but just as I expect the Avs to come out on fire after losing to Montreal at home, I expect the Rangers will play a much better game than they did on Tuesday. No word on lineups for tonight yet, but I wouldn't expect any changes for the Rangers with the 3 D still banged up and Wennberg still presumably being out for personal reasons.
Just seeing that Georgiev was not on the ice for morning skate today, so it might be Annunen for the Avs.
but this would go a long way to securing the President's trophy.
Their schedule after tonight's game does not contain a single team with a positive goal differential and only has 1 playoff team (Flyers at MSG). Of the other teams withing potential striking distance of NYR in the East...
- BOS (of their remaining 8 games) plays FLA once, CAR twice, and suddenly-hot Caps team twice in Washington. Plus the Rangers have two games in hand on them and are a point ahead.
- FLA has a slightly easier remaining 10 games playing the Leafs twice and the Bruins once in Boston. However, they are currently 3 point back from the Rangers.
- CAR (9 games remaining) plays the Caps and Detroit at home and have 2 against the Bruins. They are 3 points back and the Rangers have a game in hand.
The Rangers currently hold the first tiebreaker against Boston and Carolina (currently tied in regulation wins with Florida). They also hold the second tiebreaker against all three teams. Obviously if Florida gains 3 points on the Rangers over 10 games they will likely have the first tie-breaker over the Rangers.
The most likely outcome here is the Bruins are probably looking at the #4 seed at this point (they also lose the first tiebreaker to FLA/CAR) with the Panthers and Hurricanes battling it out for #2/3. The Rangers have the easiest road to the #1 seed on paper at this point so they just need to take care of business. A win tonight would make them the heavy favorite to be the overall #1 seed in the East (and the NHL) given the remaining schedule.
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
the difference between the #1 and #2 seed in the East is likely going to be playing PHI/WSH or TB and (in my humble opinion) the former is a mach easier task than the latter.
I think the Rangers can beat any of these teams in a 7 game series but I would rather not face Vasileskiy, Point, and Kucherov if the Rangers can avoid it as they are more likely to extend a series to the maximum number of games. Not to get ahead of ourselves but the Rangers cannot keep hoping to win the Cup if they are playing 7 game series and end up being gassed by the ECF.
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
Read my mind and had quicker typing skills. Well done
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
Tampa is red-hot and they've got the experience. Rangers need to avoid them at all costs
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
Read my mind and had quicker typing skills. Well done
Virtual high five! Haha!
Lindgren skated in full today, so looks like that absolute monster will be back. Wennberg is also there after his wife had their baby. Trouba skated in a non-contact jersey and Gus still not back. All per Colin Stephenson on Twitter.
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
Tampa is red-hot and they've got the experience. Rangers need to avoid them at all costs
Notwithstanding my posts above, looking at their schedules there is a good chance that TB passes the Leafs to take the #3 spot in the Atlantic. Leafs have 2 games against Florida and 2 against TB. Tampa's schedule is otherwise pretty light and the only team with a positive GD (other than TOR themselves) is the Red Wings and the Leafs play them has well.
Nichuskin is out and Georgie wasn't at practice (illness maybe)
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
I hear ya, man, and you be right. And the hellszapoppin 3rd vs Philly had me alternately standing up and screaming G.O.A.L (woke up the wife) and kicking the proverbial (and imaginary) dog, fff. And it has been an exhilarating season, one of the best in recent memory (21-22 stands out...until Game 5 and LAK in Henrik's finest, man, Zucc)....
I just can't take lying down lazy, 1/3 effort suckitude, in any sport, when 90% are busting their butts...and I need to vocalize!!
Can you believe some self proclaimed NYR pundit on X is already featuring 'his' lines for '24-25, 2nd being Chytil centering for Othmann and Berard? Sees KK being dealt for and to sign Marchessault. Never mind that Othmann (now on 2nd line) has taken steps back, Chytil is this season's bummer writ large, but if retirement saves his QOL will be worth it.
RE: RE: RE: Rangers magic number for the Metro is 16
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
Were you earnest about that box seat offer vs Montreal? Or were you messing with me?
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
Were you earnest about that box seat offer vs Montreal? Or were you messing with me?
I'm going to try and get my company box. I'll see if I can swing it. You will all need to lie and say you are potential customers. I'll see tomorrow if it's available.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Rangers magic number for the Metro is 16
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
Were you earnest about that box seat offer vs Montreal? Or were you messing with me?
I'm going to try and get my company box. I'll see if I can swing it. You will all need to lie and say you are potential customers. I'll see tomorrow if it's available.
Igor was tremendous tonight.
I’m so frustrated with Kreider’s play along the boards.
Agree about Fox. We cannot afford for him to be out. He is so valuable in every facet of the game.
Panarin is 6th best all time (with those who have at least 10 attempts). of course the database is limited since the shootout hasn't been around forever. The only active player ahead of him is Trevor Zegras, who is filthy. 11 for 17 (65%), Panarin is 58%.
I’m sure he is probably not 100% recovered from injury.
He is such a warrior.
Also been very impressed with Ruhwedel who played a very good game. Very noticeable on PK.
I hope you guys will give us a status report on Fox.
I don’t see any of that stuff down here in North Texas.
BTW, Stars are really playing well down here. Big win over Canucks.
They are a true SC contender in the West.
Great win! But lol now you got me going.
In comment 16449757 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
...I have to wonder is Kreider playing hurt?....But even strength, he doesn’t even seem to try to do anything. Just kind of drifts around the ice.
Have literally been saying this for months, citing his (lack of) work along the boards, as if he's allergic, and his Ice Capades routine in his own end. But going after CK was like the 3rd rail here, until recently.
Greg, not buying the playing hurt, because when he does his basket hanging thing and has a chance for an odd man rush with Zib he's shot out of a cannon. As ineffective and loose with the puck (big and small) as he's been 5 on 5, you think Lavvy wouldn't sit him a game or two if he were hurt? Hell, he did bench CK for quite a few shifts, it was either vs BOS or FLA, put Bread on LW with Zib. This was after the atrocious giveaway at the BL boards that sprung a clean breakaway that changed the game. Could it be ribs? He doesn't take enough contact to have incurred an upper body.
RE: Panarin has to be the best shootout guy I’ve ever seen
In comment 16449745 Greg from LI said: Quote:
Lethal.
Igor save.///////
Panarin is 6th best all time (with those who have at least 10 attempts). of course the database is limited since the shootout hasn't been around forever. The only active player ahead of him is Trevor Zegras, who is filthy. 11 for 17 (65%), Panarin is 58%.
Crazy thing is--Vally cited a stat--that in non-shootout breakaways this season Panarin is 0 for 11, as in Zero. Go figure
In comment 16449745 Greg from LI said: Quote:
Lethal.
Igor save.///////
Panarin is 6th best all time (with those who have at least 10 attempts). of course the database is limited since the shootout hasn't been around forever. The only active player ahead of him is Trevor Zegras, who is filthy. 11 for 17 (65%), Panarin is 58%.
Crazy thing is--Vally cited a stat--that in non-shootout breakaways this season Panarin is 0 for 11, as in Zero. Go figure
The team as a whole is the worst breakaway team in the NHL this year by a pretty substantial margin. I wish I could find the stat, I know Valiquette has tweeted it out but I can't seem to find it, but they are so far below the 31st place team it's insane.
just with Panarin and Trocheck alone. Maybe it's mindset of goalies vs shooters in SO vs run of play. Maybe Bread is somehow more relaxed in a SO but don't ask me why that would be.
Thought Joe's comment on Trocheck's SO winner was interesting: both SO goals came to Georgiev's glove side, with both shooters handling the puck to their right/shooting side with a slight deke or move low and then went top shelf. I wonder if Benoït had some input there? (:
Just seeing that Georgiev was not on the ice for morning skate today, so it might be Annunen for the Avs.
Their schedule after tonight's game does not contain a single team with a positive goal differential and only has 1 playoff team (Flyers at MSG). Of the other teams withing potential striking distance of NYR in the East...
- BOS (of their remaining 8 games) plays FLA once, CAR twice, and suddenly-hot Caps team twice in Washington. Plus the Rangers have two games in hand on them and are a point ahead.
- FLA has a slightly easier remaining 10 games playing the Leafs twice and the Bruins once in Boston. However, they are currently 3 point back from the Rangers.
- CAR (9 games remaining) plays the Caps and Detroit at home and have 2 against the Bruins. They are 3 points back and the Rangers have a game in hand.
The Rangers currently hold the first tiebreaker against Boston and Carolina (currently tied in regulation wins with Florida). They also hold the second tiebreaker against all three teams. Obviously if Florida gains 3 points on the Rangers over 10 games they will likely have the first tie-breaker over the Rangers.
The most likely outcome here is the Bruins are probably looking at the #4 seed at this point (they also lose the first tiebreaker to FLA/CAR) with the Panthers and Hurricanes battling it out for #2/3. The Rangers have the easiest road to the #1 seed on paper at this point so they just need to take care of business. A win tonight would make them the heavy favorite to be the overall #1 seed in the East (and the NHL) given the remaining schedule.
LGR
I think the Rangers can beat any of these teams in a 7 game series but I would rather not face Vasileskiy, Point, and Kucherov if the Rangers can avoid it as they are more likely to extend a series to the maximum number of games. Not to get ahead of ourselves but the Rangers cannot keep hoping to win the Cup if they are playing 7 game series and end up being gassed by the ECF.
Read my mind and had quicker typing skills. Well done
Tampa is red-hot and they've got the experience. Rangers need to avoid them at all costs
Quote:
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
Read my mind and had quicker typing skills. Well done
Virtual high five! Haha!
Lindgren skated in full today, so looks like that absolute monster will be back. Wennberg is also there after his wife had their baby. Trouba skated in a non-contact jersey and Gus still not back. All per Colin Stephenson on Twitter.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
Notwithstanding my posts above, looking at their schedules there is a good chance that TB passes the Leafs to take the #3 spot in the Atlantic. Leafs have 2 games against Florida and 2 against TB. Tampa's schedule is otherwise pretty light and the only team with a positive GD (other than TOR themselves) is the Red Wings and the Leafs play them has well.
Quote:
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
Colin Stephenson
@ColinSNewsday
Defense pairs in the skate are:
Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Schneider
Jones-Ruhwedel.
1:30 PM · Mar 28, 2024
·
27.7K
Views
Man Swedes are beautiful Hedberg and Ulf
I just can't take lying down lazy, 1/3 effort suckitude, in any sport, when 90% are busting their butts...and I need to vocalize!!
Can you believe some self proclaimed NYR pundit on X is already featuring 'his' lines for '24-25, 2nd being Chytil centering for Othmann and Berard? Sees KK being dealt for and to sign Marchessault. Never mind that Othmann (now on 2nd line) has taken steps back, Chytil is this season's bummer writ large, but if retirement saves his QOL will be worth it.
Quote:
In comment 16448839 ShockNRoll said:
Quote:
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
Were you earnest about that box seat offer vs Montreal? Or were you messing with me?
Quote:
In comment 16448876 Route 9 said:
Quote:
In comment 16448839 ShockNRoll said:
Quote:
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
Were you earnest about that box seat offer vs Montreal? Or were you messing with me?
I'm going to try and get my company box. I'll see if I can swing it. You will all need to lie and say you are potential customers. I'll see tomorrow if it's available.
Quote:
In comment 16448996 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
In comment 16448876 Route 9 said:
Quote:
In comment 16448839 ShockNRoll said:
Quote:
With Tampa looming in round 1, top seed in the East is obviously the more advantageous position. I mentioned in the other thread, I think they can beat Tampa, but if the Rangers are seriously going to contend for the Cup, they need to have a quick series or two in there. Tampa is not going to be a quick series, whereas I think they can put Washington, Philly, Islanders, Detroit down in 5 or less.
I remember having a heated argument with pjcas over this one year lol he said it didn't matter
lol, heated argument. I doubt it. It was about fatigue.
obviously if you can win in fewer games you want to (that is just common sense), my point was more these guys are professional athletes playing a hockey game once every other day (at most usually - occasionally they have back to backs but not often in the playoffs). I don't think fatigue is a problem. Sometimes facing adversity (game 7's, long OT's, stuff like that) early in the playoffs can even be a catalyst to galvanize the team. Sure they get banged up and that is never a good thing, but injuries happen in game 1 probably just as much as game 6.
Once the playoffs start these guys know they have at most 28 games left, and they need 16 wins. If those 16 wins take 28 games it's not going to impact them (physically) at all IMO. unless of course you're taking about just by playing another game you have a higher risk of someone being injured. which wasn't the point, the point we discussed was fatigue.
Were you earnest about that box seat offer vs Montreal? Or were you messing with me?
I'm going to try and get my company box. I'll see if I can swing it. You will all need to lie and say you are potential customers. I'll see tomorrow if it's available.
You're the best!
1-1
Igor save.
Amen!
I’m so frustrated with Kreider’s play along the boards.
Agree about Fox. We cannot afford for him to be out. He is so valuable in every facet of the game.
Igor save.
Panarin is 6th best all time (with those who have at least 10 attempts). of course the database is limited since the shootout hasn't been around forever. The only active player ahead of him is Trevor Zegras, who is filthy. 11 for 17 (65%), Panarin is 58%.
He is such a warrior.
Also been very impressed with Ruhwedel who played a very good game. Very noticeable on PK.
I hope you guys will give us a status report on Fox.
I don’t see any of that stuff down here in North Texas.
BTW, Stars are really playing well down here. Big win over Canucks.
They are a true SC contender in the West.
In comment 16449757 Greg from LI said:
Have literally been saying this for months, citing his (lack of) work along the boards, as if he's allergic, and his Ice Capades routine in his own end. But going after CK was like the 3rd rail here, until recently.
Greg, not buying the playing hurt, because when he does his basket hanging thing and has a chance for an odd man rush with Zib he's shot out of a cannon. As ineffective and loose with the puck (big and small) as he's been 5 on 5, you think Lavvy wouldn't sit him a game or two if he were hurt? Hell, he did bench CK for quite a few shifts, it was either vs BOS or FLA, put Bread on LW with Zib. This was after the atrocious giveaway at the BL boards that sprung a clean breakaway that changed the game. Could it be ribs? He doesn't take enough contact to have incurred an upper body.
Lethal.
Igor save.///////
Panarin is 6th best all time (with those who have at least 10 attempts). of course the database is limited since the shootout hasn't been around forever. The only active player ahead of him is Trevor Zegras, who is filthy. 11 for 17 (65%), Panarin is 58%.
Crazy thing is--Vally cited a stat--that in non-shootout breakaways this season Panarin is 0 for 11, as in Zero. Go figure
Stars have been a thorn in NYR side for years, so strong and fast, year after year.
Quote:
In comment 16449745 Greg from LI said: Quote:
Lethal.
Igor save.///////
Panarin is 6th best all time (with those who have at least 10 attempts). of course the database is limited since the shootout hasn't been around forever. The only active player ahead of him is Trevor Zegras, who is filthy. 11 for 17 (65%), Panarin is 58%.
Crazy thing is--Vally cited a stat--that in non-shootout breakaways this season Panarin is 0 for 11, as in Zero. Go figure
The team as a whole is the worst breakaway team in the NHL this year by a pretty substantial margin. I wish I could find the stat, I know Valiquette has tweeted it out but I can't seem to find it, but they are so far below the 31st place team it's insane.
Thought Joe's comment on Trocheck's SO winner was interesting: both SO goals came to Georgiev's glove side, with both shooters handling the puck to their right/shooting side with a slight deke or move low and then went top shelf. I wonder if Benoït had some input there? (: