for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

McAdoo / Mahomes

Drewcon40 : 10/16/2018 10:31 am
Guys, let me preface to say if this was posted, I am so sorry. I did a quick search and couldn't find this. I'll delete with apologies if I missed an earlier thread.

Given our current situation at QB and how loathed McAdoo was by many, I thought this was curious. I don't know the validity of this although the article cites Anita Marks. I am not privy to any inside info but if this was true, it certainly feels like a missed opportunity. Keep in mind, I am not saying we'd be the Chiefs but the QB position would be a lesser concern.

Quote:
With all that is going on in Giants world regarding their current quarterback situation, Ben McAdoo, of all people, was once a big proponent of the team drafting quarterback Patrick Mahomes.

Ben McAdoo Wanted The NY Giants To Draft Patrick Mahomes - ( New Window )
Ben McAdoo was the one guy in the room..  
Sean : 10/16/2018 10:32 am : link
who offered objectivity.
Mac's intentions of getting Mahomes  
BigBlueDownTheShore : 10/16/2018 10:36 am : link
is well documented.

We were even rumored to have tried to trade up for him as well.
jumping up from 23 to 7-9  
ron mexico : 10/16/2018 10:39 am : link
would not have been easy

This is  
Pete in MD : 10/16/2018 10:41 am : link
pretty well-known, I think but trading up 13 spots in the first round isn't that easy. Also, that would have been JR's call not Mac's.
It would have required  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 10:41 am : link
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.
Thanks gents...  
Drewcon40 : 10/16/2018 10:41 am : link
for some reason I don't recall that. I'll leave this up here for discussion and then let the post die.
RE: This is  
ron mexico : 10/16/2018 10:42 am : link
In comment 14130957 Pete in MD said:
Quote:
pretty well-known, I think but trading up 13 spots in the first round isn't that easy. Also, that would have been JR's call not Mac's.


more than 13 spots as KC wouldn't have traded with us
McAdoo was a smart guy  
AnnapolisMike : 10/16/2018 10:42 am : link
As time goes by I think his brief tenure will be looked at a little more favorably. He got a little too big for his britches in year two and lost control of the room. In retrospect the Giants should have probably left Eli on the bench...played Geno for a week or two..then Webb for a game or two...and then a final hurrah for Eli the last game of the season.

Maybe  
GoDeep13 : 10/16/2018 10:43 am : link
McAdoo WAS the smartest person in the room
It is well documented that Giants wanted him  
upstatenyg : 10/16/2018 10:43 am : link
Whether or not that was because of Macadoo, who knows.


Article after the draft - ( New Window )
It wasn't because Mac got overruled, etc  
upstatenyg : 10/16/2018 10:44 am : link
It was because they couldn't trade up, and ended up with Engram instead.

fukkin Mac had to win 11 games in 2016  
ron mexico : 10/16/2018 10:47 am : link
costing us a chance at Mahomes. Did the guy do anything right?
Mahomes was thought to be a mid-to-late first rounder  
bluepepper : 10/16/2018 10:50 am : link
leading up to the draft. That's my recollection anyway. And that's where the buzz was that the Giants might take him. Never buzz that they would make a bold trade-up type move. The Giants rarely do that. Even if Reese/McAdoo wanted to, Mara probably would have vetoed it.
.  
arcarsenal : 10/16/2018 10:50 am : link
It's kind of a two-pronged thing with McAdoo.

As time goes on, it's starting to look like he was actually right about the QB play. Being a 2nd year coach and having to come to that conclusion about a guy who has been in town as long as Eli has and has the resume - it was a battle he couldn't win unless he had an actual option to go to instead. Geno Smith was not that option.

That said - his offense without Coughlin here seemed woefully ineffective. His play calling was terrible. His play design often lacked creativity or variation.

I think Benny is going to get another job in this league at some point. Not a HC job, but I think he'll get a shot as a coordinator or at worst, a positional coach to work his way back up.

Just have to laugh at our luck sometimes...

The one freaking outlier year we've had since 2012 is the one that cost us a realistic shot at Patrick Mahomes.
RE: jumping up from 23 to 7-9  
Beer Man : 10/16/2018 10:51 am : link
In comment 14130952 ron mexico said:
Quote:
would not have been easy
From what I remember, the team did put some feelers out to see what it would cost to leap-frog that far up into the draft. My guess is that JR saw the cost too steep.
Same could be said about the current scheme  
ron mexico : 10/16/2018 10:54 am : link
"That said - his offense without Coughlin here seemed woefully ineffective. His play calling was terrible. His play design often lacked creativity or variation. "

If true, McAdoo got that one right,  
Section331 : 10/16/2018 10:55 am : link
but wasn't he the one clamoring for Davis Webb? IIRC, he liked Webb a lot.
RE: It is well documented that Giants wanted him  
shyster : 10/16/2018 10:56 am : link
In comment 14130968 upstatenyg said:
Quote:
Whether or not that was because of Macadoo, who knows.
Article after the draft - ( New Window )


McAdoo did make Texas Tech his first pro day visit and met privately with Mahomes the day before the workout.

