WARNING: If you do not like rumors or rumor-mongering, please leave this thread immediately for your own mental health. Please don't shoot the messenger. The following was provided to me by a legitimate source (not one of the previous Edwards asshats on this site):
"The talks are still on. The Browns are being cheap right now and have no interest in re-signing Edwards to a big deal. They are willing to take low compensation. They are asking for a conditional next year (high as a 3) and Danny Ware and Mario Manningham (who Mangini wanted badly for the Jets). They were asking for these same two players before the draft, but the feeling is they can get NY to bite now that they got Nicks and Brown in the draft."
"(I do not) know the status of the Giants response to this offer."
Man, even if its a one year rental that is still worth it IMO.
Pull the trigger...
Plus we have Reese to find us another Practice Squad RB (Ward, Ware) and he's pretty good at that...
Ware may be very good but with Jacobs, Bradshaw and Brown, he won't see the field
I still think 10MM a year is too much. Sorry Edwards, we don't want what you've got for that price tag.
JR has been incredibly consistent in his ability to negotiate friendly contracts. And if its incentive laden, I'm ok with it.
But Ware, Manningham & a 3rd rd pick, plus a $8.5/yr contract... DEAL!
why would the browns want another UM alum??
Edwards, in no way, shape or form come cheap. And call me crazy, but I like having all of that solid depth at running back.
Definitely do this trade if an extension is worked out
Still not an Edwards fan... now, if this was for Boldin, I'd stuff them both in a van and send it to the airport.
fuck 9-10 per though
So does anybody know the cap hit for Tyree?
Jerry: No idea, guy's got skill, but what a fucking idjit. Do we really want another flaming Demps though?
Tom: No more fucking fairies
Jerry: Alright, we keep the dopehead! Cheaper anyway and we don't have to worry about buttpirates sniffin around the showers
Go Golden Knights?
From the Giants side I don't think it's a good deal. We're not gonna pay Edwards 10M and shouldn't. I don't want to see Reese give up three players with upside for a one year rental.
Lets keep the young guys and let 'em develop.
is going to be Giants friendly. I feel like it's getting rid of bad Plax and his scary contract, and then picking up bad Plax's younger brother and giving him a scarier contract.
I don't see any "good Plax" in this. I think everyone is enamored by the one good game he had last year, against us, when Ross couldn't stop falling down.
backload?
it still counts
if he wants to accept 7.5 fine, but otherwise, he and the browns can go screw. And Braylon may actually enjoy that. NTTAWWT
It doesn't make any sense to me. They can get better value than Ware, Manningham, and our 3rd from the Jets or some other team. Unless the Browns are just stupid.
maybe he's not stupid enough to shoot himself in the leg, but I really don't see the difference.
what are we trading for a 26 year old for if we only want 4 years from him?
BE wants mega bucks...hmmm
We will never know until he gets on the field, which he won't if Edwards comes here.
"Manningham showed absolutely nothing"
I hope that that was a joke.
I don't want to get into this debate, it's not worth it, our guys are gonna be fine
Eric, can you get more details?
+ a third round pick. Three thirds?
Thats more than a 2 and a 5. If Edwards is willing to sign for a reasonable contract.. I do it. If not.. I don't. I find it hard to believe this has anything to do with compensation and everything to do with Braylon's contract.
nut up and watch our guys grow, especially smith in his third year
Anakim : 8:52 pm
better pro than Braylon, I would say you are completely nuts.
you make shit up
who the fuck said that?
we drafted him for a reason last year, his potential is off the charts, he never had a chance to see the ball last year. Trade him before even getting to see him have a full camp? To pay Demps II 10 mil per?
yep
surrounded by two pretty mediocre seasons for a #1 WR that wants a shitload of money
If they're not real high on Manningham for whatever reason the deal could make sense even if they let him hit the market next year. It will give the young guys a year to develop.
You give me a choice. I trade Hixon over MM in that deal 10x over. We can find someone else for ST. I like Hixon a lot too but I think it would be a big mistake to trade Manningham, this quickly.
btw, smith was being doubled last season at the end, played flanker, still got open
doomed?
This is a steal for the Giants, its actually too good to be true after our draft. I'm not believing it.
DO IT ALREADY!!!
Ware is or 3rd string RB and Mario may be no higher than our 4th best WR.
Edwards becomes our #1 WR the moment he puts on the NYG uniform.
DO IT JERRY!!!
carry on
I can see the argument of wanting to keep Manningham a bit more sensible...
I still think this is a pretty good deal on the table, granted it will take time and snaps away from Nicks, Barden, and Beckum.
yes, smith and hixon have done exactly 'nothing'
peace out
Braylon has been to the Pro Bowl, Braylon is a bonafide #1 WR.
0:27 Will Demps and after that you see Danny Clark - ( New Window )
I would hate to lose ware. I think he is going to be a nice rb, but someone pointed out that hes a FA after this year??? Plus since drafting Brown, hes expandable.... Mario, I think most of us have high hopes for. Hes in his 2nd year with us, hes cheap... Keep him...
They didnt want to trade with us before the draft.... Because they thought they would get more??? Now teams have drafted and positioned themselves for the start of training camp. I'm sure not as many teams, if any, are interested in trading for BE now. So I would say we hold the cards... Give them a 3rd, Ware, and Moss... We still have to sign him to a deal... Hes not coming cheap... We shouldnt have to surrender Mario...
Edwards - 16 games
Catches 55
Yards 873
Avg Yards per 15.9
Touchdowns 3
Burress 10 games
Catches 52 - projected to 16 games
Yards 724 - projected to 16 games
Avg Yards per 13.0
Touchdowns 4
Actually with Toomer gone someone needs to replace his production. Toomer did have 4 TDs. Would Edwards need to increase his overall production?
Catches 48
Yards 580
Avg 12.1
TDs 4 Toomer - 16 games
I'm not comparing MM to Braylon; But he could be everything that Moss could have been. If we could toss then Hixon; I like the corps of Edwards, Smith, Manningham; with Nicks and Barden earning a spot as soon as they are ready. That would be great depth.
Edwards is not proven either. He has proven to be inconsistent. I do like the idea of having a veteren presence. Incosistence scares me cause I'm a Knicks fan and I remember John Starks.
Granted, Is B.Edwards a top 10 WR....outside of his break out year and being a top 5 draft pick....I don't know for sure..I don't see any Browns gams..I am assuming he is that talented.
The only hurdle is his contract.
Hixon can focus on KR/PR duties and play only in specific offensive packages (strenthening our STs as well)
why is it the only year of three he has #1 stats is when the QB plays very well?
c'mon, he's not Mike Furrey, at his size and skill level, he is not 100% dependant on QB play.
With Andre brown , Ware is arguably our 4th back. With The WRs and TE weve picked up Mario isnt any higher than a 4th stringer at receiver.
This is a no brainer if true.
What has Manningham done to be valued this highly? What can he do that Smith, Nicks or Barden can't?
JerseyJoe : 9:02 pm
that may scratch what Braylon has already shown. The dude was dominant and most likley will be again in the proper environment."
The expectations would be high because if the other WRs don't produce for Toomer's stats that means Edwards would have to produce much greater numbers. Can he?
Actually, Manningham is very similar to Nicks...except Manningham had off the field issues
06= 884yds= 6tds
07= 1289yds= 16td
08= 873yds= 3TDs
not proven
So Ware hasn't proven anything and thus is expendable, but the guy who literally has never set foot on an NFL practice field, is suddenly higher on the depth chart?
Joe has reached a new low
If we are going to trade a WR let it be Moss. If MM is everything many on this site have said he could be I want to see the next chapter. Plus, I hate Mangini and the Browns. Let him draft his own players rather than cherry pick ours.
Giants need to stick to rumors we heard in the past: Trade picks not players.
he was a 2005 draft pick
Two players that have not proved they can play in the NFL and a future pick for Braylon Edwards
If the contract isn't crippling, show me where to sign.
I see a solid youth group who will be competing like hell for PT in camp, raising each others' level of play every day.
I see a good cap situation that could be very advantageous for next year.
And I see a team that needs to re-sign it's franchise QB, maybe a younger DT in Cofield
I see a majority of posters who think this is Madden
And I NEVER have made the Madden comparison to posters until now. Never.
