for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

RUMOR: WGR reporting Giants and Bills have agreement in prin

CMicks3110 : 4/18/2018 9:34 pm
RUMOR: WGR reporting Giants and Bills have agreement in principle self.buffalobills

Submitted 59 minutes ago by standingnamelessmonstr

Tony Pauline on WGR reports that the bills and Giants have an agreement in principle for the number two overall pick. He said that the Giants are waiting until they see who would drop to number two before they pull the trigger with the bills.

Sounds like if Browns take Allen the Giants will stay put at 2 and take Darnold, IMO
https://www.reddit.com/r/buffalobills/comments/8damqq/rumor_wgr_reporting_giants_and_bills_have/ - ( New Window )
Apparently  
CMicks3110 : 4/18/2018 9:36 pm : link
Tony Pauline was on WGR 550 in Buffalo and said an agreement in principle had been reached. I dunno, i'm waiting for audio to be posted.
ugh  
BleedBlue : 4/18/2018 9:37 pm : link
I guess they Don't like Bark\ey? I Agree that sounds like Darnold or trade down
Fwiw this is what he said on Twitter about it  
Strahan91 : 4/18/2018 9:44 pm : link
i said the belief from many is there's an agreement in principal but i did not say it has anything to do with the Browns pick nor did i say it is guaranteed to happen...that interview was 1PM this afternoon...interview should be around somewhere
Link - ( New Window )
DaddyM89 reported this some time ago and was blasted  
Saos1n : 4/18/2018 9:44 pm : link
He took the lashings like a man, but he may still have hope..

I would completely expect to get a haul of picks and look for DG to deal back up for a blue chipper...

Say it goes
Browns - Darnold
Bills - Allen
Jets - Mayfield
Browns - Chubb

I could see DG calling the Broncos about dealing back up to 5 for Barkley...

You would get the player you wouldve taken at 2, but get whatever picks you didnt have to give up to get back up to 5...

And maybe Browns take Barkley and you still secure Chubb...

Im loving the fact that we have no clue what is going on.... so refreshing from JR shananigans...
Tony Pauline  
Big Rick in FL : 4/18/2018 9:44 pm : link
Also said Norwell to the Giants was a done deal.
Ughh  
Jay on the Island : 4/18/2018 9:47 pm : link
Hopefully the Browns will take Allen first so the Giants stand pat and take Darnold. If they do trade down that far they had better get at least three 1st's out of it plus a 2nd.
RE: DaddyM89 reported this some time ago and was blasted  
chopperhatch : 4/18/2018 9:48 pm : link
In comment 13919677 Saos1n said:
Quote:
He took the lashings like a man, but he may still have hope..

I would completely expect to get a haul of picks and look for DG to deal back up for a blue chipper...

Say it goes
Browns - Darnold
Bills - Allen
Jets - Mayfield
Browns - Chubb

I could see DG calling the Broncos about dealing back up to 5 for Barkley...

You would get the player you wouldve taken at 2, but get whatever picks you didnt have to give up to get back up to 5...

And maybe Browns take Barkley and you still secure Chubb...

Im loving the fact that we have no clue what is going on.... so refreshing from JR shananigans...


He did NOT get blasted. The terms proposed got blasted by many here.

Its gotta be both 1sts, a first next year and number 53 in order to get this done
.  
arcarsenal : 4/18/2018 9:48 pm : link
So, we're almost certain to take Barkley... but we're also going to trade with Buffalo if they take Darnold... but we also will take Rosen because he's the guy we've been hiding the best.. but we're probably going to take Chubb.

Don't rule out Quenton Nelson, either!
Maybe Barkley is the Giants guy....  
MOOPS : 4/18/2018 9:48 pm : link
and if he goes #1 the Giants pull the trigger because no QB is on their radar.
This doesn't tell us anything new.  
eclipz928 : 4/18/2018 9:48 pm : link
Basically if the Browns don't take the player the Giants want they will stay at #2 - if they do they'll trade back. Not much of a revelation.
A few thoughts  
Matt M. : 4/18/2018 9:48 pm : link
1) Maybe it's Barkley or trade? Ever think of that? Maybe they don't love any QB enough?

2) Why are all these scenarios sounding more and more like the movie Draft Day?
RE: Tony Pauline  
GFAN52 : 4/18/2018 9:49 pm : link
In comment 13919678 Big Rick in FL said:
Quote:
Also said Norwell to the Giants was a done deal.


Ugh, that's right.
This may or may not be true  
mfsd : 4/18/2018 9:51 pm : link
But I see no reason why DG should pull the trigger anytime before last minute. Let any other team interested make their best offer on draft day
If its true it could mean many things...  
bradshaw44 : 4/18/2018 9:51 pm : link
We could still want Barkley. There is a chance the browns take Barkley at 1. Could mean we like Rosen, who the Browns could take. We may actually like Allen, and if the browns take him we would trade back. My point is, we like someone but this doesnt do anything to alleviate any of the questions.
RE: .  
JCin332 : 4/18/2018 9:53 pm : link
In comment 13919684 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
So, we're almost certain to take Barkley... but we're also going to trade with Buffalo if they take Darnold... but we also will take Rosen because he's the guy we've been hiding the best.. but we're probably going to take Chubb.

Don't rule out Quenton Nelson, either!


You're zany...!
RE: .  
GFAN52 : 4/18/2018 9:53 pm : link
In comment 13919684 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
So, we're almost certain to take Barkley... but we're also going to trade with Buffalo if they take Darnold... but we also will take Rosen because he's the guy we've been hiding the best.. but we're probably going to take Chubb.

Don't rule out Quenton Nelson, either!


That certainly narrows it down. LOL
...  
BleedBlue : 4/18/2018 9:54 pm : link
im staying at 2
Ugh  
cokeduplt : 4/18/2018 9:54 pm : link
Wouldnt be thrilled about dropping to 12
No matter what happens  
Southern Man : 4/18/2018 9:54 pm : link
this will be a highly examined draft. That's what makes the tedious drip-analysis-drip of it somewhat bearable.
Where there's smoke there's fire, and there sure is a lot of fire  
PatersonPlank : 4/18/2018 9:55 pm : link
around this one.
RE: Ugh  
bradshaw44 : 4/18/2018 9:57 pm : link
In comment 13919703 cokeduplt said:
Quote:
Wouldnt be thrilled about dropping to 12


Id be thrilled to have 2 first round picks, 3 second round picks, 3 third round picks, 2 fourth round picks and 2 firsts in 2019.
RE: RE: Tony Pauline  
Big Rick in FL : 4/18/2018 9:59 pm : link
In comment 13919689 GFAN52 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919678 Big Rick in FL said:


Quote:


Also said Norwell to the Giants was a done deal.



Ugh, that's right.


That's not the only one. Here are a few from Pauline.

Quote:
Trumaine Johnson is likely to end up with the San Francisco 49ers

The belief is that Andrew Norwell to the New York Giants is a done deal.

Just about everyone believes linebacker Anthony Hitchens will end up with the Indianapolis Colts

He said Richburg to the Jets.


So. He's not exactly batting 1.000
RE: RE: Ugh  
GFAN52 : 4/18/2018 9:59 pm : link
In comment 13919709 bradshaw44 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919703 cokeduplt said:


Quote:


Wouldnt be thrilled about dropping to 12



Id be thrilled to have 2 first round picks, 3 second round picks, 3 third round picks, 2 fourth round picks and 2 firsts in 2019.


Assuming all the picks would be offered.
Nobody knows anything  
Dave in PA : 4/18/2018 10:02 pm : link
The only team with potentially any certainty at this point is Cleveland
RE: RE: RE: Ugh  
bradshaw44 : 4/18/2018 10:02 pm : link
In comment 13919715 GFAN52 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919709 bradshaw44 said:


Quote:


In comment 13919703 cokeduplt said:


Quote:


Wouldnt be thrilled about dropping to 12



Id be thrilled to have 2 first round picks, 3 second round picks, 3 third round picks, 2 fourth round picks and 2 firsts in 2019.



Assuming all the picks would be offered.


Im just referring to whats been rumored. And if its true, I think I prefer it to all scenarios being that this roster has a ton of holes. And maybe we have a new GM that can make third round picks work.
so in this scenario...  
hitchchops2 : 4/18/2018 10:11 pm : link
....the new regimes plan is to cast their lot with an old, declining QB with exactly 2 seasons with a playoff win in his entire career....seems highly unlikely to me. I cannot fathom us not coming out of this draft with a QB for the new QB-friendly coach to groom.
Say we do indeed  
TommyWiseau : 4/18/2018 10:12 pm : link
drop to 12 and 22, what else do you think will be included in the package? Honestly I will only think about it if we get 12, 22, 53, 56, 65 and a first next year. To me that is the starting point. The Jets traded pick 37, 49 and a 2nd next year to move up only 3 spots and we would be moving down 9 and letting Buffalo jump their division rival.

Who would be our targets at 12 and 22?
don't you think they also have a deal in principle with  
V.I.G. : 4/18/2018 10:14 pm : link
the broncos and the dolphins and the bills and the cardinals
If they don't go QB, I'm fine with dealing  
ZogZerg : 4/18/2018 10:18 pm : link
back with Buffalo. Giants have a lot of holes to fill.
Relax everybody...this is what he said...  
Jarvis : 4/18/2018 10:19 pm : link

Tony Pauline

@TonyPauline
Follow Follow @TonyPauline
More
Replying to @SethBaker
i said the belief from many is there's an agreement in principal but i did not say it has anything to do with the Browns pick nor did i say it is guaranteed to happen.
RE: .  
Larry in Pencilvania : 4/18/2018 10:21 pm : link
In comment 13919684 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
So, we're almost certain to take Barkley... but we're also going to trade with Buffalo if they take Darnold... but we also will take Rosen because he's the guy we've been hiding the best.. but we're probably going to take Chubb.

Don't rule out Quenton Nelson, either!


Actually it's Fitzpatrick cause no one is talking about him at all
The Bills are desperate  
larryflower37 : 4/18/2018 10:22 pm : link
You take the whole draft and 1st next year.
Why would the Giants agree in principle when you can make them sweat it out and get more.
Tell them call us when we are on the clock and maybe we can talk
Buffalo fans/writers are reaching for hope because the team is really desperate.
RE: The Bills are desperate  
bradshaw44 : 4/18/2018 10:25 pm : link
In comment 13919740 larryflower37 said:
Quote:
You take the whole draft and 1st next year.
Why would the Giants agree in principle when you can make them sweat it out and get more.
Tell them call us when we are on the clock and maybe we can talk
Buffalo fans/writers are reaching for hope because the team is really desperate.


Dont worry, Gettleman will do exactly that. Then make them throw in their kick returner just because.
RE: RE: .  
arcarsenal : 4/18/2018 10:26 pm : link
In comment 13919738 Larry in Pencilvania said:
Quote:
In comment 13919684 arcarsenal said:


Quote:


So, we're almost certain to take Barkley... but we're also going to trade with Buffalo if they take Darnold... but we also will take Rosen because he's the guy we've been hiding the best.. but we're probably going to take Chubb.

Don't rule out Quenton Nelson, either!



Actually it's Fitzpatrick cause no one is talking about him at all


But what if Baker Mayfield is the player they REALLY covet?
So the source cited in the OP has already made it clear he has  
Mad Mike : 4/18/2018 10:28 pm : link
no knowledge of any such agreement, and is merely commenting on what many others apparently believe. So, basically this is absolutely, positively nothing. Man, people will start threads about nothing.
💤💤💤💤💤  
BigBlue4You09 : 4/18/2018 10:31 pm : link
Wake me up in 8 days
8 days  
mattlawson : 4/18/2018 10:31 pm : link
2 hours. 6 minutes. 42 seconds

If we give the opportunity for Cleveland  
SHO'NUFF : 4/18/2018 10:33 pm : link
to draft Barkley @ #4, they will. Too risky for me.
RE: 8 days  
Big Rick in FL : 4/18/2018 10:34 pm : link
In comment 13919752 mattlawson said:
Quote:
2 hours. 6 minutes. 42 seconds



I think your math might be a bit off. Maybe mine is. I'm not sure. Lol
RE: RE: RE: .  
Larry in Pencilvania : 4/18/2018 10:38 pm : link
In comment 13919746 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13919738 Larry in Pencilvania said:


Quote:


In comment 13919684 arcarsenal said:


Quote:


So, we're almost certain to take Barkley... but we're also going to trade with Buffalo if they take Darnold... but we also will take Rosen because he's the guy we've been hiding the best.. but we're probably going to take Chubb.

Don't rule out Quenton Nelson, either!



Actually it's Fitzpatrick cause no one is talking about him at all



But what if Baker Mayfield is the player they REALLY covet?


Don't COVET your neighbor's QB
All this comes from the Bills' side  
DonQuixote : 4/18/2018 10:38 pm : link
and it all just sounds like wishful thinking on their part.

The Bills know how hard it is to find a QB. I hope our management knows this as well.
OTOH  
Giantfan in skinland : 4/18/2018 10:40 pm : link
If the Giants are set on Barkley, wouldn't be a bad maneuver to potentially make the Jets sweat a bit by floating out the possibility of a bills move up.
RE: OTOH  
Eman11 : 4/18/2018 10:47 pm : link
In comment 13919763 Giantfan in skinland said:
Quote:
If the Giants are set on Barkley, wouldn't be a bad maneuver to potentially make the Jets sweat a bit by floating out the possibility of a bills move up.


Yup. I've been saying this all along. Giants make the Jets sweat it out and get their 2019 #1 for swapping picks.
RE: RE: OTOH  
mphbullet36 : 4/18/2018 10:51 pm : link
In comment 13919770 Eman11 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919763 Giantfan in skinland said:


Quote:


If the Giants are set on Barkley, wouldn't be a bad maneuver to potentially make the Jets sweat a bit by floating out the possibility of a bills move up.



Yup. I've been saying this all along. Giants make the Jets sweat it out and get their 2019 #1 for swapping picks.


your out of your mind if you think the jets are going to give you a 1st round pick to move up 1 spot...that is ridiculous
Suspect grapevine  
ghost718 : 4/18/2018 10:52 pm : link
Started out as a "belief",and finished up as "Gettleman seen taking pictures with Mr Bean in Upstate New York"
RE: RE: RE: OTOH  
Eman11 : 4/18/2018 10:54 pm : link
In comment 13919772 mphbullet36 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919770 Eman11 said:


Quote:


In comment 13919763 Giantfan in skinland said:


Quote:


If the Giants are set on Barkley, wouldn't be a bad maneuver to potentially make the Jets sweat a bit by floating out the possibility of a bills move up.



