Â
|
|
Quote: |
Aaron Wilson & #8207; @AaronWilson_NFL Follow Follow @AaronWilson_NFL More Nate Solder's Giants deal: $62M, $16M signing bonus,$34.8M gtd, salaries $5.9M (gtd), $12.9M (gtd), $9.9M, $9.9M; $3M roster bonus 2020 league year, $4M roster bonus 2021 league year, annual $100K workout bonus |
had to be so incentive to leave NE. def a good move. it had to happen imo
The $16 million signing bonus would hurt.
$5.9 million contract
$100K roster bonus
$5.9 million contract
$100K roster bonus
$100K workout bonus*
$5.9 million contract
$100K roster bonus
Raanan just reported the same thing.
Signing bonuses are pro-rated in terms of salary cap implications.
Good for him. Not too far from the Boston hospital treating his child or he good go to Sloan Kettering..He's still with the best possible care.
Quote:
but looks like he can be released after 2 years relatively painlessly?
The $16 million signing bonus would hurt.
It would be $8M cap hit after Year 2, $4M cap hit after Year 3. However, his total cap hit if he stays would exceed those numbers so technically it is still cheaper to cut him than keep him after Year 2 if play does not warrant keeping him
Why are folks ignoring the impact of a $16 million signing bonus? That's $4M per year in dead money depending on when/if you cut him.
Good for him. Not too far from the Boston hospital treating his child or he good go to Sloan Kettering..He's still with the best possible care.
Same. Norwell is the better player, but we spent on the correct position. We can find a Guard much more easily in the draft.
Quote:
Most of the guaranteed money is the signing bonus plus first two years of the contract so if he falls of a cliff we are really only committed to 2018 and 2019
Why are folks ignoring the impact of a $16 million signing bonus? That's $4M per year in dead money depending on when/if you cut him.
Keeping him in Year 3 costs $16.9 Million. $4M signing bonus + $3M roster bonus + $9.9M salary. Cutting him only costs $8 Million (prorated signing bonus). Year 4 costs $17.9M to keep, $4M to cut.
Quote:
In comment 13865759 Mike in NY said:
Quote:
Most of the guaranteed money is the signing bonus plus first two years of the contract so if he falls of a cliff we are really only committed to 2018 and 2019
Why are folks ignoring the impact of a $16 million signing bonus? That's $4M per year in dead money depending on when/if you cut him.
Keeping him in Year 3 costs $16.9 Million. $4M signing bonus + $3M roster bonus + $9.9M salary. Cutting him only costs $8 Million (prorated signing bonus). Year 4 costs $17.9M to keep, $4M to cut.
Not to quibble but you are leaving off the $100K workout bonus. Hence, the salary and workout bonus makes an even number each year. You are right on the dead cap hits of $8M in 2020 and $4M in 2021.
Quote:
Most of the guaranteed money is the signing bonus plus first two years of the contract so if he falls of a cliff we are really only committed to 2018 and 2019
Why are folks ignoring the impact of a $16 million signing bonus? That's $4M per year in dead money depending on when/if you cut him.
It's relatively front loaded compared to most deals with a psuedo team option in Year 3. Only being liable for 8m dead money hit at that time is much better than I thought when I initially saw the guarantees attached to it this morning.
Quote:
Most of the guaranteed money is the signing bonus plus first two years of the contract so if he falls of a cliff we are really only committed to 2018 and 2019
Why are folks ignoring the impact of a $16 million signing bonus? That's $4M per year in dead money depending on when/if you cut him.
Quote:
In comment 13865772 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
In comment 13865759 Mike in NY said:
Quote:
Most of the guaranteed money is the signing bonus plus first two years of the contract so if he falls of a cliff we are really only committed to 2018 and 2019
Why are folks ignoring the impact of a $16 million signing bonus? That's $4M per year in dead money depending on when/if you cut him.
Keeping him in Year 3 costs $16.9 Million. $4M signing bonus + $3M roster bonus + $9.9M salary. Cutting him only costs $8 Million (prorated signing bonus). Year 4 costs $17.9M to keep, $4M to cut.
Not to quibble but you are leaving off the $100K workout bonus. Hence, the salary and workout bonus makes an even number each year. You are right on the dead cap hits of $8M in 2020 and $4M in 2021.
Sorry left that out. That being said, if Flowers or Wheeler develop into a better LT than Solder that is potentially $10M in savings in Year 3 if we had to cut Solder which can more than afford replacement players even accounting for projected increases in Salary Cap.
Haha, that's essentially my reaction to each signing thread.
LOL, I fear I started this. I am not even down on the signing.
I think you have to do this mental exercise with any large contract. I like that it is front loaded because it allows more room to get players like OBJ, Landon Collins, etc. signed long-term
They can still cut him after three years with only 4 million in dead money. They could cut him after two years with only 8 million in dead money. So not a bad deal imo.
Quote:
Most of the guaranteed money is the signing bonus plus first two years of the contract so if he falls of a cliff we are really only committed to 2018 and 2019
Why are folks ignoring the impact of a $16 million signing bonus? That's $4M per year in dead money depending on when/if you cut him.
Agreed. For whatever reason, people seem to think that it's painless to cut someone just because cutting them results in more cap space than keeping them. $8MM (or even $4MM) of dead money is nothing to sneeze at.
Yes, the Giants can get out of the contract after two or three years, but every time you eat dead money, you are absorbing a competitive disadvantage as it relates to roster construction.
17
17
18
Backloaded- as if they are anticipating a large contract coming off the books after this season.
“Massive” is a stretch.The guy is extremely overrrated and not worth close to what we gave him. He was the ONLY option, that doesn’t make it the best option.
Why wouldn't you care about the contract? the salary cap is not a leprechaun or a unicorn. It's a real tangible thing, that is not limitless and the use of it impact your ability as a team to add other players.
Saying who cares about the contract might seem progressive, but it's very short-sighted if you care about the team's ability to go into the draft without major holes to fill.
Which I told you repeatedly this morning.
Quote:
Who cares about the contract? Did you expect him to sign the vet min? He was the only viable option at LT this off season. He is a massive upgrade over Flowers. I am thrilled with this. Look how he performed down the stretch and in the last 2 super bowls. Only 30 and could get better.
“Massive” is a stretch.The guy is extremely overrrated and not worth close to what we gave him. He was the ONLY option, that doesn’t make it the best option.
Define “extremely overrated”. Because no one thinks he’s the best LT in the game. What he is is a proven top 10 LT who has all of his experience working with what is likely the most demanding QB in football and a constant rotation of RBs to block for.
The money is what it is, time will tell how good or bad of a contract it is. But to say it’s not a significant upgrade from Flowers is ridiculous.
I just am now catching up on this deal and have to shake my head and ask why? Improving the O-line by creating the highest paid Left Tackle in the NFL. For a 3-13 team and a 38 year old QB...
Am I in the minority here?
Quote:
They can cut bait or restructure in Year 3 without too much liability.
Which I told you repeatedly this morning.
No you didn't...
I said it earlier in another thread: 16M for 2 years, and a couple of $$ then hope Y 3&4 a draft pick is a starter.
I just am now catching up on this deal and have to shake my head and ask why? Improving the O-line by creating the highest paid Left Tackle in the NFL. For a 3-13 team and a 38 year old QB...
Am I in the minority here?
I think 3-13 is something people cling to a bit too much. We aren't that bad, especially with a healthy Beckham, Jenkins, etc and factoring in the other additions like Ogletree.
Why shouldn't we try to improve? This isn't a 35 year old player.
Giants may cut him after 2 years for a $2m cap savings, but if he plays well after the first 2 years, they could extend his contract, turn salaries into a signing bonus, a lessen the cap number for the last 2 years of the contract. It’s a well structured contact.
We blew the draft so we have to pay through the nose; those are the wages of sin. Stop whining about it. Draft better.