Just because you dont read about teams wanting to trade up for a player doesn't mean that player isn't worth the pick or that the QBs are better. It just means that QBs are overvalued ... ALWAYS.
Numerous times how the browns should take Barkley 1st overall and take one of the quarterbacks available at 4.
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
Numerous times how the browns should take Barkley 1st overall and take one of the quarterbacks available at 4.
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
The only folks who think the Browns are desperate to nab Barkley at one or four are bbi posters. Browns aren't taking Barkley. Certainly not at one, that's laughable. And not even at four, if they even keep that pick. Likewise, Denver is not taking Barkley, they will trade back or go Chubb or Nelson.
Most of Those Posts are from HOMERS who have a #1 QB in mind at the second pick...they want The Browns to do ANYTHING Stupid that will add to their own scenario......such as the Browns moving to 12 in a Buffalo Rube Goldberg
Numerous times how the browns should take Barkley 1st overall and take one of the quarterbacks available at 4.
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
Numerous times how the browns should take Barkley 1st overall and take one of the quarterbacks available at 4.
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
The only folks who think the Browns are desperate to nab Barkley at one or four are bbi posters. Browns aren't taking Barkley. Certainly not at one, that's laughable. And not even at four, if they even keep that pick. Likewise, Denver is not taking Barkley, they will trade back or go Chubb or Nelson.
Just because you choose to ignore any comments in regards to Barkley at 1 does not make it true. Gil Brandt said the browns should take Barkley 1st overall. There have been reports out of Cleveland that they should take Barkley at 1. There has been talk that the browns should take a quarterback at 1 and trade with the giants to secure Barkley at 2 and it's not just bbi talk.
Numerous times how the browns should take Barkley 1st overall and take one of the quarterbacks available at 4.
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
The only folks who think the Browns are desperate to nab Barkley at one or four are bbi posters. Browns aren't taking Barkley. Certainly not at one, that's laughable. And not even at four, if they even keep that pick. Likewise, Denver is not taking Barkley, they will trade back or go Chubb or Nelson.
Just because you choose to ignore any comments in regards to Barkley at 1 does not make it true. Gil Brandt said the browns should take Barkley 1st overall. There have been reports out of Cleveland that they should take Barkley at 1. There has been talk that the browns should take a quarterback at 1 and trade with the giants to secure Barkley at 2 and it's not just bbi talk.
Look we all consume our own news sites and sources. The folks i listen to aren't projecting the browns to take Barkley. They don't view him as some rare prize worth mucking up their qb plans. And denver and cleveland beat writers i have heard are praying for the giants to take barkley, referring to it as the first mistake of the draft.
Everyone on both sides of the argument to read the eagles beat writer article Posted on the Vacarro thread. It's really the best read so far as to the detriment of taking a rb so high.
Everyone on both sides of the argument to read the eagles beat writer article Posted on the Vacarro thread. It's really the best read so far as to the detriment of taking a rb so high.
is the interest in Barkley. Cleveland may take a jump at Barkley and go QB with the 4th overall pick simply because they believe the Giants will grab him at #2. This is smart by the Giants and gives Cleveland some pause, because the Jets ARE NOT taking a RB. The only threat is the Giants...
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
I mean dumb enough to draft a RB
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
The only folks who think the Browns are desperate to nab Barkley at one or four are bbi posters. Browns aren't taking Barkley. Certainly not at one, that's laughable. And not even at four, if they even keep that pick. Likewise, Denver is not taking Barkley, they will trade back or go Chubb or Nelson.
In comment 13929784 TrueBlue56 said:
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
Quote:
Numerous times how the browns should take Barkley 1st overall and take one of the quarterbacks available at 4.
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
The only folks who think the Browns are desperate to nab Barkley at one or four are bbi posters. Browns aren't taking Barkley. Certainly not at one, that's laughable. And not even at four, if they even keep that pick. Likewise, Denver is not taking Barkley, they will trade back or go Chubb or Nelson.
Just because you choose to ignore any comments in regards to Barkley at 1 does not make it true. Gil Brandt said the browns should take Barkley 1st overall. There have been reports out of Cleveland that they should take Barkley at 1. There has been talk that the browns should take a quarterback at 1 and trade with the giants to secure Barkley at 2 and it's not just bbi talk.
Quote:
In comment 13929784 TrueBlue56 said:
Quote:
Numerous times how the browns should take Barkley 1st overall and take one of the quarterbacks available at 4.
Look at the team's picking at the top of the draft. The browns are quarterback desperate, the jets traded up because they are quarterback desperate. Then you have the Broncos who seem to be content to sit where they are and take either a quarterback or Nelson.
Why is Barkley worthy enough to be part of the discussion for 1st overall, but that's not good enough
The only team that could possibly trade out of the top 5 is us.
The only folks who think the Browns are desperate to nab Barkley at one or four are bbi posters. Browns aren't taking Barkley. Certainly not at one, that's laughable. And not even at four, if they even keep that pick. Likewise, Denver is not taking Barkley, they will trade back or go Chubb or Nelson.
Just because you choose to ignore any comments in regards to Barkley at 1 does not make it true. Gil Brandt said the browns should take Barkley 1st overall. There have been reports out of Cleveland that they should take Barkley at 1. There has been talk that the browns should take a quarterback at 1 and trade with the giants to secure Barkley at 2 and it's not just bbi talk.
Look we all consume our own news sites and sources. The folks i listen to aren't projecting the browns to take Barkley. They don't view him as some rare prize worth mucking up their qb plans. And denver and cleveland beat writers i have heard are praying for the giants to take barkley, referring to it as the first mistake of the draft.
Thanks. That's a good read. Linked here.
Dont pick Barkley at 2 - ( New Window )