WARNING: If you do not like rumors or rumor-mongering, please leave this thread immediately for your own mental health. Please don't shoot the messenger. The following was provided to me by a legitimate source (not one of the previous Edwards asshats on this site):
"The talks are still on. The Browns are being cheap right now and have no interest in re-signing Edwards to a big deal. They are willing to take low compensation. They are asking for a conditional next year (high as a 3) and Danny Ware and Mario Manningham (who Mangini wanted badly for the Jets). They were asking for these same two players before the draft, but the feeling is they can get NY to bite now that they got Nicks and Brown in the draft."
"(I do not) know the status of the Giants response to this offer."
Thanks for playing
2) The Giants were reportedly very interested in Darius Heyward-Bey and would have traded as high as #16 to get him in the draft. That probably means Nicks was their fourth-rated receiver behind Crabtree, Maclin and DHB. The knock on Nicks has always been long speed. DHB has it, and so does Braylon Edwards. The Giants got a great look at it in the Monday Night game last year when he torched us.
I think the Giants like Nicks a lot but don't think he is the type of receiver that will be true deep threat that requires a safety over the top and forces the corner to play off the line.
I think our QB and front office both want Braylon Edwards. As mentioned numerous times, the issue is likely his contract, not the trade package.
Yet in your world he is a #1 WR despite the fact that our staff did not put him on the field in that role despite needing one last year
Lets let that burst of energy on your part slide as just an exuberant mistake and move on?
I would have much preferred a Braylon contract on this team rather than Canty's. A little off topic but I still feel we way overpayed for Canty especially when we had just signed Rocky Bernaird who is a great player and I don't think Osi and Tuck or too happy with Cantys contract either.
I wanted Edwards but I will agree with GT that 7-9 million is a little over the top. I trust the front office and think he would be a good addition(even giving up MM and this has been covered over and over on this thread and I can't add much to it)but not for that much money. If the Giants can pull it off though I'm all for this move.
Which would make a trade for Manningham either ill-advised or demonstrative of Mangini's inability to learn from the past.
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=true&seasonType=REG&d-447263-o=2&conference=null&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_AVERAGE_YARDS&experience=null&d-447263-n=1&season=2006&qualified=true&Submit=Go&tabSeq=0&d-447263-p=1 - ( New Window )
two different signings for two different reasons
IMO, the ability to consistently produce a late game pass rush is incredibly important in today's NFL.
If you're going to overpay somewhere, quality defensive linemen is not a bad place to do it.
Now back to our regularly scheduled Braylon Edwares donnybrook .
Smith (stay)
Hixon (stay)
Barden (stay)
Nicks (stay)
Tyree (stay, specials)
Braylon
That six WRs right there that I'm 90% are making this roster if Braylon is acquired. Moss or Manningham is gone (prob both)
Also acquiring Braylon lets everybody move into a more natural position
Smith (slot)
Nicks (eventual Toomer-esque possession receiver on outside)
Barden (green zone development)
Hixon (burner in multiple receiver sets, with some time at 2 while Nicks develops, KR/PR)
How many years did we hear that Shockey would go for 1000 yards and 12 TDs? That Arrington would be a monster? That DeAngelo Hall would finally play to his ability if we traded for him? That Plax would be the Plax of the 2007 NFC title game if we'd just give him a 63rd chance?
Nothing is guaranteed with Edwards except the price tag.
So who are our core players on offense?
Jacobs and our starting offensive line are the only ones locked in past their rookie contracts. Eli most certainly will be. But who else?
A commitment to Braylon at even 70% of his asking price means adding him to your core. We will build around him.
So the question is - do we want to build around him? The Browns did - they offered him an extension.
I trust Reese & co to make the right decision.
Maybe some of those Olive oil/cracked black pepper Triscuits and pepper-jack cheese.nomnom
Milk/Lactaid? Meh, if we're low I may go for a gallon~
I'm not advocating paying BE 10 million per, but your position is extreme at the other end of the spectrum. According to your rationale, we might as well kiss Steve Smith goodbye in 2011 because there is no way he will re-sign for the type of deal you think he is worth.
Stupid Reese, pick up the phone damnit!!
The WR market is completely out of whack. As such, I'd always have an eye on the position at the draft if I were Reese. If you're going to have a lot of turnover, RB and WR are the positions to do it. You don't want it at QB, OL, or DL if you can avoid it.
Maybe he is, but he had an entire year off. He's going to have to fight for his job.
Yes, please.
There is no deal...right.
Are you an asshat?
I was so overjoyed with the idea the Giants might (gasp!) try to develop their own Braylon and here comes this news. Christ...
I'd be trying to trade Moss if I were Reese.
Although he had one less TD than Edwards in 2008. So at 2Td for every 3.5 million I think Edwards is defintiely worth 1.5 million off last years performance.
Makes as much sense as any other