for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

McAdoo / Mahomes

Drewcon40 : 10/16/2018 10:31 am
Guys, let me preface to say if this was posted, I am so sorry. I did a quick search and couldn't find this. I'll delete with apologies if I missed an earlier thread.

Given our current situation at QB and how loathed McAdoo was by many, I thought this was curious. I don't know the validity of this although the article cites Anita Marks. I am not privy to any inside info but if this was true, it certainly feels like a missed opportunity. Keep in mind, I am not saying we'd be the Chiefs but the QB position would be a lesser concern.

Quote:
With all that is going on in Giants world regarding their current quarterback situation, Ben McAdoo, of all people, was once a big proponent of the team drafting quarterback Patrick Mahomes.

Ben McAdoo Wanted The NY Giants To Draft Patrick Mahomes - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 6:37 pm : link
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:
Quote:
Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.


Sorry, Mahomes isn't just a plug and play QB that is just another cog in Reid's system.

If so, why did Reid jettison Alex Smith?
RE: He elevates the players around  
FStubbs : 10/16/2018 6:38 pm : link
In comment 14131292 dep026 said:
Quote:
So he makes all-pro players ............ super all-pro players?

He plays on the most loaded offense in the NFL. Saying those guys dont make him better is just foolish.


This. Who knows what Mahomes would be here, but odds are he'd suck because he'd be running the McAdoo offense with Flowers and Hart as his tackles.
RE: McAdoo  
FStubbs : 10/16/2018 6:39 pm : link
In comment 14131810 Marty866b said:
Quote:
Also said that Solder wasn't every good and moving Flowers from left tackle to right tackle would not make any difference since he can't bend. He was right on all counts. Just because McAdoo was a lousy head coach doesn't mean he doesn't know his football.


Handley was said to be a brilliant football mind too.

Awful head coach.
RE: RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 6:43 pm : link
In comment 14131844 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:


Quote:


Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.



Sorry, Mahomes isn't just a plug and play QB that is just another cog in Reid's system.

If so, why did Reid jettison Alex Smith?


Cause alex Smith isn’t good.
RE: RE: RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 6:59 pm : link
In comment 14131852 dep026 said:
Quote:


Cause alex Smith isn’t good.


Smith is good, but he's limited. Mahomes bring another, unteachable dimension. A dimension that would help elevate any offense - like ours for instance.
Alex Smith is so good  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 7:47 pm : link
That once he was replaced... his previous team thrived.
I get that some of you are frustred with our QB  
JOrthman : 10/16/2018 9:34 pm : link
I get that you want another QB. But some of you have gone off your meds based on what I'm reading lately.
I love Mahones so far  
JOrthman : 10/16/2018 10:19 pm : link
and think he is a future stud QB. HOWEVER, some of you are caught in the moment...

KC has been a perennial playoff team since Andy Reid took over. They have a lot of talent on both offense and defense. Alex Smith was making them look damn good last year until he did what Alex Smith always does. The only thing KC has been missing for the last few years is a QB who can play in a shoot out and can play from behind, which is what PM can do. Let's stop acting like KC sucked until he got there.

Now, if you traded for PM, assuming they agreed. We lose Barkly, Hill and Engram on a team that already has a lot of holes. You're overrating him too soon and not realizing how far off we really are.
RE: RE: Same could be said about the current scheme  
Matt M. : 10/16/2018 11:48 pm : link
In comment 14131047 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 14130999 ron mexico said:


Quote:


"That said - his offense without Coughlin here seemed woefully ineffective. His play calling was terrible. His play design often lacked creativity or variation. "




I don't know if the play calling is quite as bad now - it's the execution that isn't there and it's constantly taking checkdowns when an additional second or two may see something open up further down the field.

I think Shurmur's play design is a little bit better and more varied but obviously the results just aren't there.

The common issue with both coaches is that they know we are having trouble throwing the football, yet, neither made enough of an attempt to establish the run.

We're actually dead last in the league in rushing attempts this year, yet we have arguably the best RB in the sport. That doesn't quite add up.

We're 9th in YPC. We should be committing to the run more than we are. Mix Gallman in more if need be and give him more carries to take a little of the onus off Saquon if they don't want to keep banging him between the tackles.
Spot on with everything.
RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
LauderdaleMatty : 10/16/2018 11:53 pm : link
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:
Quote:
Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.


Insane is being kind. Moronic McAdoo is a joke. Will be lucky to get another OC job ever again
I'm in the camp that obviously likes Mahomes  
Matt M. : 10/16/2018 11:57 pm : link
But, doesn't see him succeeding in McAdoo's offense with the personnel we had and would have now. With no OL, no running game, no TE, and running the same 11 personnel more than 90% of the time, he wasn't the same QB we see now with 2 RBs, Good WR, solid OL and a very good offensive head coach.

