“— It still does not appear likely the Giants will take a quarterback, at least not with the No. 2 pick.”
“The Giants view Saquon Barkley as a near-perfect prospect. They think he’s a better player than Ezekiel Elliott, who went No. 4 to the Cowboys in 2016.”
“There is no doubt North Carolina State defensive end Bradley Chubb is in the mix...”
“Quenton Nelson will not be the pick at No. 2. This is not because the Giants have any reservations with the player — they do not — but it is a matter of positional value. The second-overall pick is too high to take a guard. The Giants do not view Nelson as a viable option to move outside to tackle. If they trade down (this is unlikely), moving to No. 5 to give the Broncos the No. 2 pick, then Nelson makes sense...”
Link - (
New Window )
Biz dev and ticket sales. Nothing that would qualify me as an insider on my own merit.
Do you not honestly understand the difference between an opinion and what you offer? "I think the Giants like Darnold" is an opinion. "I think Darnold is the only QB they should draft" is an opinion. Nobody has any problem with that, especially me.
"The Giants will only take Darnold based on what I am hearing" or "The fact is they will only take Darnold" is not an opinion. It is someone stating they have actual insight into what the Giants are thinking/saying privately. If you want to do that, and you have no proven history of being right, you are going to be challenged. You should be.
If your "connection" to the Giants is that you used to work in sports radio, and nobody can vouch for any history of insight you provided, maybe you should just post your opinion as opinion as most others do.
Or just keep pretending to be an insider and look foolish.