Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner
 

Archived Thread

Now(Barkley) vs Future(QB)

BeckShepEli : 4/16/2018 4:48 pm
I would say this board is 65-35 on QB in the draft vs Barkley/Chubb. I want to ask this question.

If you were guaranteed to win a Super Bowl in the next 4 years with taking Barkley would you take that or would you take 12-15 solid years out of a QB Darnold/Rosen/Allen with no guarantees of a SB?
This hypothetical STINKS  
The Dude : 4/16/2018 4:52 pm : link
but i'll play. you take a GTD superbowl where you can.
There may NOT BE  
Big Blue '56 : 4/16/2018 4:52 pm : link
a future/franchise QB in this group according to the Giants evaluators
Always  
AcidTest : 4/16/2018 5:07 pm : link
take a SB, so Barkley in this hypothetical.
I am a win now...  
Vinny from Danbury : 4/16/2018 5:08 pm : link
kind of person. There are no guarantees I'll be alive tomorrow, so I take the SB with Barkley 10 out of 10 times in this hypothetical.
Risk of success of Barkley vs Future Risk of success of QB  
George from PA : 4/16/2018 5:10 pm : link
Will Barkley be a successful RB?


Will and which QB will be successful


and how much more successful then Webb
RE: There may NOT BE  
Eman11 : 4/16/2018 5:10 pm : link
In comment 13916360 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
a future/franchise QB in this group according to the Giants evaluators


For what it's worth, Sean Payton doesn't see one in the group either. He said there's definitely not a Luck or Wentz in this group.

Thinks maybe one will be left standing in four years and that one would most likely be Darnold.

if you take Saquon Barkley  
santacruzom : 4/16/2018 5:15 pm : link
you are guaranteed to have an SB every year he's on the roster.
RE: There may NOT BE  
micky : 4/16/2018 5:21 pm : link
In comment 13916360 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
a future/franchise QB in this group according to the Giants evaluators


was there word from giants themselves stating this? If so, I missed it. point me in direction of a quote or article stating this.
RE: This hypothetical STINKS  
BeckShepEli : 4/16/2018 5:37 pm : link
In comment 13916359 The Dude said:
Quote:
but i'll play. you take a GTD superbowl where you can.


I know it sucks but I asked it anyway lol
Basically a Choice Between a SB and a Phillip  
clatterbuck : 4/16/2018 5:45 pm : link
Rivers-type career? I'll take the championship.
With the way the OP phrases the question then that's easy.  
Blue21 : 4/16/2018 6:26 pm : link
Barkley is the choice. Which also means another QB took us there.
Better question is would you give  
markky : 4/16/2018 6:30 pm : link
Your left nut for a Super Bowl. Answer is yes.
Now(Barkley) vs Future(QB)  
DonQuixote : 4/16/2018 7:02 pm : link
Maybe I should start the following thread...

I would say this board is 65-35 on QB in the draft vs Barkley/Chubb. I want to ask this question.

If you were guaranteed to be a mediocre for the next 4 years with taking Barkley and having no QB, would you take that or would you take 12-15 solid years out of a QB Darnold/Rosen/Allen and opportunities to be competitive over the long term?

Just saying ...

In the end, you're generally best off taking the better player  
Ira : 4/16/2018 7:04 pm : link
.
Silly  
Bavaro_the_Mafioso : 4/16/2018 8:00 pm : link
Who in their right mind would take 12-15 years of coming up short?
Hypothetical?  
FStubbs : 4/16/2018 9:02 pm : link
Of course under this scenario you take Barkley.

If you told me that we'd draft Barkley #2 overall, win the Superbowl,and then Barkley would retire after one year of football, guess what? I'd still draft Barkley. The goal is to win the Superbowl.
Barkley's initials make SB  
Tim in VA : 4/16/2018 9:17 pm : link
Coincidence? I think not.
Chubb  
5BowlsSoon : 4/17/2018 7:39 am : link
.
RE: Barkley's initials make SB  
SeanLandeta : 4/17/2018 8:19 am : link
In comment 13916710 Tim in VA said:
Quote:
Coincidence? I think not.


Well, I'm convinced.
Back to the Corner