Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
He's also a huge mismatch for DBs who can't match his size.
He's on the younger side, and at moments, showed some ability. Granted, inconsistently. Just wondered what the consensus was here.
I always felt like the optimism around him last year was more about him being a good person than his ability. He just doesn't seem very athletic (on an NFL level) to me.
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
He's also a huge mismatch for DBs who can't match his size.
Sure, and a good coach/OC will be able to get those matchups even if he lines up at TE for ~65% of his snaps. But if he's primarily a WR, it's a lot harder to them get him matched up on a LB.
And I think a fast TE vs a LB is a bigger mismatch than a 6'3" WR against a smallish CB. The fast TE should be able to get separation and give the QB a bigger window resulting in more big plays. The average speed (for a WR), but tall WR won't get nearly as much separation and while they can win "jump balls" over the smaller CBs, the QB has a smaller window and the CB still has a chance to make a play on the ball and knock it out of the receiver's hands.
RE: RE: I'd like to see Engram get a chance at the #2 WR spot Â
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
Understood, but Engram can be just as effective (and has proven so) on the outside. Actually, I think he was more effective on the outside than he was in-line.
RE: Actually just hoping Latimer could take on main KR and primary gunner Â
on special teams, and a reserve WR when guys get dinged.
Becoming a starting WR on the outside seems like a big step up. Sounds good but not sure he has developed that part of his NFL game.
He'd be the "starter" by default. The primary (i.e. most snaps) skill position players are likely: Beckham, Shepard, Barkley, Engram, and Ellison. People just think a "slot" WR like Shepard can't be the #2 WR.
Well one thing for sure, Latimer has walked into the perfect Â
In certain formations, but would lose part of his value if you permanently move to WR. Why have him matched up on corners when you can find mismatches on LB's and S.
what a boost that would be.....but we have seen too many injuries to our receivers the last 6 seasons.....we still need another....
Guys like Lewis/Rudolph are not the answer.....but we can only make so many moves, and can't fix everything.....so here's hoping, Latimer is a pleasant surprise....
RE: RE: RE: I'd like to see Engram get a chance at the #2 WR spot Â
Shumur is a respected offensive mind, so I am hopeful he can use shifts and motions to get our guys lined up ideally. With a smart offensive mind we really do not need a big X #2 receiver. We should line up with two of either TE or RB on most plays. Then just flex Engram or Barkley outside to the edge, leaving Sterling Shepard in the slot where he belongs....
Trust me guys. I have never played a down of football in my life. If I can figure that much out, Shurmur will do 11x better. He is not all talk and fluffed up genius. He has a track tecord.
I really liked Latimer coming out of school, and wanted the Giants to get him. He was very tough going for the ball, and about as good as many RB's when he had it in his hands. His pro career is both a surprise and a disappointment.
One of the better punt coverage guys in the NFL. If that's the "starting role" we're talking about than, yes.
Reality is, he's been a disappointment as a WR considering he was a former 2nd round pick. Denver tried to hand him the 3rd spot and he couldn't beat out Benny Fowler or Jordan Norwood.
In my opinion NYG won't be asking Latimer to win a "starting" spot. He'll just need to carve out a spot for himself as a role player and excel on coverage units. With Engram being used more as a flex TE and Ellison seeing more time inline, NYG will have enough starting options and big bodies on the field for possession targets.
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
He'll be matched up with DBs as a TE as well.
He's also a huge mismatch for DBs who can't match his size.
I don’t think about #2 wr at all. The giants have four big time weapons along with a veteran capable QB and a LT in place. Solid coaching will make that work.
Not sure why wide receiver isn’t a massive concern Â
We currently have 2 nfl caliber wide outs, both of which have a propensity for getting hurt. It isn’t like our q.b. has looked all that great throwing to backup wrs over the years. The big excuse for Elis performance last year was “look who he is throwing to”, well if obj goes down it’s the same flock of characters plus some new special team depth signings and undrafted free agents.
This front offices inability to address wide receiver and nickle corner are concerning and frankly reminiscent of some of the issues that plagued the panthers under gettleman. Think about some of the duds Cam has had to throw at over the years
All we can do is hope Latimer finds his game here in East Rutherford Â
If he does put it together as the #2 WR, our offense will be tough to stop. You double OBJ; you have a LB or SS "shadowing" Barkley; and, Engram is a mismatch for LB's and DB's.
If the OL can give Eli time he'll have a good season.
He has all the physical tools, there is no reason he can't take a big step forward.
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
I do. I wish there was more competition there, but Latimer has talent.
So whoever earns the "#2" spot shouldn't garner too much attention. If Latimer wins that job, he should do pretty well.
Also interesting to see what kind of jump, if any, Roger Lewis takes this season. Though I think Latimer is better.
Quote:
But maybe Latimer surprises
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
He's also a huge mismatch for DBs who can't match his size.
I always felt like the optimism around him last year was more about him being a good person than his ability. He just doesn't seem very athletic (on an NFL level) to me.
why would they do this?
Quote:
In comment 13963366 Anakim said:
Quote:
But maybe Latimer surprises
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
He's also a huge mismatch for DBs who can't match his size.
Sure, and a good coach/OC will be able to get those matchups even if he lines up at TE for ~65% of his snaps. But if he's primarily a WR, it's a lot harder to them get him matched up on a LB.
And I think a fast TE vs a LB is a bigger mismatch than a 6'3" WR against a smallish CB. The fast TE should be able to get separation and give the QB a bigger window resulting in more big plays. The average speed (for a WR), but tall WR won't get nearly as much separation and while they can win "jump balls" over the smaller CBs, the QB has a smaller window and the CB still has a chance to make a play on the ball and knock it out of the receiver's hands.
Quote:
But maybe Latimer surprises
why would they do this?
For the same reason they made Brandon Jacobs a TE.
Oh, wait...they didn't.
Becoming a starting WR on the outside seems like a big step up. Sounds good but not sure he has developed that part of his NFL game.
Quote:
But maybe Latimer surprises
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
Understood, but Engram can be just as effective (and has proven so) on the outside. Actually, I think he was more effective on the outside than he was in-line.
Becoming a starting WR on the outside seems like a big step up. Sounds good but not sure he has developed that part of his NFL game.
He'd be the "starter" by default. The primary (i.e. most snaps) skill position players are likely: Beckham, Shepard, Barkley, Engram, and Ellison. People just think a "slot" WR like Shepard can't be the #2 WR.
In certain formations, but would lose part of his value if you permanently move to WR. Why have him matched up on corners when you can find mismatches on LB's and S.
Guys like Lewis/Rudolph are not the answer.....but we can only make so many moves, and can't fix everything.....so here's hoping, Latimer is a pleasant surprise....
Quote:
In comment 13963366 Anakim said:
Quote:
But maybe Latimer surprises
why would they do this?
For the same reason they made Brandon Jacobs a TE.
Oh, wait...they didn't.
I thought that was a LB
Shumur is a respected offensive mind, so I am hopeful he can use shifts and motions to get our guys lined up ideally. With a smart offensive mind we really do not need a big X #2 receiver. We should line up with two of either TE or RB on most plays. Then just flex Engram or Barkley outside to the edge, leaving Sterling Shepard in the slot where he belongs....
Trust me guys. I have never played a down of football in my life. If I can figure that much out, Shurmur will do 11x better. He is not all talk and fluffed up genius. He has a track tecord.
Maybe he can do something here.
Reality is, he's been a disappointment as a WR considering he was a former 2nd round pick. Denver tried to hand him the 3rd spot and he couldn't beat out Benny Fowler or Jordan Norwood.
In my opinion NYG won't be asking Latimer to win a "starting" spot. He'll just need to carve out a spot for himself as a role player and excel on coverage units. With Engram being used more as a flex TE and Ellison seeing more time inline, NYG will have enough starting options and big bodies on the field for possession targets.
Quote:
In comment 13963366 Anakim said:
Quote:
But maybe Latimer surprises
Why? If Engram can be just an *adequate* blocker, he's a massive mismatch for Ds since most LBs (outside Keuchly and a select few others) don't have the speed to cover him. Why take away that aspect of his game?
He'll be matched up with DBs as a TE as well.
He's also a huge mismatch for DBs who can't match his size.
This front offices inability to address wide receiver and nickle corner are concerning and frankly reminiscent of some of the issues that plagued the panthers under gettleman. Think about some of the duds Cam has had to throw at over the years
If the OL can give Eli time he'll have a good season.