2 reasons to keep watching the Mets. DeGrom and Nimmo. After his dramatic 2 out HR last night to win the game, he starts tonight’s game with an inside the park HR. Guy plays the game the right way, great attitude. Should be an all-star.
Something about how, “we’re all trying to be like Brandon Nimmo.”
My son and I were just talking about this about a half an hour ago. People are so concentrated on stars in games. But glue guys win championships, IMO. Yeah, you need stars. But guys like Nimmo, I’d say as necessary to a team’s success.
Which is shocking considering how bad he was early. Give me Cespedes and Thor. Can we not see this freaking team somewhat together for a few weeks at least? If we are below .500 at the deadline again I have no problem selling but if we are over .500 somehow and are somewhat healthy I still like this team.
on paper we should be much better than our record. Especially with Wheeler and Matz emerging, and lugo/swarzak/gselman in the pen, and nimmo/conforto developing too. We need thor and ces back and we have a good core then. It would be awesome if Dom or Alonso could just burst onto the scene like rhys hoskins. +Bruce can't be this bad forever. He has been so god damn awful.
on paper we should be much better than our record. Especially with Wheeler and Matz emerging, and lugo/swarzak/gselman in the pen, and nimmo/conforto developing too. We need thor and ces back and we have a good core then. It would be awesome if Dom or Alonso could just burst onto the scene like rhys hoskins. +Bruce can't be this bad forever. He has been so god damn awful.
btw, are we going to see tj rivera anytime soon?
Im guessing we see TJ after the all star break. Its been absolutely nuts. I mean they had the figure up. We've had the best SP in all of baseball since May 20th or something like that? And that just happens to have been our worst losing streak? It makes zero sense. Our offense was just THAT bad. It's a freak thing IMO. A complete blackout. The thing about streaky hitters is they are bound to get hot eventually though. We need Thor and Cespedes back though if we are going to have a prayer. Like now.
it can still be fun for the fans if there are at least a handful of young players, players that will be part of the teams future, who are playing well.
it can still be fun for the fans if there are at least a handful of young players, players that will be part of the teams future, who are playing well.
Id call Thor, deGrom, Matz, Wheeler, Nimmo, Conforto, Rosario, Smith, Gsellman, Lugo, etc more than a handful but thats me.
Loves the game, fun to watch, can beat you several ways, an upbeat guy whose enthusiasm is infectious. And oh yeah, by the way: He's really good.
Conforto's been that guy for spurts but hasn't been able to sustain for a season. Rosario could be that guy but so far he's been pretty uninspiring at the plate. I want to see Rosario hitting about 40 points higher, with some pop.
I think he will be a good one but it isn't going to happen this year IMO. As long as he is making subtle adjustments and improving a little this year Im still happy though. His defense has actually looked smoother lately.
Conforto, I think is going to end up just fine. By the time the year is out his numbers will look just dandy.
Loves the game, fun to watch, can beat you several ways, an upbeat guy whose enthusiasm is infectious. And oh yeah, by the way: He's really good.
Conforto's been that guy for spurts but hasn't been able to sustain for a season. Rosario could be that guy but so far he's been pretty uninspiring at the plate. I want to see Rosario hitting about 40 points higher, with some pop.
In fairness to Conforto he had major shoulder surgery. Not sure why everyone is acting like that may not be a factor. Some of the doom and gloom examples of similar injuries involved guys who never showed the same power again. Conforto may have rushed/been rushed back. Rosario on the other hand has no real excuses, he's been really, really bad SO FAR.
Jay Bruce probably has zero trade value at this point Â
He has been battling foot, hip and back issues all year. I would put him on the DL and hope he can be somewhat useful in August / September as a 4th OF or backup 1B.
RE: Jay Bruce probably has zero trade value at this point Â
He has been battling foot, hip and back issues all year. I would put him on the DL and hope he can be somewhat useful in August / September as a 4th OF or backup 1B.
