for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Some data on Drafting a Hall Of Famer

Boatie Warrant : 4/11/2018 3:54 pm
I went on the HOF website and looked at HOF players drafted from 1970-present (so if I missed a player I blame the HOF site). I chose 1970 because it was close to the year I was born.
I put all that information in a spread sheet so I could sort what rounds HOFers got drafted more easily. There has been 104 HOF players from 1970-2018. 62 of the 104 (60%) have been drafted in the first round. 29 of the 62 (47%) were drafted between 1-5 (including 2 from a supplemental draft), 13 of the 62 (21%) were drafted between 6-10, 11 of the 62 (18%) were drafted between 11-20, and 9 of the 62 (15%) were drafted between 21-32.

16 of 104 (15%) in round 2
10 of the 104 (10%) in round 3
7 of 104 (7%) in round 4
2 of 104 (2%) in round 5
1 of the 104 (1%) in round 6
1 of the 104 (1%) in round 7
1 of the 104 (1%) in round 8
4 of the 104 (4%) was a UDFA

Looking at this data I am still ok with trading down but not out of the top 5. Statistically it does not make sense if you are looking for a HOF player.
By the way, 1-5 picks x 49 years = 245 picks. That’s a 12% chance of drafting a HOF player in the top 5. Not bad considering.

5 of the HOFers were picked at the #2 spot overall; 3 RB’s (Dorsett, Dickerson, Faulk), 1 LB (LT) and 1 DL/LB (Randy White)

I found this information interesting and thought BBI would also.

Thanks  
Jay in Toronto : 4/11/2018 3:57 pm : link
was wondering about that.

That's pretty remarkable actually.  
DonQuixote : 4/11/2018 4:03 pm : link
I would have expected it to look more like a crap shoot than it does.
Looking at QB's  
Boatie Warrant : 4/11/2018 4:09 pm : link
There are 11 HOF QB's from 1970 til now.
six in round 1. Four drafted #1 overall ((Bradshaw, Elway, Aikman) one was a supplemental, Young). The other 2 are Kelly and Marino.

One in round 2 (Favre)

Two in round 3 (Fouts, Montana)

Two UDFA's (Moon, Warner)


If you want to boost your argument  
Rocky369 : 4/11/2018 4:11 pm : link
run it to only 2008. Five years to be Hall eligible, and five years for the shortest career of a current HOFer.
RE: That's pretty remarkable actually.  
Brown Recluse : 4/11/2018 4:13 pm : link
In comment 13909723 DonQuixote said:
Quote:
I would have expected it to look more like a crap shoot than it does.


It still is a crapshoot, but as with everything - people sensationalize and take it out of context.
RE: That's pretty remarkable actually.  
GiantsLaw : 4/11/2018 4:15 pm : link
In comment 13909723 DonQuixote said:
Quote:
I would have expected it to look more like a crap shoot than it does.


agree. and thanks for the research boatie. very interesting
RE: RE: That's pretty remarkable actually.  
DonQuixote : 4/11/2018 4:15 pm : link
In comment 13909741 Brown Recluse said:
Quote:
In comment 13909723 DonQuixote said:


Quote:


I would have expected it to look more like a crap shoot than it does.



It still is a crapshoot, but as with everything - people sensationalize and take it out of context.


Yeah I get that...I was just thinking about so many of the NFL greats getting drafted in lower rounds, I didn't expect the "signal" (i.e. enrichment of top picks into the HOF) to be strong. It's interesting
RE: If you want to boost your argument  
Boatie Warrant : 4/11/2018 4:20 pm : link
In comment 13909738 Rocky369 said:
Quote:
run it to only 2008. Five years to be Hall eligible, and five years for the shortest career of a current HOFer.


True, The most recent Draft class to have a HOF player is 2001 (LaDainian Tomlinson)
We don't need a Hall of Famer from this draft.  
Beezer : 4/11/2018 4:22 pm : link
It would be nice to get 3 players who have long, solid careers for the Giants.
RE: We don't need a Hall of Famer from this draft.  
Boatie Warrant : 4/11/2018 4:24 pm : link
In comment 13909751 Beezer said:
Quote:
It would be nice to get 3 players who have long, solid careers for the Giants.


Just going off of what Gettleman said about drafting this high.
Great job on this analysis...thanks!  
the mike : 4/11/2018 4:29 pm : link
Just shows that the odds of selecting a HOF player are remote irrespective of draft position...
hopefully it's a combination of the 2  
Rocky369 : 4/11/2018 4:30 pm : link
DG is convinced there's a sure fire HOFer at 2, or he acquires additional picks for long time starters. Of the top five picks, statistically you show that you've got 15% chance of getting that HOFer. That's less than 1 out of those 5. Would support the notion that if X is drafted 1st overall, NYG would look to trade out.
Yea, you should shrink the end date  
giants#1 : 4/11/2018 4:36 pm : link
Here are some HOF locks that just aren't eligible yet and the year and overall pick they were drafted (1st round picks only):

