for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

I don't envy Schoen but here is my strategy

BH28 : 4/21/2024 12:16 pm
Really important draft for Schoen and company to get right, my head is swimming between all the draft prospects so here is what I would do. You need multiple approaches and my assumption is there are two buckets of QB: Williams and Daniels and then Maye, JJ, Penix, Nix.

Preferable Strategy: Trade back from 6 with the Vikings to pick up extra picks, take Penix or Nix at 11. If the Giants have QBs 3-6 graded similarly I think this approach is great because we get a QB and additional picks up build the roster.

Trade up to 3 for Daniels: This assumes the Commanders raise some eyebrows and take Maye. I'm assuming this is highly unlikely, but if it does happen, I think we need to be on the phone with the Pats about moving up.

Stay at 6 draft a WR, move back in for QB: If the Vikings or someone does have the ammo to move up ahead of us, that means we are getting one of the best WRs. I think a trade back with a team is less plausible if the Vikings jump us. I would have no problem giving up future assets to jump back into first and grab a Penix or Nix.

So those are the scenarios I think make the most sense for the Giants. Generally I don't think the Giants should be trading up unless Daniels is in play at 3. Trading back is risky, but done right we can have our cake and eat it too. Good luck, Joe!
I just posted this in another thread  
UberAlias : 4/21/2024 12:26 pm : link
But since this one is about strategy, based on asshat/reports I find most believable, here is what I think the plan is:

They love Maye and Nabers. The like JJM and Odunze, but they don't see them as guy who transform things.

--They'll make an aggressive bid to trade up for Maye, but there are too many needs and viable alternatives so they have their limits and is not the most likely scenario.


I believe all scenarios are still on table:
--they will attempt to trade up to 3 or 4 for Maye. They may have to pry him from NE which may be out of their price range. Better shot if NE takes JJM and Maye falls to Az.
--If Maye is off the board, they will sit tight and see who falls to 6. If Nabers is there (assuming Az takes MHJ), he will be the pick.
--If Maye and Nabers are both gone, their highest players are JJM and Odunze but they have offers to trade back with a team looking to trade up that they would likely take.
Here’s how I’d rank possible outcomes  
Breeze_94 : 4/21/2024 12:29 pm : link
#1 best case: Maye at 6, highly unlikely though
#2: Giants trade up with AZ for Maye, no future 1 needed
#3: Nabers at 6
#4: Odunze at 6
#5: JJM at 6…trading up for him would suck
RE: Here’s how I’d rank possible outcomes  
Tuckrule : 4/21/2024 12:35 pm : link
In comment 16477993 Breeze_94 said:
Quote:
#1 best case: Maye at 6, highly unlikely though
#2: Giants trade up with AZ for Maye, no future 1 needed
#3: Nabers at 6
#4: Odunze at 6
#5: JJM at 6…trading up for him would suck


+1. I would pass fully on JJ at 6 and take Nabers or Odunze
No option for trade up to 4?  
BleedBlue46 : 4/21/2024 12:37 pm : link
Pick 6, 70 and 2025 2nd for pick 4 get JJM or Maye is my most realistic choice.
RE: RE: Here’s how I’d rank possible outcomes  
BleedBlue46 : 4/21/2024 12:37 pm : link
In comment 16477998 Tuckrule said:
Quote:
In comment 16477993 Breeze_94 said:


Quote:


#1 best case: Maye at 6, highly unlikely though
#2: Giants trade up with AZ for Maye, no future 1 needed
#3: Nabers at 6
#4: Odunze at 6
#5: JJM at 6…trading up for him would suck



+1. I would pass fully on JJ at 6 and take Nabers or Odunze


Much rather trade down if that were the situation, personally.
I like the strategy of trading with the Vikings.  
DonnieD89 : 4/21/2024 12:47 pm : link
If the Vikings want McCarthy, let them take him and acquire their picks 11 and 23. I would then select Michael Penix Jr., at pick 11 and see if Quinion Mitchell, Brian Thomas, Jr. or Adonai Mitchell fall to 23.
What about the smoke coming from Denver  
Adirondack GMen : 4/21/2024 12:47 pm : link
They would trade Surtain, next years 1st or second (depends on who’s reporting) and their 12th. That saves us a pick since we picked up Surtrain.
I like that trade. Still have the ability to pick up a QB / a DL /or a OL…
all things are on the table  
Dave on the UWS : 4/21/2024 12:49 pm : link
he leaves no stone unturned. I have confidence he will be prepared and work the situation to best possible solution for the franchise. Never felt that way about Gettleman.
RE: No option for trade up to 4?  
BH28 : 4/21/2024 12:49 pm : link
In comment 16478000 BleedBlue46 said:
Quote:
Pick 6, 70 and 2025 2nd for pick 4 get JJM or Maye is my most realistic choice.


I wouldn't move up to 4 to take JJ or Maye. I'm assuming the odds are better that one of them will fall to six. And if the Vikings are able to jump us, you take WR and try to trade back into first for Penix or Nix.
RE: What about the smoke coming from Denver  
DonnieD89 : 4/21/2024 12:53 pm : link
In comment 16478009 Adirondack GMen said:
Quote:
They would trade Surtain, next years 1st or second (depends on who’s reporting) and their 12th. That saves us a pick since we picked up Surtrain.
I like that trade. Still have the ability to pick up a QB / a DL /or a OL…


I would be all for that too. In fact, I would like that better..
Are you kidding  
David B. : 4/21/2024 12:53 pm : link
He has a great job, a dream job among only 32 GM jobs, and he has way more info than you and the rest of us do to base his decisions on.

For once, nobody outside his inner circle knows what he's going to do, but he sure does. While the fans keep wringing their hands over this like it's their decision and responsibility to figure out what to do, Schoen already has his plans A, B, C, and D ready. He even said the other day something like "once the board is set, we're good." Implying they're ready. He's gonna sleep better this week than you lot.
RE: What about the smoke coming from Denver  
BH28 : 4/21/2024 12:54 pm : link
In comment 16478009 Adirondack GMen said:
Quote:
They would trade Surtain, next years 1st or second (depends on who’s reporting) and their 12th. That saves us a pick since we picked up Surtrain.
I like that trade. Still have the ability to pick up a QB / a DL /or a OL…


A trade with Denver could also work. That would conceivably leave us with the 'last' of the top six QBs
Preferable strategy is to trade back???  
56goat : 4/21/2024 12:58 pm : link
No. To me that is the last resort, meaning every attempt to get the QB we want has failed.

Preferable strategy is to identify a QB who is an upgrade over what we have now (low bar to hurdle) and ideally be the QB who can take us into the playoffs and eventually SB. Not year one, but moving the team forward.

We've wasted the last 10+ years with poor drafting & FAs, time to start acting like a professional organization.
RE: I just posted this in another thread  
The Mike : 4/21/2024 1:12 pm : link
In comment 16477990 UberAlias said:
Quote:
But since this one is about strategy, based on asshat/reports I find most believable, here is what I think the plan is:

They love Maye and Nabers. The like JJM and Odunze, but they don't see them as guy who transform things.

--They'll make an aggressive bid to trade up for Maye, but there are too many needs and viable alternatives so they have their limits and is not the most likely scenario.


I believe all scenarios are still on table:
--they will attempt to trade up to 3 or 4 for Maye. They may have to pry him from NE which may be out of their price range. Better shot if NE takes JJM and Maye falls to Az.
--If Maye is off the board, they will sit tight and see who falls to 6. If Nabers is there (assuming Az takes MHJ), he will be the pick.
--If Maye and Nabers are both gone, their highest players are JJM and Odunze but they have offers to trade back with a team looking to trade up that they would likely take.


This is where I am. Although if Denver offers the Surtain and two firsts deal that has been discussed here, I would take that trade and draft Penix at twelve.
RE: Preferable strategy is to trade back???  
BH28 : 4/21/2024 1:38 pm : link
In comment 16478026 56goat said:
Quote:
No. To me that is the last resort, meaning every attempt to get the QB we want has failed.

Preferable strategy is to identify a QB who is an upgrade over what we have now (low bar to hurdle) and ideally be the QB who can take us into the playoffs and eventually SB. Not year one, but moving the team forward.

We've wasted the last 10+ years with poor drafting & FAs, time to start acting like a professional organization.