Edwards is probably much more of a sure thing, especially in 2009. Though if the only way to get Edwards to in NY is to sign him to an extension that potentailly costs the Giants a chance to extend Kiwanuka, Smith or other key players over the next few years, then maybe the shot gun approach using young gusy with potential is the way to go.
seriously, fucktarded of the highest proportion
try again kid
We have big money wrapped in a lot of players
but, BE is a #1 WR with superstar potential. should be able to rise above it. guess not, guess he needs someone throwing lights out to put numbers up. Eli better be 100% on top of his game, then, I wouldn't want BE sulking and dogging it again, especially for $8-10M a season.
it's not that he's not skilled, it's that the guy is a whining dog. and if you feel we've gotten rid of that problem, why do you go back down that road again, for even more money?
I understand most WR's are headcases, but I would rather have a headcase WR that is putting out an honest effort... at least most of the time.
pick back up the gamesticks boys, let jerry run the show
I also am pretty confident the Giants haven't had much interest in trading for Edwards since very early March although if the price keeps coming down maybe they will re-think it.
Smith
Nicks
Barden
Tyree
Moss
Manningham
Dont forget Beckum will be a receiving option in certain packages as well
thats 7 WRs and a receving H back.
Braylon automatically is the #1 on that list the moment he puts on a uniform.
Gosh, to get a great player, you have to give up something.
To me, it's an easy decision. Do it.
My take is if Manningham is part of the deal for Edwards, I pass.
As is, I think Jerry is laughing ass off reading this thread
I hope that if he does tho, that MM is not involved.
Manningham showed NOTHING in a season where he had golden opportunity to step up
I do this deal in a heart beat
Seriously?
wow~
Manningham may not be truly NFL ready to contribute for another year, if ever.
I normally don't care about the $$ as it's not my job and I don't think that anyone here can determine what a guy is worth, but do you pay BE more than Osi, Tuck, any of our OLine?
I like BE, but I don't want his contract to be one of those things that come between players.
I also think that MM is a legit NFL WR.
Finally, SS is a #1.
I truly hope these Braylon rumors die out for good before long.
for one good year
If I were a betting man I would guess that Reese says no and goes to camp with what we got... but...
who knows?
rnargi email
Personally, I guess I fall on the side of going with what we got, although I must admit that if they think they can fit him into our cap long-term having combinations of Braylon, Smith, Nicks, Barden, Moss, Tyree, Boss and Beckum to guard in the red/green zone with Jacobs or Bradshaw in the backfield should be enough to cause defensive coordinators to go absolutely nuts.
not superstars like Jeff Blake, Josh McCown, Shawn King, John Navarre and Matt Leinart.
We're not trading either of our rookies before we've even seen them in camp. That kind of move just pisses of your scouts.
Smith is the only starter we have with anything close to a track record. Too valuable to part with.
Hixon has diminished trade value because of his expiring contract, particularly to a team looking at longer-term rebuilding like CLE has. His ST contributions also don't add to his value to the Browns, who already have the best returner in the league in Josh Cribbs. He's worth more to the win-now Giants, so we wouldn't get good value if we were to trade him.
That leaves Mario. No track record to suggest that he would help on '09, but enough potential based on his college years to entice a team with the long term in mind. And he's under contract through 2011. He's the only WR we've got whose value might be higher to a team like the Browns than it is to the Giants.
And I can say, without hesitation, that Eli Manning, Brandon Jacobs, the entire O-Line, the entire D-Line, and Corey Webster are all better at their jobs than Braylon Edwards is at his job.
But yea, fuck it, fuck building a team. Let's turn this into Madden, give Braylon the moon and rake in Super Bowl trophies. It's just that easy. He's always proven to be productive, focused, a team player and a winner.
or ware who he snatched off a PS and saw something?
and I'd bet my savings Jerry feels the same
But let's make Canty our highest paid DLineman for no good years.
I would rather give Edwards money than Canty
'But let's make Canty our highest paid DLineman for no good years.'
BAHAHAAHAhAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAH
Again, I fail to understand the #1 receiver argument. Our team struggled last year without Plax, but Braylon isn't Plax. We'll be fine without some overpaid wideout.
I'd prefer it if it were Hixon and Ware; but I agree with those who say you can't say no to Manningham, Ware, and a conditional 3rd round pick if Edwards can be signed to a reasonable longterm deal.
But as LTS said earlier, fuck paying him $10mil. If thats part of it I don't want him.
I'm riachhhh biatchhhhhhh
However I will admit BE at #1 and Nicks #2 with some Smith and Hixon thrown is is very very very sexy....
Sorry, I was jus' following the script~
This is all speculation, but the person who mentioned Ryan Grant made a good point - and in that situation the Giants got almost nothing in return. Yeah, it'd suck to lose Ware or Manningham but you're getting a proven player in return.
I agree, i'd like it, but there's a limit to price
Again, and I know it will go ignored, Reese did not pursue BE at all to the extent BBI believes
My worry is this, the Jets or even Eagles may be willing to offer more and MM may be all Mangini really wants aside from the pick making our hard line leverage worthless without MM.
I still can't get over this fucking line.
'But let's make Canty our highest paid DLineman for no good years.'
Is there any more proof of football asininity?
If they can get him for the same price they were willing to pay Plaxico, I think the locker room will accept that. But if he gets too close to $10M/year, it could piss a few people offer and get others to start asking for a pay-increase.
Reese has no reason to bite now if they're already lowering the price. Fun game of poker and manginakok is getting restless
oh well.
anyone up for a game of madden? Just picked up BE!!!!!!! KEWLZ
50 yard line, you up for it? It's the boyz-giants game, I'll get ya some crackerjacks and a coke
We have disagreements, that doesn't make "the other guy" ignorant or any of the other nice things that you've labeled people here..
cause I still don't get it?
special joke?
We don't KNOW what the staff thinks of MM and to be quite honest, none of our opinions means jack. I don't understand calling someone ignorant simply because they like what Reese has put together.
It's flukking assenine.
You think Canty is more deserving of getting paid strictly off potential?
Than Edwards, cause that's basically what both their contracts will be for.
Please explain
WTF is "Cowboy fan persona" and why is Joe always posting that ticket sign?
What more can Eric say?
You may be right - and I certainly hope you are. Sometimes the not completely proven player works out (Diehl taking over at LT, for instance). Personally, with a position as crucial as WR, I favor the 'go the proven route' approach, but I get the trepidation from many about paying too much (I'm with you there) or giving up players who have major potential.
Is this more about Edwards, though, than about giving up Manningham or Ware? I mean (and this is hypothetical and impossible) if the same deal were offered for Fitzgerald, you pull the trigger instantly right?
Have you watched Canty in Dallas? here's a recap, he consistently owns our LG, occasionally our center, and always was a beast against the run.
Oh yea, all those batted balls Eli throws against the cowboys?
Yep, Canty
Thickones? TANKED
And completely discount salary cap ramifications?
I can't fathom how it is you've come to this conclusion other than you missed every Cowboy-Giant game since Canty became a starter, in addition to the rest of the Dallas games
Deal with Canty boy for me?
And jerseyjoeykid
kthxbi
And both JerseyJoe and LTS are complete tools I don't know which is worse but both don't understand football. At least Joe comes up with his own dumb ideas on his own though and doesn't just puppet the lexicon of BBI into every post.
So you get mad at people for wanting to pay a WR, who had 16 TD's and made an impact in our type of offense.
But you don't get upset when we pay a 3-4 DE, who hasn't done anything as 4-3 DT or DE, and make him the highest paying lineman on a team who won a superbowl with two all pros. And then you use a example of how Canty owned our LG's? Lulzzzz
Ok, I'll use an example how Edwards made Ross his toy on national TV. What is your point. Your argument can go both ways.
Canty hasn't done squat in a 4-3 defense to deserve that contract. The Cowboys probably signed the same calibre or in some people's eye better player to replace him, for a much cheaper contract.
IMO, the only way this trade doesn't get done is if Edwards wants too much money, not because we will not give up Ware and Manningham.
And Roadwarrior, I think it's pretty clear the staff is excited about Canty. That was a very strong FA pickup whether you want to argue it or not. Canty adds a TON to this DL rotation.
I also find it hard to believe some of what im reading....
so lemme get this straight theres about 30 people who have posted on this thread that pretty much are against this. OK...
Factor this in:
-The Giants dont have the best history in drafting WR's and as much blame EA got for his Dixon's, Alfords, Daryl Jones and Tim Carters...it was still based off the same scouts that we have today. So IMO Manningham is a huge huge HUGE question mark.
-Also every year in the draft the Giants always draft a guy in the mid rounds who is a potential superstar. Bottom line tho Manningham most likely will have a better role this year but he wont be an impact. Braylon Edwards is an IMPACT
-Ware seems like a great back but we have only seen him play maybe 10 snaps. We have no clue for sure how he would hold up at 15-20 snaps a game. AN HOLD ON A SEC!!! Is there even a chance he would get 5 a game now, prob not. I mean last time we came across a situation like the Reese got pretty nice value for Grant who is now pretty much a 3rd
-Bottom line, sometimes you have to take risks. You wanna keep up w/ the Patriots in their dynasty team...then your gonna have to make a risk just like how they did when then signed Randy Moss.
btw, in addition to my first reason, I love Nicks and Barden and dont think either were a bad pick.
If he wants $10m guaranteed, Edwards wants too much money for what he's done in his career. I wouldn't take him as a FA. I definitely wouldn't send a 3rd rounder to get him at that price, and barring a hostage situation there's no way I'd send him players and a 3rd round pick for the right to overpay him.
Oh yeah - and he was Randy Freakin' Moss. Not Braylon Edwards.
Maybe Mario didn't get on the field for the same reason that we finished the season the way we did; they didn't change the WR patterns for the players that we have.
So in essence it depends on what cards we're holding.
Another thought: will Cleveland potentially want less for BE? If so, then we wait a little longer. It's like poker, the Giants want to make the move at just the right time.
No brainer. Same if you include Moss or Hixon instead. A receiver has to go to add Edwards. Ware is the big loss
It would be nice if Cleveland wants Ware and Mario instead of a 2 and a 5 that they could have had. a 3 and PS signing good value
2. Mangini coached Danny Ware, so he knows what he can do. (One does wonder why Mangini stashed Ware on the practice squad when the Jets didn't have much of a running game.)
3. Mangini wanted Manningham for the Jets, but didn't have the power to draft players as the head coach.
This makes sense.
Ware has potential, Manningham is still a few years away.
We are talking about a 3rd string Rb, a Wr who will prob be the 4th guy and a 3rd rounder next year. An dont forget we just drafted a guy who has the potential to be just as effective.
Moss at the time was a huge risk to the Patriots and their ways of success. He was coming off 2 abmismal seasons w/ the Raiders and was viewed as a clubhouse cancer.
An the Patriots had to know that upon signing he will end up costing them money at some point.
Jesus the ability for a multiple Championships is here for the taking. I think if this is true we have to make a risk here.
btw I only want this tho if Edwards signs a longterm deal.
Moss was no risk to the Pats - they got him for a 4th rounder, didn't have to pay him much - and if he wasn't productive or was a clubhouse distraction, they could cut him with no dead cap hit.
If Edwards gets $10m a year and doesn't pan out - we've caused considerable damage to the team.
If we were giving up Ware and Manningham for Edwards, and he had a couple of years left on his contract (and didn't demand an extension), then this would be a comparable situation, and I'd be all for it. That's not the case.
Pass.
But I wouldn't be mad if Jerry made this deal.
Maybe we didn't learn our lesson this past season.
The Pats protected themselves against an old player with a history of locker room issues and who was seemingly well past his prime.
Edwards is 27 and has put up numbers without a good supporting cast.
Doesn't anyone wonder why we're talking about this after the draft? Don't other teams in the league, some with lesser offenses than ours, need a #1 WR? Why isn't there more competition for this guy?
Don't get me wrong - for a reasonable contract, I'd definitely take a shot at Edwards. Reasonable. He hasn't earned the salary of a top-5 or top-10 #1 WR in the league, whether it was a result of being on the Browns or not.
you're kidding, right?
delusional WR suddenly finds common sense and lowballs self because of bad economic times?
that's got as much chance of happening as Rodney Hampton going on a diet, going to speed school and running a 4.09 40.
If that's decent, then Steve Smith and Domenik Hixon must really, really suck, using that logic.
I'll take it.
Edwards does go against the grain, and it would be a detrimental to the team if he decided to lose focus again. I dont know ...
Reese as always will check all his bases and know what would be the wisest decision. I guess Ill just leave it at "whatever Jerry Reese does, I will cont. to support"
Pass!
Gimme a break.
On the off chance that they do give him a monster deal, I'll be upset.
Same build, Same skills. He is EXACTLY what the Giants need as I've said. If its gonna cost Ware, Mario and a 3...SIGN ME UP! I like the potential of those two, but if that's all it takes to get a #1 WR who has already been to the Pro Bowl and is only 26, you do it. What's the matter with you people?
Now would I rather give up Moss than Manningham? Yes of course. And I definitely don't do it if a reasonable contract extension for BE isn't done b4hand.
How on earth does someone equate Ware to a 3rd round draft pick? The Giants just drafted Brown in the 4th, who appears to be comparable to Ware with perhaps a better dossier as a receiver.
Well, up to the draft, things were generally quiet in Cleveland about Edwards, even after he told the city to screw off in December. Well, the draft comes and goes. In the past few weeks, let's look what has happened: They work out Drew Bennett and sign Mike Furrey.
And we've seen 3 less than flattering stories come out about Edwards. The gay rumor, the information from our old buddy Will Demps that Edwards is asking him about modeling and acting jobs during the game, and that Edwards was talking about free agency in the huddle.
Stop and think about this for a second. Why is this being published now. None of those things are new, all could have been brought up months ago, why now?
How about the Cleveland fan base who were expecting a first rounder and/or Kiwanuka for Edwards. At the least they want a second rounder. If there is any truth to this package for Edwards, all things considered, it's a far way off from a 1st rounder or even a 2nd rounder. How to you sell this to the fan base. Call him a prima donna who doesn't fit with blue collar Cleveland. Let him go to NY and hang out in the Village and get his acting jobs, good riddance. PR is all about managing expectations.
We talk about building for now and for the future, but you could destroy this team by the seams if we pay him and if he's mentally not into it.
Re Ware, Manningham, and "potential." Potential is all fine and dandy, but production is what counts. Edwards has produced in the past and there's no reason to think that he won't in the future.
Now- hell yeah, if an acceptable contact can be reached. First Edwards is the real deal, he was a highlight reel two years ago- last year he regressed but his team sucked and he isn't happy.
Ware?? Are you kidding me? I like him too but running backs are a dime a dozen and third stringers maybe a nickle for a bakers dozen. The Giants have proven their ability to find RB's.
Mario?? Well it would be nice to see what this kid's got but especially since the draft the Giants have no shortage of "potential" at WR, what they do have a shortage of is proven #1 receivers. Edwards would instantly provide a problem for defenses that doesn't exist today.
6'3" Edwards, 6'2" Hixon, 6'6" Barden, 6'3" Beckum all on the field at the same time? Or mix in a Smith, Nicks and Boss? I think Mario become expendable.
I'll trust Reese to do what's right in terms of money and players. Either way I'll be excited with the team the Giants field come September.
First off... Before the draft, I was a big Edwards-trade fan...
I'm on the fence about it now... The compensation isn't the issue with me... Not at all... The contract bothers me, but I have no reason to believe that Reese and Abrams will 'forget to eat their Wheaties', so to say...
They've negotiate many cap friendly, protective deals in the past and believe that if Edwards CONTINUES to play hardball, then it won't get done... They're not gonna screw up a good thing for one player...
My only question to those against the trade and claiming he drops 'everything' is while he led the league last year in drops... And 2nd in 07'... He had 16 last year... While that is a lot, and the most in the NFL... And if he's being paid millions, he should catch them all... I understand that...
But 1 a game... 1 for every 8, 9 or 10 targets... That's EVERYTHING? A RB with 'potential', a WR with 'the tools' but not the brain, as of yet and a 3rd round pick... For a number 1 WR, who would require double coverage and open the field for our running game, smith, nicks, beckam and boss? Again, if the contract is reasonable... That's why I'm on the fence about it... Contract and contract alone...
Guess what, Antonio Pierce was working as an intern on Howard Stern and said he wants to get a post playing career lined up. Danny Clark has said the same thing which is a reason he signed with the Giants. Tiki was doing overnights at WFAN during his playing days to get into the broadcast field. Stuart Bradley is working for my friend at Elle.com right now learning the fashion industry and blogging for them. This is normal for these guys and the Browns are using it against him to turn public opinion.
I just tire of the name calling that comes with disagreements that simply are nothing more than speculation and wishful thinking.
Hey Klaatu - I AGREE!
Edwards for a conditional pick next year and Sinorice Moss. Deal.
What we think we know: Edwards wants only a 4 year contract, which would allow him to be a Free Agent when he's 30 and allow him to sign one more BIG contract in his career.
What we think we know: Browns in a cost saving mode, traded back in the 1st round three times to pick up crap the Jets gave up and only two 6th round picks. We can also guess in a simular cost saving move, they want to trade Edwards instead of meeting his contract demands.
What we think we know: From Matt's Cleveland source, several teams contacted the Browns about Edwards but majority of them have backed of because of his contract demands.
What we think we know: Giants are bidding against themselves. Cleveland knows this, Edwards knows this and most importantly Jerry Reese knows this. No other teams (so far) have seemed to be winning to not only give up the resources to meet Cleveland's demands but to also be willing to come close to Edwards demands or else the trade talks wouldn't have gotten this far.
What we think we know: Edwards is in a simular contract situation as Plaxico Burress was in 2005. Giants were also the only bidders on Burress and Plaxico kept on trying to get the Giants to bid higher for his services. When EA pulled the offer, Burress realised that was his best offer and finally accepted.
Edwards in a simular situation, must be realising that financially, the Giants are one of the few teams in the league capable of giving him his payday and willing to. In the end, when push comes to shove, Edwards might accept a reasonable contract to join the Giants, just like Burress did in 2005.......when he realises that his only other option is to stay with the Browns.
2) Now comes this rumored deal involving Manningham, Ware and conditional 3rd straight up for Edwards. Now lets break this down a little further.
What we think we know: Super Mario was one of the best playmakers in college. Showed enough ability to be a 1st round talent that fell to the 3rd round in the 2008 draft.
In the NFL, it's been rumored that Manningham had a hard time picking up the offense. Although that is usually normal with WRs as it usually takes them up until their 3rd or 4th year in the NFL before they supposedily "Get It".
What we think we know: Although Manningham has great potential, which might or might not develope for a few years. We do know as a fact that Edwards already show cased that potential and was a dominating force at WR in 2007.
As much as people talk about all his drops and only showing up for one season.......well at least he already walked the walk in the NFL and showcased his ability once. While on the other hand we have to wait for Manningham to develope in a few years, that is if he ever does.
What we think we know: Danny Ware, as with Manningham, flashed potential in preseason. Giants coaches have raved about both Ware's and Manningham's potential. But on the other hand, there's already been rumored those inside the Giants locker room are upset with Ware's lack of dedication to be around more often this off season.
Plus while Ware has ALOT of potential, so does Brown. On top of that, Ware also has two RBs ahead of him on the depth chart who have actually performed on the NFL level and carried our running game on our run to the Superbowl in the 2008 post season.
What we think we know: There is a rumored conditional 3rd round pick involved. A very key aspect I haven't seen too many people mention is the fact that it's a conditional pick and not our 2010 3rd round pick outright.
Meaning we only give up our 2010 3rd round pick IF Edwards performs to the standards that Jerry Reese agrees to in this trade. If he does perform to his 2007 level, Edwards is easily more valueable then this entire pack and well worth our 3rd round pick.
The great thing about conditional picks, as they're performance based and we'll give up a high 3rd or 4th round pick if Edwards performs. If he doesn't, the pick we give up would be much lower and most likely in the 5th-7th rounds if he performs to his 2008 level in performance or gets injury prone.
Bottom Line: Jerry Reese is in the drivers seat and with drafting Nicks, Barden, Beckum and Brown as offense weapons, he's under no pressure to make this deal.
It's the Browns (for not wanting to extend Edwards and getting value for him now) and Edwards (for agreeing to a reasonable contract to the only real suitor in a trade scenerio or else be stuck playing in Cleveland) that are under REAL pressure here. Reese and the Giants are in the drivers seats and control all the cards if everything falls properly to their liking and on their terms.
The know what Danny ware can do (and they think they can steal Manningham), I was being sarcastic about Sinorice, they want no part of him.
Losing Ware would leave us thin at RB, but I suspect that Reese could fill that spot with a functional back if he felt it necessary.
MM is all potential at this point, and if he's a deal breaker, he'd better start at WR for us this year and be the guy that forces doubles. I don't think the Giants quite see that happening (at least this year) given how hard the Giants seem to have been working for an Edwards trade. And they're in a better position to evaluate that than any of us).
So, again, I think it comes down to $ and personality. If BE and his agent become reasonable in their demands, and he's seen as a lockerroom fit, this deal is a no-brainer. WE are one BE-type from being the odds-on favorite for the SB next year. Without that type of player we're one of the teams that are contenders but will have to overcome a weakness to get there.
Stupid trade, and most of BBI STILL doesn't understand why, going by many of these posts.
If he were to hit free agency, he'd get 9 million a year
Manningham has upside, but again, he's not exactly a dealbreaker. Not with Smith, Hixon, Nicks, Barden, Boss, Beckum, Moss and Tyree all able to catch passes. And of course Edwards coming in.
Don't get me wrong, Ware and Manningham are nice young players to have on the roster as it currently stands..and unless this trade goes through (unlikely), I hope both will produce for the Giants. But being reasonable, of course the Giants should trade either one for Edwards. Both? Fine. Both AND a draft pick? No thanks. Either one and a draft pick? Ehhh..preferably Ware, but sure, either one and a mid round draft pick. A 4-6 type pick.
-----
I don't think losing those guys matters much. Acquiring Edwards for either one, or hell, even both (no draft picks though), is reasonable. The only issue then is the contract. A huge issue, but the only issue. Fucking spare me on the love for Danny Ware and Mario Manningham though. You can find Danny Ware type players all over the place any year. Draft a guy late, sign an undrafted player, whatever.
As far as the rumored deal goes...IMO a 3rd round pick plus Ware and Manningham is a bit too rich for Edwards. One has only to look at Ryan Grant to see the upside of a player like Ware, he could be a #1 RB or a very valuable cog in a 2 back tandem ala Derrick Ward. The Giants have proven very adept at scouting talent at the RB position. Manningham was widely recognized as a 1st round talent at WR who needed time to develop the mental aspects of his game and was considered a bit of an off field risk. Well it's a year later and he's stayed clean off the field. One would hope and expect a season with the team has brought him improved maturity and an understanding of the pro game so that he can begin to contribute on the field this season. His upside is very high and a lot of the issues that swirled around him coming out of Michigan have been answered to a certain degree.
What would I trade for Braylon Edwards? Nothing if he insists on a contract averaging 10 mill per season, he's not worth that. If he's willing to work with our FO and arrives at a fair deal for both parties, something similar to what Plax signed is the proper ballpark. I'd give up the 3rd rounder and EITHER Ware or Manningham but not both. That's fair value for a player of his abilty and track record that ALSO will require a contract extension to keep in NY.
I'm inclined to believe there is something to this since Reese refuses to say we've moved on, and this deal reminds me a bit of the one the Browns made with the Jets on draft day.
As for if I want it, Manningham and Ware are both intriguing players to me, but I've also been unsure what their roles were going to be, and there is also the big question of Edward's contract demands. This would look like a slam dunk deal for most non-Giants fans, but could also prove to be a very big haul for them in a couple of years.
Toastt34 : 2:06 am
Are you kidding me?? So our 3rd or 4th RB is a deal breaker for a #1 WR??? I swear the ignorance on this board sometimes is f*ckin amazing.
Especially those that don't realize that Ware is going to be filling the Ward role as our number 2 back, most likely.
Essentially, from where I sit, it's Manningham and a conditional pick, for Edwards & Edwards' money...
I'm not so sure that having Braylon and a big money deal tied up with him is the right way to go, especially if it's a burden on the CAP (in regards to re-signing current players), but if Edwards settles for close to Plax money, I think we'll see this deal completed .
I do, however, believe Manningham will be a good player in this league, and I kind of would rather the Giants stand pat and run the old Patriots approach to offense -- not force feeding it to any one guy. And having them all clawing to step up. Competition is a great thing.
A first and a third? Sure. Mario Manningham, Danny Ware, and a 3rd? F-ck it, do it.
That's 3 players basically for one, and we're pretty stocked right now.
Secondly, a lot of people would have traded away Osi to get Manning back in 2004, because they didn't really know who he was about to become. I was one of them. I learned my lesson.
I've been reading articles on Manny all morning and had Rob Bradford (a Boston=area sportswriter) on the brain. And then I mis-typed the (wrong) name to boot.
Mea culpa and get me some coffee
Go somewhere else for your trade piece. Of course the rub is, we are already going to have to cut a WR; with Edwards we will have a really tough decision to make
Leave it to Reese. Leave it to Coughlin.
You as the fans are clueless at talent evaluation. They make a SERIOUS living at it. Look what they have done recently...
It has never been this exciting to be a Giants fan, save for 1986.