That did a lot to associate him with Mahomes and plausibly so.


lubbock - ( New Window )
Macadoo under Coughlin was a solid offense  
Coach Red Beaulieu : 10/16/2018 10:59 am : link
Despite a lack of weapons. Went to complete cap once Macadoo took over.
RE: jumping up from 23 to 7-9  
lax counsel : 10/16/2018 10:59 am : link
In comment 14130952 ron mexico said:
Quote:
would not have been easy


That can't be correct. BBI tells me its easy to trade up and get a franchise qb anytime you feel like it.

In all seriousness, I think this displays the difficulty in acquiring a franchise qb when you are out of range.
RE: It would have required  
Josh in the City : 10/16/2018 11:02 am : link
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:
Quote:
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


Yeah, um I'd do that trade every single day and anyone that wouldn't STILL doesn't get the simple fact that there is no more important position on the football field than the QB. Oh, and throw in the fact thatr TE, RB, & LB are so far down that list and it's really a no brainer to me.
Last week...  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 11:05 am : link
Peter King said Ben McAdoo was the only grown up in the room at Jints Central when the Eli Fiasco occurred that Mara created.

McAdoo is unfairly maligned around here.

And indeed he wanted Mahomes but the morons running Jints Central for some inexplicable reason saw more value in a TE. What a house of horrors this organization is. This topic really bothers me because at least one person, McAdoo, had the foresight to see how special Mahomes was...
RE: Same could be said about the current scheme  
arcarsenal : 10/16/2018 11:09 am : link
In comment 14130999 ron mexico said:
Quote:
"That said - his offense without Coughlin here seemed woefully ineffective. His play calling was terrible. His play design often lacked creativity or variation. "


I don't know if the play calling is quite as bad now - it's the execution that isn't there and it's constantly taking checkdowns when an additional second or two may see something open up further down the field.

I think Shurmur's play design is a little bit better and more varied but obviously the results just aren't there.

The common issue with both coaches is that they know we are having trouble throwing the football, yet, neither made enough of an attempt to establish the run.

We're actually dead last in the league in rushing attempts this year, yet we have arguably the best RB in the sport. That doesn't quite add up.

We're 9th in YPC. We should be committing to the run more than we are. Mix Gallman in more if need be and give him more carries to take a little of the onus off Saquon if they don't want to keep banging him between the tackles.
I would have loved Mahomes...  
totowa_gman : 10/16/2018 11:17 am : link
Quote:
All signs point to the Giants having a top draft pick in the upcoming NFL Draft, likely leading to a quarterback, but missing out on Mahomes could be one of the biggest short comings in franchise history.


This guy needs to pump the brakes on the biggest short coming in franchise history...
The problem with McAdoo  
Mike from SI : 10/16/2018 11:19 am : link
is he didn't add enough wrinkles or differences to his schemes and playcalling, so that after the league figured it out, they basically knew what was coming. Odell said last year that a DB told him towards the end of a game something along the lines of "we know what you guys are running almost all the time."

At least Shurmur switches it up. Now, if he could stick to the run a little more on 2nd and medium...
RE: RE: It would have required  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 11:22 am : link
In comment 14131026 Josh in the City said:
Quote:


Yeah, um I'd do that trade every single day and anyone that wouldn't STILL doesn't get the simple fact that there is no more important position on the football field than the QB. Oh, and throw in the fact thatr TE, RB, & LB are so far down that list and it's really a no brainer to me.


Then you would make a horrific GM. Mahomes aint doing shit on this team. He is a very nice players whose flaws are still pretty prevelant.

Playing under reid, and throwing to Kelce/Hill/Watkins/Hunt is a luxury no other QB in the league has right now. His OL has been dominant as well. Throw Mahomes here with this shitbird teams and you would see MASSIVE growing pains.

It would be him and OBJ with no OL, no run game, and no TE. Yeah - no thanks on that.
Let's stop  
Kyle in NY : 10/16/2018 11:23 am : link
with the "Mcadoo got a bad rep" take that seems to be popping up recently

Sure, Macadoo had more foresight on Eli/Mahomes than others did. Though let's not forget, it would have taken a significant trade up to have a chance to get Mahomes. But let's give him credit for that.

It doesn't outweigh the fact that he was a petulant person who completely lost the locker room, according to Kim Jones refused to communicate directly with certain players, and ran the most predictable offense in the league which didn't crack 30 points during his entire tenure.

McAdoo was an awful head coach and he was ahead of the game on Eli. Both things can be true.
How did he love Mahomes and Webb?  
bradshaw44 : 10/16/2018 11:26 am : link
Two completely different QB styles. And if he was indeed looking for a Mahomes type then why grab a statue like Webb later on? Something doesn't add up to me. Also, wasn't it Reese that wanted Mahomes, not BM?
I never blamed Mac  
cjd2404 : 10/16/2018 11:26 am : link
nor do I believe he is treated fairly. For a few reasons..and these are my thoughts.

1. The offense under him as an OC statistically was great, so he was able to get something from the roster.

2. Reese's firing was long over due so a personnel problem I can't fault a new HC for.

3. Did Mac even *really* get a chance to hire his assistant coaches? I believe he was forced by ownership to keep Spags, Quinn and promote Sully.
* I might be wrong here, but I think Sully even admitted to not knowing the WCO

4. Someone was going to take the fall for the Eli situation, I think the fan backlash led to ownership firing Mac as the fall guy (even though they reportedly were on board with moving on from Eli)

Who knows who he might have brought in as assistants, but I don't think those 3 would have been his choice.

That being said, I think he probably needed at least another year as an OC -- but he had a lot of things stacked against him to begin with. Has PS taken over this team and started winning? I think that has more to do with the complete lack of a solid roster than either Mac or PS or and HC really deserves. It's going to be 2-3 years, IMO before the Giants are competitive.
McAdoo  
giantfan2000 : 10/16/2018 11:27 am : link
McAdoo wanted Mahomes badly - I believe Mahomes was the ONLY player McAdoo personally visited during that off season.

Unfortunately for Giants Mahomes was mid to late first rounder then his stock started to surge leading up to the draft - noway we were trading up for him
remember Giants were playoff team so the view was take team to next level not rebuild

Ironically if Giants were able to take Mahomes then Eli benching would have been completely different starting Geno would have been justified for protecting our first round future QB and McAdoo probably gets another year here




I'd argue that some of the passing plays are more akin to being  
GiantFanInTX : 10/16/2018 11:32 am : link
like run plays (similar to the Patriots when they had Kevin Faulk). Barkley is still getting the ball. Everyone says Shurmur needs to call more run plays, but the running plays are getting first contact in the back field, which inevitably lead to 3rd and long. The QB play is also abysmal (sorry but true), coupled with the porous line play.

Honestly, I think Shurmur's hands are tied. What do you expect him to do? The Giants have a bunch of players who probably don't even belong on an NFL roster, much less starting. This is a shit show of epic proportions and there is too much pressure being put on the head coach to fix it in on season. Many of us on here knew this would be several years. This team is THAT bad, and there are just too many holes. I'm just wondering if Shurmur is going to have the balls to make the necessary change at QB. The season is over. Cut Alex Tanney, bring in some more young guys to evaluate and start giving Lauletta the 1st team reps in practice.

Everyone blames the O line for the demise of the passing game, so maybe having an athletic, mobile QB can help. Maybe we will realize early on that there is no future for Lauletta. Maybe he will surprise everyone and be another Russell Wilson. Maybe not. It's time to find out what we've got to build on.
RE: RE: It would have required  
Keith : 10/16/2018 11:36 am : link
In comment 14131026 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.



Yeah, um I'd do that trade every single day and anyone that wouldn't STILL doesn't get the simple fact that there is no more important position on the football field than the QB. Oh, and throw in the fact thatr TE, RB, & LB are so far down that list and it's really a no brainer to me.


Lets just assume that was the cost, yeah, who wouldn't do that? That would have been a steal for Mahomes
RE: RE: RE: It would have required  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 11:40 am : link
In comment 14131121 Keith said:
Quote:
In comment 14131026 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.



Yeah, um I'd do that trade every single day and anyone that wouldn't STILL doesn't get the simple fact that there is no more important position on the football field than the QB. Oh, and throw in the fact thatr TE, RB, & LB are so far down that list and it's really a no brainer to me.



Lets just assume that was the cost, yeah, who wouldn't do that? That would have been a steal for Mahomes


Any sane GM when your team has as many holes as this team does. Barkley, Engram, and Hill is a quite a haul.

People annoint Mahommes as the next big thing. Mahommes withourt Reid, Hill, Kelce, Hunt, and Watkins is a totally different animal.
Yeah  
Keith : 10/16/2018 11:48 am : link
any gm takes that trade all day long. Its not even a question, IMO.
Agree to disagree  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 11:50 am : link
He isnt even the best player in the deal.
McAdoo seemed destined for Handley territory  
Bramton1 : 10/16/2018 11:56 am : link
And now everyone is acting like we made a mistake firing him.

