for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Why is DG being so coy about the Giants intentions?

PerpetualNervousness : 4/24/2018 1:24 pm
At the risk of totally overthinking things, I do wonder why the Giants are being so tightlipped about who they want. it is possible that they really don't know yet who's top of their board, but that seems unlikely at this point. I can see why Cleveland is being fuzzy about the #1. In their perfect scenario, they would know #2 and #3 are qbs, so then they can take the best qb #1 and still get the best position player in the draft at #4. they know the jets are taking a qb, and by suggesting they they might take barkley #1, maybe they push a qb hungry team to try to move up to #2 now, predraft, and then they get exactly what they want.

but for the Giants, it seems like there's less benefit outside of trying to force the browns hand somehow. if the giants really want barkley, wouldn't it make the most sense to make cleveland think the opposite, that the giants really want a qb? that seems the one way you'd guarantee barkley will be there at pick #2, since there's no way the browns want to end up with their 3rd choice quarterback. and if you really liked a qb, you'd probably much more strongly hint the reverse. the browns aren't taking Chubb #1, so if that's who the giants really liked, what's the point of keeping that a secret? making it seem like you might take 1 of 6 different players when you're #2 doesn't get you much unless you really want to trade the pick. or am i missing something?
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Why is DG being so coy about the Giants intentions?  
Gman11 : 4/24/2018 2:23 pm : link
You're new around here, aren't ya?
'CAUSE IT AIN'T NONE A YOUR BUSINESS!!!  
TC : 4/24/2018 2:25 pm : link
:-)
Please,  
oldog : 4/24/2018 2:42 pm : link
the draft is a poker game, and showing your hand in a poker game, is always unwise. Just keep them close to you chest.
the giants don't have the 10th pick, they have the 2nd pick  
PerpetualNervousness : 4/24/2018 2:43 pm : link
i don't want to belabor the point, but the idea that keeping the giants intentions vague this season is somehow preventing lots of teams from jumping ahead of them is actually not what's going on here. there's only 1 pick ahead of them, not many, as was the case when they didnt get floyd or conklin. there's only 1 team that can impact who they pick at 2, and that team's universe of options is pretty easily predicted. cleveland will either take a qb, or they will take barkley. they will not trade the pick - there's no trading partner for them. you'd think the play for the giants, if they had a target, would be to try to manipulate the browns, which they dont' seem to be doing. i guess my point is that it seems to me that given that, they're likelier to trade the pick than not.
RE: the giants don't have the 10th pick, they have the 2nd pick  
Strahan91 : 4/24/2018 2:46 pm : link
In comment 13928633 PerpetualNervousness said:
Quote:
i don't want to belabor the point, but the idea that keeping the giants intentions vague this season is somehow preventing lots of teams from jumping ahead of them is actually not what's going on here. there's only 1 pick ahead of them, not many, as was the case when they didnt get floyd or conklin. there's only 1 team that can impact who they pick at 2, and that team's universe of options is pretty easily predicted. cleveland will either take a qb, or they will take barkley. they will not trade the pick - there's no trading partner for them. you'd think the play for the giants, if they had a target, would be to try to manipulate the browns, which they dont' seem to be doing. i guess my point is that it seems to me that given that, they're likelier to trade the pick than not.


and what exactly is the upside to showing your hand? the downside risks are several different lower probability scenarios, but what's the upside? If there's no upside and there is some potential downside risk even if unlikely, it's smart to keep your intentions hidden.
This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
barens : 4/24/2018 2:48 pm : link
How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.
RE: This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
Strahan91 : 4/24/2018 2:51 pm : link
In comment 13928654 barens said:
Quote:
How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.


You'd have to be pretty naive to believe that the Giants were targeting Apple all along and the Bears and Titans just happened to trade up for Conklin and Floyd at 8 and 9 when the Giants were picking 10.
RE: This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
arcarsenal : 4/24/2018 2:53 pm : link
In comment 13928654 barens said:
Quote:
How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.


Leonard Floyd and Jack Conklin seem to be players you've forgotten quickly.
RE: RE: This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
Beer Man : 4/24/2018 3:00 pm : link
In comment 13928668 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13928654 barens said:


Quote:


How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.