Peyton - 1998 (#1)
Charles Woodson - 1998 (#4)
Champ Bailey - 1999 (#7)
Steve Hutchinson - 2001 (#17)
Brees* - 2001 (#32)
Peppers - 2002 (#2)
Ed Reed - 2002 (#24)
Andre Johnson - 2003 (#3)
Polamalu - 2003 (#16)

*1st pick of round 2

Stopping at 2004 to avoid Eli/Rivers/Ben HOF debate, but I think at least 2 of them make it (Eli/Ben) plus Fitzgerald is a lock.
Nice analysis but it really isn’t for 49 years since any current HOFer  
Ivan15 : 4/11/2018 4:37 pm : link
Probably had to be drafted before 2005

Why don’t you just look at the draft year of the youngest HOFer?
29 of 240 picks ......a little over 10%  
George from PA : 4/11/2018 4:43 pm : link
DG better make the right pick.....as you get ONE HOFer in the top 5 picks every 2 drafts.
RE: Nice analysis but it really isn’t for 49 years since any current HOFer  
giants#1 : 4/11/2018 4:52 pm : link
In comment 13909791 Ivan15 said:
Quote:
Probably had to be drafted before 2005

Why don’t you just look at the draft year of the youngest HOFer?


I think that is Tomlinson (2001) and even that would miss Peyton, Woodson, Bailey, Hutchinson, and Brees.

But going with that, 1-5 picks x 31 years = 155 picks
29/155 = 19% (~1 in 5 chance of drafting a HOF)

Including Peyton/Woodson would make it an even 20%.
RE: 29 of 240 picks ......a little over 10%  
giants#1 : 4/11/2018 4:53 pm : link
In comment 13909802 George from PA said:
Quote:
DG better make the right pick.....as you get ONE HOFer in the top 5 picks every 2 drafts.


Nope, you get one a year. Makes no sense including recent drafts when then players are still active, let alone guys that are retired but not yet eligible.
2002-2004  
giants#1 : 4/11/2018 4:56 pm : link
Certainly keep the one HOF/top 5 trend going to:

2002: Peppers
2003: Andre Johnson
2004: Fitzgerald + likely Eli and Rivers
Agree one a year on average  
Pepe LePugh : 4/11/2018 5:31 pm : link
And looking at averages for 6-10 etc, you need to get say three first round picks (if trading down) to get that probability of scoring a HOFer.
But this is all probabilities, not bodies. Lets not get TOO stuck in the numbers game.
RE: Great job on this analysis...thanks!  
DonQuixote : 4/11/2018 6:21 pm : link
In comment 13909762 the mike said:
Quote:
Just shows that the odds of selecting a HOF player are remote irrespective of draft position...


I reached the very opposite conclusion.

The chances of drafting a HOF player are very much higher in the first round, and even more, among the top selections in the first round.
RE: RE: Great job on this analysis...thanks!  
the mike : 4/11/2018 6:41 pm : link
In comment 13909941 DonQuixote said:
[quote] In comment 13909762 the mike said:


Quote:


Just shows that the odds of selecting a HOF player are remote irrespective of draft position...



I reached the very opposite conclusion.

My comment was in reaction to the frequency of a HOFer being drafted among the population of top ten picks, not the percentage of HOFers who were drafted in the top ten...

Let me clarify - there have only been 42 HOFers in top ten in 48 drafts, or 42 of 480 selections - that is less one in ten...

Nice Job.. Thanks for sharing  
Peppers : 4/11/2018 6:50 pm : link
I think it goes to show DG put some unrealistic expectations on the pick.
RE: RE: RE: Great job on this analysis...thanks!  
DonQuixote : 4/12/2018 8:06 am : link
In comment 13909955 the mike said:
Quote:
In comment 13909941 DonQuixote said:
[quote] In comment 13909762 the mike said:


Quote:


Just shows that the odds of selecting a HOF player are remote irrespective of draft position...



I reached the very opposite conclusion.

My comment was in reaction to the frequency of a HOFer being drafted among the population of top ten picks, not the percentage of HOFers who were drafted in the top ten...

Let me clarify - there have only been 42 HOFers in top ten in 48 drafts, or 42 of 480 selections - that is less one in ten...


Yes, it is clear that one stands a slim chance of drafting someone who will end up in the HOF. It is a crap shoot in that regard.

But if the OPs numbers are correct, then draft position is absolutely huge in determining the outcome. According to the numbers posted above, if you move from a top 5 pick to a top 10 pick, your odds of getting a HOFer are cut in half. 60% of HOFers were drafted in the first round, and among those first rounders, roughly half were drafted in the top 5. I find that pretty remarkable.
1 DL/LB (Randy White)  
x meadowlander : 4/12/2018 10:25 am : link
That was a traded Giant pick. :(

Giants traded that pick, #2 overall to Dallas for Craig Morton.

A reminder of the criticality of not fucking up a #2 overall.
Back to the Corner