McAddo was a shit head coach. He lost control of the locker room and ran a terribly predictable offense. Yes, he may have been ahead of the game with Eli, but a broken clock is correct twice a day. Let's not forget that he benched Eli in favor of GENO SMITH, a guy who had a slightly better chance than me at being the long-term quarterback for the Giants.
RE: I never blamed Mac  
Beer Man : 10/16/2018 11:57 am : link
In comment 14131085 cjd2404 said:
Quote:
nor do I believe he is treated fairly. For a few reasons..and these are my thoughts.

1. The offense under him as an OC statistically was great, so he was able to get something from the roster.

2. Reese's firing was long over due so a personnel problem I can't fault a new HC for.

3. Did Mac even *really* get a chance to hire his assistant coaches? I believe he was forced by ownership to keep Spags, Quinn and promote Sully.
* I might be wrong here, but I think Sully even admitted to not knowing the WCO

4. Someone was going to take the fall for the Eli situation, I think the fan backlash led to ownership firing Mac as the fall guy (even though they reportedly were on board with moving on from Eli)

Who knows who he might have brought in as assistants, but I don't think those 3 would have been his choice.

That being said, I think he probably needed at least another year as an OC -- but he had a lot of things stacked against him to begin with. Has PS taken over this team and started winning? I think that has more to do with the complete lack of a solid roster than either Mac or PS or and HC really deserves. It's going to be 2-3 years, IMO before the Giants are competitive.
You all seem to forget that he had lost the Locker Room (i.e., Player quitting, shooting their mouth off in the press, etc.)
RE: Agree to disagree  
Josh in the City : 10/16/2018 12:03 pm : link
In comment 14131165 dep026 said:
Quote:
He isnt even the best player in the deal.


Dep you couldn't be more wrong if you tried. And if you polled 32 GM's you'd get 32 GM's who would make that trade in a heartbeat. The sample size is still small but Mahomes looks like a generational talent. He needs to improve his accuracy on the deep ball somewhat (he overthrew a few guys deep against the Pats) and improve his footwork but if he's this good in his first season as a starter, the sky is the limit.

And btw, I do agree with you about Reid's system making it easier on him but if you don't think he would elevate our team then you simply don't understand what you're watching. We wouldn't be a 1-5 team with Mahomes under center (even without Barkley, Engram, and Carter).
RE: RE: Agree to disagree  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:06 pm : link
In comment 14131207 Josh in the City said:
Quote:
In comment 14131165 dep026 said:


Quote:


He isnt even the best player in the deal.



Dep you couldn't be more wrong if you tried. And if you polled 32 GM's you'd get 32 GM's who would make that trade in a heartbeat. The sample size is still small but Mahomes looks like a generational talent. He needs to improve his accuracy on the deep ball somewhat (he overthrew a few guys deep against the Pats) and improve his footwork but if he's this good in his first season as a starter, the sky is the limit.

And btw, I do agree with you about Reid's system making it easier on him but if you don't think he would elevate our team then you simply don't understand what you're watching. We wouldn't be a 1-5 team with Mahomes under center (even without Barkley, Engram, and Carter).


Unless Mahomes knows how to block, its all irrelevant. Youre telling me he is going to make this offense better with no run game and 1 reliable WR and no OLine?

You are absolutely insane.
LOL.  
Keith : 10/16/2018 12:13 pm : link
Mahomes would absolutely make us a different team. His escapability is Rogers'esque. Watch the Chiefs. There are many times when free rushers are on him in a split second and he escapes and launches it down the field. Its hysterical that you think one of the best QB's in the league replacing one of the worst doesn't make a huge difference.
I get it though,  
Keith : 10/16/2018 12:14 pm : link
every opinion you have, all the BS you spew and all of the blame you put on every single player or unit on the Giants is an attempt to defend Eli. Always has been and clearly always will be with you. Your act is old.
RE: RE: RE: Agree to disagree  
Josh in the City : 10/16/2018 12:15 pm : link
In comment 14131218 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14131207 Josh in the City said:


Quote:


In comment 14131165 dep026 said:


Quote:


He isnt even the best player in the deal.



Dep you couldn't be more wrong if you tried. And if you polled 32 GM's you'd get 32 GM's who would make that trade in a heartbeat. The sample size is still small but Mahomes looks like a generational talent. He needs to improve his accuracy on the deep ball somewhat (he overthrew a few guys deep against the Pats) and improve his footwork but if he's this good in his first season as a starter, the sky is the limit.

And btw, I do agree with you about Reid's system making it easier on him but if you don't think he would elevate our team then you simply don't understand what you're watching. We wouldn't be a 1-5 team with Mahomes under center (even without Barkley, Engram, and Carter).



Unless Mahomes knows how to block, its all irrelevant. Youre telling me he is going to make this offense better with no run game and 1 reliable WR and no OLine?

You are absolutely insane.


Yep Dep, that's exactly what I'm saying. He can make plays with his feet, throws on the run, avoid the rush and elevate the play of the players around him. Again, not sure how you don't see that.
If only.  
Dave in Hoboken : 10/16/2018 12:17 pm : link
Mahomes is amazing.
At this point McAdoo  
moespree : 10/16/2018 12:26 pm : link
Looks like a better evaluator than coach. And he's not perfect as an evaluator either. No second guessing from me. He was awful and needed to be fired.
He elevates the players around  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:31 pm : link
So he makes all-pro players ............ super all-pro players?

He plays on the most loaded offense in the NFL. Saying those guys dont make him better is just foolish.
RE: I get it though,  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:32 pm : link
In comment 14131241 Keith said:
Quote:
every opinion you have, all the BS you spew and all of the blame you put on every single player or unit on the Giants is an attempt to defend Eli. Always has been and clearly always will be with you. Your act is old.



IAEF
RE: jumping up from 23 to 7-9  
jeff57 : 10/16/2018 12:32 pm : link
In comment 14130952 ron mexico said:
Quote:
would not have been easy


KC went from 27 to 10.
RE: RE: jumping up from 23 to 7-9  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:34 pm : link
In comment 14131297 jeff57 said:
Quote:
In comment 14130952 ron mexico said:


Quote:


would not have been easy




KC went from 27 to 10.


Gave up two firsts and a 3rd. So the package would be quite similar if we were to. Maybe a 4th instead of a 3rd.
McAdoo crossed the Giants establishment  
jeff57 : 10/16/2018 12:35 pm : link
Front office, media, and boosters. That's why he was canned less than a season after he took them to the playoffs.
RE: RE: RE: Agree to disagree  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 12:35 pm : link
In comment 14131218 dep026 said:
Quote:


Unless Mahomes knows how to block, its all irrelevant. Youre telling me he is going to make this offense better with no run game and 1 reliable WR and no OLine?

You are absolutely insane.


With Mahomes, we are making a helluva lot more plays down field. If you can't see that than you need to start watching KC games...And I might say we have at least 1 more W.
McAdoo  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:35 pm : link
got fired cause he couldnt coach.... period.

And his relationships with players made Tom Coughlins early run as Giants coach look like he was the best players coach ever.
RE: McAdoo crossed the Giants establishment  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 12:36 pm : link
In comment 14131303 jeff57 said:
Quote:
Front office, media, and boosters. That's why he was canned less than a season after he took them to the playoffs.


That is utter bullsh-t. He got hoodwinked by that two-faced John Mara.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Agree to disagree  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:38 pm : link
In comment 14131304 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 14131218 dep026 said:


Quote:




Unless Mahomes knows how to block, its all irrelevant. Youre telling me he is going to make this offense better with no run game and 1 reliable WR and no OLine?

You are absolutely insane.



With Mahomes, we are making a helluva lot more plays down field. If you can't see that than you need to start watching KC games...And I might say we have at least 1 more W.


With a team that has so many holes, I love how people can speak of definites when comparing what a player can do on another team.

Would teams stop playing cover 2 leading to all these downfield plays?
RGIII  
bradshaw44 : 10/16/2018 12:38 pm : link
looked great his first year too. Just saying, the hype train could die down next year.
RE: McAdoo  
jeff57 : 10/16/2018 12:39 pm : link
In comment 14131307 dep026 said:
Quote:
got fired cause he couldnt coach.... period.

And his relationships with players made Tom Coughlins early run as Giants coach look like he was the best players coach ever.


I don't know how great he was, but he took the Giants to their one winning season in what will be the last 7 years.
RE: RE: McAdoo  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:40 pm : link
In comment 14131315 jeff57 said:
Quote:
In comment 14131307 dep026 said:


Quote:


got fired cause he couldnt coach.... period.

And his relationships with players made Tom Coughlins early run as Giants coach look like he was the best players coach ever.



I don't know how great he was, but he took the Giants to their one winning season in what will be the last 7 years.


Did he or the 200 million dollar defense Reese gave him?
Serious question, dep...  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 12:44 pm : link
You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?

RE: Serious question, dep...  
Dave in Hoboken : 10/16/2018 12:50 pm : link
In comment 14131334 bw in dc said:
Quote:
You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?


