What would the Giants get for Slayton?

Guessing a 5th at best. I view him as more of 3rd

Of Animal House, maximum

in the 4th or fifth round if you want. Why would you trade for one you had to pay more and is older?

I think teams would rather draft a younger player who is also significantly cheaper.

I think the real question is why would a team want to trade for Slayton?

pulls more than a 7th rd pick man, cmon.

SF is getting 4th rd offers for Deebo

so go from there.

round. Something like that

In comment 16491123 Mike from Ohio said:

Quote:

in the 4th or fifth round if you want. Why would you trade for one you had to pay more and is older?

Because he’s a proven 700 yard receiver in the NFL on a cheap contract.

a 5th is realistic maybe 4th, he's not a #1 WR obv but a very reasonably priced #2 or 3.

I think worth reaching out to LAC to move up for their #37 for our #47 and Slayton and a pick(5th?)

In a very young receiver room. He also seems like a guy who will be a good influence (potential holdout non withstanding)on the young kids.Maybe a team with a real need at WR gives you something decent, 4/5th rounder for him but is that really worth bumping a mostly inexperienced group up a peg early in the year when developing them is the most important thing?

he is not worth anything

At that point, is it worth it? That’s about where Slayton was drafted, and we consider that (or McFadden) about as good as it gets at that point in the draft…

I think he’s valuable as a WR4 here, and not sure trading him makes sense unless they get a favorable offer.

Furthermore he’s probably the WR2 until Hyatt takes a big step forward. I do think Hyatt will…but as of today, Slayton is their most accomplished WR.

In comment 16491142 battttles said:

Quote:

pulls more than a 7th rd pick man, cmon. SF is getting 4th rd offers for Deebo

Deebo wants BIG $$$$...

I think GMs are divided on the value of these WRs are the insane contracts being gotten by some.

I'd rather just draft a WRs every/other year and trade the guy away that wants 30mil.

WRs are as replaceable at RBs but with a different game impact.

He doesn't have to be the #1 receiver here, and with ambers and Robinson, he can have a career year.

I would try to package my 2 and slayton to move up for cooper

In comment 16491150 JoeyBigBlue said:

Quote:

In comment 16491123 Mike from Ohio said: Quote: in the 4th or fifth round if you want. Why would you trade for one you had to pay more and is older? Because he’s a proven 700 yard receiver in the NFL on a cheap contract.

He's also 27 and due a new contract next year.

I think 500-700 yard receivers are pretty fungible *if* you have a quarterback willing and able to throw the ball downfield.

What I caution is the Giants picked Hyatt at 73, and he drew 2/3 of the targets as Slayton and produced about half as much.

This might say more about Jones than either receiver, but at least for the Giants, picking a "Slayton" in the middle rounds hasn't been true.