for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Eli Manning is DONE

EddieNYG : 11/5/2017 2:38 pm
He is missing wide open receivers. His pocket awareness with feeling pressure keeps getting worse and he fumbled twice, losing one of them. That throw into double coverage looks like a rookie mistake.

I hate to admit this, but Eli Manning is part of the problem of why this offense is so atrocious.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: I'm not going to sit here and argue with people that have made  
short lease : 11/10/2017 7:25 am : link
In comment 13676426 Britt in VA said:
[quote] up their mind.

"All I'm saying is we don't have a professional offense right now. Not the roster, not the playbook, not the coach. Nothing about our offense is good."

Yikes .... didn't they hire Mac because he was suppose to be some kind of offensive genius?

Letting TC go was like keeping Allie Sherman and letting Vince Lombardi go to the Packers.

let's see  
PaulBlakeTSU : 11/10/2017 8:58 am : link
Eli has been without his top receivers, he is a pocket passer in an offense with no pocket, he is under pressure all game from four-man rushes, and defenses are begging us to run as they sit back in coverage.

And Eli is the problem? Eli isn't a runner. Never has been. Which QB who isn't a runner is succeeding in this offense?

Brady? Even when he had this situation, he was manhandled by the Chiefs and everyone thought he was done. The biggest difference is that he had Bill Belichick running the show who adapts his schemes and strategies to match his personnel. An even if Brady could succeed with this offense, there are many who consider him the single greatest QB of all time (though I'm not one of them).

QBs are not supposed to be facing immediate pressure all game while facing variants of Cover 2.

Someone tell me how a good non-running QB is making this offense work having to throw into pass coverage to guys like King, Lewis and Rudolph?
You don't need to be a runner to succeed in these circumstances,  
Keith : 11/10/2017 9:03 am : link
but you do need pocket presence and fearlessness. Fearlessness to not be scared to get hit. Eli is frightened as most 37 year olds would be at this point in their careers. That's where he's diminished, IMO. Physically, I don't see him diminished. Mentally, he's not the same guy.

There are a lot of reasons this offense has been so bad for 2 seasons, but I'm sorry, Eli is one of those reasons.
...  
EddieNYG : 11/10/2017 9:12 am : link
Eli missed WIDE OPEN receivers vs the Rams. He had Shepard for a TD and missed him. Had another WR in the end zone and threw it out of the end zone. He was inaccurate on crossing patterns. All of this with time to throw in the pocket.

How does a two time SB MVP have to call timeout early in the first half and second half because the play clock was gonna run out.

His ball security in the pocket is not very good for a 2 time SB MVP.

Yes, he has two WRs on IR and a poor OL, but when he's had time he has made inaccurate throws.

Can Eli play better and win another championship in the NFL? Maybe.

My gut feeling after watching that game Sunday was that he looked like a QB who was done.
Keith  
PaulBlakeTSU : 11/10/2017 9:13 am : link
true, Eli would rather get rid of the ball than take a big hit out of self-preservation. But I'm not so sure I would rather have a QB who wants to stand in there. If that's the case, I fear every game will approach the 2012 NFCCG against the 49ers. I don't think any QB can withstand that every week, certainly not one I want to depend on for a season.
on the plays you reference Eddie  
PaulBlakeTSU : 11/10/2017 9:16 am : link
the throw to Sheppard and the TD miss, I remember it differently. The Rams were barrelling down on him immediately and he had to get rid of it very early.

I'd also like to see the play again, but I remember feeling surprised that Sheppard didn't jump or lay out for it. It looked within arm's reach.
Paul, it changes the way defenses play you.  
Keith : 11/10/2017 9:16 am : link
Defenses know that Eli doesn't want to get hit and they know he's going to throw it up a few times to avoid it, its much easier to play defense. Its also easier for the dline as there is blood in the water.
what's easy for the DLine  
PaulBlakeTSU : 11/10/2017 9:18 am : link
is rag-dolling guys like Fluker and Jerry. The D-line is getting pressure with four guys on a consistent basis and dropping LBs into coverage for all the short routes.

I really don't see what Eli is supposed to do in these situations.
Paul,  
Keith : 11/10/2017 9:20 am : link
that's the NFL. Not every QB has all day like Dak Prescott to sit back and scan the field and hit guys running open. You need to make accurate throws under duress. Eli cannot do that.

RE: You don't need to be a runner to succeed in these circumstances,  
Britt in VA : 11/10/2017 9:20 am : link
In comment 13684592 Keith said:
Quote:
but you do need pocket presence and fearlessness. Fearlessness to not be scared to get hit. Eli is frightened as most 37 year olds would be at this point in their careers. That's where he's diminished, IMO. Physically, I don't see him diminished. Mentally, he's not the same guy.

There are a lot of reasons this offense has been so bad for 2 seasons, but I'm sorry, Eli is one of those reasons.


What a crock of sh-t. Eli is scared?
Paul,  
Keith : 11/10/2017 9:21 am : link
alot of times yes, definitely not all the time. When he does have time, he's ducking and hearing footsteps. He's got happy feet back there. Trying to suggest that he's under pressure every drop back is being a little disingenuous.
Eli isn't done,  
Keith : 11/10/2017 9:23 am : link
but he's done on the giants. I don't think we will ever be able to win with Eli and this current situation. Eli would have to be in a situation like Dallas to win. A studly running game and lots of time to throw with little worry of getting hit.

RE: Eli isn't done,  
Britt in VA : 11/10/2017 9:25 am : link
In comment 13684617 Keith said:
Quote:
but he's done on the giants. I don't think we will ever be able to win with Eli and this current situation. Eli would have to be in a situation like Dallas to win. A studly running game and lots of time to throw with little worry of getting hit.


A lot of people keep saying that, and I'm not sure if it's because it's what they want, or what they believe.

Gun to your head, who is the starting QB of the Giants week one next season?
Britt, no offense, but I'm not interested  
Keith : 11/10/2017 9:29 am : link
in talking to you about Eli. I understand that you are a huge fan and unable to see things without bias. I can appreciate that because Eli has meant so much to the Giants and has never gotten the respect he deserves. I hate contributing to these threads because I don't want to come accross as anything other than a huge Eli fan who thinks its over.

Do I want to move on? Yes, but only because I don't see us winning with Eli, not because I don't like and appreciate Eli. As far as next year, I'm hoping there is a QB that we like that we draft early and trade Eli for assets.
Let's focus on just the one question, because that's what I'm curious  
Britt in VA : 11/10/2017 9:37 am : link
about....

Again, REALISTICALLY, who is the starting QB for the Giants week 1, next year?

I keep reading that Eli is done with the Giants....

1. He has two years left on his contract.
2. He has a no trade clause
3. There is not a viable replacement for him right now
4. Even if you draft one, why wouldn't you let him sit and learn behind one of the most professional workers in the league?
5. The offense, as currently constructed and coached, is not going to allow any QB to be successful.
6. The new coach has a bunch of reasons to keep Manning around. The league is built with parity so teams can turn things around quickly. There actually IS talent on this roster. A couple of thrifty offensive line signings by the new GM, and a new offensive philosophy, the new coach might be able to get something together and having a veteran QB to manage it is an asset.
7. The new coach could also hedge his bets by keeping Manning around while grooming his replacement, and if things go bad early, he can sit Manning (like Warner), and go with the rookie. Which would buy him some time because hey, it's a rookie QB that has to go through growing pains.

There is pretty much ZERO logical reasoning that says Eli Manning is done as a Giant.

Wishful thinking by some, perhaps, but not reality.
And you can call me a homer or whatever....  
Britt in VA : 11/10/2017 9:39 am : link
but what I just posted is completely logical. It's not emotional, it's completely rooted in the reality of the business decision that needs to be made on Manning.
RE: Let's focus on just the one question, because that's what I'm curious  
bigbluehoya : 11/10/2017 9:42 am : link
In comment 13684646 Britt in VA said:
Quote:
about....

Again, REALISTICALLY, who is the starting QB for the Giants week 1, next year?

I keep reading that Eli is done with the Giants....

1. He has two years left on his contract.
2. He has a no trade clause
3. There is not a viable replacement for him right now
4. Even if you draft one, why wouldn't you let him sit and learn behind one of the most professional workers in the league?
5. The offense, as currently constructed and coached, is not going to allow any QB to be successful.
6. The new coach has a bunch of reasons to keep Manning around. The league is built with parity so teams can turn things around quickly. There actually IS talent on this roster. A couple of thrifty offensive line signings by the new GM, and a new offensive philosophy, the new coach might be able to get something together and having a veteran QB to manage it is an asset.
7. The new coach could also hedge his bets by keeping Manning around while grooming his replacement, and if things go bad early, he can sit Manning (like Warner), and go with the rookie. Which would buy him some time because hey, it's a rookie QB that has to go through growing pains.

There is pretty much ZERO logical reasoning that says Eli Manning is done as a Giant.

Wishful thinking by some, perhaps, but not reality.


I happen to agree that Eli is the starter 2018 Week 1, but there’s an equally logical possibility that y
Continued  
bigbluehoya : 11/10/2017 9:45 am : link
...that you are ignoring.

If a new GM and coach come in, and the decision is that the roster is a complete tear-down project, they may choose to cut Eli in the offseason simply to take the entire dead cap in 2018 and be done with it.

Again, not saying it’s likely. It does make some business sense though, depending on the direction being taken.
If they were to cut him....  
Britt in VA : 11/10/2017 9:49 am : link
Which option looks better from an overall business standpoint?

Quote:
the Giants could cut him outright and save $9.8 million against next year's cap (though they'd also have to eat a $12.4 million dead-money charge). If they keep him for 2018, they could cut him after that season and save $17 million against their 2019 cap (with a dead-money charge of $6.2 million).


Keep in mind, cutting him next year means the rookie QB or Webb is the day 1 starter.

Link - ( New Window )
I hope Eli proves me wrong  
EddieNYG : 11/10/2017 9:53 am : link
But my gut reaction to his performance on Sunday was "he is done". I'm not gonna apologize for feeling that way, nor am I looking to get rid of him.

As of right now, he is the starting QB in 2018 and 2019. He's under contract for those years.

Cutting a 2-time SB MVP QB would not sit well with me or other fans.

I could take trading him, but cutting him is wrong IMO.
RE: If they were to cut him....  
bigbluehoya : 11/10/2017 9:59 am : link
In comment 13684669 Britt in VA said:
Quote:
Which option looks better from an overall business standpoint?



Quote:


the Giants could cut him outright and save $9.8 million against next year's cap (though they'd also have to eat a $12.4 million dead-money charge). If they keep him for 2018, they could cut him after that season and save $17 million against their 2019 cap (with a dead-money charge of $6.2 million).

Keep in mind, cutting him next year means the rookie QB or Webb is the day 1 starter. Link - ( New Window )


You’d have to ask whoever the GM is. If next year is viewed as a wash, having a completely clean slate for 2019 could easily be viewed as the better of those two alternatives.
I personally think it would be a foolish business decision....  
Britt in VA : 11/10/2017 10:01 am : link
to consider next season a wash before the team ever took the field....

But you are right, it is the next GM's decision to make.
I'd say there is a better chance Eli is the QB  
Keith : 11/10/2017 10:15 am : link
of the Giants next year than not.

1. I think he's done winning in NY. I don't think we will be able to build a team Eli can win on in NY.

2. I think the Giants owe it to Eli to put him in a better situation. Explore a trade that Eli agrees with or cut him and let him go wherever he wants.
At the downward pitch this team is heading, tough to imagine  
Jimmy Googs : 11/10/2017 4:43 pm : link
same folks at the top leading the charge which means less likely Eli is at the helm at QB.

And pointedly, I don't want him to be and I have been an Eli supporter thru the years.

The team has to start over at the base before this will get better. And even if that means some other veteran backup type QB is starting day one before we put in Webb or a new franchise drafted QB than so be it.

If Eli is on the team it will slow down this rebuilding...
ELI's turnovers  
jmalls23 : 11/14/2017 11:58 am : link
Eli can certainly still make most of the throws but come on.... he loses the ball when hit with such consistency and has been picked in the most crucial spots for a very long time. He changes the momentum against us way too much. happened before all of our WR's went down
Pages: 1 2 3 4 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner