for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: Tanking in Major Leagues has led to lower attendance

CMicks3110 : 6/23/2018 8:18 am
All it takes is one glance at the Major League Baseball standings to induce a sudden case of whiplash, or perhaps severe motion sickness. Just zoom from the top to the bottom of the American League East, where a gap of nearly 30 games separates first place from last, and see if your stomach doesn’t shoot up into your throat.

As the 2018 season careens toward its 81-game midpoint, the sport is witnessing a sort of extreme stratification unseen in its recent history, its teams increasingly separated into two groups — the great and the awful — with a shrinking middle class.

It is almost certainly an outgrowth of the practice that has come to be known as “tanking,” and it may be fueling the most alarming trend in the game so far this season: the steepest drop in attendance the game has seen since the aftermath of the 1994-95 players’ strike.

Over the past 15 years, the league has never seen more than two 100-loss teams in a single season. In three of the past four seasons, including 2017, there were none. This year, three teams — the Baltimore Orioles (on pace for 115 losses), Kansas City Royals (114 losses) and Chicago White Sox (109) — entered the weekend on pace to shatter the 100-loss threshold, and two more, the Miami Marlins and Cincinnati Reds (both on pace for 99 losses), were on the doorstep.

CONTENT FROM SUB-ZERO, WOLF, AND COVE
“We'll have them taste chef-made bites, invite them to cook for themselves with our appliances, start conversations about the way they live and use their kitchens on a daily basis." — Brigg Klein, National Director of Showrooms, Sub-Zero, Wolf, and Cove
Read More
[Like 300-game winners, members of 3,000 hit club the last of a dying MLB breed]

A similar separation is occurring at the top of the standings. Only six times in history, and once in the past 15 years, have there been three 100-win teams in a season, and never has there been four. But this year, the New York Yankees (on pace for 113), Boston Red Sox (107) and Houston Astros (107) entered the weekend well ahead of 100-win pace — with run-differentials that suggest they won’t regress by much — while the Seattle Mariners (99) were just a tick below, and the Milwaukee Brewers (96), Atlanta Braves (95) and Chicago Cubs (95) were within striking distance.

You could probably guess what this dynamic has done to pennant races. In the AL alone, four teams (the Yankees, Red Sox, Astros and Cleveland Indians) had odds of 95 percent or better or reaching the postseason (as calculated by FanGraphs) entering the weekend, while six teams had odds below one percent and three others were below seven. The only races left to care about are the AL East division title — with the loser of the Yankees/Red Sox duel relegated to the wild card game — and the second wild card.


A year ago, it was a far different story, with only two AL teams (through June 21) showing playoff odds of 95 percent or better (Houston and Cleveland) and only one team (Chicago White Sox) below one percent. The Minnesota Twins, incidentally, had playoff odds of 10 percent, according to FanGraphs, but surged in the second half to earn the second wild card — the kind of memorable, late-summer charges that could become obsolete in an era of extreme stratification.

Meanwhile, leaguewide attendance, which was already on a slight but steady decline for more than a decade, is down nearly seven percent over the same date a year ago — which, if it were to continue, would represent the sharpest one-year drop since 1995, the first year after the strike — with 19 of the league’s 30 teams seeing year-over-year declines at their home stadiums entering the weekend.

While the brutal weather in the eastern half of the U.S. in April and May is almost certainly responsible for a large chunk of that decline, some of the biggest percentage drops have come from teams that either have domed stadiums (Toronto, Tampa Bay) or play on the West Coast (Oakland, San Francisco). That has led MLB to acknowledge for the first time that the lack of competitiveness across the game may be affecting the sport’s bottom line.


[Bryce Harper is not in denial. The Slump is a real thing — and he knows it.]

“We are concerned that there’s something more to it than the weather,” Commissioner Rob Manfred said last week following MLB’s quarterly owners’ meeting. However, curiously, Manfred also blamed “negative publicity” surrounding tanking — as opposed to the practice itself — as being “problematic in terms of attendance.”

But fans don’t need the media to tell them their teams are noncompetitive. It isn’t the publicity; it’s the act itself.

(Interestingly, in the case of the Orioles, who are on pace to be the sport’s losingest team since the 2003 Detroit Tigers went 43-119, there was no tanking at all. The Orioles were actually trying to win in 2018, spending $73 million this winter on multiyear deals with pitchers Alex Cobb and Andrew Cashner — which makes this year’s disaster even tougher to stomach.)

Clearly, as shown by the examples this decade of the Washington Nationals, Chicago Cubs and Houston Astros, the process of tanking can work for individual teams — provided it is done smartly. But for the industry as a whole, it has become a nightmare.


When prominent agent Scott Boras railed against the practice this spring, calling it the “noncompetitive cancer” taking over the game and saying it “damages the brand of baseball,” it was largely dismissed as the maniacal ramblings of someone just looking out for his clients’ interests. But he may have been more prescient than we thought.

At some point, baseball is going to have to do something to rein in the practice of tanking. To this point, the issue has always been the union’s problem alone, with Manfred defending the practice as recently as this spring. In February, union leadership filed a grievance accusing four teams — the Marlins, Tampa Bay Rays, Pittsburgh Pirates and Oakland A’s — of failing to spend its revenue-sharing funds on improving their clubs on the field.

The grievance has yet to be heard, and with the current labor agreement running through 2021, there isn’t any momentum toward finding a solution.

But what the numbers have shown in the first half of 2018, both in the standings and at the gate, is that the problem is bigger than we thought, and it is no longer the union’s alone. It is becoming a crisis, and it belongs to all of baseball, including the owners.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/sports/wp/2018/06/22/tanking-in-mlb-has-led-to-too-many-great-teams-too-many-awful-ones-and-a-decline-in-fans/?utm_term=.c05111e0eba0 - ( New Window )
This is my solutions:  
CMicks3110 : 6/23/2018 8:19 am : link
Economic Changes:

1. Salary Cap and Salary Floor: forces team to want to acquire talent every year not just when they are good

2. Shorter Time to Free Agency (4 years instead of 6) - shorter hold on players will encourage teams to not wait long periods of time for "windows"

3. Access to Free Agency based on quasi service time/age - if you're 28 years old and have not reached free agency, then you are a free agent. Teams shouldn't be incentivized to force players to remain in minors to meet some service time deadline (organizations have rights to players for x number of years and that's it)

4. Larger Roster (29 instead of 25) - better players will not be blocked by limited roster (having starting pitchers that literally are inactive on days they don't start is stupid)

5. International Draft, no advantages to large market teams

6. Drafting Age - like the NFL - limited to college athletes with at least 2 years of college ball, more developed players will lead to shorter periods of time in the minors

7. Contraction - some franchises just need to not exist (i.e. miami, tampa bay) - decreases of the number of fringe players

8. Minor League Franchises that exist that are no longer affiliated with Major Leagues can just be an independent

Game Changes

1. Remove the shift

2. Continue Pitch Clock to increase pace of play

3. Ensure that the type of ball used is one that increases action (there have been several physical baseball changes that has changed the nature of the game from season to season over the last several years, pick a ball that is "aerodynamically" suited to be put in play. (obviously this is very very hard, but you can find some genius to figure it out, or at least to avoid outcomes like the 'dead ball era')

4. Ever so slightly lessen the strike zone (the strikeout is the least exciting play in sports) i will take more walks if there are more hits, and this will truly separate the good from the great pitchers; plus it will lend the game to being a more offensive game, thus more exciting.

All your game changes  
section125 : 6/23/2018 9:09 am : link
are awful and unnecessary.

The strike zone is already reduced. Umps rarely call the high strike. And a strikeout is not as boring as a walk.

Pitch clock is the least offensive idea you propose and the only one worth discussing..

The shift is fine. Players just need to go the other way to defeat it.

The ball has already been called juiced, so there is no need to do a thing, plus if you make it more aerodynamic you end curves, cutters, and sliders. The deadball era will not return.



fair critique  
CMicks3110 : 6/23/2018 9:17 am : link
what about the economic changes?
I don’t think the economic changes are needed..  
Sean : 6/23/2018 9:23 am : link
Like in the NBA, tanking is happening because it can work very well. The Astros tanked & have already benefited from a WS title.

Aside from the NFL, all of these regular seasons drag on. If MLB gets Yanks/Red Sox or Yanks/Astros in the ALCS, they will be fine with it.

With regards to the sport, analytics have really hurt. Too much all or nothing with either HR’s or strikeouts. As a fan, I like stolen bases, doubles & triples and we don’t see enough of that.

Every sport could use contraction, unfortunately I don’t think we will ever see it.
If you make a hard cap  
section125 : 6/23/2018 9:31 am : link
then more teams will horde their younger players to hedge against pay those crazy 10 year contracts.
I do agree that players should have less time under team control. Seems crazy that Betances still has another year of arbitration until FA. Just saw Andujar and Torres are with the Yanks until 2024 or 2025.

I could live with a couple teams being eliminated especially if they keep selling off prime players to keep contracts low and living off the luxury tax and TV revenue.

I actually believe baseball is in good shape. There are always a few teams in any league that are hard pressed to compete.
MLB TV is probably another reason that attendance is down.
oh  
CMicks3110 : 6/23/2018 9:34 am : link
and maybe a cap on contract length. 5 years.
THE essence  
CMicks3110 : 6/23/2018 9:36 am : link
of my economic arguments though. Is just to allow for quicker turnaround times. The NFL is so popular because every year a team can turn around. There is equal access to talent. And when there is a truly dominant team, it's more exciting to watch. The 98 Yankees, the 86 mets, were legendary. The dominant teams are less exciting because they just pile up wins on crappy teams.
Baseball  
XBRONX : 6/23/2018 9:41 am : link
is boring in person. If you love pitching, the tv shot from centerfield is great. I laugh at people booing balls and strikes from their seats at the game.
RE: THE essence  
robbieballs2003 : 6/23/2018 9:44 am : link
In comment 13998080 CMicks3110 said:
Quote:
of my economic arguments though. Is just to allow for quicker turnaround times. The NFL is so popular because every year a team can turn around. There is equal access to talent. And when there is a truly dominant team, it's more exciting to watch. The 98 Yankees, the 86 mets, were legendary. The dominant teams are less exciting because they just pile up wins on crappy teams.


I don't fully agree with your reason why football is more popular. It is just a more exciting sport. The NFL does just fine with dynasties. The parody in the NFL has also led to shittier OL play and horrible tackling and possibly more injuries. The NFL can very well see their reign come to an end in the not so distant future. Plus, the NFL is just a different sport. The shelf life of a player is extremely short with no minor league so the players only care about what is going to happen in the immediate future for them not the players after them meaning the owners have so much more power than what happens in baseball. It is also much easier to selll out 8 home games in football than 81 home games in baseball.

Baseball probably has too many teams but more importantly they need better cities. Montreal got fucked and should have a team.
The NFL also has television deals  
robbieballs2003 : 6/23/2018 9:47 am : link
Where baseball has individual tv deals. I know this is very lucrative for the Yankees and extremely lucrative for the NFL. But what about teams like Kansas City and smaller market teams in baseball? How do they do?
Mets  
Hilary : 6/23/2018 10:02 am : link
I love baseball. I will not go or watch the Mets this year. Too sad. The problem is not the game of baseball. It is poor management of the team.
RE: RE: THE essence  
JerryNYG : 6/23/2018 10:29 am : link
In comment 13998084 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:



Baseball probably has too many teams but more importantly they need better cities. Montreal got fucked and should have a team.


This. The separatiste movement is largely over, the city is friendly to anglophones again, and the nostalgia factor for the Expos is high right now. I see tons of Expos hats and shirts around.

Send Tampa Bay up to Montreal and watch the AL East get even better.
I'd be up for a return of the expos  
CMicks3110 : 6/23/2018 11:05 am : link
TB is dribble. Such a waste to have a team there.
RE: THE essence  
Ron from Ninerland : 6/23/2018 11:28 am : link
In comment 13998080 CMicks3110 said:
Quote:
of my economic arguments though. Is just to allow for quicker turnaround times. The NFL is so popular because every year a team can turn around. There is equal access to talent. And when there is a truly dominant team, it's more exciting to watch. The 98 Yankees, the 86 mets, were legendary. The dominant teams are less exciting because they just pile up wins on crappy teams.
Please explain why basketball is so popular. You say that in the NFL every team has a shot. While its true that in baseball teams don't have equal access to talent its not uncommon for an unexpected team to win, witness the Mets a few years ago. The sport in which teams can't turn around quickly is basketball. Year after year its the same teams on top. Eventually the elite teams may change in basketball, but it seems to take a decade. At the beginning of the basketball season you can predict with great accuracy which teams will go deep in the playoffs and which teams have no shot. And yet its basketball is gaining in popularity while the NFL is losing popularity and MLB might be.
Ron  
CMicks3110 : 6/23/2018 11:53 am : link
you're right. Basketball is hard because there are so few players relative to other leagues, that depth and role players aren't really as important.
Something like this happened after World War II  
81_Great_Dane : 6/24/2018 2:19 am : link
when the Yankees won almost every year, and in the National League, it was the Giants and the Dodgers most of the time. The late 40s were a little more open. The Indians won a World Series in '48. But by the mid-50s they had to set a record for wins to get past the Yankees in '54, then lost to the Giants.

That era saw shrinking attendance (as television came in) at all levels and paved the way for the first wave of franchise relocations, including the Braves, Senators, Giants, Dodgers. If MLB repeats that pattern they will be in trouble -- unless they can move Miami to, say, Havana, and Tampa Bay to Mexico City, or something like that. Trends suggest MLB in Cuba and Mexico isn't happening anytime soon.
RE: THE essence  
Jesse B : 6/24/2018 8:41 am : link
In comment 13998080 CMicks3110 said:
Quote:
of my economic arguments though. Is just to allow for quicker turnaround times. The NFL is so popular because every year a team can turn around. There is equal access to talent. And when there is a truly dominant team, it's more exciting to watch. The 98 Yankees, the 86 mets, were legendary. The dominant teams are less exciting because they just pile up wins on crappy teams.


The quick turnaround in the. NFL has almost everything to do with how fast and easy rookie and second year players can develop into useful players and how quickly veterans fall off. And how few games there are.

If you're a bad baseball team it takes three four or five years for your high draft picks to learn how to hit or pitch in the MLB. You're veterans stay useful for more then a decade and the huge amount of baseball games means that over a long average Of games things play out.

Where in football three good games from Barkley and r Giants can go from a 6 win team to a 9 win team. The margin of error is much smaller in football year to year because of how few games there are which allows hit teams to capitalize a 5 game win streak in football means everything in baseball who cares.

Where do you even start?  
giantsFC : 6/24/2018 12:00 pm : link
A lot of great suggestions on here.

MLB Baseball is going to keep dying With their current plan

A very underdiscussed point is the one mentioned about young talent taking years to play at MLB level. the system is forced. Players seem to have to succeeed and ascend about 6 tiers now to get a chance. I can’t imagine that is a successful format for all personalities or talent. What happened to the days of 3 minor league levels?

The excessive shift needs to go. The NBA game is thriving in the offensive era. Illegal shifts would help baseball make it more of a true sport again.

An international draft or just one full draft for all first-year players under 25 would be great. That international spending money class system is a complete mess. Let a guy like Ohtani be the first player taken. Take the stupid signing slots off and let teams offer them whatever they want. Don’t like it, enter draft again following year.

More roster spots for position players only. The era of a 9 inni)g pitcher is over, but seeing benches with so little options makes for some boring rosters.

Total Red Herring  
WideRight : 6/24/2018 6:31 pm : link
TOTAL AVG ATENDANCE, per ESPN

2012: 925,509
2013: 915,126 -1.2%
2014: 913,097 -0.3%
2015: 914,315 +0.1%
2016: 904,879 -1.1%
2017: 900.700 -0.5%
2018: 840,837 -6.7%

A couple things. This is the total pergame average for all thirty teams from ESPN's website. So veracity is compromised by MLB's fierce attempts to refute the obvious: basball is indecline

Second, this story comes out at the same time every year. Per game attendance always increases in the summer, so expect 2018's number to go up significantly.

This is macrodate, so it reflects consumer choices relative to descretionary income. Descretionary income has increased dramatically over the past decade. For MLBs numbers to be dropping in the presence of a prevailing tailwind is really concerning. Though they can argue that there share of decretionary income is higher because of the increase in ticket and "experience" prices.

Finally, this has occured inspite of sincere attempts of MLB to change the game to suite the changing consumer. Nothing is working

The tanking phenomena may be a result of rather than a cause of this decline. Teams simply can't afford to keep overpriced players on losing teams.

I don't have any answers. Bullfighting and Jai Alai have been serious decline too. No big deal.
Tobacco companies really screwed themselves  
WideRight : 6/24/2018 6:38 pm : link
by ignoring the obvious. Tobacco causes cancer. Had they been honest and spent their money on finding the cure that is now being realized, they would have been able to keep everyone smoking. Own the tobacoo and the drugs that cure the cancer. They would be bigger than Google and Amazon.

MLB can't deny that short attention spans and spring weather lower attendance. And pitcher can't pitch nine=innings and pitching changes are boring beyond belief.

So shorten the game to six innings, and schedule more games in the summer via day/night double headers. Five weekend games. And drastically lower prices in the cheap seats to recoup cash at the consession stand.
The premise needs to be questioned  
HomerJones45 : 6/24/2018 6:50 pm : link
"tanking" or "ticket, concession and related expenses being beyond the average fan."

A baseball team has the equivalent of 4,000,000 tickets to sell in any one season. A basketball team has about 1/5 of that number to sell. Baseball needs the average fan to buy tickets. but the cost of going to the game has skyrocketed ahead of wage growth.

The average fan has gravitated to hi-def tv and MLB packages over going to the game.

As for the NBA, it's average attendance is about 12000 per game fewer than MLB and it long ago gave up on the average fan when it comes to ticket pricing and concessions.
Back to the Corner