Edwards is the real deal. It's nice to have "potential" breakout players such as Ware and Mario, but how long do you wait?? We just drafted guys to replace them immediately, and with Nicks and Barden - behind Braylon???? Shoot - Do the deal.
One more point - where did the locker room cancer talk start re: Edwards??? He is reported to be a great presence....he was just aggravated with his team, ownership and contract situation. Remember - they are just cocky kids who only have their peers to compare to. If BE doesn't feel he is a top 5 guy...frankly, I don't want him.
Pray we get this done. It would instantly bolster our SB hopes. It's the only knock on the 2009 Giants - the lack of a #1.
If we can sign BE for a reasonable price, which I am sure Reese will do or cancel the deal, this could be a great move. Edwards, Hixon, Nicks, Smith is a borderline great 4 WR set.
Also, GiantTuff is correct, I don't think the Giants believed they had a shot at Brown where they were picking. And maybe the coaches are comfortable handing Ward's duties to Bradshaw after he was more or less in the doghouse after his early fumbles last year.
But for the Browns to be backing that package, things must have gone real sour with Edwards since the draft and he's got to go.
I can't believe that people are writing that Ware or Manningham are deal breakers. We've seen Ware look good in exhibition games carrying the ball against back-ups. We have no idea if Ware can catch the ball and equally important, block and protect Eli. That skill normally takes a year or 2 and my theory about why Bradshaw didn't see that much time last year is the concern about his blocking. And, with regard to Ware, I would expect that until the coaches see him block in game conditions, they won't know either.
For Manningham, if we get Edwards, we don't need Mannningham with the holdovers and the draft picks. And, with the questions about his route running and his smarts, I can understand that you don't want to give him up but how in hell is this a dealbreaker?
Putting the contract aside for a second - the Browns have no leverage here. They're not that far off from camp, the draft is over and Edwards is in his walk year. He could conceivably sit out, which would make matters much worse.
This is a game of chicken at this point - except the Giants are driving a Mack truck and the Browns are in a Prius. We drafted well and although Edwards might be an excellent complement to what we've got, there's no dire need to get him right now.
All that considered - two players AND a third round draft pick? These guys are NFL players, not practice squad chum. If we had to give them up and no picks, fine. But a 3rd rounder no less, and two guys (one who was a 3rd rounder and one who we know can perform as a solid backup RB at a minimum)?
Too much. Not because it's not a good straight up trade (contract aside), but because the time for making that demand has passed, and the Browns leverage has fallen considerably since then.
Another thing, I don't know why people are so up in arms over differing opinions.
Impulse buyers, methinks.
However, half of you that are screaming for this trade now, would also have gladly traded away our 1 and 3 this year to do it.
Now, we have a better deal. In two months, on the eve of training camp, it will probably be even better.
At this point, we've addressed the issue through the draft. Is Braylon even a fit here anymore?
p.s.-- If Edwards feels he is a top five player at his position, I have no problem with that. My problem would be if he feels he should be payed like one if he hasn't played like one. If you think you're top five, play like it.
As far as I'm concerned, the Giants history of drafting wideouts might be bad, but Jerry Reese is changing that. So far he is 1 for 1 and he found a diamond in the rough in Hixon. Too early to tell about Manningham but he is only coming off his rookie season so you can't very well write him off yet.
i just don't understand why we would want to unload a guy with only one year of development and hasn't even shown what he can do yet.
Plus, talking about package of value, I score MM as a first round draft pick, not a third (I don't care where he actually went), average to a second, so you are putting a 3rd, Ware and MM (a 2nd basically) for Edwards. And the Browns have no leverage.
The only thing that makes an argument here is we have so many WRs now and adding Edwards, there just isn't enough reps.
But, mark it down, Manningham is going to blow up in this league. And you guys seem to want him to do it in a Browns uniform.
Put this season on Eli's shoulders, he needs to be the leader of this team and go with the young kids.
If we trade for him and can't re-sign him, we get a comp pick back - probably a third which will help sweeten the loss of Mario and Danny.
The worst thing you can do in business is fall in love with potential. Always go for the sure thing.
It's going to be Ware that takes most of Ward's role over, not Bradshaw.
If they can hammer out a contract with BE, make the trade.
Weve seen some absolutely breathtaking runs by this guy including in the playoffs.
He is a more than capable #2 .
Ware might turn out to be prety good but Edwards becomes our instant #1 WR the moment he puts on the NYG uniform
micko ... you left out Boss, Barden and Beckum, as well.
but I have Manningham on the non-trade list, why do we value Nicks and Barden more than this kid. they are all young kids who could turn into a star for us, we just don't know. that is way I look at it. why are we valuing Nicks more than MM, simply where he was picked in the draft? because if you are doing it based on potential on how they produced in college, it is pretty even.
Ware is our 3rd string RB and Mario may be no higher than our 4th best WR . NEITHER are proven NFL commidities (i.e shown sustained dominance let alone adequacy in the NFL regular season).
Edwards becomes our #1 WR the moment he puts on the NYG uniform not to mention solidifies the only unit
with a ton of unproven talent...DO IT!!!!
.
Jacobs, Bradshaw, Brown...plus I have full confidence in Reese's ability to dig up some more RB gems
You guys worked yourselves up so much last time, what makes you think there's even anything really to this?
For whatever reason. Confidence?.. injury?.. added weight?.. Dunno, but he looked a step slower and that was not due to less touches.
I'd like to see Edwards here too, and the trade compensation seems favorable to the Giants if this rumor is accurate, but the 800 pound gorilla in the room is the extension for Edwards. I wonder if he'd come down on price if the deal was only 3 years. He would hit his next contract at 29, which would make him a very attractive FA target if he puts up 3 years worth of his 2007 numbers.
Personally, I dont think BE has the mental fortitude to play in NY. He is talented but his flashes of brilliance are not consistent and he wants the bank. NO to MM, NO to Ware.
However, "I have Manningham on the non-trade list" puts your opinion on the silly pile, imo. Be honest, you've fallen in love with an unknown.
I find it highly unlikely that Reese is just going to say, "sure, here you go." without a counter offer.
He doesn't seem to even handle it well in Cleveland of all places.
He's been crying all season that the fans hate him, that he's not wanted. He'll get ripped to shreds here after he drops a pass.
However, drop the pick to a 5th and have BE sign a reasonable contract and I'd be fine with it.
But I'm sure the biggest conversation taking place right now is whether to trade the conditional, and most importantly, whether to part ways with Manningham.
If the Giants pull the trigger, they do it with the mindset that this football team has been upgraded. That will tell you how they stack Manningham against Edwards, because that is the biggest issue at odds... also whether there is a wide enough talent chasm between Bray and Mario to warrant Plaxico money for Edwards AND to give away that conditional.
I don't want to sound insensitive toward Danny Ware (if you're reading, Danny) but I don't think the Giants bat an eye for him in this discussion.
And I don't think I'm being silly, I'm open and admitting it. There are other players on the roster that we should offer before him.
And my point still stands. Offering MM is no sillier or smart for that matter than offering Nicks if you are going on talent. The only difference is their draft position which is sunk cost at this point.
disclaimer: the only thing I don't know is if the mental aspect of MM is an issue, that I have to trust the coaches on, I just don't have any data one way or the other.
he is not an elite receiver as yet
and Cleveland quite frankly is stuck with him
I am personally very in favor of the deal. But just wanted to write to dispute what some said. Manningham does not have the talent of Braylon. Does not have the size. Maybe he develops the talent more. But they are not comparable or even close, nor were they in college.
I agree, only a knucklehead would do that. Unless said knucklehead is named Sullivan, Reese or Coughlin.
I expect a "You've got to do better than that" from Reese. Maybe a 1st day pick, a 2nd day pick and a current player.
Why or why not?
Wolverine: Good to hear a comparison view from you as someone who has seen a lot of both of them.
I'm not worried about the BS surrounding BE's modeling, geighness or premadonna (nyuk-nyuk)attitude cos' I don't buy that rumor BS, I do worry about his presence if he's paid more than our stud DEs and OLine.
they let eagles move up for a 6th round pick
they are Idiots
Now Braylon has to go soon or they will watch him walk after this year
We should dictate terms --and I would not give much
- Hixon has deep speed and contributes heavily to specials.
- Nicks is viewed as a strong physical receiver with great hands. I think he can be that great compliment to the starters on 3rd downs that Smith has been behind Plax and Toomer his 1st 2 years.
- Barden could be a serious GREEN ZONE scoring threat once he is up to speed with the game at the NFL level.
I'm not sure what unique skill Manningham brings to that potential group that we wouldn't already have in Edwards, Hixon and Nicks. Also, I would think that Nicks and Barden have the potential to be much better blockers in the running game than Manningham. Both of them were lauded for being accomplished run blockers at the collegiate level in various pre-draft scouting reports.
Secondly, from a personality/character perspective, it is not even close in my opinion. Manningham is not in a position right now to ruffle feathers or create problems. However at Michigan when he was, he took advantage and had a somewhat checkered history. Braylon has been in the spotlight for a long time and what you see is what you get. He is flamboyant, outspoken, etc. However he is not a character problem. He has given back a ton. That is just an aside though.
The contract should be the FIRST thing considered in this proposed deal...not the terms of the trade.
1. The WR market is out of whack.
2. Edwards's cost is out of whack within that out of whack market because of his anomalous 2007 season.
We're talking about probably making Braylon Edwards the second highest paid player on the team. Braylon Edwards.
1)most of us are basing our evaluation on his preseason game performance and
2) he's a free agent I believe at the end of the season. I believe JR drafted Brown with the thought that Ware would walk in hopes of finding a starting gig.
Strahan cost a ton - but would we have excelled without Osi on his rookie contract, and then Tuck and Kiwi?
If we hadn't developed one of those guys, we'd be a very different team today.
We need to do that at WR now. We need someone to step up and make some production at a lower cap level. We drafted a couple of guys in the hopes that one of them can product well and stick, and hopefully Beckum will help offset the need for immediate production from them.
It's not the guaranteed SB appearance that some of you are hoping for, but I'm excited to see what Manningham and Hixon can do with a year as Giants under their belts. I'm anxious to see what Nicks and Barden can do as well. Reese has given us so many great rookies of late, I'm extremely confident that one of these guys will shine, and that the offense will adjust enough to negate the need to add a high priced FA who may not even fit here in the first place.
Again, he's not TO and I know we have lockeroom leaders, but it takes one major headcase to blow the whole thing up into an ugly mess.
They have no leverage.. offer them a pick at most.. no players...
Also, if he was some super talent I would have expected more during his rookie year than an occasional screen pass, especially given the loss of Plax.
Finally, and quite frankly to me this is the most damning, the Giants selected TWO wide receivers high in the draft, going so far as to move up to get one of them. Given that Steve Smith isn't going anywhere, is it at least fair to question how the feel about MM in light of this? I think it's fairly clear.
I don't see Bradshaw touching the ball more than 6-8 times a game this year. Important, yes...but I still don't think he touches the ball as much as Ware.
2) Jay Fiedler
3) Art Heyman(Knicks)
What would be an acceptable contract?
The contract they give Braylon will probably be comparable in terms of it's potential ceiling.
granted one pass Hixon dropped (and Smith dropped some big wide open passes in important games as well...witness the Pittsburgh game replayed on NFL Channel this week. As did Plax and Edwards) but we need production from all other positons if we are to affford a better than average QB, a dominant DL and some DB's
Which would you rather?
1) An average QB? With a below average backup?
2) Maybe one good DL rusher and a weak Dt rotation?
3) No star DB's just journeymen rotating through one or two years at a time?
4)Edwards on top of the WR/TE/HB we have?
Cannot have all of them...which do you choose?
Whats more, if Mannigham/Ware is attractive to some teams why not trade them for a decent fourth safety?
Thanks for playing
2) The Giants were reportedly very interested in Darius Heyward-Bey and would have traded as high as #16 to get him in the draft. That probably means Nicks was their fourth-rated receiver behind Crabtree, Maclin and DHB. The knock on Nicks has always been long speed. DHB has it, and so does Braylon Edwards. The Giants got a great look at it in the Monday Night game last year when he torched us.
I think the Giants like Nicks a lot but don't think he is the type of receiver that will be true deep threat that requires a safety over the top and forces the corner to play off the line.
I think our QB and front office both want Braylon Edwards. As mentioned numerous times, the issue is likely his contract, not the trade package.
Yet in your world he is a #1 WR despite the fact that our staff did not put him on the field in that role despite needing one last year
Lets let that burst of energy on your part slide as just an exuberant mistake and move on?
I would have much preferred a Braylon contract on this team rather than Canty's. A little off topic but I still feel we way overpayed for Canty especially when we had just signed Rocky Bernaird who is a great player and I don't think Osi and Tuck or too happy with Cantys contract either.
I wanted Edwards but I will agree with GT that 7-9 million is a little over the top. I trust the front office and think he would be a good addition(even giving up MM and this has been covered over and over on this thread and I can't add much to it)but not for that much money. If the Giants can pull it off though I'm all for this move.
Which would make a trade for Manningham either ill-advised or demonstrative of Mangini's inability to learn from the past.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=true&seasonType=REG&d-447263-o=2&conference=null&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_AVERAGE_YARDS&experience=null&d-447263-n=1&season=2006&qualified=true&Submit=Go&tabSeq=0&d-447263-p=1 - ( New Window )
two different signings for two different reasons
IMO, the ability to consistently produce a late game pass rush is incredibly important in today's NFL.
If you're going to overpay somewhere, quality defensive linemen is not a bad place to do it.
Now back to our regularly scheduled Braylon Edwares donnybrook .
Smith (stay)
Hixon (stay)
Barden (stay)
Nicks (stay)
Tyree (stay, specials)
Braylon
That six WRs right there that I'm 90% are making this roster if Braylon is acquired. Moss or Manningham is gone (prob both)
Also acquiring Braylon lets everybody move into a more natural position
Smith (slot)
Nicks (eventual Toomer-esque possession receiver on outside)
Barden (green zone development)
Hixon (burner in multiple receiver sets, with some time at 2 while Nicks develops, KR/PR)
How many years did we hear that Shockey would go for 1000 yards and 12 TDs? That Arrington would be a monster? That DeAngelo Hall would finally play to his ability if we traded for him? That Plax would be the Plax of the 2007 NFC title game if we'd just give him a 63rd chance?
Nothing is guaranteed with Edwards except the price tag.
So who are our core players on offense?
Jacobs and our starting offensive line are the only ones locked in past their rookie contracts. Eli most certainly will be. But who else?
A commitment to Braylon at even 70% of his asking price means adding him to your core. We will build around him.
So the question is - do we want to build around him? The Browns did - they offered him an extension.
I trust Reese & co to make the right decision.
Maybe some of those Olive oil/cracked black pepper Triscuits and pepper-jack cheese.nomnom
Milk/Lactaid? Meh, if we're low I may go for a gallon~
I'm not advocating paying BE 10 million per, but your position is extreme at the other end of the spectrum. According to your rationale, we might as well kiss Steve Smith goodbye in 2011 because there is no way he will re-sign for the type of deal you think he is worth.
Stupid Reese, pick up the phone damnit!!
The WR market is completely out of whack. As such, I'd always have an eye on the position at the draft if I were Reese. If you're going to have a lot of turnover, RB and WR are the positions to do it. You don't want it at QB, OL, or DL if you can avoid it.
Maybe he is, but he had an entire year off. He's going to have to fight for his job.
Yes, please.
There is no deal...right.
Are you an asshat?
I was so overjoyed with the idea the Giants might (gasp!) try to develop their own Braylon and here comes this news. Christ...
I'd be trying to trade Moss if I were Reese.
Although he had one less TD than Edwards in 2008. So at 2Td for every 3.5 million I think Edwards is defintiely worth 1.5 million off last years performance.
Makes as much sense as any other
David Tyree, according to the player salaries page, is the highest paid WR on the roster right now.
If its all the same, then I agree with you, but I making a move now seems premature.
The Giants’ kickoff team held opponents to a 22.5-yard average on kickoff returns, the NFL’s 12th-best figure. Opposing teams did begin their possessions after a kickoff at the 30-yard line on average, which can definitely be improved upon.
Conversely, Tyree's deal is up in 2011 and he seems to me the type of guy that would play specials for the rest of his career. There's a real value in that kind of guy. Of course, this is all contingent on Tyree being healthy.
That's the objective part of me. The subjective part of me says that Tyree deserves to be on the team. I feel like we owe him that. I know that's not rational and not how a team should be run, but I feel like we owe him that.
If we can come to terms with BE on an incentive-laden contract that maxes out in the $6-7M range, I'm onboard. Otherwise, I go with what we've got in-house.
The NFC is winnable even with the Giants young Wr's. The upgrade on D along with the fact that the NFC is pretty pathetic is reason enough to retain picks and young talent to stay at this level for the next 5 years as I don't see the other teams leap frogging.