+1
You aren't getting a bag of balls for Bruce right now with 2 years remaining on his contract. Its AMAZING that he hasn't been put on the DL yet with his production and all his injuries.
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
I don't see any market for Bruce at this point. His injuries have decimated his season and he needs to be put on the DL. Even if you throw in Familia, who has also been atrocious, I don't think any team takes on that salary commitment for a home run hitter who cant hit home runs.
I don't see Cleveland trading Mejia at his lowest value during a brutal season.
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
Not sure how we'd get Shaw for Bruce. Bruce is really a DH who can occasionally play 1B or OF. Bruce playing OF in Colorado would be a disaster?
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
Not sure how we'd get Shaw for Bruce. Bruce is really a DH who can occasionally play 1B or OF. Bruce playing OF in Colorado would be a disaster?
Colorado were finalists for Bruce in the off-season so they clearly like him. Shaw has been an absolute disaster in Colorado. 7.08 era. The Rockies also are 29th in 1B fWAR so Bruce 100% makes sense for them.
Dan, then I'd be pretty happy. Bruce was an awful signing and an awful idea from day 1. Getting a potentially useful piece for him would be a gift.
IMO, all that we can realistically hope for is Bruce to play 1B when he's healthy and platoon with Flores and sit vs lefties. This assumes that (1) Smith can't hold the job down, (2) Alonso doesn't force his way onto the team, and (3) Bruce is healthy enough to play.
was before he was hitting .212 and had 3 home runs 70 games into the season, with a chronic injury that wont heal this season. They'd be taking on $10 mil more to trade one bad player for another.
If he had any value, sure he'd fit there. But they'd be taking on more money to trade one bad player for another. I don't see it happening.
I'd love to get Shaw, but realistically mets will need to eat more $ Â
was before he was hitting .212 and had 3 home runs 70 games into the season, with a chronic injury that wont heal this season. They'd be taking on $10 mil more to trade one bad player for another.
If he had any value, sure he'd fit there. But they'd be taking on more money to trade one bad player for another. I don't see it happening.
Again.. they are at are in the NEGATIVE at 1b in fWAR. Maybe the Mets have to kick in some coin to make it closer but they need an upgrade and Shaw has a 7.08 era, let's not pretend they are giving up a valuable piece of their team. Jay Bruce career in Colorado, 15 homers over 207 ab's.
RE: I'd love to get Shaw, but realistically mets will need to eat more $ Â
to deal him. Whether that's taking on an even bigger contract (like Ian Kennedy) or just including cash in a deal for someone like Shaw (possible).
Ian Kennedy? He's completely shot with 33 million left. In fact, even factoring in Kennedy's solid 2016 his era+ the since 2012...91. 4.40 FIP. You know the Mets aren't the team to take back more salary to get good prospects, I don't think I can recall that EVER happening with them so no way on Ian Kennedy. Not unless you are clearing multiple bad contracts and the honestly don't even have that to offer.
Something about how, “we’re all trying to be like Brandon Nimmo.”
My son and I were just talking about this about a half an hour ago. People are so concentrated on stars in games. But glue guys win championships, IMO. Yeah, you need stars. But guys like Nimmo, I’d say as necessary to a team’s success.
was before he was hitting .212 and had 3 home runs 70 games into the season, with a chronic injury that wont heal this season. They'd be taking on $10 mil more to trade one bad player for another.
If he had any value, sure he'd fit there. But they'd be taking on more money to trade one bad player for another. I don't see it happening.
Again.. they are at are in the NEGATIVE at 1b in fWAR. Maybe the Mets have to kick in some coin to make it closer but they need an upgrade and Shaw has a 7.08 era, let's not pretend they are giving up a valuable piece of their team. Jay Bruce career in Colorado, 15 homers over 207 ab's.
Is Jay Bruce's .212 and 3 home runs going to change that significantly? He isn't terrible because he forgot how to play. he's terrible because he has a chronic injury that is affecting him physically and likely mentally also. That injury isn't going away. His 15 homers over 207 ab's was done when he didn't have the injury.
