for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

The writing is on the wall

Breeze_94 : 3/7/2018 5:35 pm
The Ogletree trade is just another sign, IMO, that the Giants are not taking a QB 2nd overall. Instead, they are focusing on putting the best possible roster around Eli Manning.

Teams who are taking a young QB usually don't trade draft picks to acquire players who are in the prime of their career. This is a win-now move, and I feel like the #2 pick will also be a win-now move rather than taking a rookie QB who is going to sit on the bench.

IMO, the pick is either going to be Barkley, Chubb, or possibly a trade down to 5 or 6 to grab Nelson, who likely won't come off the board until the Bucs pick otherwise.

I'm sure some will say this is an overreaction, but everything being reported by the media and said by the Giants brass has been that they won't take a QB.

Now, they move a 32 year old CB to FS instead of getting rid of him to clear cap space to sign younger players, and they trade 2 draft picks for a 26 year old LB who can help them immediately.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
Jon in NYC : 3/7/2018 5:37 pm : link
They'd get an absolute haul.
This would  
ryanmkeane : 3/7/2018 5:38 pm : link
be a solid trade regardless of what they do in round 1
RE: Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
Breeze_94 : 3/7/2018 5:38 pm : link
In comment 13853937 Jon in NYC said:
Quote:
They'd get an absolute haul.


Agreed but I think it will be less likely if the Norwell rumors turn out to be true.

Then, I think it comes down to Barkley or Bradley Chubb.

Pretty sure we can rule out a trade down for Edmunds/Roquan
Post quotes of the Giants brass saying they wont take a qb.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/7/2018 5:39 pm : link
This would be news.

ok  
mdthedream : 3/7/2018 5:39 pm : link
reality is the Giants where not as bad as they played last year. They lost the entire wr core. The oline will be fixed this year and the defense was not that bad. Hell people where saying the Giants would be in the Superbowl.
RE: Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
ryanmkeane : 3/7/2018 5:39 pm : link
In comment 13853937 Jon in NYC said:
Quote:
They'd get an absolute haul.

I think Denver at 5 is a real opportunity. No chance we trade with the Jets
Would agree  
Emil : 3/7/2018 5:39 pm : link
That this makes the prospect of a trade more likely.
RE: RE: Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
Jon in NYC : 3/7/2018 5:40 pm : link
In comment 13853942 Breeze_94 said:
Quote:
In comment 13853937 Jon in NYC said:


Quote:


They'd get an absolute haul.



Agreed but I think it will be less likely if the Norwell rumors turn out to be true.

Then, I think it comes down to Barkley or Bradley Chubb.

Pretty sure we can rule out a trade down for Edmunds/Roquan


They need probably 3 new starters on the line. Nelson and Norwell could play together.
RE: Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
The 12th Man : 3/7/2018 5:42 pm : link
In comment 13853937 Jon in NYC said:
Quote:
They'd get an absolute haul.


I would not trade back to 6. I would trade back to 4th then trade back to 6th after that. You could get a kings ransom. and be ready to rebuild this team and compete this year.
If we really think we can win now  
Essex : 3/7/2018 5:44 pm : link
there are a lot of deluded people in our front office. We were 3-13. Does this move make our team better? Yes, it sure does. Can the Giants do anything in the off season other than make us fringe playoff contenders??? Probably not. I can’t imagine any general manager in their right mind can think they could fix this that quickly. In that context, the move is a waste.
DG  
Canton : 3/7/2018 5:44 pm : link
I trades down and gets a haul of picks , we grab Nelson, than trade back up to grab Lamar Jackson. Then get another OL, RB. and DB.
Would be brilliant  
Dave in Hoboken : 3/7/2018 5:44 pm : link
considering they're not winning a championship this year.
Doesn't anyone think  
Sy'56 : 3/7/2018 5:45 pm : link
IND is going to go hard after Nelson?
RE: RE: RE: Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
Andy in Boston : 3/7/2018 5:46 pm : link
In comment 13853951 Jon in NYC said:
Quote:
In comment 13853942 Breeze_94 said:


Quote:


In comment 13853937 Jon in NYC said:



Agreed - so many unknowns though. Cleveland could
Take Nelson at 4 - then who would we draft ?


Quote:


They'd get an absolute haul.



Agreed but I think it will be less likely if the Norwell rumors turn out to be true.

Then, I think it comes down to Barkley or Bradley Chubb.

Pretty sure we can rule out a trade down for Edmunds/Roquan



They need probably 3 new starters on the line. Nelson and Norwell could play together.
RE: Post quotes of the Giants brass saying they wont take a qb.  
Breeze_94 : 3/7/2018 5:46 pm : link
In comment 13853945 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
This would be news.


