1 – Josh Rosen – UCLA -
Grade: 89
Strong Points
-Knows and understands the game inside and out, very intelligent on the field
-Advanced footwork and release, consistent mechanics
-Excels at passes within the intermediate range
Weak Points:
-Deep ball accuracy is inconsistent
-Slight frame plus concussion issues plus tennis background causes for some durability concern
-Doesn’t pose much of a threat as a passer on the move
Summary:
Junior entry. Has had the look of a pro passer since his freshman season. The 3 year career at UCLA didn’t pan out the way many were hoping for, but it can’t be pinned on him. His supporting cast was dreadful. The pass catchers dropped more balls than any of the other QBs in this top-of-the-draft discussion, there was no running game to lean on, and the offensive line was very leaky up the middle. With all of that, Rosen still threw for 9,342 yards and 59 touchdowns. One red flag, however, is that he missed 8 games over the past 2 years with various injuries. And another nugget here is that more teams are fearful of his knees not holding up, as that is a consistent occurrence with tennis players when they get in to their late 20’s-early 30’s. Rosen was a big time tennis player in his teen years, so it is something to consider.
Here is something I am confident can be put to bed. Rosen is not a character risk. He is not going to be an issue with the media, he is not going to be a problem with the coaches and players. He is not going to be a problem socially. This kid knows more about football than a lot of current professionals. He studies it hard, practices hard, and was head and shoulders on another level than his teammates mentally and physically. If you could guarantee be Rosen can stay on the field, his grade would be 90+, elite. NYG could be the perfect spot for him as it will allow him to add bulk to his frame for a year or two, use his intelligence to pick up the schemes and tendencies of the NFL, and be ready to rock in 2019 or 2020. During that time, you let Davis Webb handle backup duties and if he proves to be a solid player, you have a very good problem on your hands, one that several teams will pay up for.
NFL Comparison: Matt Ryan / ATL
2 – Baker Mayfield – Oklahoma
Grade: 86
Strong Points:
-Brings a level of charisma, confidence, and swagger to a team that is rare
-Accuracy is on point through all levels of the defense
-Maintains his eyes downfield and arm ability on the move to both sides
Weak Points:
-Gets antsy in a crowded pocket, will lose track of mechanics
-Lacks the desired size of an NFL passer and he over-strides in addition, making him shorter
-Hasn’t proven he can handle adversity
Summary:
A record setting quarterback that started off as a walk on at Texas Tech, losing his job to none other than Davis Webb. Talk about a potential complete 180 degree turn. Mayfield transferred to Oklahoma, won over the staff, and never looked back over his 3 years as starter. He ended his career with a Heisman Trophy-earning performance in addition to re-writing the OU record books. Mayfield threw for 119 TDs /21 INTs and an amazing 12,296 yards in his 3 years with the Sooners.
I was split on Mayfield and Rosen for a long time. I would be equally excited about either, but Mayfield carries more risk. His competitive spirit and on-field bad boy image can be viewed as both good and bad. I actually think it makes him a better player, as he is constantly trying to prove himself and his worth. He is hungry to win, hungry to succeed. It is actually a refreshing thing to watch these days, to be honest. However my fear is this: How will he act when a stadium starts to boo him? The team around him is falling apart, guys are chirping to the media, coaches throw him under the bus. Can he handle that? Honestly, I’m not sure. And having that at QB would scare the hell out of me. Talent and ability, however, he has it. I rarely give a second thought about his height. It is not ideal but the way you can manipulate an offense with playaction and rollouts, Mayfield’s height won’t be a major factor. This kid is a winner and will out-kick his coverage when it comes to overall talent.
NFL Comparison: Russell Wilson / SEA
3 – Sam Darnold – USC – 6’3/221
Grade: 81
Strong Points:
-Makes things happen with his feet, dangerous on the move
-Has the demeanor and presence you want in high pressure situations and games
-Excellent touch between layers of the defense
Weak Points:
-Gets too hoppy in the pocket, rushes in to decisions without lining up mechanics
-Has a hard time reading the entire defense
-Doesn’t protect the ball
Summary:
A 2 year starter that came in to the 2017 season as the poster boy of this draft class. After a 9 game run in 2016 that was capped off with one of the best Rose Bowl performances in history, Darnold had everyone thinking he was the next big thing. Maybe expectations were unfairly high, maybe not. But truth of the matter is, his 2017 season was nowhere near those expectations. He turned the ball over 24 times, most in the nation. Every time you thought he was turning a corner, he put up another head scratching performance. It was a year that created more questions than answers.
Darnold is still generally considered the top quarterback in this class among people I have spoken to and the media. The thought here is that if he can learn to play within himself, read defenses, and make his mechanics more consistent, he has the goods. Those are all correctable issues. Some of what people don’t like about him is what evaluators were nervous about with Eli Manning. Another parallel there is they both seem to rise to the occasion in big games/moments. I do like Darnold, just not enough to use a top 5 pick on him and not enough to take him in front of Mayfield or Rosen. There is a lot of boom and bust. His ability to create on his own his a big deal. His calm demeanor can be a big help. I just hated to see a lack of progress over his 2 year career. He didn’t get better and if anything, he got worse as time went on. If NYG brings him in, he can sit a year and not be rushed which would be in his best interest. However his issues need to be ironed out playing, not sitting. I think there are better situations for him than NYG and I still expect him to go #1 overall, anyway.
NFL Comparison: Andy Dalton / CIN
4 – Lamar Jackson – Louisville – 6’2/216
Grade: 78
Strong Points:
-Elite level explosion and speed in the open field
-Quick release, can reach his top arm strength with a flick of the wrist
-Shows nice touch on intermediate-to-deep throws
Weak Points:
-Erratic accuracy, fails to hit his target on simple throws too often
-Too quick to tuck the ball and scramble without his eyes downfield
-Poor lower body usage and mechanics when throwing
Summary:
Junior entry. Three year starter that had his coming out party in 2016, winning pretty much every piece of individual hardware a quarterback can, including the Heisman. Production is off the charts here with Jackson. He is the first player in history to amass 3,000 yards passing AND 1,000 yards rushing two consecutive years. In a league where putting points on the board is an absolute must, Jackson is walking away from a two year run that saw him score an amazing 95 touchdowns. There are some character red flags and overall shortcomings as a passer that need to be overcome, but there is no denying how dangerous this player can be.
Jackson is an athlete first, runner second, and passer third. If I want to be simple and blunt, that pretty much doesn’t work in the NFL. His ability to run with the ball does and always will strike fear in to opposing defenses. His presence on the field alone will make them adjust, it will make them uncomfortable. He is one of those rare players that doesn’t have a cap to his speed. He is simply faster than the guy chasing him, end of story. Jackson, however, has a ways to go as a passer. He struggles to make multiple reads and progressions, his lower body is as inconsistent as it gets, and he doesn’t keep his eyes downfield while he is on the move. If he takes just half the hits in the NFL that he did in college volume wise, his career won’t be long. The body type isn’t there. Jackson’s only option is to improve mightily as a passer and it will take a ton of time and work. I don’t have a ton of access or inside information, but there have been things said that worry me when it comes to how much he is going to try and change his game at the next level. He is not Mike Vick. Even more, he is nowhere near Mike Vick.
NFL Comparison: Robert Griffin III / BAL
5 – Josh Allen – Wyoming – 6’5/237
Grade: 78
Strong Points:
-Has a cannon for an arm, rare power that comes easy
-Has the ideal frame for the position, can take hits and keep moving, tough to bring down
-Excellent downfield passer on the move
Weak Points:
-Struggles to consistently put the ball where he needs to
-Doesn’t have the proper touch on throws between layers
-Played his worst football against his toughest competition, by far
Summary:
Fourth year junior entry. After a lightly recruited high school career, Allen spent a season in community college before being recruited to Wyoming, home of Carson Wentz’s former college coach. After breaking his collar bone in 2015, Allen finally hit his groove at the FBS level as a redshirt sophomore in 2016. His performances were very up and down but there was no denying the ceiling his talent presented. Allen entered 2017 as one of the darkhorses to overtake the top spot on the QB stack, however we simply saw more of the same. He missed two more games with a shoulder injury but did return for their bowl game, throwing 3 touchdowns against Central Michigan.
Allen earned a day 2 grade on my sheet. By no means does that mean I have the “Do Not Touch” label on him, but the thought of using a top 5 overall selection here is too risky for me. Allen has a long ways to go and lacks a lot of passer-traits that are essential to consistent QB success in the NFL. When the first, second, and third things people say about Allen all have to do with how far he can throw the ball, or how much velocity he can put on it, it is an immediate red flag to me. He has failed to show the ability to put touch on the ball up the seam between levels of the defense. He doesn’t look comfortable in the pocket either. His footwork is very sloppy and it causes a lot of erratic throws on what should be simple gains. I also didn’t like how he carried himself during games where he struggled. Just didn’t scream “leader” to me. And the last glaring stat that I can’t seem to get out of my head: In 2017 he played against 5 teams that finished with winning records. His combined stats in those games? 65 for 130 (50%) – 661 yards – 4 TD – 5 INT. One more…in 2016/2017 combined he played against 3 opponents from power 5 conferences. His stats in those games: 48 for 96 (50%) – 427 yards – 1 TD – 8 INT. Not exactly someone that brings his best against the best, and that is not a small sample size.
NFL Comparison – Ben Roethlisberger / PIT
6 – Kurt Benkert – Virginia – 6’3/218
Grade: 75
Strong Points:
-Quick and violent, but controlled release, gets a lot of zip on the ball
-Excels at downfield passing, proper blend of touch and accuracy
-Confident risk taker, won’t second guess himself
Weak Points:
-Struggles to maintain his poise and presence when pressured
-Too many turnover-prone mistakes against the blitz
-Loses accuracy and awareness on the move
Summarry:
Fifth year senior. Began his career at East Carolina. Was the backup after his redshirt year before winning the job in 2015. He was injured before the season began, however and when he didn’t get the starting gig back, he left for Virginia as a graduate transfer. He then spent 2 years with the Cavaliers and got off to a hot start, setting some all time single season records. Benkert went on to start all but 1 game over 2 years, throwing 46 TDs and 20 INTs. When things are comfortable for him, his release looks good and there are plenty of pro-caliber throws in his arsenal. He has had several stretches that scream upside but the consistency issues against pressure were a constant. He just couldn’t seem to overcome his loss of mechanics and decision making when the pocket got dirty. Benkert has some impressive tools and natural arm talent to work with, but I don’t see more than backup-caliber potential.
NFL Comparison: Mark Sanchez / UFA
7 – Mason Rudolph – Oklahoma State – 6’5/235
Grade: 75
Strong Points:
-Stands tall in the pocket, confident in making reads
-Has the body to take hits and keep getting up
-Productive downfield passer
Weak Points:
-Very immobile both in and out of the pocket
-Needs to drive the ball, almost puts too much air under the downfield pass
-Doesn’t feel pressure in the pocket, needs more awareness
Summary:
An accomplished collegiate passer that threw for 86 TDs over the past three years. He actually received some Heisman talk in 2017, leading the nation with 377 yards per game and 37 touchdowns. Rudolph comes from a spread attack that never saw him call plays from a huddle of handle snaps under center. While that has become more and more common with kids coming out of college, he will still have a lot of footwork-based adjustments to make. Rudolph is a very stiff athlete, he moves like a 35 yard old veteran already. While that just isn’t his game in general, he does look way too immobile in the pocket. He has heavy feet and struggles to evade any sort of pressure when his quick read isn’t there. Rudolph doesn’t show a ton of zip on his passes and there is too much loft on his deep ball. He got away with a lot in college that he simply will not at the next level. I think he is a career backup but one that will be around for a long time. He is a top notch kid that has some “extra coach” in him.
NFL Comparison: Derek Anderson / CAR
8 - JT Barrett – Ohio State – 6’1/224
Grade: 74
Strong Points:
-Physically and mentally tough, keeps his head in pressure situations
-Anticipates throwing lanes and gets the ball out
-Still a passer when he is on the move
Weak Points:
-Lacks the desired ideal size
-Too often struggles to make the simple throws
-Makes too many incorrect reads against complex schemes
Summary:
Fifth year senior. The only 3 time team captain in Ohio State history. Unreal production over his career as both a passer and runner. Barrett took over for an injured Braxton Miller, lost his job to Cardale Jones, then took back the job and left the program with several all time school records. I don’t see Barrett as being a guy you want driving the bus, but I think he will be one of those invaluable backups in the league. He has top notch intangibles and I think he can make things happen in a pinch. His arm talent is very limited, but there are other parts to his game that can make things happen. He is a legit day 3 option for the purpose of having a long term backup locked in for years.
NFL Comparison: Blaine Gabbert / TEN
9 - Chase Litton – Marshall – 6’5/232
Grade: 74
Strong Points:
-Big and powerful arm, full body engagement
-Maintains accuracy on the move
-Excels with short area touch throws
Weak Points:
-Lacks innovation and confidence when forced to adjust on the fly
-Turnover prone
-Front leg gets stiff and will force errant throws
Summary:
Fourth year junior entry. Three year starter with tools and a few stretches of quality tape. Litton has the look. He is big and strong, he can rifle the ball in to tight windows, and he has a really clean release. When he’s on, there is a level of touch and accuracy to his throws that make you raise your eyebrows. What is frustrating wit him, however, is the lack of consistency as a decision maker. He isn’t very calm, cool, or collected when the pocket gets crowded. I’m not sure he is a kid that really understands defensive schemes and tendencies. He is a certainly a developmental prospect but I think his upside is higher than most of the names in this tier.
NFL Comparison: Tom Savage / NO
10 - Kyle Lauletta – Richmond – 6’3/222
Grade: 73
Strong Points:
-Quick release, holds it high and has no wasted motion on short throws
-Excellent foot speed and balance, keeps him under control
-Advanced eye-work, can move and manipulate the defense
Weak Points:
-Arm strength is a problem on intermediate throws where the ball needs to be placed into small window
-Too quick to tuck and run
-Deep ball has too much loft
Summary:
Fifth year senior that started for four years. Lauletta wasn’t really on the radar until Senior Bowl week. I thought he did a favor for someone by even getting on to one of the rosters. As the week progressed he was consistently proving to be a really effective short to intermediate passer. The release stood out to me. It was so quick and repeatable and the ball was almost always put on the money. I went back and was able to get 4 of his games in from 2017, 2 from 2016. There is a hole in his power game, as he just can’t put the ball on the rope and his throws outside the hash marks lack zip. But in a system that can hide those issues somewhat, Lauletta does a lot of other things at a high level. I think he is a career backup, but a dependable one that can stay under control and keep things sane.
NFL Comparison: Case Keenum / DEN
11 - Nic Shimonek – Texas Tech – 6’3/225
Grade: 71
Strong Points:
-Powerful arm, puts the ball on a rope
-Maintains his level of accuracy on the move
-Tough minded, stands tall in the pocket and will take on pressure situations
Weak Points:
-Erratic on intermediate throws
-Doesn’t put enough touch on the ball
-Needs more situational awareness
Summary:
Fifth year senior. Began his career at Iowa but quickly transferred to Texas Tech. Was a backup until 2017. Shimonek doesn’t have a ton of experience as a starter but there are tools here to work with. For those that like Josh Allen and the arm talent based ceiling, Shimonek could be your day 3 backup plan. He can really wing it and has made several deep throws that make you want to look twice. Shimonek was in and out of the lineup under Kliff Kingsbury, who is slowly stating to lose his status in college football. He is a tough kid that can leave the negative thoughts out, a very important mental trait.
NFL Comparison: Nick Foles / PHI
12 - Mike White – Western Kentucky – 6’5/224
Grade: 70
Strong Points:
-Has plus accuracy, consistently puts the ball where it needs to be
-Calm and cool, stays under control at all times
-Understands his own arm strength and will anticipate his windows well
Weak Points:
-Needs more consistent power on his throws
-Lacks the athletic ability and feel in the pocket to avoid pressure
-Too quick to tuck the ball when his initial target is covered
Summary:
Fifth year senior. Began his career at South Florida where he had a pretty poor 2 year run. He transferred to Western Kentucky and started for 2 more years. The wide open offense enabled him to produce some gaudy stats but there is more to him than that. White is a really talented thrower. He has enough arm strength to make all the throws but he doesn’t use it enough. He has almost gotten too used to trying to place and drop the ball in to buckets rather than firing it in there. White will also have a ways to go when it comes to making reads and working through progressions from the pocket, but there is arm talent here that most in this class don’t have.
NFL Comparison: AJ McCarron / BUF
13 - Luke Falk – Washington State – 6’4/215
Grade: 70
Strong Points:
-Touch thrower, high success rate on throws to all levels
-Tough in the pocket, stares pressure in the pocket
-Accurate passer on the move
Weak Points:
-Doesn’t have the arm strength to drive the ball in to tight windows
-Needs more mass on his frame
-Loses track of footwork when moving within the pocket
Summary:
Fifth year senior with 3 years of starting experience. Left Washington State with a handful of career passing records in Pac 12 history. After a couple years of excellent production in the Mike Leach scheme, Falk was on the radar for being a 1st round pick at the beginning of the season. I never saw it, however. He does control the system and himself very well in addition to being a very accurate passer. Against college defenses, a guy like this can really dominate and that, he did. But when looking for QB traits when it comes to pocket movement, reading defenses, and firing the ball in to tight windows, he has too many negatives for me to think he can ever be a starter.
NFL Comparison: David Fales / MIA
14 - Alex McGough – Florida International - 6’3/214
Grade: 69
Strong Points:
-Extends the play consistently, keeps his eyes downfield
-Dangerous thrower on the move, a lot of zip on the ball when he is rolling out
-Experienced and smart, understands how to read defenses
Weak Points:
-Coming from a lower level of college football, slower defenses and less complexity
-Lacks success and accuracy as a downfield passer
-Has struggled in poor weather
Summary:
Four year starter. I’ve been told McGough has had some of the more impressive vists with coaches and teams when it comes to whiteboard talk. Very smart and advanced football IQ. McGough occasionally made plays that most guys in this class haven’t, plain and simple. Really innovative with the ball in his hands against pressure and he makes the difficult, athletic throw look natural. He didn’t have to make a ton of deep throws, however. He needs to show he can be more of a downfield passer but who knows what will happen once he is put in to a more sophisticated situation. He is worth a shot in the dark.
NFL Comparison: Kevin Hogan / WAS
15 - Riley Ferguson – Memphis – 6’3/212 – GRADE: 68
Grade: 67
Strong Points:
-Gunslinger mentality, consistently puts the necessary zip on the ball
-Excellent thrower on the move, especially rolling out to the left
-Steps up in to the pocket, will complete difficult throws
Weak Points:
-Frail looking frame
-Release gets long
-Too reliant on arm talent, doesn’t engage his lower body enough
Summary:
Fifth year senior. Began his career at Tennessee. After battling a leg injury and losing the quarterback competition job to Josh Dobbs, Ferguson walked away from the game. He lost his passion for a year but ended up starting from the bottom at a community college in 2015. Memphis took notice and he took over the starting gig once Paxton Lynch left for the NFL. He had a really nice 2-year run. Ferguson has matured and comes in to the draft with one of the most “sling it” mentalities in the class. He is a hard nosed player with good arm talent but has a long ways to go mechanically and schematically.
NFL Comparison: Austin Davis / SEA
16 - Tanner Lee – Nebraska – 6’4/212 – GRADE: 68
17 - Brandon Silvers – Troy – 6’2/220 – GRADE: 68
18 - Matt Linehan – Idaho – 6’3/230 – GRADE: 68
19 - Logan Woodside – Toledo – 6’1/201 – GRADE: 65
20 - Danny Etling – LSU – 6’2/215 – 6’2/215 – GRADE: 64
NYG APPROACH
From day one, I’ve said this team needs to go QB at #2 overall if, and only if, they have a guy that meets the grade. This team has rightfully committed to Eli Manning for at least another year (I think it will be 2) but John Mara has said multiple times that he loved how GB passed the torch from Brett Favre to Aaron Rodgers, whom sat for 3 years prior to taking over as the starter. I can see that being the case with a QB here and even though the immediate dividends wouldn’t exist, it would be the best long term move for the organization.
Now, if the coin flip between a QB and Barkley lands in favor of former, who will it be? I can’t imagine anyone in those walls being convinced Josh Allen is the guy and Baker Mayfield has had too many immaturity-based issues for me to think he is the next NYG franchise guy. I think it comes down to Darnold vs. Rosen if both are available. If CLE goes with one of them at #1, the decision is obviously much easier. Darnold has more Eli in him when it comes to personality But after his career, does NYG really want that along with the turnovers? I hope not. Rosen is a perfect fit for the situation here. He will be able to learn the offense inside and out (and you know he will) in addition to building up his body and also allowing Davis Webb to build up his resume to impress the league via preseason play. If Rosen checks out medically, it could be a homerun pick and one that I support fully.
But here we are, months after the debate started. Rosen vs Barkley. And we aren’t any closer to a consensus than we were back then. It is a good problem to have, as I think both would be excellent choices.
I'm not saying I downgraded him because of joint concerns. I am saying there have been discussions about it with some teams.
I know a lot about body types/genetics and injury probability...it's not about how much you weight. Partially....yes, but not completely.
And the durability concerns are nothing that are damning Rosen completely, but there isn't a credible evaluator that I know that hasn't at least mentioned it.
And I did read the in-depth insinuation that playing tennis leads to knee problems. I don't buy it. I know of a few programs that encouraged their football players to play tennis in the spring as it developed quick feet, hand/eye coordination, improved conditioning, etc.
Quote:
lends itself to durability concerns. The "frail" card is overplayed in that he was taller and heavier than Darnold. But for some reason, people still latch on to the notion that Darnold is built like a linebacker only because he was a bad one in high school.
I'm not saying I downgraded him because of joint concerns. I am saying there have been discussions about it with some teams.
I know a lot about body types/genetics and injury probability...it's not about how much you weight. Partially....yes, but not completely.
And the durability concerns are nothing that are damning Rosen completely, but there isn't a credible evaluator that I know that hasn't at least mentioned it.
Thank you. Fair enough.
Quote:
lends itself to durability concerns. The "frail" card is overplayed in that he was taller and heavier than Darnold. But for some reason, people still latch on to the notion that Darnold is built like a linebacker only because he was a bad one in high school.
And I did read the in-depth insinuation that playing tennis leads to knee problems. I don't buy it. I know of a few programs that encouraged their football players to play tennis in the spring as it developed quick feet, hand/eye coordination, improved conditioning, etc.
As an accessory, yes. Absolutely.
Well that has been in the news...I think McShay said it?
When there are so many potential QB prospects for the top of the draft and only so many teams that want one...one of these guys will drop. I wouldn't be surprised by any of them dropping.
I did. I have a 65 on him. I actually saw him live in 2017...good size, good arm. Questionable release and footwork.
It’s the concussions that bother me immensely I see him taking multiple hits. Getting concussed and calling it a career
Therefore my pick is Saquon Barkley
Rd 1 Rosen or Mayfield
Rd 2 Braden Smith (I love that he can also be a tackle though he's a Guard)
Rd 3a Tim Settle (if not available then McIntosh or Hill)
Rd 3b Either Nick Nelson, Duke Dawson, Carlton Davis or Holton Hill
Rd 4 - Geron Christian or a RB
Rd 5-- BPA or a S or a RB
Josh Allen = Ben Roethlisberger
Lamar Jackson = Robert Griffin III
Sam Darnold = Andy Dalton
Baker Mayfield = Russell Wilson
Josh Rosen = Matt Ryan
Why would Allen be your #5 QB and not #1?
I don't think that he should be as I agree that Rosen is the top QB, I'm just saying...wouldn't most teams want the next Roethlisberger versus the other QB comparisons on your list?
Josh Allen = Ben Roethlisberger
Lamar Jackson = Robert Griffin III
Sam Darnold = Andy Dalton
Baker Mayfield = Russell Wilson
Josh Rosen = Matt Ryan
Why would Allen be your #5 QB and not #1?
I don't think that he should be as I agree that Rosen is the top QB, I'm just saying...wouldn't most teams want the next Roethlisberger versus the other QB comparisons on your list?
Probably physical similarities of Ben vs Allen. At this point I'd rather Ryan to Roethlisberger but would not turn up my nose at either.
Your review confirms my suspicion that this class is way over hyped.
Josh Allen = Ben Roethlisberger
Lamar Jackson = Robert Griffin III
Sam Darnold = Andy Dalton
Baker Mayfield = Russell Wilson
Josh Rosen = Matt Ryan
Why would Allen be your #5 QB and not #1?
I don't think that he should be as I agree that Rosen is the top QB, I'm just saying...wouldn't most teams want the next Roethlisberger versus the other QB comparisons on your list?
The comparisons are not who I think they will be in the NFL. The comparisons are their playing styles and if they reach their upside, who they could be.
I always say this...but don't get caught up in the comparisons. It is meant to give a slight visual to guys who have never seen these guys play
People are underestimating how bad darnolds OLine was last year.
I think Rosen is/will be better than Goff.
Not sure about Wentz though...Wentz looks like a stud. A potential top 5 QB within the next 4 years.
...gotta go O-line in Rounds Two & Three.
People are underestimating how bad darnolds OLine was last year.
I factored it in. I watched every Darnold start...it did impact him. But there were also several mistakes that had very little to do with OL play.
Quote:
But switch darnold and mayfield on their respective teams and darnold would be selected already and mayfield maybe a 1st round pick.
People are underestimating how bad darnolds OLine was last year.
I factored it in. I watched every Darnold start...it did impact him. But there were also several mistakes that had very little to do with OL play.
I agree. I factor that as making mistakes and also being 20.
One thing I learned is no matter how the play turns out, if you don’t trust your protection, you’re going to be off even with time.
Sy, one thing I noticed with USC offense this year compared to last year was the designed roll outs. Something that may not happen as much in the nfl.
I agree. But getting the feeling more and more that they will.
Quote:
The Giants would be loco to pass on him for a RB and I dont think they will
I agree. But getting the feeling more and more that they will.
from where/who - BBI?
Quote:
In comment 13925776 GoBlue6599 said:
Quote:
The Giants would be loco to pass on him for a RB and I dont think they will
I agree. But getting the feeling more and more that they will.
from where/who - BBI?
No, from what draft analysts are saying, and deciphering Gettleman's comments.
No doubt some will be thrilled with the relative grades and others not so much. The grade differential between Rosen and Darnold is surprising though and simply reinforces my conviction that the Giants should not go quarterback in the early rounds this year. Stick with Eli, continue to develop Webb and draft a quarterback in the later rounds to compete with Webb. One of these 70+ rated quarterbacks will be there in the fifth round and if the Giants want to hedge their bets, this is where they should take the risk.
And thanks again for the entire body of work. The two biggest surprises for me overall are the Rosen/Darnold grade differential and the grade on Will Hernandez. I still feel like Hernandez is the best lineman in this draft after Nelson, but perhaps you have spotted in advance another Richburg!
Barkley continues to be the no brainer top selection this year - though after reading this quarterback preview, I can't help but think that Dorsey would be crazy not to take Barkley with the first pick and then trade with us to take their top quarterback. Getting either Chubb or Nelson with several additional top forty picks might just be the best outcome for the Giants this year.
How can the Giants not select a QB.
There is quality and depth.
Comparing Sy's grades back to 2014
Sy,s QB ratings since 2014
Rosen 89
Mayfield 86
Goff 86
Wentz 82
Carr 82
Darnold 81
Manziel 81
Trubisky 80
Winston 80
Mariota 79
Kiser 79
Jackson 78
Allen 78
Prescott 78
Watson 77
Glennon 77
Mahomes 76
Peterman 76
Barkley 76
Benkert 75
Rudolph 75
Bortles 75
Barrett 74
Litton 74
Webb 74
Hundley 74
Holy crap. How many times do the comparisons need to be addressed before people get it?
I am also curious about Logan Woodside. Any comment on his talent level?
Quote:
The Giants would be loco to pass on him for a RB and I dont think they will
I agree. But getting the feeling more and more that they will.
