Or they think enough of Webb to backup Eli this year rather than bring in a Vet. They now have 2 young kids let the competition begin. If one of them turns into something, it's a homerun. I'll trust our new HC that there's a possibility here.
You can spin it however you want, but if the Giants have to hedge their bets by taking another QB, it means that they're not sold on Webb.
I was actually holding out hope that they passed on a QB at 2 because they really liked Webb. Now I know that they don't.
After watching RGIII / Cousins, even Wentz / Foles, tho not #1s Â
I get it. Insurance & flexibility at the most important position, as well as a shot at a starter / backup, if not the chance to flip one should both produce
Also makes sense given Shurmur's situation in MN w/ Bridgewater / Bradford / Keenum and his QB coaching experience (as well as what Bettcher saw at QB in AZ fwiw). Maybe they don't like Webb, maybe they just like KL, or maybe they know they need a #1 / #2 soon with Eli near the end
And that's what the Giants did....I have no problem with this....everybody here is so freakin emotional, which is why none of you are making picks for an NFL team......one day, I have a feeling that every negative poster on this thread is gonna be called out at some time in the future......you go with your board....
I hope Webb pans out, this is just another opportunity. If they can hit on one of the two it allows them to go 1-3 more years with Eli and then hopefully have a successor ready without having to spend really premium picks on a guy either selecting him or trading up for him.
Right approach I think.
They also just didn’t have a third string QB until now.
First of all Chubb was gone also. you keep trying to add players that weren't available and you go hey would you want a 1st rounder and 2nd rounder or a 1st and a 4th? Really it should be in your own words
Would you want
A) Darnold + Chubb
or
B) Barkley + Will Hernandez + Lauletta
there fixed for you... I a keeping the 1st round ranked stud OG thank you.
Jones and Chubb went after Hernandez. So both were available.
Fine. I'll add a third varriable.
Darnold + Chubb + Christian.
Something to think about...
RE: The pick make no sense for a number of reasons Â
1) There's limited number of developmental snaps to go around
2) You spent a mid round pick on a developmental QB last year
3) Neither QB is ready to step in if Eli gets hurt
4) You clearly realize you'll need an Eli replacement but keep trying to find it with mid round picks (Nassib, Webb, Lauletta) but not with the higher ranked prospects.
5) you have a roster that badly needs depth
1. Shurmur obviously likes him and don’t you think he knows a thing or two about qbs. I have no problem letting he and Webb battle it out for Eli’s throne.
2. Crosby apparently is not as good as Wheeler, Biz, and Flowers.
So, this pick is more for the future, right? KL can be more beneficial in the long run than Crosby. In fact, KL just might be the man after Eli’s two years are up. We don’t really know, do we?
3. Do you trust Shurmur, DG, and our new qb coach? Or do you trust your skills in evaluating qbs more?
Lauletta was so great, if so many teams had a second round grade on him, then why was he still available in the fourth round? Especially since teams are always desperate for QBs. The Patriots have an aging Tom Brady, and they passed on him how many times?
That’s a dumb argument. Why did Tom Brady last until the 6th round?
It’s called gambling. The pats probably looked at who would likely pick a Qb and thought he could last later. Same may hold true with the Saints.
thought about it for a bit. It's not a stupid pick... Â
of you guys are ridiculous. It's starting to get comical with all the complaining. I'm excited to see this young QB develop. If he does, awesome. If he doesn't we still have Webb, and didn't waste a premium pick on him. Big fan of what the Giants are doing. For me this is smart drafting. I hope it all works out, and I can't wait to start rooting for this rookie class.
Lauletta was so great, if so many teams had a second round grade on him, then why was he still available in the fourth round? Especially since teams are always desperate for QBs. The Patriots have an aging Tom Brady, and they passed on him how many times?
That’s a dumb argument. Why did Tom Brady last until the 6th round?
Brady was a fluke. Day three QBs are a waste. Nassib, Bomar, and Woodson. And that's just the Giants. The Steelers took Landry Jones the same year we took Nassib, and took Dobbs last year. And Nassib had a stronger arm than Lauletta.
Check the link, plenty of “flukes” on this list that were picked way later than round 6. From solid to spectacular. This kid has been doubted every step of the way since high school. But here he is, our possible future starting QB. List of “Fluke” QBs picked later in the draft... - ( New Window )
Unless the Giants believe he's a lot better than Webb, this is where I begin to have a problem with BPA. I don't buy needing to have two developmental QB's unless they both have exceptional potential to develop into a quality franchise QB. If they drafted a speed bump, it would be more likely to actually to ultimately contribute.
First of all Chubb was gone also. you keep trying to add players that weren't available and you go hey would you want a 1st rounder and 2nd rounder or a 1st and a 4th? Really it should be in your own words
Would you want
A) Darnold + Chubb
or
B) Barkley + Will Hernandez + Lauletta
there fixed for you... I a keeping the 1st round ranked stud OG thank you.
Jones and Chubb went after Hernandez. So both were available.
Fine. I'll add a third varriable.
Darnold + Chubb + Christian.
Something to think about...
No thanks... we need OL bad and you want to take out Will Hernandez? how would that ever make sense.
And that's what the Giants did....I have no problem with this....everybody here is so freakin emotional, which is why none of you are making picks for an NFL team......one day, I have a feeling that every negative poster on this thread is gonna be called out at some time in the future......you go with your board....
People said that about Nassib and others as well. Pretty sure no one regrets their posts about those guys..
1. Shurmur obviously likes him and don’t you think he knows a thing or two about qbs. I have no problem letting he and Webb battle it out for Eli’s throne.
2. Crosby apparently is not as good as Wheeler, Biz, and Flowers.
So, this pick is more for the future, right? KL can be more beneficial in the long run than Crosby. In fact, KL just might be the man after Eli’s two years are up. We don’t really know, do we?
3. Do you trust Shurmur, DG, and our new qb coach? Or do you trust your skills in evaluating qbs more?
How do you know Crosby is not as good? Its only the 4th round, Biz was a 6th rounder and Wheeler undrafted
RE: The pick make no sense for a number of reasons Â
1) There's limited number of developmental snaps to go around
2) You spent a mid round pick on a developmental QB last year
3) Neither QB is ready to step in if Eli gets hurt
4) You clearly realize you'll need an Eli replacement but keep trying to find it with mid round picks (Nassib, Webb, Lauletta) but not with the higher ranked prospects.
5) you have a roster that badly needs depth
1 - How do you know how many developmental snaps are available? are you at the Giants practices, meetings, training camp...That's a false statement.
2 - This regime did not spend any picks on anyone last year, this is their first draft.
3 - Again, how do you know neither is ready?
4 - I don't even have to name the qbs who were drafted later in the drafting that are starting right now for NFL teams.
5 - The Draft is not the end all be all for getting depth in this league, NFL FA, UDFA, and post training camp cuts will all be considered as well.
So many of the same people who said we had to have a QB are now bitching we drafted one. You can not Make it up. So it was okay
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
...but I'm not crazy about some of the negatives including:
Arm strength is a substantial concern;
Can't make all the NFL throws;
Perception of pressure can affect him;
Feet start dancing nervously when his internal clock goes off (hello Kerry Collins).
Positives include:
Heralded by scouts as team leader and elected team captain twice;
Has experience from shotgun, pistol and under center;
Footwork is smooth in play-action and setup;
Able to throw accurately to intermediate targets on the move.
very different from the nassib pick. nassib was hopefully never going to play for the giants. remember those quotes? AND they traded up to get nassib. AND it was clear from watching him in college that he sucked. i don't think this kid sucks, he has a chance to take the reigns from Eli, and they didn't trade up to get him
the part that concerns me is they seem to be trying to win now. would they not have been better off drafting someone here who can help with this? there are LOTS of holes on this team still.
Lauletta was so great, if so many teams had a second round grade on him, then why was he still available in the fourth round? Especially since teams are always desperate for QBs. The Patriots have an aging Tom Brady, and they passed on him how many times?
That’s a dumb argument. Why did Tom Brady last until the 6th round?
Brady was a fluke. Day three QBs are a waste. Nassib, Bomar, and Woodson. And that's just the Giants. The Steelers took Landry Jones the same year we took Nassib, and took Dobbs last year. And Nassib had a stronger arm than Lauletta.
Check the link, plenty of “flukes” on this list that were picked way later than round 6. From solid to spectacular. This kid has been doubted every step of the way since high school. But here he is, our possible future starting QB. List of “Fluke” QBs picked later in the draft... - ( New Window )
10 QB on a list that goes back to Bart Starr in 1956. How many QBs total were taken in round four or later in the last 62 years?
RE: RE: The pick make no sense for a number of reasons Â
1) There's limited number of developmental snaps to go around
2) You spent a mid round pick on a developmental QB last year
3) Neither QB is ready to step in if Eli gets hurt
4) You clearly realize you'll need an Eli replacement but keep trying to find it with mid round picks (Nassib, Webb, Lauletta) but not with the higher ranked prospects.
5) you have a roster that badly needs depth
1 - How do you know how many developmental snaps are available? are you at the Giants practices, meetings, training camp...That's a false statement.
2 - This regime did not spend any picks on anyone last year, this is their first draft.
3 - Again, how do you know neither is ready?
4 - I don't even have to name the qbs who were drafted later in the drafting that are starting right now for NFL teams.
5 - The Draft is not the end all be all for getting depth in this league, NFL FA, UDFA, and post training camp cuts will all be considered as well.
Thank you for this intelligent rebuttal. You win....hands down.
under the new regime. This pick has nothing to do with them "liking" him. This is about them picking their own QB and creating competition at the most important position in football.
So many of the same people who said we had to have a QB are now bitching we drafted one. You can not Make it up. So it was okay
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
So all QB's drafted are equal? There's a big difference between taking a QB you feel will be your next franchise QB to stand around for a season or two and learn compared to taking one who is likely to never do anything OTHER than stand around.
If they believe Webb can never be a starter, and Lauletta can, it's an entirely different story. I don't have an absolute opinion about Lauletta one way or the other, but from what I've seen, I don't have overwhelming confidence he will be that guy.
very different from the nassib pick. nassib was hopefully never going to play for the giants. remember those quotes? AND they traded up to get nassib. AND it was clear from watching him in college that he sucked. i don't think this kid sucks, he has a chance to take the reigns from Eli, and they didn't trade up to get him
the part that concerns me is they seem to be trying to win now. would they not have been better off drafting someone here who can help with this? there are LOTS of holes on this team still.
There's a lot of revisionist history at play here. It's really not much different from the Nassib pick at all. Nassib was someone Mayock and others listed as having starter potential. And it was clear he didn't have it after a few years.
The quote of "we hope he never has to play" was very clear. Eli Manning was their best option at the time. If Nassib had to play, something bad happened to the starter.
But I've read alot about this kid. I think the basement is Case Keenum. The ceiling...Joe Montana
I agree on the basement :-)
I don't get the angst.
Neither DG or PS drafted Webb.
It's a little irrational to be upset, when for the most important position on any football team, the leadership of our franchise didn't pick Webb and we're all supposed to fall in line and think he's nailed that job?
And this isn't Nassib 2.0. With Nassib they traded UP to get him.
I feel Shurmer and Shula are very good at developing and evaluating QB's. They had conviction in this kid. There is no way this was just the scouts here. The HC and OC had to be heavily involved here.
Guys days 1 and 2 were a homerun.
This is the first pick which is more towards the future.
So many of the same people who said we had to have a QB are now bitching we drafted one. You can not Make it up. So it was okay
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
It's not too hard to figure out that these people wanted a specific QB not just any QB. I wanted draft either Darnold or Rosen. I didn't want Allen, Rudolph, Jackson, or Lauletta. Lauletta lacks the arm strength to handle the winds of Metlife stadium.
Low percentage chance guys to be our franchise about. The chances are neither works out, but it is like buying another raffle ticket- it improves your chances somewhat. I don’t mind it, at first glance or thought. Both guys were the MVP of the Senior Bowl
The Giants selected Richmond quarterback Kyle Lauletta with their fourth-round pick.
"Very good in all areas. Winner. Competitor. Only lacks elite arm strength, but he makes up for it with his legs and moxie," Giants coach Pat Shurmur told ESPN's Chris Mortensen in a text message. ESPN - ( New Window )
So many of the same people who said we had to have a QB are now bitching we drafted one. You can not Make it up. So it was okay
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
It's not too hard to figure out that these people wanted a specific QB not just any QB. I wanted draft either Darnold or Rosen. I didn't want Allen, Rudolph, Jackson, or Lauletta. Lauletta lacks the arm strength to handle the winds of Metlife stadium.
The "wind" of Met Life is a myth. Met Life is no where near as windy as Giants Stadium. Not even close.
Quote:
Or else why pick Lauletta?
Or they think enough of Webb to backup Eli this year rather than bring in a Vet. They now have 2 young kids let the competition begin. If one of them turns into something, it's a homerun. I'll trust our new HC that there's a possibility here.
You can spin it however you want, but if the Giants have to hedge their bets by taking another QB, it means that they're not sold on Webb.
I was actually holding out hope that they passed on a QB at 2 because they really liked Webb. Now I know that they don't.
Also makes sense given Shurmur's situation in MN w/ Bridgewater / Bradford / Keenum and his QB coaching experience (as well as what Bettcher saw at QB in AZ fwiw). Maybe they don't like Webb, maybe they just like KL, or maybe they know they need a #1 / #2 soon with Eli near the end
Lauletta's 52 mph had him near the bottom of the 2018 class per the link above.
Link - ( New Window )
Right approach I think.
They also just didn’t have a third string QB until now.
First of all Chubb was gone also. you keep trying to add players that weren't available and you go hey would you want a 1st rounder and 2nd rounder or a 1st and a 4th? Really it should be in your own words
Would you want
A) Darnold + Chubb
or
B) Barkley + Will Hernandez + Lauletta
there fixed for you... I a keeping the 1st round ranked stud OG thank you.
Jones and Chubb went after Hernandez. So both were available.
Fine. I'll add a third varriable.
Darnold + Chubb + Christian.
Something to think about...
2) You spent a mid round pick on a developmental QB last year
3) Neither QB is ready to step in if Eli gets hurt
4) You clearly realize you'll need an Eli replacement but keep trying to find it with mid round picks (Nassib, Webb, Lauletta) but not with the higher ranked prospects.
5) you have a roster that badly needs depth
^This.
Lauletta is very accurate, but has a weak arm...and he was taken on Day 3.
2. Crosby apparently is not as good as Wheeler, Biz, and Flowers.
So, this pick is more for the future, right? KL can be more beneficial in the long run than Crosby. In fact, KL just might be the man after Eli’s two years are up. We don’t really know, do we?
3. Do you trust Shurmur, DG, and our new qb coach? Or do you trust your skills in evaluating qbs more?
Quote:
Lauletta was so great, if so many teams had a second round grade on him, then why was he still available in the fourth round? Especially since teams are always desperate for QBs. The Patriots have an aging Tom Brady, and they passed on him how many times?
That’s a dumb argument. Why did Tom Brady last until the 6th round?
It’s called gambling. The pats probably looked at who would likely pick a Qb and thought he could last later. Same may hold true with the Saints.
They are butthurt over Darnold not being taken.
Quote:
In comment 13943047 AcidTest said:
Quote:
Lauletta was so great, if so many teams had a second round grade on him, then why was he still available in the fourth round? Especially since teams are always desperate for QBs. The Patriots have an aging Tom Brady, and they passed on him how many times?
That’s a dumb argument. Why did Tom Brady last until the 6th round?
Brady was a fluke. Day three QBs are a waste. Nassib, Bomar, and Woodson. And that's just the Giants. The Steelers took Landry Jones the same year we took Nassib, and took Dobbs last year. And Nassib had a stronger arm than Lauletta.
Check the link, plenty of “flukes” on this list that were picked way later than round 6. From solid to spectacular. This kid has been doubted every step of the way since high school. But here he is, our possible future starting QB.
List of “Fluke” QBs picked later in the draft... - ( New Window )
Quote:
First of all Chubb was gone also. you keep trying to add players that weren't available and you go hey would you want a 1st rounder and 2nd rounder or a 1st and a 4th? Really it should be in your own words
Would you want
A) Darnold + Chubb
or
B) Barkley + Will Hernandez + Lauletta
there fixed for you... I a keeping the 1st round ranked stud OG thank you.
Jones and Chubb went after Hernandez. So both were available.
Fine. I'll add a third varriable.
Darnold + Chubb + Christian.
Something to think about...
No thanks... we need OL bad and you want to take out Will Hernandez? how would that ever make sense.
People said that about Nassib and others as well. Pretty sure no one regrets their posts about those guys..
2. Crosby apparently is not as good as Wheeler, Biz, and Flowers.
So, this pick is more for the future, right? KL can be more beneficial in the long run than Crosby. In fact, KL just might be the man after Eli’s two years are up. We don’t really know, do we?
3. Do you trust Shurmur, DG, and our new qb coach? Or do you trust your skills in evaluating qbs more?
How do you know Crosby is not as good? Its only the 4th round, Biz was a 6th rounder and Wheeler undrafted
2) You spent a mid round pick on a developmental QB last year
3) Neither QB is ready to step in if Eli gets hurt
4) You clearly realize you'll need an Eli replacement but keep trying to find it with mid round picks (Nassib, Webb, Lauletta) but not with the higher ranked prospects.
5) you have a roster that badly needs depth
1 - How do you know how many developmental snaps are available? are you at the Giants practices, meetings, training camp...That's a false statement.
2 - This regime did not spend any picks on anyone last year, this is their first draft.
3 - Again, how do you know neither is ready?
4 - I don't even have to name the qbs who were drafted later in the drafting that are starting right now for NFL teams.
5 - The Draft is not the end all be all for getting depth in this league, NFL FA, UDFA, and post training camp cuts will all be considered as well.
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
Im taking barkley/lauletta/hernandez
over
darnold/chubb/christian
stupid but im going with our guys.
No thanks... we need OL bad and you want to take out Will Hernandez? how would that ever make sense.
Are you suggesting Christian isn't a good OL prospect? Or perhaps you don't know who he is?
You can sign guys like this as vet free agents all day long.
...but I'm not crazy about some of the negatives including:
Arm strength is a substantial concern;
Can't make all the NFL throws;
Perception of pressure can affect him;
Feet start dancing nervously when his internal clock goes off (hello Kerry Collins).
Positives include:
Heralded by scouts as team leader and elected team captain twice;
Has experience from shotgun, pistol and under center;
Footwork is smooth in play-action and setup;
Able to throw accurately to intermediate targets on the move.
Link - ( New Window )
the part that concerns me is they seem to be trying to win now. would they not have been better off drafting someone here who can help with this? there are LOTS of holes on this team still.
Quote:
In comment 13943063 Chris in Philly said:
Quote:
In comment 13943047 AcidTest said:
Quote:
Lauletta was so great, if so many teams had a second round grade on him, then why was he still available in the fourth round? Especially since teams are always desperate for QBs. The Patriots have an aging Tom Brady, and they passed on him how many times?
That’s a dumb argument. Why did Tom Brady last until the 6th round?
Brady was a fluke. Day three QBs are a waste. Nassib, Bomar, and Woodson. And that's just the Giants. The Steelers took Landry Jones the same year we took Nassib, and took Dobbs last year. And Nassib had a stronger arm than Lauletta.
Check the link, plenty of “flukes” on this list that were picked way later than round 6. From solid to spectacular. This kid has been doubted every step of the way since high school. But here he is, our possible future starting QB. List of “Fluke” QBs picked later in the draft... - ( New Window )
10 QB on a list that goes back to Bart Starr in 1956. How many QBs total were taken in round four or later in the last 62 years?
Quote:
1) There's limited number of developmental snaps to go around
2) You spent a mid round pick on a developmental QB last year
3) Neither QB is ready to step in if Eli gets hurt
4) You clearly realize you'll need an Eli replacement but keep trying to find it with mid round picks (Nassib, Webb, Lauletta) but not with the higher ranked prospects.
5) you have a roster that badly needs depth
1 - How do you know how many developmental snaps are available? are you at the Giants practices, meetings, training camp...That's a false statement.
2 - This regime did not spend any picks on anyone last year, this is their first draft.
3 - Again, how do you know neither is ready?
4 - I don't even have to name the qbs who were drafted later in the drafting that are starting right now for NFL teams.
5 - The Draft is not the end all be all for getting depth in this league, NFL FA, UDFA, and post training camp cuts will all be considered as well.
Thank you for this intelligent rebuttal. You win....hands down.
I've been to two of his games. Daughter goes to JMU.
Quote:
No thanks... we need OL bad and you want to take out Will Hernandez? how would that ever make sense.
Are you suggesting Christian isn't a good OL prospect? Or perhaps you don't know who he is?
Christian Sam OG from ASU? Yeah I am a pac-12 guy and he isn't even close to Will Hernandez who everyone had as a 1st rounder. Sam is a 5th rounder.
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
So all QB's drafted are equal? There's a big difference between taking a QB you feel will be your next franchise QB to stand around for a season or two and learn compared to taking one who is likely to never do anything OTHER than stand around.
If they believe Webb can never be a starter, and Lauletta can, it's an entirely different story. I don't have an absolute opinion about Lauletta one way or the other, but from what I've seen, I don't have overwhelming confidence he will be that guy.
Quote:
In comment 13943244 Amtoft said:
Quote:
No thanks... we need OL bad and you want to take out Will Hernandez? how would that ever make sense.
Are you suggesting Christian isn't a good OL prospect? Or perhaps you don't know who he is?
Christian Sam OG from ASU? Yeah I am a pac-12 guy and he isn't even close to Will Hernandez who everyone had as a 1st rounder. Sam is a 5th rounder.
Oh wait that is Sam Jones I was thinking of. You must mean Geron?
the part that concerns me is they seem to be trying to win now. would they not have been better off drafting someone here who can help with this? there are LOTS of holes on this team still.
There's a lot of revisionist history at play here. It's really not much different from the Nassib pick at all. Nassib was someone Mayock and others listed as having starter potential. And it was clear he didn't have it after a few years.
The quote of "we hope he never has to play" was very clear. Eli Manning was their best option at the time. If Nassib had to play, something bad happened to the starter.
I agree on the basement :-)
I don't get the angst.
Neither DG or PS drafted Webb.
It's a little irrational to be upset, when for the most important position on any football team, the leadership of our franchise didn't pick Webb and we're all supposed to fall in line and think he's nailed that job?
And this isn't Nassib 2.0. With Nassib they traded UP to get him.
I feel Shurmer and Shula are very good at developing and evaluating QB's. They had conviction in this kid. There is no way this was just the scouts here. The HC and OC had to be heavily involved here.
Guys days 1 and 2 were a homerun.
This is the first pick which is more towards the future.
It's an excellent draft.
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
It's not too hard to figure out that these people wanted a specific QB not just any QB. I wanted draft either Darnold or Rosen. I didn't want Allen, Rudolph, Jackson, or Lauletta. Lauletta lacks the arm strength to handle the winds of Metlife stadium.
"Very good in all areas. Winner. Competitor. Only lacks elite arm strength, but he makes up for it with his legs and moxie," Giants coach Pat Shurmur told ESPN's Chris Mortensen in a text message.
ESPN - ( New Window )
Quote:
So many of the same people who said we had to have a QB are now bitching we drafted one. You can not Make it up. So it was okay
to take a QB in the 1st round hold the clipboard and do nothing and not focus on a position of need Now they take one they believe talent is better than where they are drafting him and the world ends.Thank God your not the GM’s. This is creating competition at the most important position on the field. Good for DG and his staff. Great job so far.
It's not too hard to figure out that these people wanted a specific QB not just any QB. I wanted draft either Darnold or Rosen. I didn't want Allen, Rudolph, Jackson, or Lauletta. Lauletta lacks the arm strength to handle the winds of Metlife stadium.
The "wind" of Met Life is a myth. Met Life is no where near as windy as Giants Stadium. Not even close.
Quote:
In comment 13943244 Amtoft said:
Quote:
No thanks... we need OL bad and you want to take out Will Hernandez? how would that ever make sense.
Are you suggesting Christian isn't a good OL prospect? Or perhaps you don't know who he is?
Christian Sam OG from ASU? Yeah I am a pac-12 guy and he isn't even close to Will Hernandez who everyone had as a 1st rounder. Sam is a 5th rounder.
No, Geron Christian, Louisville.
You're lost...
I’m assuming facetious?
Quote:
.
I’m assuming facetious?
Not at all. I love the pick.