If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
for the division so I’d like them to keep winning to make week 18 meaningful. That might be a bigger factor than SOS.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
I think it's criminal that Dallas is getting two Thursday night home
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
I can pretty much guarantee you the Giants will be tied with someone, so SOS will come into play. There are 6 other teams with four wins and five more with 5 wins. I can guarantee that as much as you can guarantee one loss will change the Seahawks spot.
The Seahawks aren't going to lose out, they still have Tennessee and Arizona. So you can expect 8 wins at a minimum. Do you really think the difference between picking 18th and 22nd in the second round is more important than the difference between picking 4th and 7th in the first? Just look at the trade charts and you'll see how much weight the teams value the difference in those picks.
Also, need comes into play more in the late second than in the early first. At that point the Giants might be focusing on DL while the teams in front of them are focusing on WR. In the first, the Giants, Jets, and Commanders are all going to be looking for a QB. Those are teams we might tie with. Imagine if, say, Daniels is the last of the three QBs on the board and the Jets or the Commanders pick right before us and get him because the edged us in SOS because Seattle lost to Dallas. And we have to watch Jets fans celebrate for years. Or struggle for years against Washington. How happy would you be that they picked four spots earlier in round two then?
I've lived thru a lot of Giants high draft picks where they ended up, say, fifth in a five player draft (Cedric Jones instead of Jonathan Ogden is the best, but not only example). I'd rather not have that happen again and miss out on a guy the Giants desperately need by one pick, all to pick four spots earlier in round 2.
for the division so I’d like them to keep winning to make week 18 meaningful. That might be a bigger factor than SOS.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
The Week 18 game is at MetLife, not Philly. If the Eagles don't need the game, I don't see them risking injury to Hurts for even the first half. He didn't play a down in the preseason.
for the division so I’d like them to keep winning to make week 18 meaningful. That might be a bigger factor than SOS.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
While I certainly agree that the likely won’t sit players, it isn’t guaranteed especially if someone like Hurts is banged up.
never root for anything but injuries for the cowturds! Hopefully the Giants that will build a team that can once again beat the cowturds and the green slime!
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
I can pretty much guarantee you the Giants will be tied with someone, so SOS will come into play. There are 6 other teams with four wins and five more with 5 wins. I can guarantee that as much as you can guarantee one loss will change the Seahawks spot.
The Seahawks aren't going to lose out, they still have Tennessee and Arizona. So you can expect 8 wins at a minimum. Do you really think the difference between picking 18th and 22nd in the second round is more important than the difference between picking 4th and 7th in the first? Just look at the trade charts and you'll see how much weight the teams value the difference in those picks.
Also, need comes into play more in the late second than in the early first. At that point the Giants might be focusing on DL while the teams in front of them are focusing on WR. In the first, the Giants, Jets, and Commanders are all going to be looking for a QB. Those are teams we might tie with. Imagine if, say, Daniels is the last of the three QBs on the board and the Jets or the Commanders pick right before us and get him because the edged us in SOS because Seattle lost to Dallas. And we have to watch Jets fans celebrate for years. Or struggle for years against Washington. How happy would you be that they picked four spots earlier in round two then?
I've lived thru a lot of Giants high draft picks where they ended up, say, fifth in a five player draft (Cedric Jones instead of Jonathan Ogden is the best, but not only example). I'd rather not have that happen again and miss out on a guy the Giants desperately need by one pick, all to pick four spots earlier in round 2.
5 player draft? I don’t remember, but are you suggesting there were no great players drafted after Giants took Cedric Jones?
Because if there were, it was just a bad pick and not the result of bad draft placement
So If There Are Positives And Negatives Regardless Of The Outcome
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
I can pretty much guarantee you the Giants will be tied with someone, so SOS will come into play. There are 6 other teams with four wins and five more with 5 wins. I can guarantee that as much as you can guarantee one loss will change the Seahawks spot.
The Seahawks aren't going to lose out, they still have Tennessee and Arizona. So you can expect 8 wins at a minimum. Do you really think the difference between picking 18th and 22nd in the second round is more important than the difference between picking 4th and 7th in the first? Just look at the trade charts and you'll see how much weight the teams value the difference in those picks.
