for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Eli "wasn’t sure of his Giants future before draft"...

Mike in St. Louis : 5/2/2018 4:12 pm
doesn't look like this was posted...if it was, I'll delete...

from ProFootball Talk...

“For the first time ever, I didn’t know what the future held,” he said, via the New York Daily News. “I tried not to overthink it and draw conclusions off information I didn’t know. Just had to say, ‘Hey, I have to be positive through the season, offseason, and just work out and be ready for whatever is thrown at me.’

“Obviously, I was very excited to hear news from Mr. Gettleman and Mr. Mara they wanted me back. I work extremely hard to keep my job and when you almost lose something it makes you appreciate it even more. That’s certainly the case here.”
Link - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: RE: RE: RE: beedub  
JOrthman : 5/3/2018 5:34 pm : link
In comment 13952962 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 13952878 Bill L said:


Quote:


The most likely scenario would have been that we had the same draft that we got, except swapping Darnold for Barkley. In fact, once you got to round 3, I think you would have had a hard time saying that we would would get was appreciably better than what we have. And that ain't much. It really is the philosophical difference of whether or not a ground game is very important at all.



I was arguing with someone last Saturday - it kills me that I can't remember who - about this.

I said QB/Nick Chubb/Geno Christian was the better package than the actual combination of Barkley/Hernandez/Carter. Then we changed out Carter for Lauelleta.

Still get a terrific RB (Chubb) and outstanding OL (Christian)...and the QB > Barkley...

I think the ground game is very important, just on the cheap.


If that happened I doubt they would of even picked a RB. RB wasn't such a need that, they would of passed on other players to take one later like that. I think the only reason they went RB that high was because of who he was.
Right. At that point there would have been  
Bill L : 5/3/2018 6:00 pm : link
Incremental difference at th very best from Gallman. They would have just punted (literally and figuratively).
RE: Right. At that point there would have been  
bw in dc : 5/3/2018 6:08 pm : link
In comment 13953320 Bill L said:
Quote:
Incremental difference at the very best from Gallman.


Well there you have it - it's been declared.

All of the RBs AFTER Barkley were only incrementally better.

Does that mean you think Gallman is great, so we have another great back. Or Gallman is average, so we have another average back? Don't answer - just being a wise ass...I know your answer. ;)
I will answer  
Bill L : 5/3/2018 6:15 pm : link
It’s a bit of both.

That hated word “generational”is actually applicable. And 3rd down back in s 3rd down back.
This franchise is 51-61 since 2011  
Ten Ton Hammer : 5/3/2018 6:22 pm : link
If you want to be optimistic, fine. You're entitled to. Go be that without telling other people what to think.

There's been plenty of reason to question the things this team does.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner