for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

A Gettleman rebuild? : Who does not fit - trade for pick?

Gothamist : 3/23/2018 10:55 am
A hybrid rebuild, adding supporting cast for this year.

Is he building Apple up and looking to deal him for a #3 or #4?
Does he think about trading Jenkins or Snacks?
What is a Gettleman culture?
Will he give Landon Collins top market or prefer to spend the big bucks on the line?
Please  
Jay on the Island : 3/23/2018 11:02 am : link
take a break from making threads.
Seriously. Consider taking a break  
Bold Ruler : Mod : 3/23/2018 11:05 am : link
.
I think it is becoming clear  
Vanzetti : 3/23/2018 11:07 am : link
He is giving the team a chance to compete this year by shoring up the OL and switching to a 3-4. Giants D played well below the money they were being paid last year

But the real eye is on the future. That’s why he took the huge dead money hit this year with JPP. In past Giants would have restructured and punted the dead money to the future. DG knows he needs space to sign Odell and Collins. Now he has it and more.

This draft will tell you exactly  
Vegas Steve : 3/23/2018 11:23 am : link
what his plan is.

I terms of defense fast LB's are a must against todays offenses. Press Corners Work best with attacking defense. Of course nothing works unless you can rush the passer.

At LB's 3 names to keep an eye on(they seem to be the types DG values)
LEIGHTON VANDER ESCH Does everything well (Tackling and Coverage) can be a factor as a pass rusher and still learning

JOSEY JEWELL Ideal for a 3-4 WLB; just a tackling machine Loves the game and a team leader

SHAQUEM GRIFFIN
(Non stop motor; plays with passion; speed rusher off the edge but just makes plays) Only 1 hand

Why on earth  
HoodieGelo : 3/23/2018 11:39 am : link
would he trade Snacks?
RE: Why on earth  
Gothamist : 3/23/2018 11:52 am : link
In comment 13882240 HoodieGelo said:
Quote:
would he trade Snacks?


He has Tomlinson, he is focused on 2019-20, Snacks may not be re-signed and Gettleman may get a #3?
RE: Why on earth  
Gothamist : 3/23/2018 11:56 am : link
In comment 13882240 HoodieGelo said:
Quote:
would he trade Snacks?


Snacks is not always a three down player and may be better suited for two gap. Not that Tomlinson is a sack artist.
RE: RE: Why on earth  
Jay on the Island : 3/23/2018 9:03 pm : link
In comment 13882281 Gothamist said:
Quote:
In comment 13882240 HoodieGelo said:


Quote:


would he trade Snacks?



He has Tomlinson, he is focused on 2019-20, Snacks may not be re-signed and Gettleman may get a #3?

What are you talking about? Snacks has three seasons left on his contract. You want to trade away the best NT in football when we are switching to a 3-4 defense? What's your next suggestion trading away Beckham and Engram after the Giants draft a QB at 2?
Back to the Corner