for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Jordan Raanan: Giants in a good spot

GFAN52 : 3/20/2018 10:30 am
Jordan Raanan
& #8207;
Verified account

@JordanRaanan
2m2 minutes ago
More
Jordan Raanan Retweeted Rich Cimini
The #Giants are in a good spot. Lots of flexibility.
Link - ( New Window )
Thanks for the great insight, Jordan  
Ira : 3/20/2018 10:31 am : link
.
RE: Thanks for the great insight, Jordan  
Essex : 3/20/2018 10:33 am : link
In comment 13875596 Ira said:
Quote:
.


hahahahah
Ok  
jvm52106 : 3/20/2018 10:34 am : link
I have to admit while this board can be overly critical of beat guys etc., this comes off as nothing more than I am required to tweet something every hour. That couldn't possibly have been a more obvious statement..
I bet you could find more Giants news at the Tick Tock diner  
dep026 : 3/20/2018 10:34 am : link
than you can from Jordan.
that's the entire thing?  
Rocky369 : 3/20/2018 10:34 am : link
assumed the link was to an article at least.
Agree ....  
Beer Man : 3/20/2018 10:35 am : link
The Jets trade puts them into an even better position. Every team wanting a QB know that the three out of the top four picks could be QB. It even causes the Browns to pause; if they were thinking Barkley at 1 and the QB they want at 4, they now know the QB they want could be gone by 4. The next month and a half is going to be interesting.
Achieved primary goal  
mfsd : 3/20/2018 10:35 am : link
Got someone to post this as news on BBI. Mission accomplished.
RE: Agree ....  
Brown Recluse : 3/20/2018 10:36 am : link
In comment 13875605 Beer Man said:
Quote:
The next month and a half is going to be interesting.


Its going to be really long and boring.
Hahaha  
UConn4523 : 3/20/2018 10:36 am : link
groundbreaking
To be fair, Jordan is just retweeting  
bigbluescot : 3/20/2018 11:00 am : link
Rich Cimini's tweet of an article about the top six.

http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/272042/where-top-six-in-nfl-draft-stand-whos-taking-qbs-or-could-trade-down
Didnt someone else say they were in a bad situation?  
superspynyg : 3/20/2018 11:00 am : link
Who to believe??

oh wait. 2nd pick...tons of options...We are in a GREAT spot!
#2 is nice, but the best spot in the draft (barring a trade)  
Bill L : 3/20/2018 11:23 am : link
is #32. Give me that every year and I will be happy
No way  
Mr. Nickels : 3/20/2018 12:24 pm : link
RE: Achieved primary goal  
JordanRaanan : 3/20/2018 4:13 pm : link
In comment 13875606 mfsd said:
Quote:
Got someone to post this as news on BBI. Mission accomplished.


Geez, it's called teasing a story. Apparently that is grounds for BBI insults these days. Tough crowd.
Jordan,  
Keith : 3/20/2018 4:17 pm : link
I wouldn't waste your time buddy.
RE: Jordan,  
bradshaw44 : 3/20/2018 4:19 pm : link
In comment 13876375 Keith said:
Quote:
I wouldn't waste your time buddy.


+1. Do not engage.
RE: RE: Jordan,  
section125 : 3/20/2018 4:27 pm : link
In comment 13876378 bradshaw44 said:
Quote:
In comment 13876375 Keith said:


Quote:


I wouldn't waste your time buddy.



+1. Do not engage.


+2. just say no
Always appreciate Mr. R's contributions  
shyster : 3/20/2018 4:29 pm : link
but, rather than repeating the platitude, I'd like to see a beat reporter take seriously the notion that the Jets' move actually cost NYG a lot of flexibility.

#5/#6 were the sweet spots for NYG to trade down and get a blue-chipper (in fact, very possibly get the non-QB they wanted anyway), plus a big premium of draft picks.

Now #6 is gone, and Broncos at #5 with Keenum are very possibly not desperate at all, and willing to wait to see what falls into their lap.

Sure, Bills want to, but down to #12 in this draft is very different.
RE: Always appreciate Mr. R's contributions  
Giantfan in skinland : 3/20/2018 5:00 pm : link
In comment 13876391 shyster said:
Quote:
but, rather than repeating the platitude, I'd like to see a beat reporter take seriously the notion that the Jets' move actually cost NYG a lot of flexibility.

#5/#6 were the sweet spots for NYG to trade down and get a blue-chipper (in fact, very possibly get the non-QB they wanted anyway), plus a big premium of draft picks.

Now #6 is gone, and Broncos at #5 with Keenum are very possibly not desperate at all, and willing to wait to see what falls into their lap.

Sure, Bills want to, but down to #12 in this draft is very different.


To the extent the Broncos were/are going to make a deal, the Jets moving in front of them makes them more likely...not less. Presumably, there will now be three QBs off the board instead of two at pick 5...so if they want one of them, they will need to move up too.

My suspicion is that the Giants were not interested in the deal the Jets offered. I find it very hard to accept that the Jets wouldn't have put out some feelers to their co-tenant to see if they move up to 2. Why would any team just accept the third choice instead of the second without even inquiring on the cost difference (if any)?
Jordan  
Joey in VA : 3/20/2018 5:15 pm : link
Have you not learned that 99% of this place is full of people who would turn and run if they saw a football coming at them? There is very little understanding of this game and how the media works and it keeps getting worse. You being bashed by fuckwits is actually a good sign.
RE: RE: Achieved primary goal  
NoGainDayne : 3/20/2018 5:20 pm : link
In comment 13876368 JordanRaanan said:
Quote:
In comment 13875606 mfsd said:


Quote:


Got someone to post this as news on BBI. Mission accomplished.



Geez, it's called teasing a story. Apparently that is grounds for BBI insults these days. Tough crowd.


Thanks for stopping by. While you are here maybe we can learn a little instead of bashing someone for no reason with some insight into the organization.

Do you get the feeling that the information you are getting RE: the draft is more controlled from the top vs. leaked? From my perspective there seems to be a distinct disinformation campaign in regards to who the pick will be whereas in prior years I got the sense that beat writers were getting the actual opinions of those in the organization.

Appreciate any info you can on this, very interesting off-season!
The man  
old man : 3/20/2018 6:05 pm : link
Earns his paycheck doesn't he?
I hope he supports my theory that the sky is blue.
RE: RE: Achieved primary goal  
mfsd : 3/20/2018 6:13 pm : link
In comment 13876368 JordanRaanan said:
Quote:
In comment 13875606 mfsd said:


Quote:


Got someone to post this as news on BBI. Mission accomplished.



Geez, it's called teasing a story. Apparently that is grounds for BBI insults these days. Tough crowd.


You took what I posted as an insult? Come on man, you’ve usually got thicker skin than that. I’ve always been one of your fans on this site, just breaking balls
RE: RE: Always appreciate Mr. R's contributions  
shyster : 3/20/2018 6:38 pm : link
In comment 13876414 Giantfan in skinland said:
Quote:
In comment 13876391 shyster said:


Quote:


but, rather than repeating the platitude, I'd like to see a beat reporter take seriously the notion that the Jets' move actually cost NYG a lot of flexibility.

#5/#6 were the sweet spots for NYG to trade down and get a blue-chipper (in fact, very possibly get the non-QB they wanted anyway), plus a big premium of draft picks.

Now #6 is gone, and Broncos at #5 with Keenum are very possibly not desperate at all, and willing to wait to see what falls into their lap.

Sure, Bills want to, but down to #12 in this draft is very different.



To the extent the Broncos were/are going to make a deal, the Jets moving in front of them makes them more likely...not less. Presumably, there will now be three QBs off the board instead of two at pick 5...so if they want one of them, they will need to move up too.

My suspicion is that the Giants were not interested in the deal the Jets offered. I find it very hard to accept that the Jets wouldn't have put out some feelers to their co-tenant to see if they move up to 2. Why would any team just accept the third choice instead of the second without even inquiring on the cost difference (if any)?


The point about the Broncos is that the Keenum acquisition itself may have taken the edge off their desperation. So what looked like a potential landing spot at #5 (before FA) may be gone. And now the Jets at #6 are gone.

Of course the Jets would have felt out the Giants. And the Giants evidently decided not to go for it. But that decision has consequences.
The Giants may be in a good spot  
JohnF : 3/20/2018 6:49 pm : link
but #32 is a much better spot!
Somewhere in America...  
BamaBlue : 3/20/2018 8:08 pm : link
Ralph Vacchiano is counting belly button lint and thinking... thinking of a way to get a more enlightening Tweet on the wire.
Case Keenum is 30 years old and just had his first decent season  
Ten Ton Hammer : 3/20/2018 8:34 pm : link
Why would anyone think signing him should impact the Broncos draft plans? If it does that organization is headed for trouble.
The chances of the Giants trading down  
5BowlsSoon : 3/20/2018 8:43 pm : link
Are very very small......I believe. We normally just don’t do that kind of stuff. Usually very conservative KISS approach....
RE: Case Keenum is 30 years old and just had his first decent season  
shyster : 3/20/2018 8:53 pm : link
In comment 13876634 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
Why would anyone think signing him should impact the Broncos draft plans? If it does that organization is headed for trouble.


It's a tipping factor. The vibe is that Elway was not hot to give up the farm in the first place for the #2 spot. Broncos don't have the two seconds the Jets had, so they would have to strip their draft this year plus a first next year. There may be four QBs in this draft Denver likes, one way or the other.

Pinpointing the cause is less important than the bottom line that Giants may very well not get an offer from DEN as good as what NYJ gave up.

RE: The chances of the Giants trading down  
santacruzom : 3/21/2018 1:15 am : link
In comment 13876643 5BowlsSoon said:
Quote:
Are very very small......I believe. We normally just don’t do that kind of stuff. Usually very conservative KISS approach....


Keep it stupid, stupid?
Back to the Corner