It makes no sense for them not to draft the QB they want. If they pass on a QB, the best they could do is 3rd choice and if they do that it shows they don't know what they are doing. The Bills had Taylor and gave up on him because he is not a top tier QB. The Browns then gave up on Kiser, so they have to take a QB.
They don't need more picks, they need to make the right picks. Pick the best QB at 1, maybe the Giants take Barkley but that will still leaves them Chubb or Nelson. Why would they gamble? If you are taking a QB in the 1st round you pick the one you like the most at 1 and don't look back. Picking at 4 could potentially leave them the 4th best QB and they have been there before. It's not out of the question they land the top QB and still have their choice of Barkley, Nelson and Chubb at 4.
I'm on record as saying I would take the QB. But I don't think the Giants are going to do that. I think they want Barkley and if he is isn't there, they will draft Chubb or Nelson.
Have you asked the coaches or scouts or any professional in any team what they think of Barkley? None of us know what these people think about Barkley or anybody.
We have already heard from numerous ones of what they think of him.
Right now they are guaranteed either any QB they want + Barkley/Chubb (one or both will be there at #4) or Barkley #1 and still have one of the top 3 QBs. The second scenario is less likely after the Jets traded up to 3. Trading back,
This may be off the wall but I have a sneaky suspicion that the Jets are going to take Barkley after Darnold and Rosen go 1 and 2 ..... why did they acquire Teddy Bridgewater ?
They already have the 4th pick and a ton of picks in the draft. They need a QB - why would they just not draft their guy. They are the only team that can not be boxed out on a choice.
Maybe the reason everyone is talking up Barclay to the Giants (Kim Jones, etc.) is really because they are hoping the Browns will take the bait and pick Barclay at #1 knowing they can still getting one of the top 3 QBs at #4 while the Giants get the guy they really want (Darnold). Don't forget, we're talking about the Browns.
Maybe the reason everyone is talking up Barclay to the Giants (Kim Jones, etc.) is really because they are hoping the Browns will take the bait and pick Barclay at #1 knowing they can still getting one of the top 3 QBs at #4 while the Giants get the guy they really want (Darnold). Don't forget, we're talking about the Browns.
Not the same Browns.. completely different GM and personnel department..
...that would be him if he started making all these crazy deals with Cleveland's top picks. The only question is who is the "Jeff Carson" GM out there to enable him?
Last time the Browns had the first pick in a quarterback Rich draft Â
They don't need more picks, they need to make the right picks. Pick the best QB at 1, maybe the Giants take Barkley but that will still leaves them Chubb or Nelson. Why would they gamble? If you are taking a QB in the 1st round you pick the one you like the most at 1 and don't look back. Picking at 4 could potentially leave them the 4th best QB and they have been there before. It's not out of the question they land the top QB and still have their choice of Barkley, Nelson and Chubb at 4.
We have already heard from numerous ones of what they think of him.
Not Taking the top pick, especially at 1 for the last 32, would be Cowardly and Incompetent
Not the same Browns.. completely different GM and personnel department..