Sorry I should have phrased that better- but everything they've said has been hinting towards keeping Eli and building around him/not taking a QB.

-We believe Eli has years left
-That game vs. Philly was not a mirage
-We want to draft a hall of fame caliber player at #2
-We are going to take the best player available
-We graded Davis Webb out highly, we liked him in the 2017 NFL draft
RE: Doesn't anyone think  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/7/2018 5:47 pm : link
In comment 13853966 Sy'56 said:
Quote:
IND is going to go hard after Nelson?


The question is do they like Nelson enough to sacrifice their ability to add to their roster. I don't think of the colts as an offensive lineman away from being fixed.
RE: Doesn't anyone think  
Breeze_94 : 3/7/2018 5:47 pm : link
In comment 13853966 Sy'56 said:
Quote:
IND is going to go hard after Nelson?


I've heard a ton of people saying Chubb is the guy they should draft
RE: RE: Post quotes of the Giants brass saying they wont take a qb.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/7/2018 5:48 pm : link
In comment 13853970 Breeze_94 said:
Quote:
In comment 13853945 Ten Ton Hammer said:


Quote:


This would be news.




Sorry I should have phrased that better- but everything they've said has been hinting towards keeping Eli and building around him/not taking a QB.

-We believe Eli has years left
-That game vs. Philly was not a mirage
-We want to draft a hall of fame caliber player at #2
-We are going to take the best player available
-We graded Davis Webb out highly, we liked him in the 2017 NFL draft


If you believe what any team is talking about in their press conferences around draft and free agency.

Which, I think is kind of a mistake. The media also reported that there was going to be an effort to hide their intentions more effectively.
This has to be a joke  
BigBlueDownTheShore : 3/7/2018 5:49 pm : link
Ogletree was literally one of the worst LBs in the league last year. He ranked 830 out of 856 players.

Now, could he play better in a different scheme. Hells yes, but this doesn’t scream the writings on the wall.
Everything being reported in media  
twostepgiants : 3/7/2018 5:50 pm : link
So your position is that the Giants have tipped their hand that they won't
draft QB

And you think this means Barkley, trade down or Nelson/Chubb

Well. Woundnt they have devalued their trade position by ruling out QB in the media? The Jets & Broncos could sit tight at 6 guaranteed to get 1 of tbe 4 and Giants passing and Browns taking only 1?

Wouldnt they habe also tipped off Browns to take Barkley at 1?

Wouldnt they be hurting 2 of their potential moves?

OR maybe media is clueless as they were on HC who had Wilks and then Patricia as the guy?
RE: Everything being reported in media  
Breeze_94 : 3/7/2018 5:54 pm : link
In comment 13853980 twostepgiants said:
Quote:
So your position is that the Giants have tipped their hand that they won't
draft QB

And you think this means Barkley, trade down or Nelson/Chubb

Well. Woundnt they have devalued their trade position by ruling out QB in the media? The Jets & Broncos could sit tight at 6 guaranteed to get 1 of tbe 4 and Giants passing and Browns taking only 1?

Wouldnt they habe also tipped off Browns to take Barkley at 1?

Wouldnt they be hurting 2 of their potential moves?

OR maybe media is clueless as they were on HC who had Wilks and then Patricia as the guy?


This is just my feeling- I really don't see a QB at #2 as of now. Maybe they really like Darnold- and if he falls past the Browns they take him, but if I were a betting man I'd wager that they go in another direction other than QB with the 2nd pick
Lol.  
UberAlias : 3/7/2018 5:58 pm : link
Yep. If they were going QB they’d be sitting in their hands not trying to improve the roster with talented young players. You just can’t make this shit up.
RE: RE: Doesn't anyone think  
AcidTest : 3/7/2018 5:58 pm : link
In comment 13853971 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
In comment 13853966 Sy'56 said:


Quote:


IND is going to go hard after Nelson?



The question is do they like Nelson enough to sacrifice their ability to add to their roster. I don't think of the colts as an offensive lineman away from being fixed.


Agreed. I also don't think this trade will affect what we do in the draft. It was just about getting a good player at a position of need at a very fair price.
Confirmation bias strikes again!  
Milton : 3/7/2018 6:03 pm : link
Let me guess, Breeze_94, you don't think the Giants should draft a QB with the #2 overall pick.
There are just  
mrvax : 3/7/2018 6:04 pm : link
so many damn possibilities. No one knows what the Giants will do in round 1. Man, I'm anxious about this draft.
Sorry  
jeff57 : 3/7/2018 6:08 pm : link
Looked at the wall. Didn’t see any writing on it.
Why can't this be the senario...  
bw in dc : 3/7/2018 6:11 pm : link
The Rams called Jints Central, because they know their LBs are a weakness, offer the Olgetree package.