This is the Jay Bruce that has plantar fasciitis which isn't going away, an injured hip and has only hit 3 home runs this season. 3. Only two more than Jose Reyes. 3 less than Adrian Gonzalez.
They aren't going to trade for him. Sure the trade makes sense on paper, it's not preposterous, but I would be absolutely shocked if any team has any interest in taking him on without serious monetary incentives or another player.
Bruce is tailor-made for Colorado. He would hit bombs there. Â
Baseball seems to have gotten away from these scrappy higher average guys. There are barely 20 guys hitting near .300 in the league. And probably only 50 hitting above .250.
Baseball, and more specifically the Mets (they haven't used these types in years) needs more of these players making impacts on rosters.
He is the only bright spot for me watching this team. Unless they give degrom an extension or at least assure he isn't being traded I don't really want to follow him.
RE: RE: I'd love to get Shaw, but realistically mets will need to eat more $ Â
to deal him. Whether that's taking on an even bigger contract (like Ian Kennedy) or just including cash in a deal for someone like Shaw (possible).
Ian Kennedy? He's completely shot with 33 million left. In fact, even factoring in Kennedy's solid 2016 his era+ the since 2012...91. 4.40 FIP. You know the Mets aren't the team to take back more salary to get good prospects, I don't think I can recall that EVER happening with them so no way on Ian Kennedy. Not unless you are clearing multiple bad contracts and the honestly don't even have that to offer.
Right and Bruce is looking pretty DH'y with $28m left after this year. Right now, with the foot issue and the numbers he's posted, I don't think there's any way to get rid of Bruce and save money. Getting Shaw might be possible, but only if the Mets cover some or all of the extra $9m Bruce is owed. And even still I think it's more realistic that they'd have to take on a slightly bigger contract like Kennedy to get rid of Bruce. Helping another team save money is the only incentive to getting Bruce until he shows he's healthy and producing again.
RE: RE: RE: I'd love to get Shaw, but realistically mets will need to eat more $ Â
to deal him. Whether that's taking on an even bigger contract (like Ian Kennedy) or just including cash in a deal for someone like Shaw (possible).
Ian Kennedy? He's completely shot with 33 million left. In fact, even factoring in Kennedy's solid 2016 his era+ the since 2012...91. 4.40 FIP. You know the Mets aren't the team to take back more salary to get good prospects, I don't think I can recall that EVER happening with them so no way on Ian Kennedy. Not unless you are clearing multiple bad contracts and the honestly don't even have that to offer.
Right and Bruce is looking pretty DH'y with $28m left after this year. Right now, with the foot issue and the numbers he's posted, I don't think there's any way to get rid of Bruce and save money. Getting Shaw might be possible, but only if the Mets cover some or all of the extra $9m Bruce is owed. And even still I think it's more realistic that they'd have to take on a slightly bigger contract like Kennedy to get rid of Bruce. Helping another team save money is the only incentive to getting Bruce until he shows he's healthy and producing again.
Your last line is the reason it won't happen, gotta face facts, this is a cheapo organization that always seems to be shopping at the bargain basement. Remember last years trade-off, all they did was dump salary and got nada back in return...Pathetic!
but nothing about this organization gives me confidence that they'll just cut their losses with Bruce and not let him hang around as a weight on all COF/1B decisions for the next year+. I will be happier than anyone if another team bails us out, but why would they while he's injured and not producing? Literally, the only reason would be to somehow save money.
Bruce has more recent success than Ian Kennedy. Ian Kennedy has been worth 2.4 fWAR... HIS LAST 4 seasons combined! I didn't want Jay Bruce resigned even 1% but Jay Bruce was more valuable than Ian Kennedy's last 4 seasons... last year alone. What does Ian Kennedy do for the Mets? 60+ starts of Ian Kennedy/Vargas next season? PUKE. Ian Kennedy is also 33 years old so very real chance he's completely shot. Bruce may be too but he's more recently shown himself to be a "solid" player. Ian Kennedy would get a minor league deal if released today.
has always been a hedge for Cespedes' injury proneness. Problem now is that he is also turning into a sunk cost. Bruce/Cespedes is a huge burden on our payroll. Thank god Wright's contract is insured, otherwise you have 3 players being paid $60 million and producing absolutely zilch.
Bruce has more recent success than Ian Kennedy. Ian Kennedy has been worth 2.4 fWAR... HIS LAST 4 seasons combined! I didn't want Jay Bruce resigned even 1% but Jay Bruce was more valuable than Ian Kennedy's last 4 seasons... last year alone. What does Ian Kennedy do for the Mets? 60+ starts of Ian Kennedy/Vargas next season? PUKE. Ian Kennedy is also 33 years old so very real chance he's completely shot. Bruce may be too but he's more recently shown himself to be a "solid" player. Ian Kennedy would get a minor league deal if released today.
I don't want Kennedy - I'm saying realistically right now that's the only type of player you could get for Bruce. With Bruce hurt and not producing, why would any team trade for him?
You mentioned COL having a negative WAR at 1B on the season, do you really think they are going to commit to spending an additional $9m on Jay Bruce's hobbled -.3 WAR when they could just sign Hanley for practically nothing? Or Agon?
Until Bruce proves he's healthy and starts producing like he did last year the only way to get rid of him is going to be in helping another team save money. Which is why it's a virtual lock that in the next few months we'll be locked in the cycle of him taking away playing time that could be better spent on others to prop up trade value.
was always a bad move. There is a reason the market for him ALWAYS sucks. He's the epitome of Sandy's inability to do anything outside of what is in front of his face. In fact the Ramos trade (which I didn't like because of the player not the idea) was a rare "breath of fresh air" in terms of originality.
was always a bad move. There is a reason the market for him ALWAYS sucks. He's the epitome of Sandy's inability to do anything outside of what is in front of his face. In fact the Ramos trade (which I didn't like because of the player not the idea) was a rare "breath of fresh air" in terms of originality.
Completely agree. I understood that Cuddyer signing more than I understood bringing back Bruce. Made zero sense.
My son and I were just talking about this about a half an hour ago. People are so concentrated on stars in games. But glue guys win championships, IMO. Yeah, you need stars. But guys like Nimmo, I’d say as necessary to a team’s success.
:(
We absolutely have the pitching if we can put together any sort of a semblance of a lineup.
Torch from Wright officially been passed
btw, are we going to see tj rivera anytime soon?
btw, are we going to see tj rivera anytime soon?
Im guessing we see TJ after the all star break. Its been absolutely nuts. I mean they had the figure up. We've had the best SP in all of baseball since May 20th or something like that? And that just happens to have been our worst losing streak? It makes zero sense. Our offense was just THAT bad. It's a freak thing IMO. A complete blackout. The thing about streaky hitters is they are bound to get hot eventually though. We need Thor and Cespedes back though if we are going to have a prayer. Like now.
Id call Thor, deGrom, Matz, Wheeler, Nimmo, Conforto, Rosario, Smith, Gsellman, Lugo, etc more than a handful but thats me.
Conforto's been that guy for spurts but hasn't been able to sustain for a season. Rosario could be that guy but so far he's been pretty uninspiring at the plate. I want to see Rosario hitting about 40 points higher, with some pop.
Conforto, I think is going to end up just fine. By the time the year is out his numbers will look just dandy.
Link - ( New Window )
It would be a lot of fun to watch an outfield of Conforto, Juan, Nimmo every night.
You could send Bruce on vacation to the DL and let him get healthy. Come back in August.
Rosenthal says they want to get more athletic... that's def not Jay Bruce
Conforto's been that guy for spurts but hasn't been able to sustain for a season. Rosario could be that guy but so far he's been pretty uninspiring at the plate. I want to see Rosario hitting about 40 points higher, with some pop.
In fairness to Conforto he had major shoulder surgery. Not sure why everyone is acting like that may not be a factor. Some of the doom and gloom examples of similar injuries involved guys who never showed the same power again. Conforto may have rushed/been rushed back. Rosario on the other hand has no real excuses, he's been really, really bad SO FAR.
+1
You aren't getting a bag of balls for Bruce right now with 2 years remaining on his contract. Its AMAZING that he hasn't been put on the DL yet with his production and all his injuries.
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
I don't see any market for Bruce at this point. His injuries have decimated his season and he needs to be put on the DL. Even if you throw in Familia, who has also been atrocious, I don't think any team takes on that salary commitment for a home run hitter who cant hit home runs.
I don't see Cleveland trading Mejia at his lowest value during a brutal season.
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
Not sure how we'd get Shaw for Bruce. Bruce is really a DH who can occasionally play 1B or OF. Bruce playing OF in Colorado would be a disaster?
Quote:
Sherman suggested a salary swap of Bruce and Shaw, so Familia to Cleveland, Bruce to Colorado, Mejia and Shaw to the Mets. Bryan Shaw still has an 8.7 K/9, velocity is actually UP, experience with Mickey, 19.5 remaining over the next 2 (including his buyout) vs. Bruce 2 for 28.
Not sure how we'd get Shaw for Bruce. Bruce is really a DH who can occasionally play 1B or OF. Bruce playing OF in Colorado would be a disaster?
Colorado were finalists for Bruce in the off-season so they clearly like him. Shaw has been an absolute disaster in Colorado. 7.08 era. The Rockies also are 29th in 1B fWAR so Bruce 100% makes sense for them.
IMO, all that we can realistically hope for is Bruce to play 1B when he's healthy and platoon with Flores and sit vs lefties. This assumes that (1) Smith can't hold the job down, (2) Alonso doesn't force his way onto the team, and (3) Bruce is healthy enough to play.
If he had any value, sure he'd fit there. But they'd be taking on more money to trade one bad player for another. I don't see it happening.
If he had any value, sure he'd fit there. But they'd be taking on more money to trade one bad player for another. I don't see it happening.
Again.. they are at are in the NEGATIVE at 1b in fWAR. Maybe the Mets have to kick in some coin to make it closer but they need an upgrade and Shaw has a 7.08 era, let's not pretend they are giving up a valuable piece of their team. Jay Bruce career in Colorado, 15 homers over 207 ab's.
Ian Kennedy? He's completely shot with 33 million left. In fact, even factoring in Kennedy's solid 2016 his era+ the since 2012...91. 4.40 FIP. You know the Mets aren't the team to take back more salary to get good prospects, I don't think I can recall that EVER happening with them so no way on Ian Kennedy. Not unless you are clearing multiple bad contracts and the honestly don't even have that to offer.
My son and I were just talking about this about a half an hour ago. People are so concentrated on stars in games. But glue guys win championships, IMO. Yeah, you need stars. But guys like Nimmo, I’d say as necessary to a team’s success.
Syndergaard??? Who's that?
Quote:
was before he was hitting .212 and had 3 home runs 70 games into the season, with a chronic injury that wont heal this season. They'd be taking on $10 mil more to trade one bad player for another.
If he had any value, sure he'd fit there. But they'd be taking on more money to trade one bad player for another. I don't see it happening.
Again.. they are at are in the NEGATIVE at 1b in fWAR. Maybe the Mets have to kick in some coin to make it closer but they need an upgrade and Shaw has a 7.08 era, let's not pretend they are giving up a valuable piece of their team. Jay Bruce career in Colorado, 15 homers over 207 ab's.
Is Jay Bruce's .212 and 3 home runs going to change that significantly? He isn't terrible because he forgot how to play. he's terrible because he has a chronic injury that is affecting him physically and likely mentally also. That injury isn't going away. His 15 homers over 207 ab's was done when he didn't have the injury.
This is the Jay Bruce that has plantar fasciitis which isn't going away, an injured hip and has only hit 3 home runs this season. 3. Only two more than Jose Reyes. 3 less than Adrian Gonzalez.
They aren't going to trade for him. Sure the trade makes sense on paper, it's not preposterous, but I would be absolutely shocked if any team has any interest in taking him on without serious monetary incentives or another player.
I agree if he were healthy. My only argument is that they wont trade for him with this contract with this injury.
Baseball, and more specifically the Mets (they haven't used these types in years) needs more of these players making impacts on rosters.
He is the only bright spot for me watching this team. Unless they give degrom an extension or at least assure he isn't being traded I don't really want to follow him.
Quote:
to deal him. Whether that's taking on an even bigger contract (like Ian Kennedy) or just including cash in a deal for someone like Shaw (possible).
Ian Kennedy? He's completely shot with 33 million left. In fact, even factoring in Kennedy's solid 2016 his era+ the since 2012...91. 4.40 FIP. You know the Mets aren't the team to take back more salary to get good prospects, I don't think I can recall that EVER happening with them so no way on Ian Kennedy. Not unless you are clearing multiple bad contracts and the honestly don't even have that to offer.
Right and Bruce is looking pretty DH'y with $28m left after this year. Right now, with the foot issue and the numbers he's posted, I don't think there's any way to get rid of Bruce and save money. Getting Shaw might be possible, but only if the Mets cover some or all of the extra $9m Bruce is owed. And even still I think it's more realistic that they'd have to take on a slightly bigger contract like Kennedy to get rid of Bruce. Helping another team save money is the only incentive to getting Bruce until he shows he's healthy and producing again.
Quote:
In comment 13994274 Eric on Li said:
Quote:
to deal him. Whether that's taking on an even bigger contract (like Ian Kennedy) or just including cash in a deal for someone like Shaw (possible).
Ian Kennedy? He's completely shot with 33 million left. In fact, even factoring in Kennedy's solid 2016 his era+ the since 2012...91. 4.40 FIP. You know the Mets aren't the team to take back more salary to get good prospects, I don't think I can recall that EVER happening with them so no way on Ian Kennedy. Not unless you are clearing multiple bad contracts and the honestly don't even have that to offer.
Right and Bruce is looking pretty DH'y with $28m left after this year. Right now, with the foot issue and the numbers he's posted, I don't think there's any way to get rid of Bruce and save money. Getting Shaw might be possible, but only if the Mets cover some or all of the extra $9m Bruce is owed. And even still I think it's more realistic that they'd have to take on a slightly bigger contract like Kennedy to get rid of Bruce. Helping another team save money is the only incentive to getting Bruce until he shows he's healthy and producing again.
Your last line is the reason it won't happen, gotta face facts, this is a cheapo organization that always seems to be shopping at the bargain basement. Remember last years trade-off, all they did was dump salary and got nada back in return...Pathetic!
I don't want Kennedy - I'm saying realistically right now that's the only type of player you could get for Bruce. With Bruce hurt and not producing, why would any team trade for him?
You mentioned COL having a negative WAR at 1B on the season, do you really think they are going to commit to spending an additional $9m on Jay Bruce's hobbled -.3 WAR when they could just sign Hanley for practically nothing? Or Agon?
Until Bruce proves he's healthy and starts producing like he did last year the only way to get rid of him is going to be in helping another team save money. Which is why it's a virtual lock that in the next few months we'll be locked in the cycle of him taking away playing time that could be better spent on others to prop up trade value.
Completely agree. I understood that Cuddyer signing more than I understood bringing back Bruce. Made zero sense.
I thought Ty Kelly played left field. I dont see Smith or Wilmer as an outfielder...
Quote:
Smith in left field tonight.
I thought Ty Kelly played left field. I dont see Smith or Wilmer as an outfielder...
Kelly is back in LV. Only OFers on the active roster are Nimmo, Conforto, and Bautista.