Apparently, we shouldn't look for a new QB until we have a good OLine. So, just draft lineman until you find an entire good line, then draft a QB years later until you know that line is solid/good.

Sound strategy, eh?
RE: Serious question, dep...  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:51 pm : link
In comment 14131334 bw in dc said:
Quote:
You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?


Yes it would be better, because Eli is clearly done. Does it mean we would have more wins? I cant go there. People keep insisting we would make more plays downfield - forgetting the fact that teams would still play us cover 2. So there would still be 2 safeties deep to prevent that. Our running game would be far, far worse.

What Mahommes is doing is fantastic, hes been amazing this year. However, switiching him to the Giants doesnt guarantee the same results or anything close to it. He extends plays but he isnt really a runner unless its wide open. He would do a much better job of avoiding sacks - but he would be seeing more and more people hit him.

People keep making this about its all Eli's fault is missing the forest from the trees. Replacing Eli needs to be done. But there is a ton more too.

So would I trade a future all-pro RB and a pro-bowl TE for a QB? No I would not.
RE: RE: Serious question, dep...  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:52 pm : link
In comment 14131342 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:
In comment 14131334 bw in dc said:


Quote:


You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?




Apparently, we shouldn't look for a new QB until we have a good OLine. So, just draft lineman until you find an entire good line, then draft a QB years later until you know that line is solid/good.

Sound strategy, eh?


Being that I wanted to draft Darnold, I am sure you arent insinuating this is me.
RE: RE: Serious question, dep...  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:53 pm : link
In comment 14131342 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:
In comment 14131334 bw in dc said:


Quote:


You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?




Apparently, we shouldn't look for a new QB until we have a good OLine. So, just draft lineman until you find an entire good line, then draft a QB years later until you know that line is solid/good.

Sound strategy, eh?


Worked out really well for the Colts, huh? Luck is amazing and his team will never go anywhere.
RE: RE: RE: Serious question, dep...  
Dave in Hoboken : 10/16/2018 12:53 pm : link
In comment 14131348 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14131342 Dave in Hoboken said:


Quote:


In comment 14131334 bw in dc said:


Quote:


You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?




Apparently, we shouldn't look for a new QB until we have a good OLine. So, just draft lineman until you find an entire good line, then draft a QB years later until you know that line is solid/good.

Sound strategy, eh?



Being that I wanted to draft Darnold, I am sure you arent insinuating this is me.


There are other idiots on this board who I've seen parrot that shit on here.
RE: RE: Serious question, dep...  
Default : 10/16/2018 12:53 pm : link
In comment 14131346 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14131334 bw in dc said:


Quote:


You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?



So would I trade a future all-pro RB and a pro-bowl TE for a QB? No I would not.


IMO yes, but there also isnt any evidence what-so-ever Engram will be a pro-bowl TE.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Serious question, dep...  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:54 pm : link
In comment 14131351 Dave in Hoboken said:
Quote:


There are other idiots on this board who I've seen parrot that shit on here.


Lets put it this way.... if DG thinks Herbert is the goods. You take him number 1 in 2019. If not, load up on the offensive line and look forward to 2020.
RE: RE: RE: Serious question, dep...  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 12:55 pm : link
In comment 14131353 Default said:
Quote:



IMO yes, but there also isnt any evidence what-so-ever Engram will be a pro-bowl TE.


He should have been last year, and has shown the skills to put up nig numbers in a functional offense.
As far as that trade proposition goes,  
Dave in Hoboken : 10/16/2018 12:55 pm : link
of course you take it. No matter what anyone said here in the offseason, as we can now see, there is no position more important on the football field than QB.
I guess the new BBI meme is  
HomerJones45 : 10/16/2018 1:00 pm : link
the "Unrealized Genius of Ben McAdoo."
Mahomes in Andy Reid’s offense  
BBelle21 : 10/16/2018 1:01 pm : link
Taking over a wild card playoff team is fun to watch. Mahomes in McAdoo’s 11 personnel hell being protected by Flowers (who would still be here) and co, no bueno for Mahomes. He wouldn’t have Barkley either. Mahomes should thank the football gods everyday he never had the misfortune of getting tethered to that clown of a head coach.
Like I said in the KC thread  
WillVAB : 10/16/2018 3:58 pm : link
Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.
RE: RE: RE: Serious question, dep...  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/16/2018 5:04 pm : link
In comment 14131350 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14131342 Dave in Hoboken said:


Quote:


In comment 14131334 bw in dc said:


Quote:


You honestly think Mahomes skill set wouldn't make us more productive offensively?




Apparently, we shouldn't look for a new QB until we have a good OLine. So, just draft lineman until you find an entire good line, then draft a QB years later until you know that line is solid/good.

Sound strategy, eh?



Worked out really well for the Colts, huh? Luck is amazing and his team will never go anywhere.


Luck was drafted into a franchise that was just as inept as the Giants are right now. It takes extreme incompetence to foul up drafting an excellent young QB. And even with that extreme incompetence he's carried that team to a .500 record in the playoffs when they had zero right to be there.
Would have been great to get him  
upstatenyg : 10/16/2018 5:26 pm : link
But trading up for him only makes sense now after seeing what he has done in kc and what Eli is doing.

Let's not forget that it wasn't just benching Eli that caused him to be Un liked in NY. It was also the idiotic choice to start Geno over Davis Webb which truly no one could understand.

RE: Would have been great to get him  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/16/2018 5:31 pm : link
In comment 14131777 upstatenyg said:
Quote:
It was also the idiotic choice to start Geno over Davis Webb which truly no one could understand.


Now that the next coach and GM came along and determined that Webb isn't even worth a roster spot, why do we still need to call this idiotic?
McAdoo  
Marty866b : 10/16/2018 6:07 pm : link
Also said that Solder wasn't every good and moving Flowers from left tackle to right tackle would not make any difference since he can't bend. He was right on all counts. Just because McAdoo was a lousy head coach doesn't mean he doesn't know his football.
RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 6:37 pm : link
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:
Quote:
Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.


Sorry, Mahomes isn't just a plug and play QB that is just another cog in Reid's system.

If so, why did Reid jettison Alex Smith?
RE: He elevates the players around  
FStubbs : 10/16/2018 6:38 pm : link
In comment 14131292 dep026 said:
Quote:
So he makes all-pro players ............ super all-pro players?

He plays on the most loaded offense in the NFL. Saying those guys dont make him better is just foolish.


This. Who knows what Mahomes would be here, but odds are he'd suck because he'd be running the McAdoo offense with Flowers and Hart as his tackles.
RE: McAdoo  
FStubbs : 10/16/2018 6:39 pm : link
In comment 14131810 Marty866b said:
Quote:
Also said that Solder wasn't every good and moving Flowers from left tackle to right tackle would not make any difference since he can't bend. He was right on all counts. Just because McAdoo was a lousy head coach doesn't mean he doesn't know his football.


Handley was said to be a brilliant football mind too.

Awful head coach.
RE: RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 6:43 pm : link
In comment 14131844 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:


Quote:


Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.



Sorry, Mahomes isn't just a plug and play QB that is just another cog in Reid's system.

If so, why did Reid jettison Alex Smith?


Cause alex Smith isn’t good.
RE: RE: RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
bw in dc : 10/16/2018 6:59 pm : link
In comment 14131852 dep026 said:
Quote:


Cause alex Smith isn’t good.


Smith is good, but he's limited. Mahomes bring another, unteachable dimension. A dimension that would help elevate any offense - like ours for instance.
Alex Smith is so good  
dep026 : 10/16/2018 7:47 pm : link
That once he was replaced... his previous team thrived.
I get that some of you are frustred with our QB  
JOrthman : 10/16/2018 9:34 pm : link
I get that you want another QB. But some of you have gone off your meds based on what I'm reading lately.
I love Mahones so far  
JOrthman : 10/16/2018 10:19 pm : link
and think he is a future stud QB. HOWEVER, some of you are caught in the moment...

KC has been a perennial playoff team since Andy Reid took over. They have a lot of talent on both offense and defense. Alex Smith was making them look damn good last year until he did what Alex Smith always does. The only thing KC has been missing for the last few years is a QB who can play in a shoot out and can play from behind, which is what PM can do. Let's stop acting like KC sucked until he got there.

Now, if you traded for PM, assuming they agreed. We lose Barkly, Hill and Engram on a team that already has a lot of holes. You're overrating him too soon and not realizing how far off we really are.
RE: RE: Same could be said about the current scheme  
Matt M. : 10/16/2018 11:48 pm : link
In comment 14131047 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
In comment 14130999 ron mexico said:


Quote:


"That said - his offense without Coughlin here seemed woefully ineffective. His play calling was terrible. His play design often lacked creativity or variation. "




I don't know if the play calling is quite as bad now - it's the execution that isn't there and it's constantly taking checkdowns when an additional second or two may see something open up further down the field.

I think Shurmur's play design is a little bit better and more varied but obviously the results just aren't there.

The common issue with both coaches is that they know we are having trouble throwing the football, yet, neither made enough of an attempt to establish the run.

We're actually dead last in the league in rushing attempts this year, yet we have arguably the best RB in the sport. That doesn't quite add up.

We're 9th in YPC. We should be committing to the run more than we are. Mix Gallman in more if need be and give him more carries to take a little of the onus off Saquon if they don't want to keep banging him between the tackles.
Spot on with everything.
RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
LauderdaleMatty : 10/16/2018 11:53 pm : link
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:
Quote:
Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.


Insane is being kind. Moronic McAdoo is a joke. Will be lucky to get another OC job ever again
I'm in the camp that obviously likes Mahomes  
Matt M. : 10/16/2018 11:57 pm : link
But, doesn't see him succeeding in McAdoo's offense with the personnel we had and would have now. With no OL, no running game, no TE, and running the same 11 personnel more than 90% of the time, he wasn't the same QB we see now with 2 RBs, Good WR, solid OL and a very good offensive head coach.

And for the record, I was calling for McAdoo to be gone long before Eli was benched. I don't care that he wanted to bench Eli. I do, however, care, that he replaced him with Geno fucking Smith and seemingly lied to management.
RE: RE: Like I said in the KC thread  
WillVAB : 10/17/2018 12:30 am : link
In comment 14131844 bw in dc said:
Quote:
In comment 14131666 WillVAB said:


Quote:


Anyone who thinks Mahomes would be lighting it up under McAdoo w Reese building the roster is insane.

Mahomes got drafted into the absolute nut spot. Sick offensive scheme, a year to learn, under a coach w the best resume developing QBs in the league.

Having the right scheme and staff is just as important as getting the right QB.



Sorry, Mahomes isn't just a plug and play QB that is just another cog in Reid's system.

If so, why did Reid jettison Alex Smith?


Reid resurrected Vick’s career from the dead as well as Smith’s. It’s an absolute fact he gets the ceiling out of his QBs.

I never said Mahomes is plug and play. I’m saying you’re a fool if you think McAdoo could get similar production in his trash scheme with Reese building a garbage roster around him.
Future Franchise you do the trade  
Giantimistic : 10/17/2018 3:30 am : link
If the Giants thought Mahones was a future franchise QB can't miss prospect than you do what you can to make the trade up. Just because McAdoo liked him and Reese may have looked into trading up, doesn't mean they knew he would be this good. If they did, they may have made the trade.

The bigger reason that Reese may not have made the trade is because he screwed up so many drafts, that he needed the picks to attempt to fix his past mistakes.

McAdoo was a coach in over his head. Just because he liked a player doesn't all the sudden make his a great coach in retrospect. I am pretty sure some posters on this board wanted Mahones as well--not sure I want them coaching the team either. He botched handling Manning from the start. He lost my respect when he continually throw Manning under the bus in his press confrences but not other players more deserving. He had an agenda. It is fine if he thought the Giants needed to move on from Manning, but his handling of the whole situation showed a disrepect for what Manning meant to the Giants and his inexperience as a leader.
Mahomes is still not a cant miss prospect  
dep026 : 10/17/2018 7:44 am : link
He’s played 6 games. He has shown to be excellent so far. But geez Louise.
remember the talk  
bc4life : 10/17/2018 8:08 am : link
about trying to trade up. the article doesn't even mention draft order or any of that.
Funny that the  
RollBlue : 10/17/2018 9:48 am : link
roster is crap, and MacAdoo is crap, yet they go 11-5 in 2016? How was the roster better in 2016? Was the OL better? Were the LBers better? Was the RB better?

You can't have it both ways. Frankly I think the Roster isn't that bad (less injuries that ravaged the team a year ago) - coaching is the bigger issue - see the Rams with McVay ve Fischer.

So far I've been unimpressed with both OC and DC. Until they get a good HC, OC and DC - will need a top QB to overcome that.
RE: It would have required  
Essex : 10/17/2018 9:53 am : link
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:
Quote:
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.

If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.
RE: RE: It would have required  
dep026 : 10/17/2018 9:55 am : link
In comment 14132465 Essex said:
Quote:
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.


6 games. Reminder that after 6 games last year Alex Smith was the MVP of the league.
RE: RE: It would have required  
ron mexico : 10/17/2018 9:57 am : link
In comment 14132465 Essex said:
Quote:
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.


and wouldn't that mean not having Webb as opposed to Hill or Carter?

So really its Barkley and Engram for Mahomes
RE: RE: RE: It would have required  
Essex : 10/17/2018 10:09 am : link
In comment 14132468 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14132465 Essex said:


Quote:


In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


If you would have came to me today and said will you trade Engram and Barkley for Mahomes, I would do it in a split second. Mahomes is going to the best qb in football for the next decade and it really isn't close between him and some of the younger guys below him, including Goff, Wentz, etc.



6 games. