ig: josinaanderson
& #8207;Verified account @JosinaAnderson
I'm told #Giants WR Odell Beckham Jr is scheduled to travel into town today with plans of attending the team's mandatory mini camp practice which starts Tuesday, per source. Beckham Jr. participated in the Giants voluntary offseason conditioning program w/o a contract extension.
He's also likely still limited and thus has significantly lower chance of injury during these camps.
Lets see if the embarrassing/damaging penalties and sideline antics are the next thing to go.
Agreed. He could not have handled this offseason program any better. I think they've convinced him the contract will be done prior to camp.
Risking another injury before you sign a new contract is risky business
impossible to answer that without knowing how the negotiations have gone so far
https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/news/breaking-news/insurance-wanted--odell-beckham-jr--considering-a-record-setting-policy-76846.aspx - ( New Window )
I'd like him to, yes - but I also think the team would be wise to get this done sooner than later so that he can participate in full. I wouldn't blame him at all for wanting to play things safe and participate as much as possible without really putting himself at risk to get re-injured.
I think what he's doing is showing the team that he's committed to being a Giant and wants to be here. He wants to be a team player and be part of this thing. I'm sure he was told that if he handles himself professionally and doesn't cause a big stir through this process that he'll be rewarded sooner than later - which is hopefully how this will go.
I am waiting for the next news flash telling me that Eli Manning is expected to attend mini camp. I wonder if pat shurmur will be there?
I am waiting for the next news flash telling me that Eli Manning is expected to attend mini camp. I wonder if pat shurmur will be there?
Its really not that complicated. Here you have a kid playing on his rookie contract that has outperformed significantly and he wants a new contract. He's one of the best, if not the best, WR in football and he's looking to get his payday. Eli isn't in the same situation, he's make 600 billion in his career. Neither is the HC who isn't a part of the teams salary cap structure.
I am waiting for the next news flash telling me that Eli Manning is expected to attend mini camp. I wonder if pat shurmur will be there?
It is fairly newsworthy; see Thomas, Earl - another guy who wants a new contract - who is not showing up for mandatory camp in Seattle
Quote:
I mean the guy showed up for VOLUNTARY OTA's and yet the fact he will show up for mandatory mini camp is newsworthy?
I am waiting for the next news flash telling me that Eli Manning is expected to attend mini camp. I wonder if pat shurmur will be there?
Its really not that complicated. Here you have a kid playing on his rookie contract that has outperformed significantly and he wants a new contract. He's one of the best, if not the best, WR in football and he's looking to get his payday. Eli isn't in the same situation, he's make 600 billion in his career. Neither is the HC who isn't a part of the teams salary cap structure.
I get the fact that he is on a rookie contract and I get that he is looking to get paid. What I don't get is that it's newsworthy that he will be attending mandatory mini camp after he has already attended VOLUNTARY OTA's.
I can see it being somewhat newsworthy if Beckham wasn't there during the voluntary OTA's, but he was there.
Reporting that Beckham is expected to attend mandatory mini camp is the same thing as reporting Eli is expected to attend or that shurmur will be there. Of course they will be there and of course Beckham will be there. I can't imagine anyone having any doubts about whether he would be there or not. It's mandatory and a player can be fined for not attending.
Quote:
I mean the guy showed up for VOLUNTARY OTA's and yet the fact he will show up for mandatory mini camp is newsworthy?
I am waiting for the next news flash telling me that Eli Manning is expected to attend mini camp. I wonder if pat shurmur will be there?
It is fairly newsworthy; see Thomas, Earl - another guy who wants a new contract - who is not showing up for mandatory camp in Seattle
Did earl Thomas attend voluntary OTA's? No
Same goes for Aaron Donald who didn't attend voluntary OTA's
Did Beckham attend voluntary OTA's? Yes
So wait, an NFL player is actually looking out for his wallet? Holy crap, the audacity of that miserable distraction!
How the hell someone can take this story and try to turn it into a negative is beyond me. Of course I am not the least bit surprised. Certain supposed Giants fans have a holier than thou attitude towards Beckham so no matter what he does, they kill him for it. Bunch of miserable ass clowns.
Quote:
In comment 13988491 TrueBlue56 said:
Quote:
I mean the guy showed up for VOLUNTARY OTA's and yet the fact he will show up for mandatory mini camp is newsworthy?
I am waiting for the next news flash telling me that Eli Manning is expected to attend mini camp. I wonder if pat shurmur will be there?
Its really not that complicated. Here you have a kid playing on his rookie contract that has outperformed significantly and he wants a new contract. He's one of the best, if not the best, WR in football and he's looking to get his payday. Eli isn't in the same situation, he's make 600 billion in his career. Neither is the HC who isn't a part of the teams salary cap structure.
I get the fact that he is on a rookie contract and I get that he is looking to get paid. What I don't get is that it's newsworthy that he will be attending mandatory mini camp after he has already attended VOLUNTARY OTA's.
I can see it being somewhat newsworthy if Beckham wasn't there during the voluntary OTA's, but he was there.
Reporting that Beckham is expected to attend mandatory mini camp is the same thing as reporting Eli is expected to attend or that shurmur will be there. Of course they will be there and of course Beckham will be there. I can't imagine anyone having any doubts about whether he would be there or not. It's mandatory and a player can be fined for not attending.
Its because that's the only leverage he has. Maybe he said to the Giants, I'll come to voluntary as a show of good faith, but then I expect a new deal. If I don't get one, I'll hold out. When guys don't show up to OTA's, it's not considered a "hold out". When guys don't show up to mandatory, it is.
If, come December, he has 90 catches for 1200 yards and 12 TDs, fine. Open up negotiations.
However insignificant you believe it to be, he's still coming off injury. It's great he's stayed out of the headlines for a couple of months but why would NYG be in a rush here?
Its because that's the only leverage he has. Maybe he said to the Giants, I'll come to voluntary as a show of good faith, but then I expect a new deal. If I don't get one, I'll hold out. When guys don't show up to OTA's, it's not considered a "hold out". When guys don't show up to mandatory, it is.
Yes, because that makes perfect sense. Show up for voluntary OTA's when you can actually make a statement about your contract with no consequence and then really show the giants that you mean business and hold out during mandatory mini camp when there is consequences financially. Smh
Aaron Donald and earl Thomas both held out of OTA's and are holding out of mandatory mini camp. Was there ever any doubt why they were not attending voluntary OTA's?
And this hasnt been talked about much but Beckham could have a record-breaking year under Shurmur.
If, come December, he has 90 catches for 1200 yards and 12 TDs, fine. Open up negotiations.
However insignificant you believe it to be, he's still coming off injury. It's great he's stayed out of the headlines for a couple of months but why would NYG be in a rush here?
Exactly, nor would it be the best for Beckham either
Getting a deal done before this season probably lowers the overall cost a bit and gives him peace of mind and this becomes a non-story before it ever turns into a big deal.
So, if NYG are confident he'll return to form - and there's no reason he shouldn't - it would probably benefit them to take care of it sooner than later.
To sign OBj BEFORE we know what we have in him is crazy....
And to sign him after he has big numbers this year, like Arc says, just drives up the price....
Has to be a compromise somewhere.....you see him play several games to judge if that ankle is ok....if it is then you make a serious offer.....but you don't pay him QB money.....You offer him in the stratosphere of the top receivers, only.....
Otherwise, you have him this year and can tag him next.....but how this will affect his attitude, is anyone's guess......without a contract, in the back of his mind he will be playing cautiously, and may not be the same OBj.....
Not sure why they would want bend over backwards.
The last thing they should want to do is replicate the Lev Bell situation in PIT. In the grand scheme of things, it's not hurting them on the field, but it's a distracting story every offseason because they keep tagging him and keep avoiding giving him a L/T deal.
I'd prefer we avoided a similar scenario here and it would probably behoove the Giants to do so from a financial standpoint.
Quote:
of not coming is to avoid being injured. When you're not going to participate you cant get injured. He's just looking out for his wallet and in no way is this an indication of how he'll participate if and when he's cleared.
So wait, an NFL player is actually looking out for his wallet? Holy crap, the audacity of that miserable distraction!
How the hell someone can take this story and try to turn it into a negative is beyond me. Of course I am not the least bit surprised. Certain supposed Giants fans have a holier than thou attitude towards Beckham so no matter what he does, they kill him for it. Bunch of miserable ass clowns.
I didnt mean it negatively. Just saying the question if will he show up if he's healthy enough to participate without a contract.
Lets see if the embarrassing/damaging penalties and sideline antics are the next thing to go.
You mean the four unsportsmanlike conduct penalties he's gotten in his entire career?
Quote:
a new contract before the season?
If, come December, he has 90 catches for 1200 yards and 12 TDs, fine. Open up negotiations.
However insignificant you believe it to be, he's still coming off injury. It's great he's stayed out of the headlines for a couple of months but why would NYG be in a rush here?
Exactly, nor would it be the best for Beckham either
That makes zero sense. Beckham just tasted a season ending injury, why wouldn’t he sacrifice a bit off the top to get a deal done this season?
If, come December, he has 90 catches for 1200 yards and 12 TDs, fine. Open up negotiations.
However insignificant you believe it to be, he's still coming off injury. It's great he's stayed out of the headlines for a couple of months but why would NYG be in a rush here?
Agree completely. If OBJ wants a contract before the season he needs to be giving the Giants a significant hometown discount. It is all about which side is exposed to risk IMO. There is a cost associated with taking the risk and the value of his contract needs to reflect that.
Want $100MM? Take the risk, prove you are healthy, and can perform all while staying out of the headlines (for the wrong reasons).
And this hasnt been talked about much but Beckham could have a record-breaking year under Shurmur.
By what measure is his value down? What would you use to indicate that? We're not that far removed from hysteria about teams trying to trade for him.
Take a step back, most great players get paid before their rookie deal is up. So why are those teams doing it too?
Quote:
a new contract before the season?
If, come December, he has 90 catches for 1200 yards and 12 TDs, fine. Open up negotiations.
However insignificant you believe it to be, he's still coming off injury. It's great he's stayed out of the headlines for a couple of months but why would NYG be in a rush here?
Agree completely. If OBJ wants a contract before the season he needs to be giving the Giants a significant hometown discount. It is all about which side is exposed to risk IMO. There is a cost associated with taking the risk and the value of his contract needs to reflect that.
Want $100MM? Take the risk, prove you are healthy, and can perform all while staying out of the headlines (for the wrong reasons).
Of course, it's a LOT easier to say he should risk every dollar of his earning potential just for the sake of being a good soldier when it's not you that's in a contract negotiation.
He's making $8.5 mill this year, that is a reason to show up. Plus, He has to show that he can play before he gets a huge contract. I think he knows that.
It is a Catch 22 - Needs to show he is still Odell before getting big contract vs Does not want to get injured before getting extension...