Interesting stuff from Jay Glazer...

Is he egging the Browns to trade down with the Giants?

Maybe he was, but that must go away quickly working in a role like his. You know everyone and have friends/contacts everywhere.

I think that Browns will take Barkley first pick
because they have #4 and there are 3 top QBs left on the table..
so they are getting on of the top 3 QBS
if they really love on of those QBs they can trade with Giants and move up to 2

In comment 13923819 giantfan2000 said:

Quote:

I think that Browns will take Barkley first pick because they have #4 and there are 3 top QBs left on the table.. so they are getting on of the top 3 QBS if they really love on of those QBs they can trade with Giants and move up to 2

this.

In comment 13923875 mdc1 said:

Quote:

In comment 13923819 giantfan2000 said: Quote: I think that Browns will take Barkley first pick because they have #4 and there are 3 top QBs left on the table.. so they are getting on of the top 3 QBS if they really love on of those QBs they can trade with Giants and move up to 2 this.

NOT this.

Why settle for the 3rd best QB?

They were taking a QB? Or was that not srrious

For a RB. There is no chance they take Barkley at 1.

They are going to take Allen at 1. Giants take Darnold at 2. Jets take Mayfield at 3. Browns have their pick of Barkley/Chubb at 4.

In comment 13924244 Big Rick in FL said:

Quote:

For a RB.

I don't have any strong feelings about any of these guys, though I'm a little skeptical of Josh Allen. And I don't know how Dorsey thinks about this stuff. But I don't think that's how it works.

The Browns (and the Giants, and the Jets, and...) do need their next great quarterback, but that's not the same as needing [I]any[/I} quarterback. If they think one of these guys is a potential Hall of Famer, and could lead their team for 15 years (barring injury), hell yeah they're going to grab him. But if they don't think the QBs are the best players in the draft, and they think there are other HoF talents in the draft, they'd be foolish to pass on a Hall of Famer for a guy think will be a pretty good starting QB.

Nobody knows the future, we don't know how all this will turn out, but if you have a much higher grade on Barkley or Chubb or Fitzpatrick than on any of the QBs, you don't take the QB first. You take the guy you think is best -- or trade the pick. You could get a fortune for the pick from some other team that has a different grade on the players, and maybe still get a QB prospect at a more reasonable price.

In comment 13923819 giantfan2000 said:

Quote:

I think that Browns will take Barkley first pick because they have #4 and there are 3 top QBs left on the table.. so they are getting on of the top 3 QBS if they really love on of those QBs they can trade with Giants and move up to 2

That might be what ends up happening

In comment 13924642 81_Great_Dane said:

Quote:

In comment 13924244 Big Rick in FL said: Quote: For a RB. I don't have any strong feelings about any of these guys, though I'm a little skeptical of Josh Allen. And I don't know how Dorsey thinks about this stuff. But I don't think that's how it works. The Browns (and the Giants, and the Jets, and...) do need their next great quarterback, but that's not the same as needing [I]any[/I} quarterback. If they think one of these guys is a potential Hall of Famer, and could lead their team for 15 years (barring injury), hell yeah they're going to grab him. But if they don't think the QBs are the best players in the draft, and they think there are other HoF talents in the draft, they'd be foolish to pass on a Hall of Famer for a guy think will be a pretty good starting QB. Nobody knows the future, we don't know how all this will turn out, but if you have a much higher grade on Barkley or Chubb or Fitzpatrick than on any of the QBs, you don't take the QB first. You take the guy you think is best -- or trade the pick. You could get a fortune for the pick from some other team that has a different grade on the players, and maybe still get a QB prospect at a more reasonable price.

Agree 100%