Yup. I've been saying this all along. Giants make the Jets sweat it out and get their 2019 #1 for swapping picks.



your out of your mind if you think the jets are going to give you a 1st round pick to move up 1 spot...that is ridiculous


They'd be giving up next year's first to guarantee they get the QB they want and the Bills don't jump them and take that guy. It's far from a rediculous trade. Look at what the Bears gave up last year to swap with SF.
RE: RE: RE: RE: OTOH  
mphbullet36 : 4/18/2018 10:55 pm : link
In comment 13919775 Eman11 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919772 mphbullet36 said:


Quote:


In comment 13919770 Eman11 said:


Quote:


In comment 13919763 Giantfan in skinland said:


Quote:


If the Giants are set on Barkley, wouldn't be a bad maneuver to potentially make the Jets sweat a bit by floating out the possibility of a bills move up.



Yup. I've been saying this all along. Giants make the Jets sweat it out and get their 2019 #1 for swapping picks.



your out of your mind if you think the jets are going to give you a 1st round pick to move up 1 spot...that is ridiculous



They'd be giving up next year's first to guarantee they get the QB they want and the Bills don't jump them and take that guy. It's far from a rediculous trade. Look at what the Bears gave up last year to swap with SF.


how does two 3rd rounders and a 4th rounder equal a 1st rounder? LOL
I don't think  
Eman11 : 4/18/2018 11:01 pm : link
The Jets have all those picks to offer. So like I said, make them sweat it out and if they get antsy that's the asking price and go from there.
I'm still waiting...  
Nysportsfn13 : 4/18/2018 11:15 pm : link
For Norwell to sign with the Giants like Tony said was a done deal..
RE: I don't think  
firedbytheboss : 4/18/2018 11:20 pm : link
In comment 13919782 Eman11 said:
Quote:
The Jets have all those picks to offer. So like I said, make them sweat it out and if they get antsy that's the asking price and go from there.


cmon man. The Jets aren't sweating anything. They moved th three thinking they will get the third qb off the board. The jets will be happy with Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield. Maybe even Allen. Use your head.
RE: If we give the opportunity for Cleveland  
firedbytheboss : 4/18/2018 11:22 pm : link
In comment 13919755 SHO'NUFF said:
Quote:
to draft Barkley @ #4, they will. Too risky for me.


jeez.. forget about Barkley. He isn't worth this much agita. He's just a back man. There's a good chance Guice or Michel or Jones will be better. The Barkley hysteria is out of control.
RE: RE: If we give the opportunity for Cleveland  
arcarsenal : 4/18/2018 11:24 pm : link
In comment 13919790 firedbytheboss said:
Quote:
In comment 13919755 SHO'NUFF said:


Quote:


to draft Barkley @ #4, they will. Too risky for me.



jeez.. forget about Barkley. He isn't worth this much agita. He's just a back man. There's a good chance Guice or Michel or Jones will be better. The Barkley hysteria is out of control.


Not as out of control as your bizarre obsession with posting about him over and over and over again... but carry on.
RE: RE: I don't think  
Eman11 : 4/18/2018 11:27 pm : link
In comment 13919789 firedbytheboss said:
Quote:
In comment 13919782 Eman11 said:


Quote:


The Jets have all those picks to offer. So like I said, make them sweat it out and if they get antsy that's the asking price and go from there.



cmon man. The Jets aren't sweating anything. They moved th three thinking they will get the third qb off the board. The jets will be happy with Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield. Maybe even Allen. Use your head.


Do you really think the Jets traded up just to settle on whichever QB drops to them? I don't. I think they definitely have a target, and at worst have a plan B, but not a C.

Plus if it's a Division rival jumping them they can't be thrilled at that. It could very well make them get antsy and the trade would be a way for them to definitely get their guy and block a Division rival.

Maybe the Giants can't get their 2019 #1, but they sure could start with that asking price.

RE: RE: RE: If we give the opportunity for Cleveland  
firedbytheboss : 4/18/2018 11:29 pm : link
In comment 13919791 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 13919790 firedbytheboss said:


Quote:


In comment 13919755 SHO'NUFF said:


Quote:


to draft Barkley @ #4, they will. Too risky for me.



jeez.. forget about Barkley. He isn't worth this much agita. He's just a back man. There's a good chance Guice or Michel or Jones will be better. The Barkley hysteria is out of control.



Not as out of control as your bizarre obsession with posting about him over and over and over again... but carry on.


haha cmon you have to admit the constant hyperventilating and reading of tea leaves at every utterance "means it is gonna be Barkley" or "we can still get Barkley" or "then we trade up and get Barkley" it's just plain stupid. It's like these guys never watched a game of football. "OMG he's the next Barry Sanders" Guess what, Barry Sanders was an awesome back but he never won shit. Most of the great backs didn't win much. QBs win Super Bowls. Not RBs.
Giants aren't trading down to 12  
Nysportsfn13 : 4/18/2018 11:31 pm : link
And missing out on any top prospect they could get mainly Barkley, Chubb or Nelson.

The Giants Bills talk is about as likely as the talk about Odell was.
RE: RE: RE: I don't think  
firedbytheboss : 4/18/2018 11:32 pm : link
In comment 13919792 Eman11 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919789 firedbytheboss said:


Quote:


In comment 13919782 Eman11 said:


Quote:


The Jets have all those picks to offer. So like I said, make them sweat it out and if they get antsy that's the asking price and go from there.



cmon man. The Jets aren't sweating anything. They moved th three thinking they will get the third qb off the board. The jets will be happy with Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield. Maybe even Allen. Use your head.



Do you really think the Jets traded up just to settle on whichever QB drops to them? I don't. I think they definitely have a target, and at worst have a plan B, but not a C.

Plus if it's a Division rival jumping them they can't be thrilled at that. It could very well make them get antsy and the trade would be a way for them to definitely get their guy and block a Division rival.

Maybe the Giants can't get their 2019 #1, but they sure could start with that asking price.


look I wouldnt do this trade WITH the Bills 2019 #1. So if the Giants do this trade without it, I think they are as dumb as shit.

As for the Jets, I don't think they are sweating this. I think they want Rosen or Mayfield. So Buffalo jumps ahead for either Allen or Rosen (would be my guess). So the Jets will get Rosen or Mayfield. I don't think they give a ransom to go from 3 to 2. Yea maybe a second round pick.
RE: RE: RE: RE: I don't think  
Eman11 : 4/18/2018 11:41 pm : link
In comment 13919797 firedbytheboss said:
Quote:
In comment 13919792 Eman11 said:


Quote:


In comment 13919789 firedbytheboss said:


Quote:


In comment 13919782 Eman11 said:


Quote:


The Jets have all those picks to offer. So like I said, make them sweat it out and if they get antsy that's the asking price and go from there.



cmon man. The Jets aren't sweating anything. They moved th three thinking they will get the third qb off the board. The jets will be happy with Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield. Maybe even Allen. Use your head.



Do you really think the Jets traded up just to settle on whichever QB drops to them? I don't. I think they definitely have a target, and at worst have a plan B, but not a C.

Plus if it's a Division rival jumping them they can't be thrilled at that. It could very well make them get antsy and the trade would be a way for them to definitely get their guy and block a Division rival.

Maybe the Giants can't get their 2019 #1, but they sure could start with that asking price.




look I wouldnt do this trade WITH the Bills 2019 #1. So if the Giants do this trade without it, I think they are as dumb as shit.

As for the Jets, I don't think they are sweating this. I think they want Rosen or Mayfield. So Buffalo jumps ahead for either Allen or Rosen (would be my guess). So the Jets will get Rosen or Mayfield. I don't think they give a ransom to go from 3 to 2. Yea maybe a second round pick.


I agree with you about who the Jets want. I think it's one of those two as well.

The thing is though this is just speculation with another week to go and who knows how it shakes out? What if the Browns fool everyone and grab either Rosen or Mayfield? With Buffalo knocking on the Giants door for the #2, I think the Jets could very well get antsy.

That's really the only point I was trying to make. Not that I think it would happen only that it could, and if so I'd ask for that 2019 #1 and go from there.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: I don't think  
firedbytheboss : 4/18/2018 11:47 pm : link
In comment 13919801 Eman11 said:
Quote:
In comment 13919797 firedbytheboss said:


Quote:


In comment 13919792 Eman11 said:


Quote:


In comment 13919789 firedbytheboss said:


Quote:


In comment 13919782 Eman11 said:


Quote:


The Jets have all those picks to offer. So like I said, make them sweat it out and if they get antsy that's the asking price and go from there.



cmon man. The Jets aren't sweating anything. They moved th three thinking they will get the third qb off the board. The jets will be happy with Darnold, Rosen or Mayfield. Maybe even Allen. Use your head.



Do you really think the Jets traded up just to settle on whichever QB drops to them? I don't. I think they definitely have a target, and at worst have a plan B, but not a C.

Plus if it's a Division rival jumping them they can't be thrilled at that. It could very well make them get antsy and the trade would be a way for them to definitely get their guy and block a Division rival.

Maybe the Giants can't get their 2019 #1, but they sure could start with that asking price.




look I wouldnt do this trade WITH the Bills 2019 #1. So if the Giants do this trade without it, I think they are as dumb as shit.

As for the Jets, I don't think they are sweating this. I think they want Rosen or Mayfield. So Buffalo jumps ahead for either Allen or Rosen (would be my guess). So the Jets will get Rosen or Mayfield. I don't think they give a ransom to go from 3 to 2. Yea maybe a second round pick.



I agree with you about who the Jets want. I think it's one of those two as well.

The thing is though this is just speculation with another week to go and who knows how it shakes out? What if the Browns fool everyone and grab either Rosen or Mayfield? With Buffalo knocking on the Giants door for the #2, I think the Jets could very well get antsy.

That's really the only point I was trying to make. Not that I think it would happen only that it could, and if so I'd ask for that 2019 #1 and go from there.


yea never hurts to ask. I guess we dont know what any of these teams is going to do. If Cleveland go Mayfield that would be a shocker. But it's possible the Giants will take Mayfield I guess and therefore if the Browns love him they have to take him first or risk losing him. I for one think the Giants should take Rosen and I think they will. There just hasnt been enough chatter about Rosen and I think it is strange since they met with him as much or more than they have with all the other qbs.
RE: The Bills are desperate  
Kev in Cali : 4/18/2018 11:54 pm : link
In comment 13919740 larryflower37 said:
Quote:
You take the whole draft and 1st next year.
Why would the Giants agree in principle when you can make them sweat it out and get more.
Tell them call us when we are on the clock and maybe we can talk
Buffalo fans/writers are reaching for hope because the team is really desperate.


Bills won 9 games, we won 3.....who's desperate?????
RE: RE: The Bills are desperate  
firedbytheboss : 4/19/2018 12:16 am : link
In comment 13919808 Kev in Cali said:
Quote:
In comment 13919740 larryflower37 said:


Quote:


You take the whole draft and 1st next year.
Why would the Giants agree in principle when you can make them sweat it out and get more.
Tell them call us when we are on the clock and maybe we can talk
Buffalo fans/writers are reaching for hope because the team is really desperate.



Bills won 9 games, we won 3.....who's desperate?????


hahahaahah... thank you for the proper reality check!!

RE: RE: The Bills are desperate  
.McL. : 4/19/2018 1:36 am : link
In comment 13919808 Kev in Cali said:
Quote:
In comment 13919740 larryflower37 said:


Quote:


You take the whole draft and 1st next year.
Why would the Giants agree in principle when you can make them sweat it out and get more.
Tell them call us when we are on the clock and maybe we can talk
Buffalo fans/writers are reaching for hope because the team is really desperate.



Bills won 9 games, we won 3.....who's desperate?????

In case you didn't notice, the Bills traded away anything that even resembled a QB that was on their roster.
RE: RE: RE: The Bills are desperate  
firedbytheboss : 4/19/2018 1:40 am : link
In comment 13919840 .McL. said:
Quote:
In comment 13919808 Kev in Cali said:


Quote:


In comment 13919740 larryflower37 said:


Quote:


You take the whole draft and 1st next year.
Why would the Giants agree in principle when you can make them sweat it out and get more.
Tell them call us when we are on the clock and maybe we can talk
Buffalo fans/writers are reaching for hope because the team is really desperate.



Bills won 9 games, we won 3.....who's desperate?????


In case you didn't notice, the Bills traded away anything that even resembled a QB that was on their roster.


but they added AJ Mc and they are going to add a QB. Even if they dont jump up and get one of the top-4 (which I am confident they will - i think at worst they will deal with the Browns at 4) they can add Lamar or Mason with one of their late firsts.
RE: don't you think they also have a deal in principle with  
.McL. : 4/19/2018 1:51 am : link
In comment 13919730 V.I.G. said:
Quote:
the broncos and the dolphins and the bills and the cardinals


^^^^ This
Its about getting the most value out of the pick, no matter what you chose to do. Be prepared for all scenarios. If the decision is to trade back, then you need to have the frameworks of the deals already prepared, and then sell the pick to the highest bidder at the last moment creating a sense of urgency which also increases the perceived value.
RE: RE: RE: RE: The Bills are desperate  
.McL. : 4/19/2018 1:53 am : link
In comment 13919841 firedbytheboss said:
Quote:
In comment 13919840 .McL. said:


Quote:


In comment 13919808 Kev in Cali said:


Quote:


In comment 13919740 larryflower37 said:


Quote:


You take the whole draft and 1st next year.
Why would the Giants agree in principle when you can make them sweat it out and get more.
Tell them call us when we are on the clock and maybe we can talk
Buffalo fans/writers are reaching for hope because the team is really desperate.



Bills won 9 games, we won 3.....who's desperate?????


In case you didn't notice, the Bills traded away anything that even resembled a QB that was on their roster.



but they added AJ Mc and they are going to add a QB. Even if they dont jump up and get one of the top-4 (which I am confident they will - i think at worst they will deal with the Browns at 4) they can add Lamar or Mason with one of their late firsts.


Yes they did... But I agree, I don't think they have any intention of going into the season with just AJM as a viable option.
Future picks  
Jay in Toronto : 4/19/2018 6:27 am : link
Pat has a good article on the challenge of signing lots of picks this year, so a boat lead of picks should include future picks.
RE: Say we do indeed  
Ed A. : 4/19/2018 6:52 am : link
In comment 13919728 TommyWiseau said:
Quote:
drop to 12 and 22, what else do you think will be included in the package? Honestly I will only think about it if we get 12, 22, 53, 56, 65 and a first next year. To me that is the starting point. The Jets traded pick 37, 49 and a 2nd next year to move up only 3 spots and we would be moving down 9 and letting Buffalo jump their division rival.

Who would be our targets at 12 and 22?


I totally agree with your package of return. Giants are giving up an opportunity to choose a blue chip player and Bills will pick in front of the Jets. With the franchise QB Bills will get, next years No. 1 will be a low pick. I wouldn't do it for any less.
I don't think they trade further than #5  
JonC : 4/19/2018 7:18 am : link
if at all.
RE: I don't think they trade further than #5  
Sean : 4/19/2018 7:27 am : link
In comment 13919920 JonC said:
Quote:
if at all.


Agreed. I dont think they are trading down at all.
RE: I don't think they trade further than #5  
Eman11 : 4/19/2018 7:30 am : link
In comment 13919920 JonC said:
Quote:
if at all.


That's my thinking as well.

DG has a top QB in mind and if he's there, he most likely takes him. If not he takes who he thinks is the highest rated non QB in the draft.
Yup, blue chip talent is so hard to find at this level  
JonC : 4/19/2018 7:32 am : link
and to get it on rookie contract scale is hard to surrender.

For me, the question is Barkley or Chubb, if Darnold is gone.
RE: DaddyM89 reported this some time ago and was blasted  
Milton : 4/19/2018 7:33 am : link
In comment 13919677 Saos1n said:
Quote:
He took the lashings like a man, but he may still have hope..
That's not what he reported (he said the trade was going to happen that night or the next day) and I don't recall him taking much of a lashing.
RE: Yup, blue chip talent is so hard to find at this level  
Milton : 4/19/2018 7:48 am : link
In comment 13919929 JonC said:
Quote:
and to get it on rookie contract scale is hard to surrender.

For me, the question is Barkley or Chubb, if Darnold is gone.
For me it's how far should they trade down if Rosen is gone. The good news is that it's not very likely that Rosen will be gone, but it is possible, so the Giants need to have a contingency plan in place.
Rosen will be there  
JonC : 4/19/2018 7:51 am : link
.
To trade w the Bills, I'd demand  
Pep22 : 4/19/2018 8:00 am : link
6 premium assets i.e.

RD1, pick 12
RD1, pick 22
RD2, pick 53
RD3, pick 65 (1st pick of RD3)
Next years RD1 pick
Nate Peterman (because they have McCarron + the QB at 2 and it gives NYG two bites of the proverbial QB apple with the most likely scenario being Webb is heir to Eli throne and Peterman being his back-up)

Then the draft might look something like this:

RD1 12: RT Mike McGlinchey
RD1 22: LG Isiah Wynn
RD2 34: CB Isiah Oliver
RD2 53: RB Rashard Penny
RD3 65: WR Equanameous St. Brown
RD3 66: FS Armani Watts
RD3 69: LB Darius Leonard
RD4 108: DE Duke Ejoifor
RD5 139: RG Tony Adams

plus 2 # 1s next year.

..........  
CoughlinHandsonHips : 4/19/2018 8:03 am : link
I'm split on trading down with the Bills.

If the Gmen don't get a QB, they'll find themselves in a similar situation that the Bills are in the future. A with some offensive pieces without a QB, that have to trade a way a ton of resources to get within the range of a potential franchise QB in the draft.

On the the other hand, you'd be betting on the Bills being cellar dwellers next season, so any picks you acquire will very likely be within range for a QB next season

I don't think Buffalo is desperate enough  
JonC : 4/19/2018 8:04 am : link
to offer up three #1 picks and more.
RE: I don't think Buffalo is desperate enough  
Pep22 : 4/19/2018 8:11 am : link
In comment 13919957 JonC said:
Quote:
to offer up three #1 picks and more.


That's fine. If not, I walk away and tell them to continue to enjoy playing with the caliber of QB they've had essentially since Jim Kelly.
While we'd all love the booty you propose  
JonC : 4/19/2018 8:16 am : link
it's not realistic, is the point.
RE: While we'd all love the booty you propose  
GFAN52 : 4/19/2018 8:21 am : link
In comment 13919970 JonC said:
Quote:
it's not realistic, is the point.


I agree. As fans we always ask for a haul of picks.
My problem would  
joeinpa : 4/19/2018 8:25 am : link
Be that reportedly there is a precipitous drop in talent in this draft in after the mid 20 s

Is it wise to miss out on a blue chip talent for more picks in the 2 and 3rd rounds?
RE: Rosen will be there  
Ten Ton Hammer : 4/19/2018 8:36 am : link
In comment 13919946 JonC said:
Quote:
.


You thinking that's the pick?
No  
JonC : 4/19/2018 8:46 am : link
I think it's Darnold, or choice of Barkley or Chubb if the QB's gone. But, I should hear something eventually.
Picks 12, 22, 53, 56, 65  
jeff57 : 4/19/2018 8:47 am : link
Would give the Giants 8 of the top 69 picks.
I wouldn't doubt that many of the top teams  
Mike from Ohio : 4/19/2018 8:50 am : link
work out a framework to trade back with interested teams before the draft because doing it while you are on the clock is difficult. I also wouldn't be surprised if they have one or two others in place, not because they necessarily want to trade back, but because there is still a week left before the draft and having options is good.
RE: My problem would  
Ten Ton Hammer : 4/19/2018 8:56 am : link
In comment 13919979 joeinpa said:
Quote:
Be that reportedly there is a precipitous drop in talent in this draft in after the mid 20 s



I don't think that's accurate in the general sense. It's specific to what positions you're looking at. There will absolutely be high quality talent past pick 20 if you're looking for cornerbacks, for example.
RE: My problem would  
JonC : 4/19/2018 8:58 am : link
In comment 13919979 joeinpa said:
Quote:
Be that reportedly there is a precipitous drop in talent in this draft in after the mid 20 s

Is it wise to miss out on a blue chip talent for more picks in the 2 and 3rd rounds?


Most analysts feel there's only 6-8 blue chips, depending how they grade the QBs. So, the drop in terms of how it could impact NYG starts around picks 6-8.
OL, LB, RB and CB are deep  
jeff57 : 4/19/2018 9:01 am : link
All positions of need for the Giants.
The Giants are going to take a QB in the first round  
AnnapolisMike : 4/19/2018 9:13 am : link
The million dollar questions are who and where?

My guess is that if Darnold is off the board or they do not love any of the QB's...they try and trade back. I do think they like Rosen enough to draft him in the first round...just not at #2. So do this trade with the Bills and drop back. If a QB they like gets past #5...they can trade back up to grab him.

There is no reason to believe that the Giants can't trade with the Bills and slide back up into a top 10 position and take a guy they like. Who my guess would be Rosen.
RE: The Giants are going to take a QB in the first round  
jeff57 : 4/19/2018 9:15 am : link
In comment 13920084 AnnapolisMike said:
Quote:
The million dollar questions are who and where?

My guess is that if Darnold is off the board or they do not love any of the QB's...they try and trade back. I do think they like Rosen enough to draft him in the first round...just not at #2. So do this trade with the Bills and drop back. If a QB they like gets past #5...they can trade back up to grab him.

There is no reason to believe that the Giants can't trade with the Bills and slide back up into a top 10 position and take a guy they like. Who my guess would be Rosen.


Gambling that Rosen, or any of the top 4 QBs, will be there at 12 is a very risky bet. They could drop to 5. But that's it.
RE: I don't think they trade further than #5  
AcidTest : 4/19/2018 9:44 am : link
In comment 13919920 JonC said:
Quote:
if at all.


Agreed. I still think the mostly scenario is that they take Darnold or Barkley, in that order. But the most they will do is drop down to five to ensure that they get one of Barkley, Chubb, or Nelson.
RE: No  
MetsAreBack : 4/19/2018 11:13 am : link
In comment 13920000 JonC said:
Quote:
I think it's Darnold, or choice of Barkley or Chubb if the QB's gone. But, I should hear something eventually.


That would be unfortunate. Nothing against you, but there's absolutely nothing to be gained from the team providing you, or any fan, in on their strategy. Reese's inability to keep things in-house was a huge detriment in recent years.

Anyway, i'm with you.. i'd certainly open to trading down, but i covet that 5th pick... not the 12th. Give me Nelson or Barkley at #5 and two extra 2nds (one this year, one next) and maybe their 4th rounder ... to move down those 3 spots to get the guy i wanted anyway... and I'm happy.

But, I'm also guessing Denver is ultimately comfortable to stay at 5 and see what Keenum gives them this year while letting one of their younger QBs learn on the sidelines.
So much depends on whether  
Jay in Toronto : 4/19/2018 11:24 am : link
Cleveland, Giants, Jets, Broncos, Bills etc have a singular conviction on "a" quarterback who is "the" QB.
I  
AcidTest : 4/19/2018 11:47 am : link
don't see Denver as a trading partner. I think they're perfectly content to remain at #5, especially since Rosen is likely to still be available. If the Giants want to trade down, they'll probably have to drop out of the top 10, which is unlikely. Gentleman has never traded down. "Don't get cute." The offer would have to be ridiculous. Given what teams do to get a franchise QB, that's certainly possible, but still not very realistic. Add it all up, and I think the Giants stay at #2, and take Darnold, or if he's gone, Barkley.
JonC, the good news is that at least one of the qbs picked...  
manh george : 4/19/2018 12:06 pm : link
in the top 6-8 will probably not be part of the definition of a Blue Chip. So, 5-7 blue chips would mean one being available at least to 6, possibly to 8, and 6-8 blue chips would put one at 7, possibly to 9.

This year I am a very big fan of trading down for that reason. At 7, for example, we would add a bunch of picks plus salary cap room vs. staying at 2, and still probably get a blue chip. Something like 7 plus mid-20s plus more down the line plus something next year would provide a very nice haul.I think there is a very good chance Nelson is still on the board at 7. Also Denzel Ward, the consensus best cb, Fitzpatrick and Tremain Edwwards. Edwards is a giant of a kid who could fit perfectly on the edge in a 3-4--6 4 1/2, 253 and only 19 years old.

Plus, Gettleman likes to use picks to move up within a round. Trading down in round one could help with that.
george  
JonC : 4/19/2018 12:29 pm : link
Good to see you posting. If they don't pick Chubb at #2, watch and see if they try to trade up from #34 for a prospect such as Marcus Davenport, or pick in a trade down like you suggested.

Not so sure DG will pick a CB high tho, he seems to devalue the position when it comes time to pay them a second pro contract. Definitely could use one in the pipeline.
JonC, do you have an e-mail address for me since I left Citi?  
manh george : 4/19/2018 8:11 pm : link
Probably not. If not, I will reach out to Eric and get yours.

A couple of things to chat about. I am starting to write a book.
hey george  
JonC : 4/20/2018 8:50 am : link
I just checked and only have the old citi address. Eric will connect us, I want to hear about the book and your latest Scotch adventures.
JonC  
manh george : 4/21/2018 11:53 am : link
Left them a message to get me the e-mail.
Back to the Corner