Also, need comes into play more in the late second than in the early first. At that point the Giants might be focusing on DL while the teams in front of them are focusing on WR. In the first, the Giants, Jets, and Commanders are all going to be looking for a QB. Those are teams we might tie with. Imagine if, say, Daniels is the last of the three QBs on the board and the Jets or the Commanders pick right before us and get him because the edged us in SOS because Seattle lost to Dallas. And we have to watch Jets fans celebrate for years. Or struggle for years against Washington. How happy would you be that they picked four spots earlier in round two then?
I've lived thru a lot of Giants high draft picks where they ended up, say, fifth in a five player draft (Cedric Jones instead of Jonathan Ogden is the best, but not only example). I'd rather not have that happen again and miss out on a guy the Giants desperately need by one pick, all to pick four spots earlier in round 2.
5 player draft? I don’t remember, but are you suggesting there were no great players drafted after Giants took Cedric Jones?
Because if there were, it was just a bad pick and not the result of bad draft placement
The Giants have their qb and it appears good back up qb, so move off the qb draft in the first round! Oline, dline, LB, pass rusher, wr re bigger needs!
and rooting for that Texas team.
Looking at Seattles schedule after tonight:
49ers
Eagles
Titans
Steelers
Cardinals
They SHOULD win the last 3, so losing tonight then the next 2 gets them to 9-8 and the playoffs but it should force them vs a better playoff team and keep them in the lower 20s. Hopefully Pitt ( another team I dislike) brings an upset, gets them to 8-9 and possibly oout of the playoffs but at 20.
5 player draft? I don’t remember, but are you suggesting there were no great players drafted after Giants took Cedric Jones?
Because if there were, it was just a bad pick and not the result of bad draft placement
There were a bunch of good or even great players picked after Jones. Ray Lewis and Marvin Harrison (Sr.), to name two.
Sure, but the first four in that draft were studs. All pros. All played positions the Giants needed, especially Ogden.
Anyone should want to pick 4th ahead of the Jets and Commanders rather than four spots earlier in round 2. There are lots of good players taken later than 18 in round 2 who become stars.
for the division so I’d like them to keep winning to make week 18 meaningful. That might be a bigger factor than SOS.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
we want the cowboys to win every game, and that the last game of the season matters to the eagles because they lose .
Sirianni and the Eagles will want to crush the Giants in front of the Philly fans even if they are 15-1 going into the game. Nor will he want the starters not playing for three weeks. I'd bet my house Sirianni and his team will do whatever they can to stomp the Giants into the turf. This isn't KC, it's the Eagles. They hate the Giants and vice versa. Losing to the Giants at home would be an embarrassment for them. They aren't going to role over.
That they are tied with the Giants for most OL changes, tied for #1 in the league. Yet IMO the Seahawks OL looks much more functional. Coaching, QB/WR play, I just wonder why.
Not smart enough to double a guy like Parsons in a 2 min situation. At least chip him with a TE
He torched the RT 1on1 2 plays in a row, then the 4th down play they didn’t even block him….if so was a Seattle fan I’d be livid at the offensive staff
How is he getting word of the call before it’s announced by the ref in the game?
I’ve never seen that before.
The only thing I can think of is he’s actually listening in on the replay talk between the ref and replay HQ. Maybe the league allows these guys to plug in and hear the discussion.
well coached team. Let's be real. Great teams know how to win.
Oh please. Who have they beaten?
The fact they can come back and beat you even when they are down. The fact that they really only have one good WR in Lamb and can still produce offense. I'm surprised teams don't gameplan to completely shutdown Lamb?! They have a rookie TE that looks like he is an all pro in only his first year. They were getting beat and made good adjustments in the 2nd half. They can put just about anyone on the offensive line and look like they never lost a step. They are consistent.
well coached team. Let's be real. Great teams know how to win.
Oh please. Who have they beaten?
The fact they can come back and beat you even when they are down. The fact that they really only have one good WR in Lamb and can still produce offense. I'm surprised teams don't gameplan to completely shutdown Lamb?! They have a rookie TE that looks like he is an all pro in only his first year. They were getting beat and made good adjustments in the 2nd half. They can put just about anyone on the offensive line and look like they never lost a step. They are consistent.
better than I thought they could. But how do you leave Micah Parsons unblocked on a 4th and 2 play?
We set the template for them!
Great question.
That said, in a game with an impossible number of penalties, Parsons was lined up in the neutral zone, by a lot, on the last 2 plays. One was so far he was probably lined up offsides.
I was thinking the same thing. Makes their normal uniform look awful.
I believe the "logic" behind all this is that when the Seahawks originally wore those jerseys they were as invisible as an NFL franchise could be.
The darker jerseys that Pete Carroll started out with are actually ok (look up the Beastquake run), and then they unveiled the current jerseys with their 2012 run that foreshadowed the success to come, when they drafted Wagner, Wilson, Irvin, and the LOB was set.
They haven't even worn the 2010-2011 era jerseys since then, so going all the way back to this throwback now is interesting.
It definitely is a better jersey.
No reason for the lime green jerseys at all, but they've had some notable wins in them so in a weird way they've justified wearing them way more than they ever should.
Very interesting way of thinking in the Pacific Northwest.
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
Quote:
.
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
Quote:
In comment 16308894 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
.
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
I can pretty much guarantee you the Giants will be tied with someone, so SOS will come into play. There are 6 other teams with four wins and five more with 5 wins. I can guarantee that as much as you can guarantee one loss will change the Seahawks spot.
The Seahawks aren't going to lose out, they still have Tennessee and Arizona. So you can expect 8 wins at a minimum. Do you really think the difference between picking 18th and 22nd in the second round is more important than the difference between picking 4th and 7th in the first? Just look at the trade charts and you'll see how much weight the teams value the difference in those picks.
Also, need comes into play more in the late second than in the early first. At that point the Giants might be focusing on DL while the teams in front of them are focusing on WR. In the first, the Giants, Jets, and Commanders are all going to be looking for a QB. Those are teams we might tie with. Imagine if, say, Daniels is the last of the three QBs on the board and the Jets or the Commanders pick right before us and get him because the edged us in SOS because Seattle lost to Dallas. And we have to watch Jets fans celebrate for years. Or struggle for years against Washington. How happy would you be that they picked four spots earlier in round two then?
I've lived thru a lot of Giants high draft picks where they ended up, say, fifth in a five player draft (Cedric Jones instead of Jonathan Ogden is the best, but not only example). I'd rather not have that happen again and miss out on a guy the Giants desperately need by one pick, all to pick four spots earlier in round 2.
Quote:
for the division so I’d like them to keep winning to make week 18 meaningful. That might be a bigger factor than SOS.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
The Week 18 game is at MetLife, not Philly. If the Eagles don't need the game, I don't see them risking injury to Hurts for even the first half. He didn't play a down in the preseason.
Quote:
for the division so I’d like them to keep winning to make week 18 meaningful. That might be a bigger factor than SOS.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
While I certainly agree that the likely won’t sit players, it isn’t guaranteed especially if someone like Hurts is banged up.
Agreed
Quote:
In comment 16308940 k2tampa said:
Quote:
In comment 16308894 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
.
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
I can pretty much guarantee you the Giants will be tied with someone, so SOS will come into play. There are 6 other teams with four wins and five more with 5 wins. I can guarantee that as much as you can guarantee one loss will change the Seahawks spot.
The Seahawks aren't going to lose out, they still have Tennessee and Arizona. So you can expect 8 wins at a minimum. Do you really think the difference between picking 18th and 22nd in the second round is more important than the difference between picking 4th and 7th in the first? Just look at the trade charts and you'll see how much weight the teams value the difference in those picks.
Also, need comes into play more in the late second than in the early first. At that point the Giants might be focusing on DL while the teams in front of them are focusing on WR. In the first, the Giants, Jets, and Commanders are all going to be looking for a QB. Those are teams we might tie with. Imagine if, say, Daniels is the last of the three QBs on the board and the Jets or the Commanders pick right before us and get him because the edged us in SOS because Seattle lost to Dallas. And we have to watch Jets fans celebrate for years. Or struggle for years against Washington. How happy would you be that they picked four spots earlier in round two then?
I've lived thru a lot of Giants high draft picks where they ended up, say, fifth in a five player draft (Cedric Jones instead of Jonathan Ogden is the best, but not only example). I'd rather not have that happen again and miss out on a guy the Giants desperately need by one pick, all to pick four spots earlier in round 2.
5 player draft? I don’t remember, but are you suggesting there were no great players drafted after Giants took Cedric Jones?
Because if there were, it was just a bad pick and not the result of bad draft placement
Because if there were, it was just a bad pick and not the result of bad draft placement
There were a bunch of good or even great players picked after Jones. Ray Lewis and Marvin Harrison (Sr.), to name two.
