for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Half a dozen teams were interested in Flowers

pjcas18 : 10/15/2018 10:38 am
I don't think the Giants were wrong to part ways with Flowers - we all watched his play, he was brutal, but you'd think this many teams interested they could have worked out a trade even though it was no secret they were planning to release him.

It will be very interesting to see if Flowers resurrects his career elsewhere.

Quote:

Matt Lombardo
& #8207;Verified account @MattLombardoNFL

Ereck Flowers signed with the #Jaguars, but according to an #NFL source, there were ‘half a dozen’ teams interested in the ex-#Giants first-round pick:

Link - ( New Window )
Half a dozen teams, and we couldn't get something for his fat ass?  
jcn56 : 10/15/2018 10:41 am : link
I guess they were interested, just at a much lower price.
6 out of 32  
K-Gun? Pop-Gun : 10/15/2018 10:41 am : link
Not a ringing endorsement for a former 1st rounder.

Coaches have egos too; they think they can 'fix' talent.
Then I guess  
Doomster : 10/15/2018 10:43 am : link
we weren't the only idiots ....

One thing I will say though, we knew he couldn't play tackle on either side, so why in the world did we not try him at guard? Did we even try?
RE: 6 out of 32  
jcn56 : 10/15/2018 10:43 am : link
In comment 14129269 K-Gun? Pop-Gun said:
Quote:
Not a ringing endorsement for a former 1st rounder.

Coaches have egos too; they think they can 'fix' talent.


It's not that - it's the dearth of OL talent in the NFL.

As much as everyone wants to ignore it, it's true. That's why lineman salaries have shot up. That's the only way we can justify paying Solder what we did.

Hell, Greg Robinson is on a roster too.
Umm, we are taking this way too seriously  
jvm52106 : 10/15/2018 10:44 am : link
this no different than us being interested in a former starter being released by another team. Depth and experience are hard to find, even if the find isn't that good.
source was likely Rosenhaus  
JonC : 10/15/2018 10:46 am : link
.
Very young, experienced player with the size you look for  
larryflower37 : 10/15/2018 10:47 am : link
Why wouldn't teams line up on a cheap deal to see if you can be the one to fix his technique.
Very little risk for the Jag's, It's not like they used a top 10 pick in the draft for him.
Say what you want about Geoff Schwartz  
GiantsRage2007 : 10/15/2018 10:47 am : link
But he nailed it on this take:

"Another example, and there are plenty, of draft status being the only reason someone gets a job. If anyone below the 3rd round had Flowers film, he'd never play again."

IF true, that proves my point...  
EricJ : 10/15/2018 10:49 am : link
in that there are plenty of teams that have OL problems. If they are willing to TRADE For Flowers...
If he were on another team and got released  
UberAlias : 10/15/2018 10:49 am : link
BBI would be all over us to sign him. There would be sleeping at wheel signs in threads if they didn’t sign him. Truth is, he’s better than some OLine currently on the roster. But they had to move on.
No one respects the Giants coaching  
Rflairr : 10/15/2018 10:52 am : link
. And some teams are likely smart enough to try him at Guard before completely giving up on him
He also plays  
NoPeanutz : 10/15/2018 10:53 am : link
every game.
I used to think that  
Beer Man : 10/15/2018 10:58 am : link
he would make a decent RG/LG. But his attitude and communication skills are so bad, I don't see him making it at any position.
RE: He also plays  
BigBlue4You09 : 10/15/2018 11:00 am : link
In comment 14129303 NoPeanutz said:
Quote:
every game.


“Plays”
RE: Say what you want about Geoff Schwartz  
bluepepper : 10/15/2018 11:03 am : link
In comment 14129287 GiantsRage2007 said:
Quote:
But he nailed it on this take:

"Another example, and there are plenty, of draft status being the only reason someone gets a job. If anyone below the 3rd round had Flowers film, he'd never play again."

Man, Schwartz can't help himself can he. Flowers is benched then cut and he's still taking shots at him.

Also, I seriously doubt Coughlin and Flaherty brought him in due to draft status. They have first hand experience with him. They signed him because they figured he might be useful to them.
RE: Then I guess  
Rjanyg : 10/15/2018 11:03 am : link
In comment 14129275 Doomster said:
Quote:
we weren't the only idiots ....

One thing I will say though, we knew he couldn't play tackle on either side, so why in the world did we not try him at guard? Did we even try?


I agree. He might have made a decent Right Guard. Omamah is below average. Or we should have just retained Fluker and cut Flowers in the offseason.
RE: source was likely Rosenhaus  
giants#1 : 10/15/2018 11:06 am : link
In comment 14129281 JonC said:
Quote:
.


Likely with an eye to the offseason.
RE: Then I guess  
giants#1 : 10/15/2018 11:06 am : link
In comment 14129275 Doomster said:
Quote:
we weren't the only idiots ....

One thing I will say though, we knew he couldn't play tackle on either side, so why in the world did we not try him at guard? Did we even try?


After 3+ years he still couldn't fix his technique issues at OT. What makes you think he can make the more drastic changes needed for a switch to OG?
RE: Then I guess  
BigBlueinChicago : 10/15/2018 11:11 am : link
In comment 14129275 Doomster said:
Quote:
we weren't the only idiots ....

One thing I will say though, we knew he couldn't play tackle on either side, so why in the world did we not try him at guard? Did we even try?


Moving to guard changed Leonard Davis' career after being the #2 pick and flaming out at tackle. This is why I held out hope for Flowers under the idea that all options would be exhausted first.

But it appeared the Giants were in a "tackle or bust" mode with him, that no other option would suffice. I never totally understood that.
RE: I used to think that  
giants#1 : 10/15/2018 11:11 am : link
In comment 14129325 Beer Man said:
Quote:
he would make a decent RG/LG. But his attitude and communication skills are so bad, I don't see him making it at any position.


Good point re: communication. He struggled when communicating with 1 guy (OG), but people assume he'd be better at OG where he has to communicate with 2 guys (C and OT) every play?
RE: RE: source was likely Rosenhaus  
pjcas18 : 10/15/2018 11:12 am : link
In comment 14129355 giants#1 said:
Quote:
In comment 14129281 JonC said:


Quote:


.



Likely with an eye to the offseason.


The article says it was a "league source", pretty sure if it was Rosenhaus they would have crafted as "a source with knowledge of the situation" or something like that, but not a "league source"
RE: RE: Say what you want about Geoff Schwartz  
GiantsRage2007 : 10/15/2018 11:13 am : link
In comment 14129344 bluepepper said:
Quote:
In comment 14129287 GiantsRage2007 said:


Quote:


But he nailed it on this take:

"Another example, and there are plenty, of draft status being the only reason someone gets a job. If anyone below the 3rd round had Flowers film, he'd never play again."



Man, Schwartz can't help himself can he. Flowers is benched then cut and he's still taking shots at him.

Also, I seriously doubt Coughlin and Flaherty brought him in due to draft status. They have first hand experience with him. They signed him because they figured he might be useful to them.


I'll agree Schwartz must really not like him, as he never has anything good to say about him - but he was asked about him - it's wasn't unsolicited.

I do find it odd that Coughlin/Flaherty brought him aboard... since there was rumors of a clash with Flaherty.

As far as helping? He might...Who knows... I will say, of the available guys out there who can play LT who aren't currently playing or injured, he's probably the best. That aint saying much though!

2 things interesting about this  
giants#1 : 10/15/2018 11:13 am : link
1. Teams were 'interested' but clearly not enough to even offer a 7th round pick

2. Assuming the interest manifested itself in actual offers and that the offers were all comparable, it's interesting that Flowers chose reuniting with TC/Flaherty over the other possible destinations after all the rumblings we've heard.
RE: RE: Then I guess  
Jay on the Island : 10/15/2018 11:14 am : link
In comment 14129368 BigBlueinChicago said:
Quote:
In comment 14129275 Doomster said:


Quote:


we weren't the only idiots ....

One thing I will say though, we knew he couldn't play tackle on either side, so why in the world did we not try him at guard? Did we even try?



Moving to guard changed Leonard Davis' career after being the #2 pick and flaming out at tackle. This is why I held out hope for Flowers under the idea that all options would be exhausted first.

But it appeared the Giants were in a "tackle or bust" mode with him, that no other option would suffice. I never totally understood that.

Davis didn't flame out at OT. He occassionally had issues with speed but he was solid and he would have been a better fit on the right side. He was just an elite guard. The Giants were interested in him in free agency and they reportedly wanted him for OT at the time.
One more thing  
Jay on the Island : 10/15/2018 11:15 am : link
Technique and hand placemnt is just as important if not more so at guard which is still FLowers' weakness.
William Roberts  
jvm52106 : 10/15/2018 11:26 am : link
failed at T but he had athleticsm and size. He was just a bad tackle. He excelled once the Giants moved him to guard and played POWER football.

Keep in mind, a guy can be a decent tackle or decent guard in one system and completely suck ass in another. We consistently get big physical guys and try to have them play this pansy ass west coast passive blocking style. Bad mix of style and ability.
Nobody  
AcidTest : 10/15/2018 11:30 am : link
wanted the pro rated portion of his contract, even for a seventh, which is why he also cleared waivers. As a FA, teams can negotiate a new contract.
RE: RE: RE: source was likely Rosenhaus  
JonC : 10/15/2018 11:34 am : link
In comment 14129374 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
In comment 14129355 giants#1 said:


Quote:


In comment 14129281 JonC said:


Quote:


.



Likely with an eye to the offseason.



The article says it was a "league source", pretty sure if it was Rosenhaus they would have crafted as "a source with knowledge of the situation" or something like that, but not a "league source"


Wouldn't be so strict with the choice of wording, my money is on Rosenhaus.
Someone will put him at G and he'll probably be good there.  
Heisenberg : 10/15/2018 11:39 am : link
Burned his bridges here.
RE: RE: Say what you want about Geoff Schwartz  
WillVAB : 10/15/2018 11:41 am : link
In comment 14129344 bluepepper said:
Quote:
In comment 14129287 GiantsRage2007 said:


Quote:


But he nailed it on this take:

"Another example, and there are plenty, of draft status being the only reason someone gets a job. If anyone below the 3rd round had Flowers film, he'd never play again."



Man, Schwartz can't help himself can he. Flowers is benched then cut and he's still taking shots at him.

Also, I seriously doubt Coughlin and Flaherty brought him in due to draft status. They have first hand experience with him. They signed him because they figured he might be useful to them.



They signed him bc they’re decimated by injuries and he’s all that’s out there.
RE: IF true, that proves my point...  
JohnnyFlowers : 10/15/2018 12:03 pm : link
In comment 14129288 EricJ said:
Quote:
in that there are plenty of teams that have OL problems. If they are willing to TRADE For Flowers...


Maybe they are looking for somebody to boost the confidence of their DL during practice!
Funny, Jags sign him and they immediately get blown out by  
ZogZerg : 10/15/2018 12:18 pm : link
Cowboys and can't run the ball (65 yards).
LOL.

(Yeah, I know he didn't play).
If Eli was any good Flowers would have been All- Pro..  
JCin332 : 10/15/2018 12:18 pm : link
..
Half a dozen teams  
ghost718 : 10/15/2018 12:18 pm : link
Problem is the CFL and NFL can't make trades
The thing is what is the definition of interest?  
Giant John : 10/15/2018 12:21 pm : link
Like as in if the Giants cut him he can’t be worse than some of the guys riding our bench? Move on folks there is nothing to see here.
RE: Then I guess  
TMS : 10/15/2018 12:23 pm : link
In comment 14129275 Doomster said:
Quote:
we weren't the only idiots ....

One thing I will say though, we knew he couldn't play tackle on either side, so why in the world did we not try him at guard? Did we even try?
Curious about that myself and if he ends up there and successful, there will be hell to pay.
Off the theme a bit  
Pepe LePugh : 10/15/2018 1:25 pm : link
But I was wondering about cap implications. If he is paid by another team for a portion of the season, does the amount they pay reduce the "dead money"?
RE: Funny, Jags sign him and they immediately get blown out by  
Milton : 10/15/2018 1:38 pm : link
In comment 14129567 ZogZerg said:
Quote:
Cowboys and can't run the ball (65 yards).
LOL.

(Yeah, I know he didn't play).
He doesn't need to play to have that kind of effect on a team! That's why the Giants had to do more than just demote him.
RE: Off the theme a bit  
pjcas18 : 10/15/2018 1:40 pm : link
In comment 14129700 Pepe LePugh said:
Quote:
But I was wondering about cap implications. If he is paid by another team for a portion of the season, does the amount they pay reduce the "dead money"?


No, I believe that would have been the case if he was claimed off waivers, but he was not, he went unclaimed so the Giants are solely responsible for his entire remaining contract signed as a rookie.
That's just a referendum on how few legit OL there are out there  
YAJ2112 : 10/15/2018 1:40 pm : link
in today's NFL. Same reason why Pugh/Richburg got big $ to continue to suck in FA.
I really wish I could have been in the room  
Jay on the Island : 10/15/2018 1:45 pm : link
When Flaherty was told that the Jags would be signing Flowers.
RE: RE: Say what you want about Geoff Schwartz  
Diver_Down : 10/15/2018 1:46 pm : link
In comment 14129344 bluepepper said:
Quote:
In comment 14129287 GiantsRage2007 said:


Quote:


But he nailed it on this take:

"Another example, and there are plenty, of draft status being the only reason someone gets a job. If anyone below the 3rd round had Flowers film, he'd never play again."



Man, Schwartz can't help himself can he. Flowers is benched then cut and he's still taking shots at him.

Also, I seriously doubt Coughlin and Flaherty brought him in due to draft status. They have first hand experience with him. They signed him because they figured he might be useful to them.


Being on their 3rd string LT, Flowers on a vet. min. deal is an upgrade. He likely will never resurrect his career, but a moving speed bump who is adept at clothes-lining or kicking the opponent is better than nothing.
Back to the Corner