It's assuming the Giants have QBs 3-6 ranked similarly. If so, it's an opportunity to gain additional assets and still get a QB.
I see the draft unfolding one of two ways  
M.S. : 4/21/2024 1:48 pm : link

With a trade and without.

Trade
1. Chicago - Caleb Williams
2. Washington - Jayden Daniels
3. Minnesota (from N.E) - J.J. McCarthy
4. Arizona - Marvin Harrison, Jr.
5. L.A. Chargers - Malik Nabers
6. N.Y. Giants - Drake Maye

without Trade
1. Same
2. Same
3. New England - Drake Maye
4. Same
5. Same
6. N.Y. Giants - J.J. McCarthy
RE: I just posted this in another thread  
AcidTest : 4/21/2024 1:53 pm : link
In comment 16477990 UberAlias said:
Quote:
But since this one is about strategy, based on asshat/reports I find most believable, here is what I think the plan is:

They love Maye and Nabers. The like JJM and Odunze, but they don't see them as guy who transform things.

--They'll make an aggressive bid to trade up for Maye, but there are too many needs and viable alternatives so they have their limits and is not the most likely scenario.


I believe all scenarios are still on table:
--they will attempt to trade up to 3 or 4 for Maye. They may have to pry him from NE which may be out of their price range. Better shot if NE takes JJM and Maye falls to Az.
--If Maye is off the board, they will sit tight and see who falls to 6. If Nabers is there (assuming Az takes MHJ), he will be the pick.
--If Maye and Nabers are both gone, their highest players are JJM and Odunze but they have offers to trade back with a team looking to trade up that they would likely take.


Excellent analysis. I think this is probably correct, assuming they really want Maye. If they do, and he's available at #4, they should be able to trade with Arizona, unless they want something ridiculous in return, like our #1 next year. I also wonder if they would trade down if JJM is available at #6, even if Nabers is as well. Somebody might offer a ton to move up and take JJM.
trading back and selecting a QB  
Archer : 4/21/2024 2:05 pm : link
Please explain to me why the Vikings are so intent on trading up when they can have their choice of Penix and Nix.

It would appear that the Vikings see a significant difference between the top 4 QBs and thereafter.

If the Giants want a QB and one is available at 6 they should draft him.
everyone seems to be forgetting  
outeiroj : 4/21/2024 2:08 pm : link
there is a scenario where all this QB talk is a smokescreen so an extra skills position player falls to 6.

very realistic that they could care less about a QB and just take a WR
RE: trading back and selecting a QB  
DonnieD89 : 4/21/2024 2:13 pm : link
In comment 16478097 Archer said:
Quote:
Please explain to me why the Vikings are so intent on trading up when they can have their choice of Penix and Nix.

It would appear that the Vikings see a significant difference between the top 4 QBs and thereafter.

If the Giants want a QB and one is available at 6 they should draft him.


Simple. It’s the style of play. O’Connell may be looking for a specific quarterback. That all depends, also, how JS and DB think about the quarterbacks. If they really like McCarthy, they can go up and get him. No that’s if the Giants do not like McCarthy.
RE: everyone seems to be forgetting  
BleedBlue46 : 4/21/2024 2:14 pm : link
In comment 16478098 outeiroj said:
Quote:
there is a scenario where all this QB talk is a smokescreen so an extra skills position player falls to 6.

very realistic that they could care less about a QB and just take a WR


Long live king Daniel Jones!
RE: RE: everyone seems to be forgetting  
DonnieD89 : 4/21/2024 2:18 pm : link
In comment 16478102 BleedBlue46 said:
Quote:
In comment 16478098 outeiroj said:


Quote:


there is a scenario where all this QB talk is a smokescreen so an extra skills position player falls to 6.

very realistic that they could care less about a QB and just take a WR



Long live king Daniel Jones!


Waiting for Jack Stroud's copy and pasted punchline.
RE: everyone seems to be forgetting  
ThomasG : 4/21/2024 2:26 pm : link
In comment 16478098 outeiroj said:
Quote:
there is a scenario where all this QB talk is a smokescreen so an extra skills position player falls to 6.

very realistic that they could care less about a QB and just take a WR


Some serious frequent flier miles scouting and meeting QBs for the past 7 months. Smokescreen?
RE: Preferable strategy is to trade back???  
WillVAB : 4/21/2024 2:47 pm : link
In comment 16478026 56goat said:
Quote:
No. To me that is the last resort, meaning every attempt to get the QB we want has failed.

Preferable strategy is to identify a QB who is an upgrade over what we have now (low bar to hurdle) and ideally be the QB who can take us into the playoffs and eventually SB. Not year one, but moving the team forward.

We've wasted the last 10+ years with poor drafting & FAs, time to start acting like a professional organization.


Not necessarily. They may like Penix/Nix but would prefer to select them after a trade down.
Stay where we are or trade down a little  
PatersonPlank : 4/21/2024 2:58 pm : link
I am fine with Nix or Penix, it doesn't have to be Maye or JJM. Lets see who comes to us and then decide.
RE: I just posted this in another thread  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 4/21/2024 3:03 pm : link
In comment 16477990 UberAlias said:
Quote:
But since this one is about strategy, based on asshat/reports I find most believable, here is what I think the plan is:

They love Maye and Nabers. The like JJM and Odunze, but they don't see them as guy who transform things.

--They'll make an aggressive bid to trade up for Maye, but there are too many needs and viable alternatives so they have their limits and is not the most likely scenario.


I believe all scenarios are still on table:
--they will attempt to trade up to 3 or 4 for Maye. They may have to pry him from NE which may be out of their price range. Better shot if NE takes JJM and Maye falls to Az.
--If Maye is off the board, they will sit tight and see who falls to 6. If Nabers is there (assuming Az takes MHJ), he will be the pick.
--If Maye and Nabers are both gone, their highest players are JJM and Odunze but they have offers to trade back with a team looking to trade up that they would likely take.


Good summary.
The reason a trade with Denver  
Dave on the UWS : 4/21/2024 3:26 pm : link
is appealing is (assuming they are willing to part with 2025 #1), it fills a crucial need (Surtain), the 12th pick can be used (either there) or with a trade up back into the top 10, for a WR, and you have TWO #1s to work with next year to get your QB. This would be good roster building.
RE: RE: I just posted this in another thread  
Adirondack GMen : 4/21/2024 3:44 pm : link
In comment 16478042 The Mike said:
[quote] In comment 16477990 UberAlias said:


Quote:


But since this one is about strategy, based on asshat/reports I find most believable, here is what I think the plan is:

They love Maye and Nabers. The like JJM and Odunze, but they don't see them as guy who transform things.

--They'll make an aggressive bid to trade up for Maye, but there are too many needs and viable alternatives so they have their limits and is not the most likely scenario.


I believe all scenarios are still on table:
--they will attempt to trade up to 3 or 4 for Maye. They may have to pry him from NE which may be out of their price range. Better shot if NE takes JJM and Maye falls to Az.
--If Maye is off the board, they will sit tight and see who falls to 6. If Nabers is there (assuming Az takes MHJ), he will be the pick.
--If Maye and Nabers are both gone, their highest players are JJM and Odunze but they have offers to trade back with a team looking to trade up that they would likely take.



This is where I am. Although if Denver offers the Surtain and two firsts deal that has been discussed here, I would take that trade and draft Penix at twelve.
Now you’re talking! Being in the “dirty dozen” we can still get an impactful player…I trust Joe et. al and if this is on the table I’m sure he would give it serious consideration..
I think getting to 3 will cost too much  
Mike from Ohio : 4/21/2024 3:53 pm : link
Certainly the 2025 1st will be included. Hopefully NE likes JJM and takes him at #3. If that happens Schoen should be working hard to get to #4 to get Maye.

If the Patriots take Maye at #3, I would love to see the Giants trade back at pick #6 and let the Vikings come up to get JJM. Use #11 on Penix and #23 on BPA between WR, DE, OL and CB. The rest of the draft you are ok to let it come to you without having to force any picks.

If they love Nabers and take him at #6 I’m fine with that, although it leaves us forced to get a QB in 2025 with perhaps the exact same position we are in this year. I hope they don’t pick JJM.
Adirondack GMen  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 4/21/2024 3:53 pm : link
that Denver trade story is increasingly looking bogus. No one else is reporting it. In fact, one of the national reporters said Denver is just as likely to trade down.
RE: I think getting to 3 will cost too much  
BleedBlue46 : 4/21/2024 3:55 pm : link
In comment 16478228 Mike from Ohio said:
Quote:
Certainly the 2025 1st will be included. Hopefully NE likes JJM and takes him at #3. If that happens Schoen should be working hard to get to #4 to get Maye.

If the Patriots take Maye at #3, I would love to see the Giants trade back at pick #6 and let the Vikings come up to get JJM. Use #11 on Penix and #23 on BPA between WR, DE, OL and CB. The rest of the draft you are ok to let it come to you without having to force any picks.

If they love Nabers and take him at #6 I’m fine with that, although it leaves us forced to get a QB in 2025 with perhaps the exact same position we are in this year. I hope they don’t pick JJM.


Only if Min didn't trade with LAC first.
Trade back for a first round swap...  
BMac : 4/21/2024 3:56 pm : link
...and an additional 2nd and either 3rd or 4th. Take a CB with the one, the best DT with one of the twos, then it's dealer's choice from there. Take Milton later with either the extra 3/4.
RE: What about the smoke coming from Denver  
bLiTz 2k : 4/21/2024 5:54 pm : link
In comment 16478009 Adirondack GMen said:
Quote:
They would trade Surtain, next years 1st or second (depends on who’s reporting) and their 12th. That saves us a pick since we picked up Surtrain.
I like that trade. Still have the ability to pick up a QB / a DL /or a OL…


That rumor is total horse shit
RE: RE: Preferable strategy is to trade back???  
56goat : 4/21/2024 6:41 pm : link
In comment 16478064 BH28 said:
Quote:
In comment 16478026 56goat said:


Quote:


No. To me that is the last resort, meaning every attempt to get the QB we want has failed.

Preferable strategy is to identify a QB who is an upgrade over what we have now (low bar to hurdle) and ideally be the QB who can take us into the playoffs and eventually SB. Not year one, but moving the team forward.

We've wasted the last 10+ years with poor drafting & FAs, time to start acting like a professional organization.



It's assuming the Giants have QBs 3-6 ranked similarly. If so, it's an opportunity to gain additional assets and still get a QB.


That is possible, but not likely to me. The scenario you described seems to me to be more likely if the Giants don't like any of the QBs 3-6 and trade down just to get more picks. If the Giants still like one or more of 3-6, they try to work a deal, not trade back - could get jumped if they move back.
RE: RE: RE: Preferable strategy is to trade back???  
BH28 : 4/21/2024 7:04 pm : link
In comment 16478467 56goat said:
Quote:
In comment 16478064 BH28 said:


Quote:


In comment 16478026 56goat said:


Quote:


No. To me that is the last resort, meaning every attempt to get the QB we want has failed.

Preferable strategy is to identify a QB who is an upgrade over what we have now (low bar to hurdle) and ideally be the QB who can take us into the playoffs and eventually SB. Not year one, but moving the team forward.

We've wasted the last 10+ years with poor drafting & FAs, time to start acting like a professional organization.



It's assuming the Giants have QBs 3-6 ranked similarly. If so, it's an opportunity to gain additional assets and still get a QB.



That is possible, but not likely to me. The scenario you described seems to me to be more likely if the Giants don't like any of the QBs 3-6 and trade down just to get more picks. If the Giants still like one or more of 3-6, they try to work a deal, not trade back - could get jumped if they move back.


If they end up trading back with the Vikings, they would need to get jumped by two teams in order to not have a shot at one the top six QBs. I think that's highly unlikely. That would also mean that 6 QBs would have gone in the top 10.
I think the Giants draft a receiver in Round 1 if not already taken  
GeofromNJ : 4/22/2024 12:17 am : link
otherwise, they draft Alt, and then attempt to trade up to get Nix in late Round 1. Not saying this is ideal, just what is possible.
RE: What about the smoke coming from Denver  
BigBlueinDE : 4/22/2024 9:21 am : link
In comment 16478009 Adirondack GMen said:
Quote:
They would trade Surtain, next years 1st or second (depends on who’s reporting) and their 12th. That saves us a pick since we picked up Surtrain.
I like that trade. Still have the ability to pick up a QB / a DL /or a OL…


As do I. CB is a need and Denver helps us solve that problem. I would be fine with trading down at this point.
Back to the Corner