I hope not.. to enjoy 15 years of Eli Manning and then get another franchise QB the likes of Josh Rosen would be a stroke of pure luck for this franchise
Simms Manning and Rosen
I would say "yes."
The money you save or draft picks you save - imo it's worth it.
Tails - Barkley
...
I don't see how they compare mentally. Darnold is known for player big in big games. The biggest knock on Dalton is he comes up small in big games.
Maybe they play similar but Darnold reminds me much more of Eli Manning with legs...he can get a little loose with the football but you never have to worry about him in the big spot...he usually shows up.
Darnold crumbles in big spots. So I just don't see it.
I don't see how they compare mentally. Darnold is known for player big in big games. The biggest knock on Dalton is he comes up small in big games.
Maybe they play similar but Darnold reminds me much more of Eli Manning with legs...he can get a little loose with the football but you never have to worry about him in the big spot...he usually shows up.
Darnold crumbles in big spots. So I just don't see it.
Holy crap. How many times do the comparisons need to be addressed before people get it?
Quote:
I get there play styles...but you said the comps are play styles and who they "could" be if they reach there potential.
I don't see how they compare mentally. Darnold is known for player big in big games. The biggest knock on Dalton is he comes up small in big games.
Maybe they play similar but Darnold reminds me much more of Eli Manning with legs...he can get a little loose with the football but you never have to worry about him in the big spot...he usually shows up.
Darnold crumbles in big spots. So I just don't see it.
Holy crap. How many times do the comparisons need to be addressed before people get it?
he said verbatim, that its play style and who they could be if the reach there potential...so a I'm stating exactly what he said...
I am also curious about Logan Woodside. Any comment on his talent level?
I'm actually curious about him as well. Aside from his frame (which is even smaller than Mayfield), he seems to have some tools.
Quote:
In comment 13925867 mphbullet36 said:
Quote:
I get there play styles...but you said the comps are play styles and who they "could" be if they reach there potential.
I don't see how they compare mentally. Darnold is known for player big in big games. The biggest knock on Dalton is he comes up small in big games.
Maybe they play similar but Darnold reminds me much more of Eli Manning with legs...he can get a little loose with the football but you never have to worry about him in the big spot...he usually shows up.
Darnold crumbles in big spots. So I just don't see it.
Holy crap. How many times do the comparisons need to be addressed before people get it?
he said verbatim, that its play style and who they could be if the reach there potential...so a I'm stating exactly what he said...
You're stating exactly what he said, in only the first part of what he said. But yeah, other than that, its exactly what he said.
You're stating exactly what he said, in only the first part of what he said. But yeah, other than that, its exactly what he said.
which I acknowledged that there play styles were similar so I understand that aspect. But the mental side of the game is just as important if you ask me. So 50% of what Dalton brings is totally different than what 50% of what Darnold brings.
So what we are saying is he some mix between Dalton play style and Eli Mannings mentality...thats a pretty damn good play if you ask me.
not really I respect the hell what he does. But Watson was ranked 3rd last year and before that injury was by far the best QB. I think Darnold has the potential to be the best QB here as well.
He needs time but I think we can afford him that sitting behind Eli. But like Sy says he probably will be the #1 pick anyway so the point is mute.
Mayfield is more Drew Brees than Wilson to me, fwiw. Mayfield is not the runner Wilson is, but is accurate on the move like Wilson is. Whether Brees or Wilson, pretty decent comparison IMV.
I think Sy's review of Rosen is pretty much what everyone already knows. Rosen is the best QB, and the biggest reason he's being downgraded is because of some durability concerns.
I'm more surprised that he has Mayfield rated so highly. Though I do recall him saying last year that he really liked Mayfield.
It's funny- I remember watching Goff throw the ball around the field on the Giants last year, feeling envious about his ability and the secure feeling of having a young franchise qb on the roster. Rosen could bring that same type of feeling to this organization, though I think he will be even better than Goff. Additionally, having at least 1 year to sit behind Eli and get even further removed from those concussions should make everyone feel even a little better about medicals.
However, like many bbi posters, I think the Giants will overestimate the time Eli has left and pass on Rosen for a running back- a decision I think will haunt this franchise for a decade.
BTW, my high school coach didn't like that I played tennis. He also didn't like that I did theater. Mostly, he didn't like that I sucked at football.
+1
Surprised by favorite, Mayfield, ranked that high. Too bad they couldnt put him in elevated cleats.And tighten up his mind re: offfield things.
Thanks yet again Sy.
BTW, my high school coach didn't like that I played tennis. He also didn't like that I did theater. Mostly, he didn't like that I sucked at football.
that made me laugh...nice
I don't think this factors into the decision even a little. Unless he had some sort of trauma to the knee.
Quote:
a lot of posters have not liked Rosen for awhile. With Sy being deservedly well respected around BBI, does anyone feel more into Rosen now after Sys review? Just wondering really. This has actually reinforced my belief Rosen should be the pick. I think Mayfield is a winner and I like the way Sy put it that his personality may help him some. Darnold is exciting, but when you watch Rosen, at least to me, you see a Pro QB.
It's funny- I remember watching Goff throw the ball around the field on the Giants last year, feeling envious about his ability and the secure feeling of having a young franchise qb on the roster. Rosen could bring that same type of feeling to this organization, though I think he will be even better than Goff. Additionally, having at least 1 year to sit behind Eli and get even further removed from those concussions should make everyone feel even a little better about medicals.
However, like many bbi posters, I think the Giants will overestimate the time Eli has left and pass on Rosen for a running back- a decision I think will haunt this franchise for a decade.
Totally agree, even in the Papa video with Gettleman it shows him watching tape of the Eagles game (Also a UCLA game at one point) but I agree with the Eli longevity exaggeration. It just seems crazy to me that they would pass on the perfect scenario to get a QB because of Eli. I also wonder if the backlash over the Eli benching factors in. I respect everyone’s views on the draft, even the ones I don’t agree with.
I don't think there has been any question from the beginning that Rosen is the more polished and highest floor quarterback in this draft. Sy's grade reinforces that. The surprising thing for me is Darnold's relatively low grade. This would now be a serious reach for Cleveland to take Darnold with the first pick relative to the grades of both Barkley and Rosen...
So Sy's grades have changed my view on Cleveland's strategy - I think Dorsey will take Barkley and trade with the Giants to take Darnold or Allen with their second pick. Why would he do this? It is simply a better hedging strategy for him - if Darnold/Allen busts, it was his second pick, not the first... people will always remember Dorsey's first pick so it is better for his self preservation to take Barkley and exercise the quarterback risk with his second pick.
This then gives us the fourth pick along with the first three picks of the second day... This also now mitigates Gettleman's risk because he either takes the no brainer Chubb/Nelson pick or, if Rosen, Darnold or Allen are there and he wants to take the quarterback risk, he can take a quarterback and still have three picks at the top of the second round to "check the hog molly and running game boxes" with three "first round quality" players.
This is likely wishful thinking on my part, but I can't believe this outcome has been lost on both Dorsey and Gettleman... they both get the best of both worlds and both fan bases will be universally thrilled... Browns could get Barkley/Darnold and Giants could get Rosen/Williams/Michel/Wynn... And if either quarterback busts, the GMs will still be respected by their fan bases as having masterfully mitigated the risk with additional top player(s)...
In an interview he remarked how different it was for him to see the court at 6'4" in high school compared to when he had last played at 6 feet tall. That being said, one of the things that led to him giving up tennis was that he faced surgery for a repetitive motion injury (or something like that) that resulted from the motion of the shoulder and arm when serving the ball. Ultimately he didn't have the surgery, gave up the game, and the issue resolved itself; but I wonder if there was a residual effect or if it's something completely in the past.
Kizer may have been a miss but that may not have been even Kizer’s fault.
2014 was a mess because there was no clear priority and everyone was clustered together.
Keep up the good work.
Kizer may have been a miss but that may not have been even Kizer’s fault.
2014 was a mess because there was no clear priority and everyone was clustered together.
Keep up the good work.
Another thing to look back on is Sy’s QB grades from this year compared to previous years. According to his grades and compared to years past, it’s safe to say he grades this as an excellent QB class.
Agreed. I think when looking at a QB with Rosen’s talent sometimes people look to hard for the flaws. However I think his reviews are very fair. I might bump Darnold up a point or two, but Sy really defends his position on it. I figured Mayfield would get a good grade, but that seems better than I guessed. Mayfield is really a football player though. He’s got the heart and drive.
Quote:
QB class than usual, especially with Rosen? Come on with the tennis issue. Wouldn't that infer he has superior lateral movement skills?
Agreed. I think when looking at a QB with Rosen’s talent sometimes people look to hard for the flaws. However I think his reviews are very fair. I might bump Darnold up a point or two, but Sy really defends his position on it. I figured Mayfield would get a good grade, but that seems better than I guessed. Mayfield is really a football player though. He’s got the heart and drive.
He's got the TOOLS. And he's got the TALENT!
-Winston Zeddemore
1- Rosen 89
2- Goff 86
3- Mayfield 86
4- Wentz 84
Prior to this Sy had given out just 6 grades of 80 or higher at QB. This shows hiw difficult it is to get a QB at the top. There are 3 over 80 in this Draft. As a comp he has 5 DL and 4 Edges at 80 and over this draft alone and 16 RBs over 80 in his 5 yrs.
Rosen stands out.
Quote:
I figured Mayfield would get a good grade, but that seems better than I guessed. Mayfield is really a football player though. He’s got the heart and drive.
Mayfield and Darnold were born to play football, Rosen was born to play quarterback.
Milton I have been with you on Rosen for awhile. He’s my number 1. After that, it’s Darnold and Mayfield. I think Barkley is electric but I want a QB out of this group. Allen is intriguing but scary. I hope all those dinners with Rosen are a precursor to him joining the GMen
Fair enough and I completely agree - if the Giants can get a 2019 first round pick in any trade with the Browns great... But Gettleman cannot let "the perfect" impede "the good". If the best and final offer is #33 and #35, we are still better served trading and mitigating the bust risk of any of these quarterbacks... And potentially getting the quarterback we want anyway at #4... Along with the possibility that we could trade again and get an even better 2019 first round pick in any haul from the Broncos, Dolphins, Bills, Patriots or Cardinals if they so choose to trade down. Sy's grades simply reinforce the uncertainty that surrounds all of these quarterbacks. Kiper loves Allen. Mayock loves Darnold. Sy loves Rosen.
Dorsey and Gettleman are both better served as GMs by mitigating that uncertainty...
Immobile can be a good thing. Immobile has kept Eli upright for 15 years. Eli's inability to even slide has been a constant source of amusement.
BTW, my high school coach didn't like that I played tennis. He also didn't like that I did theater. Mostly, he didn't like that I sucked at football. [/quote]
OK, that was pretty damn funny.
Quote:
as there are a couple highlights of Rosen taking off and showing he is not immobile.
Immobile can be a good thing. Immobile has kept Eli upright for 15 years. Eli's inability to even slide has been a constant source of amusement.
Yes I remember him running for a TD against Washington years ago. It seemed like he was running for 5 minutes and we were in the 2!!
If Rosen didn't have an injury history, he would be an easy choice. Rosen fans want to minimize that history - but missing 8 games over the last two years for any reason is an issue. I think this is what is so interesting about this year. There is no easy choice here.
1- Rosen 89
2- Goff 86
3- Mayfield 86
4- Wentz 84
Prior to this Sy had given out just 6 grades of 80 or higher at QB. This shows hiw difficult it is to get a QB at the top. There are 3 over 80 in this Draft. As a comp he has 5 DL and 4 Edges at 80 and over this draft alone and 16 RBs over 80 in his 5 yrs.
Rosen stands out.
Yeah this seals it.. a QB graded so high shouldn't be passed up on because of Barkley.. Take either Rosen, if giants are worried about injuries then take Mayfield.. I love the attitude he brings to the game..
At the beginning of the process there were ties to Rosen and the Giants, but very little since.
All this talk/whispers/inferences about pro Barkley and pro Chubb have me thinking they have kept their mouths shut about Rosen - a little too tight.
I think secretly this is who Gettleman covets and will draft on Thursday.
If Rosen didn't have an injury history, he would be an easy choice. Rosen fans want to minimize that history - but missing 8 games over the last two years for any reason is an issue. I think this is what is so interesting about this year. There is no easy choice here.
I hear what you are saying, it just seems to me that his injuries are highlighted non stop whereas other players injuries are not even mentioned much, Mayfield and Allen to name a few.
Also if you start talking about durability and longevity, how much do you get out of a RB there. Very few seem to last very long at a high level. Frank Gore has played forever, but most RBs have a very short shelf life.
The QB rating is based upon their innate ability and potential.
The success of a QB is dependent upon the team.
There are some QBs who transcend schemes, such as Rodgers,but, most are scheme dependent.
So, before the Giants select a QB, they must commit to a style of offense, and the QB must be able to function within that system.
If Rosen didn't have an injury history, he would be an easy choice. Rosen fans want to minimize that history - but missing 8 games over the last two years for any reason is an issue. I think this is what is so interesting about this year. There is no easy choice here.
we're dealing with a sample size issue here - rosen missed 6 games because of the shoulder surgery
this past season he missed one regular season game because of a concussion and was back the next week and the bowl game too
does he get judged more harshly than mayfield who also had a few concussions but only missed half a game since the next game was bedlam and the second one happened in his bowl game?
- 17-13 record as a starter
- 10-10 record in Pac 12
- 0-5 road record in 2017
- 1 bowl appearance in three seasons (his freshman year); loss against Nebraska
Last week I heard Aikman (UCLA alum) on a podcast say the following: "the program is worse now than when Rosen got there".
[quote] If he's so good, why did UCLA stink in a poor Pac 12? Consider:
- 17-13 record as a starter
- 10-10 record in Pac 12
- 0-5 road record in 2017
- 1 bowl appearance in three seasons (his freshman year); loss against Nebraska
Last week I heard Aikman (UCLA alum) on a podcast say the following: "the program is worse now than when Rosen got there". [/quote
I believe UCLA's record without him was abysmal. 17-13 is quite good given the talent around him, which wasn't great by any standard.
I still see it as Allen/Rosen 1-2 with Mayfield 3. NFL will push up Allen because of the physical tools. I want CLE to pick him and give the Giants the choice of Rosen or Barkley.
I'd go Rosen there and think Giants will too. Just too hard to pass up on a guy who can be an elite QB for 15 years.
Nothing missing with Rosen.
- 17-13 record as a starter
- 10-10 record in Pac 12
- 0-5 road record in 2017
- 1 bowl appearance in three seasons (his freshman year); loss against Nebraska
Last week I heard Aikman (UCLA alum) on a podcast say the following: "the program is worse now than when Rosen got there".
Yeah, that Elway guy had a worse record in the conference. And look how bad he turned out.
I did, but "his supporting cast sucked" doesn't make me feel any better.
- 17-13 record as a starter
- 10-10 record in Pac 12
- 0-5 road record in 2017
- 1 bowl appearance in three seasons (his freshman year); loss against Nebraska
Last week I heard Aikman (UCLA alum) on a podcast say the following: "the program is worse now than when Rosen got there".
the ucla defense was horrendous
2015 these were the points allowed in the losses 38/56/31/40/37
2016 they lost in OT at texas a&m and by single digits to a top ten stanford team
2017 their defense continued to suck save for the game at USC
rosen led the legendary comeback in the opener against texas a&m but the defense still allowed 44
defensive points allowed in losses last year 48/58/47/44/48/35
He can really throw it. He looks the part. I like him and could be a late round steal.
Same reason AJ McCarron only lost 6 games in 4 years at Alabama. The team was amazing, and he was just good enough.
How can the Giants not select a QB.
There is quality and depth.
Comparing Sy's grades back to 2014
Quote:
Sy,s QB ratings since 2014
Rosen 89
Mayfield 86
Goff 86
Wentz 82
Carr 82
Darnold 81
Manziel 81
Trubisky 80
Winston 80
Mariota 79
Kiser 79
Jackson 78
Allen 78
Prescott 78
Watson 77
Glennon 77
Mahomes 76
Peterman 76
Barkley 76
Benkert 75
Rudolph 75
Bortles 75
Barrett 74
Litton 74
Webb 74
Hundley 74
Great job Archer.
Would it be fair to say that Sy undervalued Wentz (with a lot of other people)?
mayfield has had at least two concussions that were reported and has been in college for two years longer than rosen
Didn’t Mayfield have two concussions? Concussions happen a lot in football. I am not a doctor but does having a concussion in the past lead to a higher risk of more concussions? Isn’t there different levels of concussions? Do you think Chubb or Barkley has really never had a concussion?
Mayfield has 3 documented concussions and maybe a 4th in his arrest.
Mayfield also has had multiple concussions.
UCLA is 1-7 without Rosen
Quote:
UCLA’s record with Rosen starting vs not playing?
UCLA is 1-7 without Rosen
Exactly. He makes a huge difference and obviously makes people around him better.
- 17-13 record as a starter
- 10-10 record in Pac 12
- 0-5 road record in 2017
- 1 bowl appearance in three seasons (his freshman year); loss against Nebraska
Last week I heard Aikman (UCLA alum) on a podcast say the following: "the program is worse now than when Rosen got there".
Understandable.
But how many guys can you name that Rosen played with? Particularly at RB/WR/TE?
They were at a deficit almost every week. In addition, I am really down on Mora and have been for years.
He can really throw it. He looks the part. I like him and could be a late round steal.
He looks the part, has some good velocity numbers, spins it well. So it is a good start.
But when they really needed him to step up his game, I thought he went in the wrong direction. Looked worse, lacked comfort and confidence. Too many INTs...just looks like he is throwing without seeing too often.
Well....he's not 6'4 so...
yes, he comes with risk... but this is the type of QB I want at the helm for the forseeable future. Ballsy, accurate, mobile, brash, vocal leader...
Initially I thought Darnold but then switched to Rosen I will be fine if they choose him .
I am still on the Barkley train but everything you stated
makes sense were in a great spot I am amped up for this draft !
I see Baker Mayfield being godly for his completion percentage and yards but he was throwing to huge open windows on almost every throw. I just don't see why Ferguson is not even being talked about for producing close numbers to Mayfield with half the overall talents.
At this stage in college, Jackson is indeed better than Vick. He's a better runner and passer. Which statistical category at Tech was Vick better than Jackson?
Vick has a better arm, but his motion was long, twisted, and funky. And he had ZERO touch. Jackson is a far more gifted passer going into the draft.
ryanmkeane : 11:07 am : link : reply
you can be a great QB and be on a shitty college team. Jared Goff won 1 game his freshman year, and they really weren't that good for the majority of his career.
Goff still needs to prove he's the guy. Just look at Dak Prescott's regression. Lots of examples:
- Josh Freeman
- Ryan Tannehill
- Mark Sanchez
- Jameis Winston
He's obviously trending upward, but I don't think Goff can be labeled as either poor or good just yet.
JaDeveon Clowney 93 DE 2014
MYLES JACK 92 DE 2016
Myles Garrett 92 DE 2017
Star Lotulelei 91 DT 2013
Jamal Adams 91 Safety 2017
Eric Fisher 90 OT 2013
Derwin James 90 Safety 2018
Dee Milliner 90 CB 2013
only Dree Brews and Russell Wilson are starting QBs under 6 -1 in NFL
And they are only Super Bowl Winning QBs under 6 -1
Quote:
GT
ryanmkeane : 11:07 am : link : reply
you can be a great QB and be on a shitty college team. Jared Goff won 1 game his freshman year, and they really weren't that good for the majority of his career.
Goff still needs to prove he's the guy. Just look at Dak Prescott's regression. Lots of examples:
- Josh Freeman
- Ryan Tannehill
- Mark Sanchez
- Jameis Winston
He's obviously trending upward, but I don't think Goff can be labeled as either poor or good just yet.
That's true. When Goff was drafted I thought that he was going to be a bust but from watching him last season I've done a 180. His arm talent is impressive and he did take a huge step forward from year 1 to 2.
While I think Rosen is somewhat better coming out of college as a prospect (slightly better arm, not as athletic), the Matt Ryan comparison is very good. My only issue with him is that I feel the ability to run for QBs has been magnified in today's game and as Sy said, Rosen isn't going to do anything with his his feet. I'd love to take him, but it seems like the Giants aren't going there.
I think the Darnold assessment is far too negative in that it has to be taken into account that Darnold is leaving earlier than he probably should've and his 2017 performance isn't really indicative of the type of prospect he is. Harping on the turnovers is a bit unfair. Guys like Matt Ryan and DeShaun Watson were top 2 in the country in interceptions and those guys were in their third year of starting. (To be fair, I have worried a bit about Darnold's penchant for fumbles.) Comparing him to Andy Dalton is just... crazy for lack of a better word. Their ceilings are dissimilar. Their physical skills are dissimilar. Their careers at the end of their redshirt sophomore seasons are dissimilar. I have no clue what they have in common.
While I think Rosen is somewhat better coming out of college as a prospect (slightly better arm, not as athletic), the Matt Ryan comparison is very good. My only issue with him is that I feel the ability to run for QBs has been magnified in today's game and as Sy said, Rosen isn't going to do anything with his his feet. I'd love to take him, but it seems like the Giants aren't going there.
I think the Darnold assessment is far too negative in that it has to be taken into account that Darnold is leaving earlier than he probably should've and his 2017 performance isn't really indicative of the type of prospect he is. Harping on the turnovers is a bit unfair. Guys like Matt Ryan and DeShaun Watson were top 2 in the country in interceptions and those guys were in their third year of starting. (To be fair, I have worried a bit about Darnold's penchant for fumbles.) Comparing him to Andy Dalton is just... crazy for lack of a better word. Their ceilings are dissimilar. Their physical skills are dissimilar. Their careers at the end of their redshirt sophomore seasons are dissimilar. I have no clue what they have in common.
Lazy is a strong word.
Both are undersized. Both have over the top releases. Both make a lot of plays on the move. Both keep their eyes downfield when scrambling. Both have very strong arms (Do you know what Mayfield clocked at the combine?). Both have plus accuracy numbers downfield.
Yes Russell Wilson runs faster in tights at the combine.
only Dree Brews and Russell Wilson are starting QBs under 6 -1 in NFL
And they are only Super Bowl Winning QBs under 6 -1
There is a lot more to QB than being tall
At this stage in college, Jackson is indeed better than Vick. He's a better runner and passer. Which statistical category at Tech was Vick better than Jackson?
Vick has a better arm, but his motion was long, twisted, and funky. And he had ZERO touch. Jackson is a far more gifted passer going into the draft.
Vick was more explosive and had more feel as a runner, better vision. Studier frame.
And as a thrower, Vick was head and shoulders above Jackson. Much smoother release, much more consistent. More zip and better with touch throws.
I've heard the same thing a few times. Not sure how much I value that to be honest. Vick isn't going to go on air saying Jackson isn't as good.
Because best QB prospect of the last decade trumps that
Quote:
Are happy to see such highly-rated QBs, but if we're going by Sy's ratings, how do we not take Barkley? Sy rated him the best prospect in the 6 years he's been doing this... "positional value" aside how do we not take the best prospect of the last half-decade? It's not like Barkley is a punter, he can run/catch/return and could touch the ball 30+ times a game.
Because best QB prospect of the last decade trumps that
I mean half decade. Clearly Luck was a better prospect
Vick was more explosive and had more feel as a runner, better vision. Studier frame.
And as a thrower, Vick was head and shoulders above Jackson. Much smoother release, much more consistent. More zip and better with touch throws.
With all due respect, you are way, way off on this. Vick dropped from 57% completion rate to a 54% completion rate his final year at VT. What exactly is "consistent" about that? Jackson has improved every year and nearly hit 60% this year.
Vick was sturdier - true. But he had nowhere near the explosive edge you suggest. That's actually a very puzzling remark. Look at Jackson's rushing stats compared to Vick. And this is now when the ACC is much, much better. It isn't even close who is the more explosive player...You make it seem like Jackso is doing his work in the Sun Belt conference...
Quote:
Vick was more explosive and had more feel as a runner, better vision. Studier frame.
And as a thrower, Vick was head and shoulders above Jackson. Much smoother release, much more consistent. More zip and better with touch throws.
With all due respect, you are way, way off on this. Vick dropped from 57% completion rate to a 54% completion rate his final year at VT. What exactly is "consistent" about that? Jackson has improved every year and nearly hit 60% this year.
Vick was sturdier - true. But he had nowhere near the explosive edge you suggest. That's actually a very puzzling remark. Look at Jackson's rushing stats compared to Vick. And this is now when the ACC is much, much better. It isn't even close who is the more explosive player...You make it seem like Jackso is doing his work in the Sun Belt conference...
Comparing stats between Vick and Jackson is near pointless. Look at the schemes they ran....
Neither win a lot of points via accuracy but Vick simply had a cleaner throwing motion and and easier deep ball than Jackson. There is no question there.
And I am not crapping on Jackson, I just don't think he is a 1st rounder.
He is an excellent athlete. But I am confident in what I said. They are two different animals that played in 2 schemes that were entirely different.
Jackson is an excellent runner but he isn’t on Vick’s level.
Vick had a better arm too.
I like Jackson but Vick was a better prospect.
Can’t stand this position. They’ve all had concussions. Did you play? If you did and played hard you probably had one too. It’s part of the game.
Quote:
Jackson had 19 runs in his career at Louisville of 40+ yards, btw.
He is an excellent athlete. But I am confident in what I said. They are two different animals that played in 2 schemes that were entirely different.
Whatever. Go watch the Clemson games, the Texas A&M game, the Miss State game, the Florida State games. These are teams with a ton of depth and pro talent and Jackson runs through and around them with astonishing ease. That's God given, not "scheme"...
I wish Jackson has run the 40 because I think he has better straight line speed than Vick. What did Vick run the forty in? 4.35ish?
Jackson hurdles defenders like Edwin Moses running the 440 hurdles. You can't discount that skill set; and he has this uncanny ability to just bounce off defenders without getting squarely hit.
Vick is a better cutter - I cede that point.
I am sure there is a lot more than being tall .. just like there is a lot more to being a basketball player than being tall
but the fact is to be an NFL QB the rule seems to be you need to be taller than 6' - 1"
the fact that only two QB under 6' 1" have won a super bowl is a very telling
Quote:
In comment 13927220 bw in dc said:
Quote:
Jackson had 19 runs in his career at Louisville of 40+ yards, btw.
He is an excellent athlete. But I am confident in what I said. They are two different animals that played in 2 schemes that were entirely different.
Whatever. Go watch the Clemson games, the Texas A&M game, the Miss State game, the Florida State games. These are teams with a ton of depth and pro talent and Jackson runs through and around them with astonishing ease. That's God given, not "scheme"...
I wish Jackson has run the 40 because I think he has better straight line speed than Vick. What did Vick run the forty in? 4.35ish?
Jackson hurdles defenders like Edwin Moses running the 440 hurdles. You can't discount that skill set; and he has this uncanny ability to just bounce off defenders without getting squarely hit.
Vick is a better cutter - I cede that point.
What does any of this have to do with playing QB in the NFL?
This time though, with the QB's? We have the same top 5.
Agree with every single thing he says in this post
Surely you are not referring to Manning's lack of athleticism. Are you talking about turnovers or low key personality?
They have Mayfield as the clear cut number 1. Followed by Rosen, Darnold closer to a mid/late first round pick and then Allen more of a top 30 guy..
I've bought Ourlads since I was about 12 and I'm almost 36. Not sure that means anything (it doesn't), but I do find them to be pretty reliable for draft info and a bit more objective than some other publications out there that are publishing stuff second hand or sensationalized.
The QB rating is based upon their innate ability and potential.
The success of a QB is dependent upon the team.
There are some QBs who transcend schemes, such as Rodgers,but, most are scheme dependent.
So, before the Giants select a QB, they must commit to a style of offense, and the QB must be able to function within that system.
Exactly. And the reason why I feel great with the Giants taking Rosen is because of Shurmur.
It's a match made in heaven. Coaching and QB talent can go a long way in today's NFL. All the way to legendary.