Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.
... and you mentioned preaching.. I don't know ya'll from a hole in the wall plus I'm not in the business of trying to convince NOBODY. I'm just pointing out that "minor" detail..
We're not talking about falsifying your job application. We're talking about an accusation that could put you in JAIL.. Forget football suspension.. Prison..
I'm sorry, I can't dismiss that as a "minor" incident, brushing it aside as a mistake and continue to move in the direction that he actually did something..
It's funny to me, there's 2 (maybe 3) sides to every story, but it seems that we never seem to believe that its even remotely possible that the accuser is the one that is lying..
I have a big problem with you putting quotes around things I never said. You should apologize for misattributing statements to me. I never said anything was "minor". Search this whole fucking dialogue and you're the only one saying that. Really... gfy.
[quote)I can tell you from first hand experience that there is NOTHING WORSE in life than having been accused of something that ONLY you and God KNOW is a lie.. I learned at a young age that they females lie too and have no problems shedding tears at the snap of a finger..
It's sickening feeling watching that play out..[/quote]
Yes, but being victimized by some rich kid whose money and Dad (JJ) buy him out is pretty traumatic too.
But it's not the original charge, but rather an accumulation of incidents and cover-up's that are threatening the spoled and indulged child.
A poster says he'd rather beat them at full strength and has to endure being mocked and having his statement distorted.
He never said he played for the NY Giant. He said that as a fan he'd rather beat them at full strength. It seems to me to be reasonable and a personal preference.
Even if someone disagrees, Why does it provoke an attack and misrepresentation? Attacks like this are always on the attacker and reveal someone living a sad life trying to feel better about himself.
that we can beat every team at full strength. If you guarantee the win than I'm all for it. But the notion that you'd rather go into a game as a fan knowing that you have the option to not have your team face the opponent with their best player, but somehow not want that advantage is mind boggling.
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
that we can beat every team at full strength. If you guarantee the win than I'm all for it. But the notion that you'd rather go into a game as a fan knowing that you have the option to not have your team face the opponent with their best player, but somehow not want that advantage is mind boggling.
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
I had no problem with Gronk being seriously 'impaired' in XLVI
that we can beat every team at full strength. If you guarantee the win than I'm all for it. But the notion that you'd rather go into a game as a fan knowing that you have the option to not have your team face the opponent with their best player, but somehow not want that advantage is mind boggling.
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
I'd be fine with either of them sitting out the game. Both would be even better.
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
This one is an exception, I think. I don't care about Gronk playing, let him sit and weaken the Patriots. Play them in a Super Bowl without Brady? Despite history, Eli/Giants only beat the Patriots (for a third time) because Brady wasn't playing. No thanks.
idiot I just stumbled over first take talking about him
when Skip Bayless is bashing the golden boy there's some
deep problems .
Cowboys run game will function fine without him but I am
glad if they suspend him for the opener .
Quote:
In comment 13551872 Gussi41 said:
Exactly. You read one article and deemed the entire case null and void. You shouldn't be preaching to anyone about this case, considering you know about as much as anyone with a passing knowledge of it.
... and you mentioned preaching.. I don't know ya'll from a hole in the wall plus I'm not in the business of trying to convince NOBODY. I'm just pointing out that "minor" detail..
We're not talking about falsifying your job application. We're talking about an accusation that could put you in JAIL.. Forget football suspension.. Prison..
I'm sorry, I can't dismiss that as a "minor" incident, brushing it aside as a mistake and continue to move in the direction that he actually did something..
It's funny to me, there's 2 (maybe 3) sides to every story, but it seems that we never seem to believe that its even remotely possible that the accuser is the one that is lying..
I have a big problem with you putting quotes around things I never said. You should apologize for misattributing statements to me. I never said anything was "minor". Search this whole fucking dialogue and you're the only one saying that. Really... gfy.
It's sickening feeling watching that play out..[/quote]
Yes, but being victimized by some rich kid whose money and Dad (JJ) buy him out is pretty traumatic too.
But it's not the original charge, but rather an accumulation of incidents and cover-up's that are threatening the spoled and indulged child.
A poster says he'd rather beat them at full strength and has to endure being mocked and having his statement distorted.
He never said he played for the NY Giant. He said that as a fan he'd rather beat them at full strength. It seems to me to be reasonable and a personal preference.
Even if someone disagrees, Why does it provoke an attack and misrepresentation? Attacks like this are always on the attacker and reveal someone living a sad life trying to feel better about himself.
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
I had no problem with Gronk being seriously 'impaired' in XLVI
I asked it earlier and got no response, if we play the Pats in the SB, would you rather Gronk play or sit? What about Brady?
I'd be fine with either of them sitting out the game. Both would be even better.
This one is an exception, I think. I don't care about Gronk playing, let him sit and weaken the Patriots. Play them in a Super Bowl without Brady? Despite history, Eli/Giants only beat the Patriots (for a third time) because Brady wasn't playing. No thanks.
It is entertaining to see some of the idiots chime in.
when Skip Bayless is bashing the golden boy there's some
deep problems .
Cowboys run game will function fine without him but I am
glad if they suspend him for the opener .
Need to get Reggie Hammond back to prison.
.