I'm more concerned with RB as Jacobs simply will not enter the playoffs as strong as he enters week 1 and Bradshaw may very well have shown his best stuff in 07.
Say Tyree is healthy, which is good.
But also say Moss looks really good fielding punts
And say Wright or Woodson or some UDFA or second year CB looks like a stud at gunner..
And say Moss just looks a little better at WR than Tyree, just due to his speed and wiggle..
Sorry, but Tyree makes more than all of them, and though he's been a money player for the team, it would be time to cut him.
I thought they did him a solid last year by keeping him on the roster for as long as they did, then IR'ing him, instead of just reaching an injury settlement.
Then we can trade ELi for picks and trade the picks to NE for Moss and Welker and Seymour. And Brady already has them broken in so Gillbride can simplify the passing trees. Seymour lets us play the 2-9 for sure and can come in for goal and short yardage as a 5th TE. Whats good about this is that we can weaken the Pats while "guaranteeing" the SB
Since we are built to win right now.
Do it Jerry!
When we switch back and forth with the 2-9 it will confuse the Eagles no matter how many WR they draft
Did someone also say Moss might look good returning punts? wow again.........
(((And now, back to the thread.)))
I just think that, if he's healthy, we're a better team with his contributions than we are with Moss's. And I'm a Moss guy.
The guy is a gamer, man. In December if we've got injuries at WR I trust him to show up on short notice.
Guy is a gamer.
JR won't upset the salary strucure. He somewhat did that with Canty...won't do it with Edwards.
I think Braylon's attitude issues are overblown. Last year, the Browns season was circling the bowl, the coaches were lame ducks, and the fans were blaming him as the most visible star on the team not on IR. That's miles away from the situation he'd be in on the Giants. Put him on a stable, successful team with respected coaches and veterans, and he'll behave a lot better.
That said, cost is the big reason this probably won't happen. #1 WRs get huge contracts because they're generally not available at any price unless they're sociopaths or on the downside of their career. As teams have gotten better at managing the cap, the more valuable positions have disappeared from the FA market. QB, DE, and OT, primarily, but now CB and WR have also become really scarce. (C, S, and G are next.) Reese wouldn't be in this conversation at all if he wasn't willing to something close to the going rate for young WRs with star potential. (I'm thinking of the Roy W. contract.) If he can work enough team-protection provisions in there, as he did with Plaxico, I'd be on board.
some of you will be happy, others sad...that's the only hint I'm going to give you.
Eric, if it wasn't obvious I was joking, you're off your game.
Would he still be a gamer?
Shockey for a 2 and a 5.
Those are the only trades Reese has made.
They are not similar to this situation, IMO.
Don't want to part with Ware either b/c everything I read about him screams of him making the most of his opporunity this year. He is also cheap.
We have a good team, we don't need another "superstar", we just need to keep adding pieces to the puzzle. If BE is going to cost $10 million per, we can spend that money wisely elsewhere. IMHO
I'd rather do this trade than the Ware trade
I still have questions about Reese's ability to manage the trade market based on that, his near trades for Hall and Edwards and their big contracts, and the failure to get a deal done with Cleveland when they made the move for Quinn.
What I do know is if we end up making this trade and give Braylon the contract he is said to be looking for, to me, we paid too much. Considering the market, it may not be, but for this talented a team, who I no longer think has a necessity for a #1 WR, I think it will be. As far as young, potential star talent at WR, I don't think another team is close. Let's let our guys battle it out in camp and see who emerges this year and next. There are no guarantees in the NFL (BE being the catalyst for a SB), except that we will be extremely competitive and in the running for another SB for years to come with what we have now.
I'm even more worried about getting Braylon to sign at a lesser deal than he had initially asked for. Two, maybe even one nice year in blue and we're right back to dealing with another headache at WR. He'll be unhappy and looking to renegotiate. I'm tired of Giants management having to deal with that. You signed the contract, get over it. Let our young, homegrown guys earn their first big payday the right way.
Ware can catch the ball out of the backfield.
Even assuming all of the replacement draft picks DON'T bust, that's a ridiculous amount of turnover at the position. Eli Manning would essentially be throwing to a new number one WR every single season or every other season. Realistically, MOST of those WR draft picks would bust, and we'd be extremely thin on talent at the WR position every single year because we are too cheap to retain the talented guys we have.
Then what about the other positions? How are we going to reload along the OL/DL in future drafts if we are too busy blowing premium picks on WR's every year?
Let's look at this objectively - he's been in the league for 4 years. Conventional wisdom is that it takes 3 years for WR's to "get it".
And in his 3rd year, BE gets........1,300 yards and 16 TD's.
Last year was a bad year, but maybe - JUST MAYBE - that had something to do with the QB play, and the facts they sucked balls.
Say you don't want him becuase of the CAP impact, or becuase the asking price is too high, but to say that his good (fantastic) year was an anomoly, when by conventional wisdom he should have only had 2 good (great) years by now is just silly...Espcially when during that 2nd year the QB play - and the team - were just awful...
And we may be spending alot, but its not like we have a bunch of veteran recievers that will get pissed off at the contract. He'll be our highly payed superstar reciever that most every team has nowadays. There's nothing for our defensive stars to be upset about.
Edwards is one of the top wideouts in the league and if you can't see that then you aren't looking very hard. Still, I'm ready to move on and I think we'll do very well with what we've got.
I believe they are very high on Ware, and it helped them make the decision to let Ward walk.
That's just my belief. We'll see it it comes true or not.
Bradshaw will have every oppurtunity to win the position, as Ward had every oppurtunity last year. Bradshaw has showed no signs that he is not capable for this role, and unless he fumbles the pre season away, he is the number two.
Coughlin sticks to his depth chart going into training camp, and based on last year it was Jacobs, Ward, Bradshaw, Ware. With Ward Gone, it will be Jacobs then Bradshaw. As I stated above, Bradshaw is to talented to lose this position
We DO NOT know who that will be at this point, IMO.
Bill, you talk about progression assumption, I think you are also using that assuming that it will be Bradshaw.
I actually have MUCH higher hopes for Andre Brown and think he'll be our #2 by next year. Jacobs, Brown, Bradshaw and the castoff du jour is more than sufficient.
And this is for Braylon Fucking Edwards!!! It's not like we're trading for Patrick Crayton here.
I just don't see how the team can hold onto 4 TE's and 5 RB's. Even if you assume one RB is gone, I think that there is still a roster squeeze and you are going to have to make a RB choice. (I included TE's in the sentence because of the hybrid spot that Beckum will have)
I just can't believe people are thinking Manningham and Ware are a potential road block to this trade. If that offer is on the table, the only thing I see preventing this from going through is Edwards' contract demands. If he will sign for a reasonable rate (nowhere near $10 M) then this trade should get done.
Edwards is still young, but comparing the two is different because he only had 1 pro bowl 1,000 + season, while Moss had alot more. So you know that BE has lots of potential as a WR, but at 10 million a year, or so, you only have that 1 year to go off of. With Moss you have a larger body of work where he proved to be successful.
Would a change of scenery work for BE? Who knows? But in the end we still only have a limited amount of work, in terms of years to go by. So I guess that's where the debate lies. Is he worth all that compensation AND that contract for his production, in his career thus far?
But I am quite sure this is fun for everyone. It's also based on incorrect information.
And again, I am not questioning Eric's honesty (as I didn't question MattSGS). I am saying their source(s) is/are wrong. Or lying.
But it is a legit NFL source, someone employed by an NFL organization.
Was the information given to you for the purpose of posting, or did you just decide to post it?
You have to be in the room to criticize a GM for the moves he didn't make. Especially if you look at his first 2 years. He's not perfect, but he isn't dumb either.
The source is not someone who was new to me.
Am I missing something here?
Here is my thinking.
IF we were able to get Edwards, the Giants have a legitimate number one receiver. Which is the final piece of the puzzle. IMO.
I have always thought Nicks would be a beast #2.
Steve Smith is the IDEAL slot receiver and still Eli Manning's security blanket over the middle.
You bring in Barden inside the 20, and use him as a red zone threat.
I'm not seeing the downside here. All of our guys still see the field, we lose Ware and Manningham who are virtual unknowns and we press onto Superbowl Caliber Championship teams for years to come.
If we could get Edwards for those terms and sign him to an 8 million a year contract (the other money will be made up when we becomes a star in the NY market)... I say we do it. Don't Look Back.
-Tim
Not only that, but we're going to have to ask him to stay healthy throughout the whole year, or we'll probably repeat '08 again if he gets hurt (assuming no one develops since most of BBI have no faith in them) and the scheme doesn't change that late in the year).
We lost Osi -> apparently no problem
We lost #1 WR -> Playoff loss - that has to change in '09 or we're doomed.
Because with all that, we'll need that one piece of the puzzle to be there in the post season and if he's not, then we'll have to rely on the guys who were held back due to Edwards/Plax/Toomer. WR is one of the main reasons we lost to PHI. Hixon, Smith, Barden, Boss, etc. aren't Edwards, but Edwards isn't going to be the final piece to another SB run. Edwards will help, but he'll be asked too much here. We need to develop our own unless a FA is actually worth the pick up (one who won't affect future picks, decisions).
Honestly, if we were going to make a trade, I'd rather see Nicks for Edwards and maybe we throw in a conditional pick based on the performance of both next year. We'd still have developmental guys in Manningham and Barden (and Moss, if you're still hopeful there) to go with experienced players in Edwards, Smith and Hixon (and Tyree, if you're a fan of him). And yes, B.E. will be more expensive than Nicks, but he's also more of a sure thing and still has potential for a high ceiling in a new system with a good QB.
If Edwards is willing to sign a reasonable deal, I am all for trading unknown young players.
Odds are, Edwards wants too much. Will see how it plays out.
Braylon Edwards would serve as a big play reciever and decoy. We need the decoy in place, so we can unleash the Beast (Brandon Jacobs) at will.
Opposing teams will respect Edwards lining up on the outside. They do not respect any of our current WR's to hurt them deep.
I trust Jerry Reese to (if indeed he signs him) to make his contract very Giant friendly.
Aren't you glad Accorsi didn't give him away to get Manning?
It's a chance either way. I'm all for whatever the front office does. They've shown in the past that they can assemble a damned good team.
If they think BE is worth 2 unknowns (to fans at least- I would hope the coaches and FO know what they've got), then I'm all for it.
That's what they (the Browns) are asking for.
I just hope that if we do get BE that #1- he produces and #2- his cap-hit doesn't hamstring us for the future.
I want Braylon Edwards for that reason alone.
But again, it's all about the money. These rumors never even mention the contract demands and then we have 500 posts on a thread where only about 10 people mention the contract demands. People are pissing on each other about Manningham and Danny Ware...it's kind of funny.
I don't suppose we trade for Edwards and NOT sign him long term until he proves himself? is that an option here? Make a fair deal with Clev, then tell Edwards to play for pay and go from there?
I think you are 100% wrong, here.
But just for ha ha's...Osi dominated the Panthers late in 04. Manningham caught a screen pass one time I think. He also had problems with the playbook and really never got on to the field.
If salaries weren't a concern, you trade Manningham for Edwards every single time and never even think twice about it.
It's barely been a year since he was drafted. He's still a rookie pretty much.
He was a first round talent taken in the third round, and he was a project, we knew that.
You would trade him away not even a year into it w/out seeing what he can do at all?
I think i'd do that.
Stan from LA : 4/28/2009 12:19 pm
I was told yesterday by a friend who is a big time Brown fan that he heard from someone in the Browns' organization that the Edwards deal was done and it was done a few weeks ago, but that the Giants and Edwards could not come to an agreement on contract extension terms. Apparently the Giants wanted to give Plaxico money to Edwards but Edwards wanted Fitz money.
He also said that he was told that the deal could still be done if "BE visits reality with his contract demands."
I hear this is still the case...
If he blows up this year and goes for 80 with 15 tds....NY could let him walk and most liekly re-coup the 3rd rounder as FA compensation anwyay.
The more I think about it the more I like the idea of dealing a 3rd and even a 6th for Edwards and letting him play for pay.
I just don't believe a substantial part of the salary cap should be allocated to the WR position.
Firstly, if Edwards comes here assume he is in the 1 slot.right..I personally think Nicks/Smith will fight for 2 and 3, with the understanding that our game changer can return to his older position and guess who can return punts and kicks again. Dont get me wrong, Hixon has a huge upside as a WR but if this happens to go threw, I would not have anything wrong with throwing him in on certain packages to stretch the field. and as a 4. I personally think beckum will be an immediate impact player. So if we do get Edwards. I see Edwards/Nicks/Smith/Hixon lets not forget about Boss, Beckum out of the H-Back. Barden for 3 downs and red zone. We have mad talent.
I wont even talk about the RBS. They speak for themselves. Just my $.02
Anyway, I'm in the "No Thanks on BE" camp. Fk all that money he's gonna want. He's not good enough to be worth it, imo. I'd rather we go with what we have.
Unless Cle. & BE settles for less. MM needs to NOT be included.
Thats a joke. You guys have seen him play how many snaps? How many snaps would he even play this year behind Jacobs, Bradshaw and quite possibly Brown?
This is a good deal I think and as long as Braylon isn't a little bitch about his contract and we sign him to an extension (that we don't overpay for), I think we would be stupid not to take this deal.
The other guy who happens to be a personal favorite is Sinorice Moss because he has such deadly speed. He made some great plays in preseason and he gives them another dimension with speed.
Steve Smith should take the role of vintage Amani Toomer, great possession receiver and 2 rookies who knows what their roles will be. Manningham from all indications is a guy thats gonna contribute prominently at WR. They'll be loaded at WR, maybe overloaded, depending on what a guy like Manningham does.
coming up with a good enough scheme to replace plax
after the incident, it was fine during the suspension when hixon started but he didnt scheme well enough after that
if they come up with a scheme that keeps defenses off balance well enough that could be better than 1 guy that could get injuried and they are back at square one again
im all for the edwards trade but only if they get him at the right price but not giving up too much,if reese thinks he has a good enough squad without edwards then im happy to trust him on that
Call me crazy, but intelligence matters. How many of Eli's INTs through '07 were due to the knucklehead Shockey running the wrong routes?
We're not rebuilding - Screw potential.
If the contract numbers were right, I'd make this trade in a second.
We saw what Moss did for the Pats O. Braylon while not Moss could have a similiar impact on this O, rather than crossing our fingers with a ton of youth.
Could it work out relying on a ton of youth? Sure but the chances are nowhere near picking up a guy who has already shown sustained dominance as a #1 WR on the NFL level.
Link - ( New Window )
Move along, there's nothing to see here. This is not going to happen.
the more I think about this and now considering the draft we had, we should be able to do just fine. and if not, it isn't because we didn't get a #1 in free agency, the team simply failed. there is plenty enough talent on this team that the coaches should be able to develop a scheme and the players should be able to make plays.
The point is, it quite often takes even great receivers 3-4 years and yet so many here are expecting a break out year from Mario who's not the brightest bulb in the house.
Mario MAY have a break out year, but it might not be for another 1-3 years. It's silly to be counting on it this year when we're a contender. If we were rebuilding we could afford to be patient, but we're not. I feel like a broken record.
Could we win with our super green receiving corp/ Anything is possible BUT the chances are MUCH smaller than bringing in a guy who already has proven #1 NFL production in Braylon.
I understand we also are giving a 3 and Ware, but the loss of Ware is offset by Brown so then we are down to comparing a 3 and a rookie for a young WR who is rated as one of the top 5 WR in the NFL.
If Edwards contract is not too ridiculous (over 8.5 Mill @ year) this is a no-brainer. WTF would make anyone think that losing MM is too much to obtain BE?
You can't possibly be talking about Braylon Edwards; Do you even follow football?
Name 5 that are better, and don't based your answer on one year.
Moss
Calvin Johnson
Reggie Wayne
Brandon Marshall
I'll continue if need be
He would fall somewhere after those top 7, IMO
Mook,
a fair point. But even if he is the 7th best instead of the 5th would you not make that trade? And how much difference in contract demands would there be for that? Not that mush i would guess. My day really sucks knowing that i actually agree with the mangina
I would disagree strongly that he was no better then the 15th best WR in the NFL. Besides that, he has many years left in which he can only get better which has to be taken into account. Case in point is that 3 years ago Marvin Harrison could have been argued as the best WR in the league. Now he is being thought of as being done.
Also keep in mind that when we got Plax, his previous 2 seasons with Pitt were less then stellar to say the least. His second best season of his career was his first one with us. So if the player has some past success, a change of scenery can get that back
There's really no compelling case for adding him, whatsoever.
I don't think Edwards will be a Giant because I think the Giants feel there is some reason to believe Edwards may never reach his full potential.
If Plax had been a disciple of the game as Rice who knows what his ceiling was