy of a massive contract in the next two years.

Sure we can trade JPP, OV, DRC, Jenkins, Collins, Apple and Harrison some because they are overpaid others because in reality this team will not win in the next two years. These are the guys who repsent all the problems with big FA contracts that don’t work out for the most part along with young guys who will overvalue their skills. Yes dead money will be an issue but only for one year then you also get to out from the Eli big money June cut.

Or you can continue to hope for the great turnaround why because these guys are really good, they are who they showed you they are. The Giants have 24+ mil in CAP space the other five win teams or less for the most part have 60+ mil in CAP space. There is nothing wrong with admitting you made some mistakes the problems come when you continue to make the same mistakes.
I really..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/24/2018 8:15 am : link
have no fucking idea what was said in that last post.

We are not a cap problem team. We are not restricted from making moves to make the team better.

What we were was a poorly coached team with a GM who failed at good roster construction.

The cap is actually an area we are fine in, both for 2018 and going forward the next few years.

What was Philly’s cap hit for Sam Bradford?  
ThreePoints : 2/24/2018 9:51 am : link
For Kiko Alanso? For Bryan Maxwell?

All of those moves helped them improve, even if they did incur a cap hit. The Giants should do everything to improve the team long term, Ben if it causes a short term problem.
Vernon?  
bc4life : 2/24/2018 10:50 am : link
I'd rather wait and see what new DC can do with him. And get some depth so he and JPP don't have to take so many reps. Although their production wasn't as good as we would have liked - you don't trade away very good players unless you have to, IMO.
Guys  
Dragon : 2/24/2018 11:27 am : link
Why is it so hard for you all to see it’s time to move on from these guys asking them to change positions and learn a totally new defense at 27 years or older. If you can explain your plans to yourself and really believe it’s going to work this year or maybe next year your a special case.

Start the rebuild you have a reason not to expect much but if you keep these same guys and get the same results as this year is that a good strategy? This team is broken don’t try patching holes and dreaming oh we are good now that’s BS.
FatMan in Charlotte  
Dragon : 2/24/2018 11:35 am : link
When you have trash you eventually have to throw it out that’s what we have on defense. Don’t get fooled by the hype or belief they had a bad year they 98% of them just totally sucked not in one game but almost all of them that’s hard to hide your true abilities. If I can get future considerations for most of them I’m fine with that but they all need to go.
I don't think you know what a rebuild is..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 2/24/2018 11:46 am : link
Quote:
Sure we can trade JPP, OV, DRC, Jenkins, Collins, Apple and Harrison some because they are overpaid others because in reality this team will not win in the next two years


That isn't "taking out the trash", that is gutting your defense, including some young and high-performing players.

It isn't hard to grasp - we aren't in cap trouble. We have a new coach and GM to lead prudent roster turnover, and we have a #2 pick that gives us a lot of options.

I think many are stuck in the 90's when teams took a few years to rebuild and the salary cap was a problem.

In the 90's, there was an average of 34% turnover year to year in the playoffs. Since 2000, the playoffs year to year have had a 53% turnover.

Rebuilds are just a figment of imagination anymore.
RE: RE: other options  
Big_Pete : 2/24/2018 5:19 pm : link
In comment 13840957 section125 said:
Quote:
In comment 13840941 Big_Pete said:


Quote:


There are other options available with Olivier Vernon.

We could cut him with the June 1 designation. That would clear up $13m in 2018, $15.5 in 2019 and 2020.

That kind of money would be enough to sign a free agent such as G Andrew Norwell for example.

I am not sure I am on board with this approach, but it could be something to consider.

I actually like Olivier Vernon quite a bit. However, given how much retooling we need to do and needs elsewhere, having the two of the top DE/OLB contracts in NFL is sustainable (only Von Miller ($19m) and Muhammad Wilkerson ($17.2m) average more than the $17m per year we are paying JPP and OV.



And so, what do they do for DEs? Pete I would not trade Vernon or JPP this year. Wait and see what happens this year. See what Bettcher devises for a defense. The Giants, according to Abrams, are not restricted in anyway on signing players..


Good point. Looking at what the Cardinals did is a good option. The scheme Bettcher used most last year was a 2-4-5.

We are more likely to move to more of a 3-4 as our 'base'defence

Bettcher didn't use 4-3 fronts much.


My thinking for the 3-4 is move JPP and Avery Moss to OLB. Resign Kennard as the other OLB and we will bring in someone else, maybe a Alex Okafor or someone in the draft (there are a few good 3-4 OLB options), perhaps someone like a Harold Landry could be on the radar..

As a 3-4 DE we have guys like Okwara, Williams who may be ok. We could also look at a free agent like DaQuan Jones or maybe someone like Dashawn Hand in the draft.

Freeing up cap space does give us more flexibility to upgrade our ILBs in free agency if we choose (which is a big priority this off-season imho). Bettcher prefers fast athletic ILBs.

I am not saying we should our shouldn't. It really is all about how we manage resources to get the best bang for buck. I don't think we should be wary of restructuring our roster just because 'he is a good player'. Vernon is a good player whom I like, but I do think it should be on the table.
Time to ship the overpaid  
I love liverwurst : 2/24/2018 6:05 pm : link
underperforming kneeler out of town. Agreed
Why  
BigBluesman : 2/25/2018 2:20 pm : link
would we trade one of our best players? I'm sure for many of you its because he kneels. In my opinion, if the Giants traded/cut Vernon, and no one kneeled for the Giants this season (if the trend continues through the league otherwise), that might seriously prompt me to withdraw my fandom. It's pretty clear that many Giants fans are reactionary to the extreme and don't respect the rights of African-Americans to peacefully protest their being shot down in the streets with impunity. Were the ownership to agree, and force Vernon out for this reason, you can bet your ass I would find another team.
RE: It's shit like this that prompts me to say  
HomerJones45 : 2/25/2018 2:37 pm : link
In comment 13840994 djm said:
Quote:
That money and contracts have ruined much of the objective fan talk on player and team building debates. We just aren't objective anymore. Yes contracts are key to the current cap landscape but there's this misconception that you can't win with "overpaid" players. This is flat out false. Not only false but impossible. You don't want too many so called overpaid players on your roster but sometimes you just have to pay the FAs, your own or outsiders, big big bucks. You have to overpay at times. And some of these overpaid vets may not maintain that elite production that you initially paid for. You need to balance the overpaid guys with enough underpaid stars and hope your team breaks through during that window of opportunity.

The Giants will cut Vernon if and when they feel he can't play anymore or is a negative presence here. He's a good player by every metric. Forget his salary. The Giants will worry about that when the time comes.
+1 Too many posters act like its their money being spent.
Back to the Corner