Quote:
In comment 16308972 Jim in Tampa said:
Quote:
In comment 16308940 k2tampa said:
Quote:
In comment 16308894 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
.
If you're talking about the draft that is only true if you're just looking at the 2nd round pick from Seattle. A Cowboys win hurts us in strength of schedule against the Jets and Tennessee in the first round because it counts as 2 wins by an opponent. A Seattle win only counts as one win. And the same will be true when they play the Eagles.
Giants fans should want Seattle to win this game (and/or the Eagles game), but lose every other game possible. I'd rather pick two spots higher in round one and four spots lower in the second half of round 2.
That's a solid point. But a loss by Seattle against the 'Boys is guaranteed to impact their draft position in RD-2, whereas, there is no guarantee that the Giants will tie either the Jets or the Titans to impact the Giants' RD-1 draft position.
I can pretty much guarantee you the Giants will be tied with someone, so SOS will come into play. There are 6 other teams with four wins and five more with 5 wins. I can guarantee that as much as you can guarantee one loss will change the Seahawks spot.
The Seahawks aren't going to lose out, they still have Tennessee and Arizona. So you can expect 8 wins at a minimum. Do you really think the difference between picking 18th and 22nd in the second round is more important than the difference between picking 4th and 7th in the first? Just look at the trade charts and you'll see how much weight the teams value the difference in those picks.
Also, need comes into play more in the late second than in the early first. At that point the Giants might be focusing on DL while the teams in front of them are focusing on WR. In the first, the Giants, Jets, and Commanders are all going to be looking for a QB. Those are teams we might tie with. Imagine if, say, Daniels is the last of the three QBs on the board and the Jets or the Commanders pick right before us and get him because the edged us in SOS because Seattle lost to Dallas. And we have to watch Jets fans celebrate for years. Or struggle for years against Washington. How happy would you be that they picked four spots earlier in round two then?
I've lived thru a lot of Giants high draft picks where they ended up, say, fifth in a five player draft (Cedric Jones instead of Jonathan Ogden is the best, but not only example). I'd rather not have that happen again and miss out on a guy the Giants desperately need by one pick, all to pick four spots earlier in round 2.
5 player draft? I don’t remember, but are you suggesting there were no great players drafted after Giants took Cedric Jones?
Because if there were, it was just a bad pick and not the result of bad draft placement
Looking at Seattles schedule after tonight:
49ers
Eagles
Titans
Steelers
Cardinals
They SHOULD win the last 3, so losing tonight then the next 2 gets them to 9-8 and the playoffs but it should force them vs a better playoff team and keep them in the lower 20s. Hopefully Pitt ( another team I dislike) brings an upset, gets them to 8-9 and possibly oout of the playoffs but at 20.
This and seattles pick are enough for me. Hate rooting for cowboys but it’s a rare occasion where I will
“Wide Right”
This. And please ditched the neon greens
Because he had them -
Quote:
5 player draft? I don’t remember, but are you suggesting there were no great players drafted after Giants took Cedric Jones?
Because if there were, it was just a bad pick and not the result of bad draft placement
There were a bunch of good or even great players picked after Jones. Ray Lewis and Marvin Harrison (Sr.), to name two.
Sure, but the first four in that draft were studs. All pros. All played positions the Giants needed, especially Ogden.
Anyone should want to pick 4th ahead of the Jets and Commanders rather than four spots earlier in round 2. There are lots of good players taken later than 18 in round 2 who become stars.
Quote:
for the division so I’d like them to keep winning to make week 18 meaningful. That might be a bigger factor than SOS.
I'll keep saying this till I'm blue in the face. There is no way in hell that Sirianni and the Eagles don't try to crush the Giants in that game. First, they hate the Giants. Second, their fans hate the Giants and the game is in Philly. And third, if they sit their starters they will go three weeks between games. No coach is going to do that. Some of the starter might only play a half, but that will be plenty.
Quote:
.
we want the cowboys to win every game, and that the last game of the season matters to the eagles because they lose .
Sirianni and the Eagles will want to crush the Giants in front of the Philly fans even if they are 15-1 going into the game. Nor will he want the starters not playing for three weeks. I'd bet my house Sirianni and his team will do whatever they can to stomp the Giants into the turf. This isn't KC, it's the Eagles. They hate the Giants and vice versa. Losing to the Giants at home would be an embarrassment for them. They aren't going to role over.
This is an art that many WRs need to learn. Not sure that we have a WR on our roster who knows to do this.
These Seahawks unis are excellent.
Our 80s-90s era is so much better.
80s-90s Jets is way better.
Bucs creamsicles
Eagles Kelley greens way better than what they have now
Just about every throwback I can think of I like better.
I’ve never seen that before.
Sirianni and the Eagles will want to crush the Giants in front of the Philly fans even if they are 15-1 going into the game.
The Week 18 game is at MetLife.
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
Sirianni and the Eagles will want to crush the Giants in front of the Philly fans even if they are 15-1 going into the game.
The Week 18 game is at MetLife.
And judging by what it's been like the last few years it will be full of Philly fans because Giant fans will sell them their tickets.
Maybe my favorite uniform in the league, after giants throwback of course.
They do seem a little disinterested.
money throw.
I liked going for it, but either a dive or a quick slant is the call.
ive never seen an OL like this in yearsssss
I liked going for it, but either a dive or a quick slant is the call.
Why go for it at midfield with a lead. Again, the stupidity of analytics.
You run the ball.
If you don’t want to run, at least throw a higher percentage pass play to the sticks.
0 targets for your best WR in the last 22:00 minutes of game action.
Seattle needs a new QB desperately.
This is why stats are meaningless. Geno always chokes with the game on the line.
He torched the RT 1on1 2 plays in a row, then the 4th down play they didn’t even block him….if so was a Seattle fan I’d be livid at the offensive staff
Dallas is an extremely talented team. I’m not sure how well coached they are.
I thought McCarthy was stupid not to take the 3 points after the Bland interception at a point in the game when Seattle was gaining some momentum.
The 4th down call was atrocious and could have easily lost them the game.
Dallas is amazing with their personnel. They draft as well as anyone in the league.
Oh please. Who have they beaten?
We set the template for them!
I’ve never seen that before.
The only thing I can think of is he’s actually listening in on the replay talk between the ref and replay HQ. Maybe the league allows these guys to plug in and hear the discussion.
Quote:
well coached team. Let's be real. Great teams know how to win.
Oh please. Who have they beaten?
The fact they can come back and beat you even when they are down. The fact that they really only have one good WR in Lamb and can still produce offense. I'm surprised teams don't gameplan to completely shutdown Lamb?! They have a rookie TE that looks like he is an all pro in only his first year. They were getting beat and made good adjustments in the 2nd half. They can put just about anyone on the offensive line and look like they never lost a step. They are consistent.
Quote:
In comment 16309357 prdave73 said:
Quote:
well coached team. Let's be real. Great teams know how to win.
Oh please. Who have they beaten?
The fact they can come back and beat you even when they are down. The fact that they really only have one good WR in Lamb and can still produce offense. I'm surprised teams don't gameplan to completely shutdown Lamb?! They have a rookie TE that looks like he is an all pro in only his first year. They were getting beat and made good adjustments in the 2nd half. They can put just about anyone on the offensive line and look like they never lost a step. They are consistent.
They only have one good WR?
On another note, does Dak get it done this year.
The pressure on Dak has to be great trying to get that SB win. More so than any other QB.
Quote:
better than I thought they could. But how do you leave Micah Parsons unblocked on a 4th and 2 play?
We set the template for them!
Great question.
That said, in a game with an impossible number of penalties, Parsons was lined up in the neutral zone, by a lot, on the last 2 plays. One was so far he was probably lined up offsides.
Quote:
Gotta go back to that ....
I was thinking the same thing. Makes their normal uniform look awful.
I believe the "logic" behind all this is that when the Seahawks originally wore those jerseys they were as invisible as an NFL franchise could be.
The darker jerseys that Pete Carroll started out with are actually ok (look up the Beastquake run), and then they unveiled the current jerseys with their 2012 run that foreshadowed the success to come, when they drafted Wagner, Wilson, Irvin, and the LOB was set.
They haven't even worn the 2010-2011 era jerseys since then, so going all the way back to this throwback now is interesting.
It definitely is a better jersey.
No reason for the lime green jerseys at all, but they've had some notable wins in them so in a weird way they've justified wearing them way more than they ever should.
Very interesting way of thinking in the Pacific Northwest.