And for the record, I was calling for McAdoo to be gone long before Eli was benched. I don't care that he wanted to bench Eli. I do, however, care, that he replaced him with Geno fucking Smith and seemingly lied to management.
RE: RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
WillVAB : 10/17/2018 12:30 am : link
In comment 14131844 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:


Quote:


Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.



Sorry, Mahomes isn't just a plug and play QB that is just another cog in Reid's system.

If so, why did Reid jettison Alex Smith?


Reid resurrected Vick’s career from the dead as well as Smith’s. It’s an absolute fact he gets the ceiling out of his QBs.

I never said Mahomes is plug and play. I’m saying you’re a fool if you think McAdoo could get similar production in his trash scheme with Reese building a garbage roster around him.
Future Franchise you do the trade  
Giantimistic : 10/17/2018 3:30 am : link
If the Giants thought Mahones was a future franchise QB can't miss prospect than you do what you can to make the trade up. Just because McAdoo liked him and Reese may have looked into trading up, doesn't mean they knew he would be this good. If they did, they may have made the trade.

The bigger reason that Reese may not have made the trade is because he screwed up so many drafts, that he needed the picks to attempt to fix his past mistakes.

McAdoo was a coach in over his head. Just because he liked a player doesn't all the sudden make his a great coach in retrospect. I am pretty sure some posters on this board wanted Mahones as well--not sure I want them coaching the team either. He botched handling Manning from the start. He lost my respect when he continually throw Manning under the bus in his press confrences but not other players more deserving. He had an agenda. It is fine if he thought the Giants needed to move on from Manning, but his handling of the whole situation showed a disrepect for what Manning meant to the Giants and his inexperience as a leader.
Mahomes is still not a cant miss prospect  
dep026 : 10/17/2018 7:44 am : link
He’s played 6 games. He has shown to be excellent so far. But geez Louise.
remember the talk  
bc4life : 10/17/2018 8:08 am : link
about trying to trade up. the article doesn't even mention draft order or any of that.
Funny that the  
RollBlue : 10/17/2018 9:48 am : link
roster is crap, and MacAdoo is crap, yet they go 11-5 in 2016? How was the roster better in 2016? Was the OL better? Were the LBers better? Was the RB better?

You can't have it both ways. Frankly I think the Roster isn't that bad (less injuries that ravaged the team a year ago) - coaching is the bigger issue - see the Rams with McVay ve Fischer.

So far I've been unimpressed with both OC and DC. Until they get a good HC, OC and DC - will need a top QB to overcome that.
RE: It would have required  
Essex : 10/17/2018 9:53 am : link
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:
Quote:
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.

If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.
RE: RE: It would have required  
dep026 : 10/17/2018 9:55 am : link
In comment 14132465 Essex said:
Quote:
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.


6 games. Reminder that after 6 games last year Alex Smith was the MVP of the league.
RE: RE: It would have required  
ron mexico : 10/17/2018 9:57 am : link
In comment 14132465 Essex said:
Quote:
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.


and wouldn't that mean not having Webb as opposed to Hill or Carter?

So really its Barkley and Engram for Mahomes
RE: RE: RE: It would have required  
Essex : 10/17/2018 10:09 am : link
In comment 14132468 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14132465 Essex said:


Quote:


In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.



6 games. Reminder that after 6 games last year Alex Smith was the MVP of the league.

I am ok with taking the risk at this point. I get that things could change, but teams give up their draft based on watching a player play in a level below the pros; after six games, not only do the results show great promise, but most importantly, the eye test shows that this is the next "it" QB. I would make that trade in a second.
I posted about the interest in Mahomes leading up to that draft  
JonC : 10/17/2018 10:16 am : link
A week or two prior I was told if he were available, he was the Giants pick.

They gambled he would be available at their pick, and were ok with picking Engram otherwise. Chiefs traded up out of nowhere to get Mahomes.

McAdoo might have been dead on about the kid, but he also earned his pink slip along with Reese.
This falls into the "whatever" category  
Jimmy Googs : 10/17/2018 10:32 am : link
if being used to defend McAdoo. He had enough flaws that showed through. And its not like we lost a mastermind coach...

Focus on finding the next Mahomes in the draft...
RE: This falls into the  
Essex : 10/17/2018 11:44 am : link
In comment 14132547 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
if being used to defend McAdoo. He had enough flaws that showed through. And its not like we lost a mastermind coach...

Focus on finding the next Mahomes in the draft...

I think McAdoo got a bad rap here, including from me. He was wide eyed and honest about our most important position. I didn't like it at the time and I still think benching Eli for Geno was idiotic, but in the main McAdoo was right about Eli and sought to change that. His owners knew about that and cut him loose or threw him under the bus because of it. Was he abrasive? Yes. Was his offense to one-dimensional? Yes Was he Vince Lombardi? No. But,, you also have to be fair to the evidence and the evidence was that he diagnosed the problem correctly. It is aslo obvious he was not ok with Flowers. Before this season when they asked him how they thought the right side move would work, he was like can he "bend" on the right side better than the left side. The only difference, according to McAdoo, was that Eli would be able to see it now. So, my point is that McAdoo should never be confused with the coach whose name shall not be mentioned around here. If we did draft Mahomes and he replaced Eli with Mahomes last season, McAdoo is probably still the coach here and who knows how that would have ended. I thought he did a good to great job with little talent in 2016, a bad job with worse talent in 2017 (including the injuries). But never forget he lost his job primarily because the owner threw him under the bus on the Manning debacle.
Mahomes was drafted in the 2017 draft ...  
Manny in CA : 10/22/2018 12:55 pm : link

The Kansas City Chiefs selected Mahomes in the first round (10th overall) in the 2017 NFL Draft.[42] The Buffalo Bills traded the 10th overall pick to the Chiefs for their first round pick (27th) , third round pick, and the Chiefs' first round pick in the 2018 NFL Draft.

The New York Giants picked #23 in the first round (selecting Evan Engram).

None of the 2018 draft QBs was the equal of Mahomes (41 TDs/10 INTs at Texas Tech in 2006). Andy Reid knew it and so did McAdoo, THAT was the year to go after that elusive "Franchise QB). Reese blew it, big-time; I remember time very well.

There were more than a few BBIers (including me that begged for Mahomes). Just think what this team would be like - Mahomes, OBJ, Barkley on the field at the SAME time !!
RE: Mahomes was drafted in the 2017 draft ...  
ron mexico : 10/22/2018 12:58 pm : link
In comment 14139038 Manny in CA said:
Quote:

The Kansas City Chiefs selected Mahomes in the first round (10th overall) in the 2017 NFL Draft.[42] The Buffalo Bills traded the 10th overall pick to the Chiefs for their first round pick (27th) , third round pick, and the Chiefs' first round pick in the 2018 NFL Draft.

The New York Giants picked #23 in the first round (selecting Evan Engram).

None of the 2018 draft QBs was the equal of Mahomes (41 TDs/10 INTs at Texas Tech in 2006). Andy Reid knew it and so did McAdoo, THAT was the year to go after that elusive "Franchise QB). Reese blew it, big-time; I remember time very well.

There were more than a few BBIers (including me that begged for Mahomes). Just think what this team would be like - Mahomes, OBJ, Barkley on the field at the SAME time !!


well we would have to give up our 2018 #1 to get him so no barkley

Chiefs have drafted very well  
HomerJones45 : 10/22/2018 1:05 pm : link
They got Tyreke Hill in the fifth round and Hunt in the 3rd. They've had some really big hits in the draft.
RE: It would have required  
Nomad Crow on the Madison : 10/26/2018 11:57 am : link
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:
Quote:
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


it's a QB driven league; so for me it's yes.
Where is Ben McAdoo coaching now? Did Andy Reid hire him?  
Ira : 10/26/2018 12:17 pm : link
Is he back with Green Bay?
RE: Mahomes was drafted in the 2017 draft ...  
Sean : 10/26/2018 12:20 pm : link
In comment 14139038 Manny in CA said:
Quote:

The Kansas City Chiefs selected Mahomes in the first round (10th overall) in the 2017 NFL Draft.[42] The Buffalo Bills traded the 10th overall pick to the Chiefs for their first round pick (27th) , third round pick, and the Chiefs' first round pick in the 2018 NFL Draft.

The New York Giants picked #23 in the first round (selecting Evan Engram).

None of the 2018 draft QBs was the equal of Mahomes (41 TDs/10 INTs at Texas Tech in 2006). Andy Reid knew it and so did McAdoo, THAT was the year to go after that elusive "Franchise QB). Reese blew it, big-time; I remember time very well.

There were more than a few BBIers (including me that begged for Mahomes). Just think what this team would be like - Mahomes, OBJ, Barkley on the field at the SAME time !!


Um, how are they getting Barkley in your scenario?
RE: It would have required  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:27 pm : link
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:
Quote:
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


Are you kidding? If the Chiefs offered us Mahomes for Engram, Barkley, Hill, and Carter I'd happily pack their bags.
the revisionist history here is baffling  
Csonka : 10/26/2018 12:28 pm : link
Congrats to MacAdoo for recognizing Mahomes' talent. He was right. He was also an absolutely horrible coach. He lost the faith of the team, the media, and the fans. He was over his head.
McAdoo was better than Shurmur  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:29 pm : link
And I don't think it's close.
RE: the revisionist history here is baffling  
jeff57 : 10/26/2018 12:30 pm : link
In comment 14150082 Csonka said:
Quote:
Congrats to MacAdoo for recognizing Mahomes' talent. He was right. He was also an absolutely horrible coach. He lost the faith of the team, the media, and the fans. He was over his head.


Only Giants coach to have a winning season in the last 7 years. What does that say about the other two?
RE: RE: It would have required  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:30 pm : link
In comment 14150080 Go Terps said:
Quote:
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.



Are you kidding? If the Chiefs offered us Mahomes for Engram, Barkley, Hill, and Carter I'd happily pack their bags.


You’re even further away from a rebuild. Getting rid of 3 quality players for 1 player at a position where he is doomed to fail is bad football.

RE: RE: RE: It would have required  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:31 pm : link
In comment 14150086 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14150080 Go Terps said:


Quote:


In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.



Are you kidding? If the Chiefs offered us Mahomes for Engram, Barkley, Hill, and Carter I'd happily pack their bags.



You’re even further away from a rebuild. Getting rid of 3 quality players for 1 player at a position where he is doomed to fail is bad football.


I don't think you're operating in reality.
Reality would be  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:35 pm : link
We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.
RE: Reality would be  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:38 pm : link
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:
Quote:
We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.


A mobile young quarterback with a cannon to throw in the move is a good start. I agree our line sucks, but Mahomes would be a lot more effective behind it than Eli has been.
RE: Reality would be  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:40 pm : link
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:
Quote:
We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.


That's a very short term view.

Eli wasn't a success when he took over.
RE: RE: Reality would be  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:42 pm : link
In comment 14150097 Go Terps said:
Quote:
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:


Quote:


We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.



A mobile young quarterback with a cannon to throw in the move is a good start. I agree our line sucks, but Mahomes would be a lot more effective behind it than Eli has been.


I am not disagreeing he would give us the opportunity to make more plays. But it would give us more holes to fill hence why I think the rebuild would be longer.
RE: RE: Reality would be  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:43 pm : link
In comment 14150105 ron mexico said:
Quote:
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:


Quote:


We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.



That's a very short term view.

Eli wasn't a success when he took over.


Actually it’s the long term view. Trading away quality players for one player makes a rebuild longer.

Plus you guys are assuming success based of what he has done at KC.
The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:46 pm : link
especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.
so you were all for putting Darnold on this team with no Barkley  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:47 pm : link
but you wouldn't put Mahomes on it without Engram and Barkley?

I dont get it
RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:48 pm : link
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:
Quote:
especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.


thats why you make the trade - are we talking past each other?
RE: RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:49 pm : link
In comment 14150119 ron mexico said:
Quote:
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:


Quote:


especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.



thats why you make the trade - are we talking past each other?


nevermind this post - got you mixed up with Dep. We are saying the same thing

RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:50 pm : link
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:
Quote:
especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.


Goff
Watson
Wentz
Wilson

Seem like it doesn’t take decades to find the hot new QB. Again you’re assuming he would have the same chance to succeed here than he has in KC.
Plus Go Terps  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:52 pm : link
By the time Giants might be good again... you would have to pay astronomically to keep Mahomes. Something you’re totally against.
RE: RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:55 pm : link
In comment 14150123 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:


Quote:


especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.



Goff
Watson
Wentz
Wilson

Seem like it doesn’t take decades to find the hot new QB. Again you’re assuming he would have the same chance to succeed here than he has in KC.


in this scenario, he is the same player. Success might not have come as quickly but he would still have the same skills.

And please save me the David Carr syndrome shit. Good players will rise above adversity.
I hate David Carr Syndrome  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:58 pm : link
But the reality is he would be getting hit more and often which will affect his overall performance. Not saying he becomes gun shy but the wow plays would decrease.
RE: Plus Go Terps  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 1:03 pm : link
In comment 14150126 dep026 said:
Quote:
By the time Giants might be good again... you would have to pay astronomically to keep Mahomes. Something you’re totally against.


5 years is an eternity in todays NFL
The hidden genius of McAdoo  
HomerJones45 : 10/26/2018 1:26 pm : link
stayed very, very hidden.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner