Packers plotting a potential trade up

at his disposal, although only one pick in each of the first three rounds so there may be a limit to how high they can go without dipping into future drafts."
-

PFT - ( New Window )

talents in the secondary; James, Ward or Fitzpatrick.

They have an abundance of Day 3 picks, including the first one:
Round 1 Pick 14
Round 2 Pick 13
Round 3 Pick 12
Round 4 Pick 1
Round 4 Pick 33
Round 5 Pick 1
Round 5 Pick 35
Round 5 Pick 37
Round 6 Pick 12
Round 6 Pick 33
Round 7 Pick 14
Round 7 Pick 21

I could easily see the Giants moving down - especially from on of their 3rd-round slots - for the chance to fill more holes on Saturday..

As for the first round, it’s hard to see the Packers moving into the top five.

between him and Rodgers, they'll have a QB for 16 games.

In comment 13931435 SHO'NUFF said:

Quote:

between him and Rodgers, they'll have a QB for 16 games.

Lol, perfect plan.

Rodgers has been the starter there for a decade and has only missed more than a game in two seasons. He's played 15 or 16 games in 8 of those years.

I think they're okay @ QB.

In comment 13931406 Chris684 said:

Quote:

talents in the secondary; James, Ward or Fitzpatrick.

I was thinking Chubb as well.

In comment 13931491 bw in dc said:

Quote:

In comment 13931406 Chris684 said: Quote: talents in the secondary; James, Ward or Fitzpatrick. I was thinking Chubb as well.

I can see Nelson. In terms of talent he is probably very high but may drop a little to within trading range where they don't have to give up a ton but still get one of the top players in the draft.

Than our indestructible gumby QB.