Leonard Floyd and Jack Conklin seem to be players you've forgotten quickly.
+1. You beat me to it. It may not have been Reese that was doing the leaking, but it appeared that someone with inside knowledge was feeding the press.
Why?  
TC : 4/24/2018 3:01 pm : link
The simple answer is there is nothing to be gained by doing so. And by doing so, they can an inhibit receiving trade offers from teams who want someone other than the prospect the Giants name.
To be honest if he ends up taking Barkley  
bigbluescot : 4/24/2018 3:06 pm : link
I wouldn't say he's been particularly coy. He's been ridiculously effusive about Barkley throughout the process.
Having the #2 pick  
ryanmkeane : 4/24/2018 3:09 pm : link
it's not like we are picking from 10 guys. There are probably 3-4 players the Giants are considering. So it probably won't be a surprise. The great thing is, nobody really knows in what order the preference is...all we know is that Barkley, Chubb, Nelson, and probably 1 QB are in the top 4
Because DG  
Giant John : 4/24/2018 3:20 pm : link
Is trying to influence the thinking of other teams by forcing them to speculate and react to that thinking in such a way as to favor theGiants.
Simple  
widmerseyebrow : 4/24/2018 3:27 pm : link
Keeps all prospective trade downs open. And if we do trade down, it keeps all those teams ahead of us in the dark about who we really want.
RE: RE: This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
barens : 4/24/2018 4:04 pm : link
In comment 13928668 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13928654 barens said:


Quote:


How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.



Leonard Floyd and Jack Conklin seem to be players you've forgotten quickly.


I don't think it took a mental genius to figure out that the Giants needs aligned with the best players available at the time. That's just how the draft goes some years, you don't always get what you want. The only thing that could have changed that is if they traded up, which they made the decision not to, and you'd have a better point if you wanted to knock Reese for not doing that, but acting like he was the most predictable GM with which player he wanted? Complete bullshit.
Is this your fist year watching the NFL? Sounds like it.  
SterlingArcher : 4/24/2018 5:11 pm : link
.
RE: RE: RE: This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
arcarsenal : 4/24/2018 5:33 pm : link
In comment 13928846 barens said:
Quote:
In comment 13928668 arcarsenal said:


Quote:


In comment 13928654 barens said:


Quote:


How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.



Leonard Floyd and Jack Conklin seem to be players you've forgotten quickly.



I don't think it took a mental genius to figure out that the Giants needs aligned with the best players available at the time. That's just how the draft goes some years, you don't always get what you want. The only thing that could have changed that is if they traded up, which they made the decision not to, and you'd have a better point if you wanted to knock Reese for not doing that, but acting like he was the most predictable GM with which player he wanted? Complete bullshit.


It was very well-known before the draft even started or before we were ever on the clock that we had major interest in both players. It's not "bullshit" and not a coincidence that two teams leapfrogged us to get them. They knew we wanted them.

You've had your head in the sand on this.

Leonard Floyd especially was a name being repeated over and over again here and in general for the Giants. Our intent was very much telegraphed that year and most everyone knew it.
Telegraphed? It wasn’t exactly a talent rich draft,  
barens : 4/24/2018 6:14 pm : link
And the Giants weren’t the only team that had interest in those two players. There were maybe 10 “blue chip” players going into that draft, and one of them had a draft day bomb dropped on them(Tunseil). Again, I don’t exactly know what Reese did to let everyone know who they were going to pick, but that seemed to be the logical landing spot for those players regardless of what team was selecting there.

The bottom line, to me, is if they really wanted one of those players, they would have had to trade up, and who knows what options were on the table.

Let me ask you, did you know the Giants were going to draft Pugh? OBJ? Even Flowers? Or Engram? I sure didn’t.
Floyd was the top pass rusher in the draft  
UConn4523 : 4/24/2018 6:21 pm : link
and Conklin a top Tackle, it wasn’t a leap of faith to think the Giants wanted one of them. We also may not have wanted to give what it took to move up. I really don’t see what the issue is during that draft.
.  
arcarsenal : 4/24/2018 6:24 pm : link
If they hadn't been so clear about liking those players, it's possible that CHI/TEN would have simply sat tight thinking the players would fall past the Giants or at least have taken that chance if they were under the impression that NYG were interested in other players there.

They both leapfrogged us because everyone in the world knew those were our targets.

As far as other players - as a matter of fact, there were guys here who knew about both David Wilson AND Justin Pugh before we were on the clock.

Read JonC's posts regarding leaks this year. He's said several times that much, much less info is getting out now than in the past. The draft is in 2 days, we are picking 2nd overall, and not a single person outside of Giants Central seems to know exactly what their plan is.

Contrast that with 2 years ago where leading up to the draft, all you heard about was Leonard Floyd and to a slightly lesser degree, Jack Conklin coming from here. It was very clear who we wanted and both the Bears and Titans knew it.
RE: Floyd was the top pass rusher in the draft  
Strahan91 : 4/24/2018 6:44 pm : link
In comment 13929058 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
and Conklin a top Tackle, it wasn’t a leap of faith to think the Giants wanted one of them. We also may not have wanted to give what it took to move up. I really don’t see what the issue is during that draft.


Floyd with his 4.5 sacks in his junior year ahead of declaring for the draft was the best pass rusher in a draft with Joey Bosa? Floyd was a late riser but before the Giants interest he wasn't projected in the top 10 by most.
As an OLB, yes  
UConn4523 : 4/24/2018 7:17 pm : link
he was he top pass rusher and had freakish length coming from the SEC. if our interest in him caused the Bears to jump us and give up picks for him, so be it. If Reese wanted him bad enough he could have traded up for him, but he didn’t.
You should ask the worst kept secret, the Browns taking Darnold...  
GFAN52 : 4/24/2018 7:36 pm : link
and why Dorsey is still playing coy.
And drafting 1 when you also have 4  
UConn4523 : 4/24/2018 7:42 pm : link
or drafting 2 when you still maybe want to keep your current QB opens up the options for both teams. I think part of it is simply that, anyone of 5 or 6 guys is possible so it’s less about being coy and more about say “no shit we like that guy”.
RE: This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
djm : 4/24/2018 7:50 pm : link
In comment 13928654 barens said:
Quote:
How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.


Fact.
RE: RE: This whole thread reeks of bullshit.  
arcarsenal : 4/24/2018 7:51 pm : link
In comment 13929176 djm said:
Quote:
In comment 13928654 barens said:


Quote:


How exactly did Reese ever show his intentions? I don't ever remember anyone predicting the Giants picks, and if they did, it wasn't because Reese tipped his hand. He had a few bad picks, a couple we were unlucky with injuries, but the lengths people will go to squarely put the blame on our old GM, instead of just saying we had a shitty team, and shit happens.



Fact.


It's not a "fact" - people here have known our picks before they were made.

B in ALB knew we were taking Pugh before the draft even started. If he knew that, who else did?
RE: ... Eric, I agree...  
Darasman : 4/24/2018 7:53 pm : link
In comment 13928414 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
It's not that complicated. Teams can move ahead of the Giants if they desire the same player. And if the Giants trade back, they still may land their preference if teams don't know what they are doing.

My question to you, why do you want to know?
Giants have thrown out the Barkley stuff  
Tuckrule : 4/24/2018 9:49 pm : link
To get Cleveland to possibly take him at 1. I really don’t see any chance we actually draft a running back Idc who it is at 2 overall when we have a 37 year old qb. We draft a qb or try and trade down. It’s really that simple
RE: Giants have thrown out the Barkley stuff  
GFAN52 : 4/24/2018 9:56 pm : link
In comment 13929408 Tuckrule said:
Quote:
To get Cleveland to possibly take him at 1. I really don’t see any chance we actually draft a running back Idc who it is at 2 overall when we have a 37 year old qb. We draft a qb or try and trade down. It’s really that simple


DG won't trade down. It's not a Giants type move.
Arc  
djm : 4/24/2018 9:59 pm : link
I’m sorry but that’s bullshit. B likely just got lucky. Pugh was a pretty highly rated guard tackle and the giants had a need there. Wow, a regular Nostradamus!

Plus, I’d love to see this post where B called the pick. I’ve been here forever and never saw it. And I don’t wannw hear that he listed 2-3 players with caveats like a few others here love to do. Save it, ain’t buying it.
I really hope  
You'reMyBoyBlue!! : 4/24/2018 10:00 pm : link
This was a 3 year troll job where you set-up a username to one day come back and ask an incredibly ridiculous question that perfectly fits your name.
Even if there were “leaks” (bullshit)  
djm : 4/24/2018 10:02 pm : link
How on earth is that on Reese?

How do you hide it? Don’t scout the guy? Sneak the player in through Steve’s steakhouse backroads in carlstadt?

Ok fine Pugh was leaked. Only one. And it’s still bullshit.
RE: Arc  
arcarsenal : 4/24/2018 10:03 pm : link
In comment 13929435 djm said:
Quote:
I’m sorry but that’s bullshit. B likely just got lucky. Pugh was a pretty highly rated guard tackle and the giants had a need there. Wow, a regular Nostradamus!

Plus, I’d love to see this post where B called the pick. I’ve been here forever and never saw it. And I don’t wannw hear that he listed 2-3 players with caveats like a few others here love to do. Save it, ain’t buying it.


He didn't get lucky. He played football @ Syracuse and found out from a reputable source.

It wasn't a guess. He had concrete info.
.  
arcarsenal : 4/24/2018 10:05 pm : link
People here knew we were taking David Wilson too.

Just like we were going to take Leonard Floyd.

Jerry Reese was not running a tight ship. Word got out. It happens. I don't know why some of you guys are so unwilling to believe this.

John Fox basically admitted that the Bears jumped us to take Floyd because they already knew we were going to.
In that case, we might as well fire Gettleman,  
barens : 4/24/2018 10:21 pm : link
Given everyone and their mother knows we are going to draft Barkley..
.  
arcarsenal : 4/24/2018 10:30 pm : link
No one "knows" that we're taking Barkley.

We're also picking 2nd overall which makes the entire scenario different. It means there's only one team teams can trade with to get ahead of us - and Cleveland isn't giving up #1 overall. They know they need a QB and the only way they can ensure they get him is to take him there.

Waiting until 4 is too much of a risk. NYG can certainly go QB and it's almost a lock that NYJ will. So Cleveland risks 2 QB's going off the board before they're on the clock again and if they really like one of these QB's (... Darnold) more than the others, they'll probably lose him.
RE: Floyd was the top pass rusher in the draft  
bradshaw44 : 4/24/2018 10:47 pm : link
In comment 13929058 UConn4523 said:
Quote:
and Conklin a top Tackle, it wasn’t a leap of faith to think the Giants wanted one of them. We also may not have wanted to give what it took to move up. I really don’t see what the issue is during that draft.


We got jumped for both of them.
RE: .  
djm : 4/25/2018 10:11 am : link
In comment 13929447 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
People here knew we were taking David Wilson too.

Just like we were going to take Leonard Floyd.

Jerry Reese was not running a tight ship. Word got out. It happens. I don't know why some of you guys are so unwilling to believe this.

John Fox basically admitted that the Bears jumped us to take Floyd because they already knew we were going to.


People called Wilson, in veiled form no less, SECONDS before the pick. Maybe minutes.

Fox "knew" the Giants liked Floyd much like I knew the guy sitting across from me had pocket aces. Gut feeling based on smoke.

Giants will draft barkley and people will say it was telegraphed.
I don't believe it  
djm : 4/25/2018 10:14 am : link
because there is little to no evidence. And some of the whispers or rumors or statements don't cement anything as fact, merely coincidences.

And again, how do you "hide" your intentions? How do allow leaks to happen? Are you telling me that Reese was walking around metlife telling everyone who would listen that he loved Conklin or Floyd? Or maybe people just connected the dots?
.  
arcarsenal : 4/25/2018 11:40 am : link
You're making it sound like it's not possible for leaks to get out to the media.

Why do you think Dave Gettleman has made such a point of making sure this doesn't happen? He's well-aware that it was happening in the past. It has been acknowledged.

Reese didn't have to stand on a building with a megaphone for people to find out which players we were truly coveting. It's very easy for information to leak. It's really not that complicated or hard to comprehend.

And people knew about Wilson earlier than "seconds" before he was picked. That was also something that has been widely-discussed around here.
Some weird revisionist history going on here  
JonC : 4/25/2018 11:58 am : link
I shared David Wilson several days BEFORE the draft (Eric had the same info), also mentioned interest in Solder, OB, Flowers, had the exact trade up details for Collins, and shared the Floyd/Conklin interest.

There were leaks galore under Reese. It's impossible for any org to plug every leak at every layer from scouts up, especially with two big families and so many Maras involved in the foundation.
RE: Some weird revisionist history going on here  
arcarsenal : 4/25/2018 12:01 pm : link
In comment 13930451 JonC said:
Quote:
I shared David Wilson several days BEFORE the draft (Eric had the same info), also mentioned interest in Solder, OB, Flowers, had the exact trade up details for Collins, and shared the Floyd/Conklin interest.

There were leaks galore under Reese. It's impossible for any org to plug every leak at every layer from scouts up, especially with two big families and so many Maras involved in the foundation.


Thank you.

Holy shit, I feel like I'm in bizarro world here. I thought this was all very well-known stuff around here. Apparently not.
RE: Some weird revisionist history going on here  
Strahan91 : 4/25/2018 12:03 pm : link
In comment 13930451 JonC said:
Quote:
I shared David Wilson several days BEFORE the draft (Eric had the same info), also mentioned interest in Solder, OB, Flowers, had the exact trade up details for Collins, and shared the Floyd/Conklin interest.

There were leaks galore under Reese. It's impossible for any org to plug every leak at every layer from scouts up, especially with two big families and so many Maras involved in the foundation.


I'd also add that hitdog mentioned both Engram and Tomlinson on several occasions before the draft.
True  
JonC : 4/25/2018 12:08 pm : link
and YANKEE28 knew of the high interest in Tomlinson, and I was told it's Engram if Mahomes is gone.

People are human, the draft build up is vital to the NFL game, everyone gets excited over the possibilities.
I cannot believe that the OP was serious...  
EricJ : 4/25/2018 12:09 pm : link
.
There may have been leaks, as there are everywhere in the NFL,  
barens : 4/25/2018 6:09 pm : link
I never disputed that. But putting this on Reese I just don't get. He was as bland as it gets during just about every pre draft process, but somehow, he fucks up letting their intentions show?

People seem to forget agents, players, owners and more are involved, and there is only so much you can do.

RE: I cannot believe that the OP was serious...  
PerpetualNervousness : 4/25/2018 6:23 pm : link
In comment 13930482 EricJ said:
Quote:
.


sigh. below is a clearer version of what i was trying to say with the post
why i think the giants want to trade out of the pick - ( New Window )
RE: RE: Floyd was the top pass rusher in the draft  
UConn4523 : 4/25/2018 6:43 pm : link
In comment 13929528 bradshaw44 said:
Quote:
In comment 13929058 UConn4523 said:


Quote:


and Conklin a top Tackle, it wasn’t a leap of faith to think the Giants wanted one of them. We also may not have wanted to give what it took to move up. I really don’t see what the issue is during that draft.



We got jumped for both of them.


We did?
Might as well have DG tell the truth on who the pick will be.  
Jimmy Googs : 4/25/2018 6:48 pm : link
Who would believe him anyway?
I don’t want to kill or disparage any of the asshats or insiders  
djm : 4/25/2018 7:07 pm : link
Not my intentions. I just dont there were as many so called damaging leaks as much as just people hearing things. Some truths probably but even then I’d use the term truth very carefully. And let’s be honest, this is much different. Second pick new regime shit is gonna be tighter than a frogs ass right now.

I love the asshattery. I just don’t think it’s fair to single out Reese or prior regimes like some are. Like JonC said there’s a human element.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner