I know he was a very good weak side lber. And If we resigned him I would be fine with him there.
But I have been reading up on Zach Cunningham and watching clips. If he is our pick at 23 could we resign Keenan and play him at Strong side with Cunningham at Will?
Or is that not feasible? Does that go against his skill set?
Plus I like Kennard in that role.
One. But he did have 4.5 in his rookie year. He wasn't called upon to blitz all that much anyway this past year, but he did make it easier for guys like Collins to get to the QB.
Seems to be having a little trouble with this aspect.
Here were is 2016 stats
games 16
GS9
Tot T61
Assisted 40
Solo21
Sacks 1.0
not bad but if we get a talent like Cunningham and are able to re-sign Robinson then I want our best talent starting and Kennard as a backup.
If Robinson cant play Sam then Kennard is fine....When Healthy
Quote:
just needs to stay healthy to increase his production.
Seems to be having a little trouble with this aspect.
Here were is 2016 stats
games 16
GS9
Tot T61
Assisted 40
Solo21
Sacks 1.0
not bad but if we get a talent like Cunningham and are able to re-sign Robinson then I want our best talent starting and Kennard as a backup.
If Robinson cant play Sam then Kennard is fine....When Healthy
You conveniently left out the part where I called Kennard "an ascending talent," which his is, and what Robinson isn't. But if you want to question Kennard's durability, which is valid, than I suggest you do the same with Robinson.
highly doubt it but if he did you run to the podium
Quote:
In comment 13397983 Klaatu said:
Quote:
just needs to stay healthy to increase his production.
Seems to be having a little trouble with this aspect.
Here were is 2016 stats
games 16
GS9
Tot T61
Assisted 40
Solo21
Sacks 1.0
not bad but if we get a talent like Cunningham and are able to re-sign Robinson then I want our best talent starting and Kennard as a backup.
If Robinson cant play Sam then Kennard is fine....When Healthy
You conveniently left out the part where I called Kennard "an ascending talent," which his is, and what Robinson isn't. But if you want to question Kennard's durability, which is valid, than I suggest you do the same with Robinson.
Look I have no problem with Kennard. If he is the Sam, fine, but I am really liking this Cunningham kid. I know many want Robinson to return. I would over the moon for Kennard-Goodson-Cunningham.
Look I have no problem with Kennard. If he is the Sam, fine, but I am really liking this Cunningham kid. I know many want Robinson to return. I would over the moon for Kennard-Goodson-Cunningham.
I won't lose any sleep if the Giants don't re-sign Robinson. His injury history is a major red flag for me when it comes to giving him any kind of multi-year deal. Add to that the fact that there are a whole bunch of OLBs in the upcoming draft that I think would look great in blue. Cunningham, Haason Reddick, Tyus Bowser, Ryan Anderson, Alex Anzalone...take your pick.
As for our SAM, besides Kennard, the Giants took a flyer on Ishaq Williams last year. He fits their size-speed profile and I figure they'll be content to continue his development both at LB and as a special-teamer.