DG says, "I like proven commodities for a mid-round and late round pick, John", and Jints Central pulls the trigger. Probably sees a younger Thomas Davis...

So I'm not sure there is a win now approach underneath this...I think there is an add-more-talent approach...
RE: Why can't this be the senario...  
mrvax : 3/7/2018 6:13 pm : link
In comment 13854021 bw in dc said:
Quote:
The Rams called Jints Central, because they know their LBs are a weakness, offer the Olgetree package.

DG says, "I like proven commodities for a mid-round and late round pick, John", and Jints Central pulls the trigger. Probably sees a younger Thomas Davis...

So I'm not sure there is a win now approach underneath this...I think there is an add-more-talent approach...


This seems likely to me.
Thank god there are still people here like BW and Uber  
Dave on the UWS : 3/7/2018 6:23 pm : link
who have a brain. This move has NOTHING to do with pick #2. It's about improving the roster- acquiring talent any way possible. This is not that complicated!
RE: ok  
NYSports1 : 3/7/2018 6:25 pm : link
In comment 13853946 mdthedream said:
Quote:
reality is the Giants where not as bad as they played last year. They lost the entire wr core. The oline will be fixed this year and the defense was not that bad. Hell people where saying the Giants would be in the Superbowl.


Was I dreaming or were the Giants not 0-5 with the full roster healthy? This is a terrible team with an old aging qb and we will regret not taking a qb when for the next decade we are scrambling looking for qb
RE: RE: Post quotes of the Giants brass saying they wont take a qb.  
NYSports1 : 3/7/2018 6:27 pm : link
In comment 13853970 Breeze_94 said:
Quote:
In comment 13853945 Ten Ton Hammer said:


Quote:


This would be news.




Sorry I should have phrased that better- but everything they've said has been hinting towards keeping Eli and building around him/not taking a QB.

-We believe Eli has years left
-That game vs. Philly was not a mirage
-We want to draft a hall of fame caliber player at #2
-We are going to take the best player available
-We graded Davis Webb out highly, we liked him in the 2017 NFL draft


The game vs Philly was not a mirage? Did DG watch the tape of the following game in AZ? Or we only count games where eli has a lot of yards? Eli in that game had 68 passing yards late in the 4th quarter vs a terrible AZ team
You'd have to be drinking some good stuff to think those games against  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/7/2018 6:29 pm : link
Philly were the "real Eli" and the other 14 games didn't have a bearing.
RE: Thank god there are still people here like BW and Uber  
mfsd : 3/7/2018 6:31 pm : link
In comment 13854035 Dave on the UWS said:
Quote:
who have a brain. This move has NOTHING to do with pick #2. It's about improving the roster- acquiring talent any way possible. This is not that complicated!


+2. I don't see how this telegraphs anything else the Giants do in FA or the draft. Except we now have one less whole to fill
RE: RE: Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
Eman11 : 3/7/2018 6:31 pm : link
In comment 13853942 Breeze_94 said:
Quote:
In comment 13853937 Jon in NYC said:


Quote:


They'd get an absolute haul.



Agreed but I think it will be less likely if the Norwell rumors turn out to be true.

Then, I think it comes down to Barkley or Bradley Chubb.

Pretty sure we can rule out a trade down for Edmunds/Roquan


Agreed. I don't think they draft Nelson if they sign Norwell.

I think it's Barkley at 2 if he's there but if he's gone, I think a trade back to either 4 or 5 and they'd go Fitzpatrick if they sign Norwell, Nelson if they don't.
I think you are jumping to conclusions  
Keith : 3/7/2018 6:36 pm : link
a bit here.
RE: Would be brilliant  
djm : 3/7/2018 6:36 pm : link
In comment 13853962 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:
considering they're not winning a championship this year.


Right... just like Philly would never win a title ever let alone in 2017.

Save me this crap. Teams surprise all the time. literally... all the time. Fans always say never and then quietly go away when never actually happens.
RE: RE: Would be brilliant  
NYSports1 : 3/7/2018 6:37 pm : link
In comment 13854059 djm said:
Quote:
In comment 13853962 Dave in Hoboken said:


Quote:


considering they're not winning a championship this year.



Right... just like Philly would never win a title ever let alone in 2017.

Save me this crap. Teams surprise all the time. literally... all the time. Fans always say never and then quietly go away when never actually happens.


Sorry to break it to you but the Giants are not winning another SB with Eli at qb....Good luck thinking that this will happen....unless the Giants build a HOF team around him and ask him to hand the ball off....ALA PEYTON Manning last year...How are those Broncos doing now?
RE: Confirmation bias strikes again!  
Breeze_94 : 3/7/2018 6:39 pm : link
In comment 13854011 Milton said:
Quote:
Let me guess, Breeze_94, you don't think the Giants should draft a QB with the #2 overall pick.


I actually think they should if there is a guy they really like and believe in
....  
djm : 3/7/2018 6:39 pm : link
I'm not sure why a relatively minor trade for a decent LB indicates anything other than the Giants wanted to add a LB.

this trade doesn't indicate some kind of long term or short term plan. Calm down lol.
RE: RE: ok  
lax counsel : 3/7/2018 6:40 pm : link
In comment 13854042 NYSports1 said:
Quote:
In comment 13853946 mdthedream said:


Quote:


reality is the Giants where not as bad as they played last year. They lost the entire wr core. The oline will be fixed this year and the defense was not that bad. Hell people where saying the Giants would be in the Superbowl.



Was I dreaming or were the Giants not 0-5 with the full roster healthy? This is a terrible team with an old aging qb and we will regret not taking a qb when for the next decade we are scrambling looking for qb


Agreed. I am extremely skeptical of this franchise. Collectively, this team has not made many good decisions since 2012. Why are we all giving them the benefit of the doubt right now? They should have to endear themselves back to us. To start, the sham GM search should tip us all off that this is more business as usual for this team. They've made the playoffs, what, twice in the past 10 years?

Building around a 37 year old declining qb will set this franchise back far more than being wrong on a qb at 2. I hope that this is not the mind set, because we could end up in a endless loop of a qb search, similar to post Simms.
RE: RE: RE: Would be brilliant  
djm : 3/7/2018 6:40 pm : link
In comment 13854063 NYSports1 said:
Quote:
In comment 13854059 djm said:


Quote:


In comment 13853962 Dave in Hoboken said:


Quote:


considering they're not winning a championship this year.



Right... just like Philly would never win a title ever let alone in 2017.

Save me this crap. Teams surprise all the time. literally... all the time. Fans always say never and then quietly go away when never actually happens.



Sorry to break it to you but the Giants are not winning another SB with Eli at qb....Good luck thinking that this will happen....unless the Giants build a HOF team around him and ask him to hand the ball off....ALA PEYTON Manning last year...How are those Broncos doing now?


What?
Maybe I would see your point  
Keith : 3/7/2018 6:47 pm : link
if Ogletree was a 32 year old LB. We just traded for a young LB that can improve and make us better in the short and long term.
RE: Maybe I would see your point  
djm : 3/7/2018 6:51 pm : link
In comment 13854086 Keith said:
Quote:
if Ogletree was a 32 year old LB. We just traded for a young LB that can improve and make us better in the short and long term.


No. This is clearly a sign that the Giants are building around Eli. And they have no shot with Eli by the way have you seen the broncos lately??

Ps the broncos did actually win a super bowl with a broken down Peyton. Yeah.
LOL  
Peppers : 3/7/2018 6:56 pm : link
NYG trades for a 26 year old LB..

"We're not drafting a QB" -- Barkley fan

RE: Would be thrilled with a trade down to 6 for Nelson.  
WillVAB : 3/7/2018 6:56 pm : link
In comment 13853937 Jon in NYC said:
Quote:
They'd get an absolute haul.


This is what I want, or Chubb at 6. Looks like a safe bet one or the other would be available.

The extra 2’s would let the Giants hit on value at need spots.
Heres what this move is  
twostepgiants : 3/7/2018 6:59 pm : link
Its the "Boss CEO" move which says you come in and make immediate changes in tbe areas of biggest weakness. It breds confidence in new leadership.

The Reese regime left OL and LB completely neglected to the noticement of absoluteky everyone and their brother.

The Boss CEO move is to come in and immediately address OL and LB

Norwell will be the FA move and they went trade route on LB
To follow up  
twostepgiants : 3/7/2018 7:03 pm : link
Watch the reputation of Gettleman when he he has answered OL and LB with Norwell and Ogletree. 2 mid-20s guys locked up long term. And he will have it done by mid-March.
If the Giants tipped their hand shame on them!  
Simms11 : 3/7/2018 7:12 pm : link
I think DG is better then that. We will have no leverage for a trade down if teams know we don’t want one of the coveted QBs.
I would be willing to bet that DG  
Dave on the UWS : 3/7/2018 7:23 pm : link
is still thinking about what he would like to do with the 2nd pick. This move is about improving the roster not whether to pick a QB or not.
I’m pretty sure your OP is word for word taken  
Brown Recluse : 3/7/2018 7:26 pm : link
from something I read some place else.

Who did you plagiarize?
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner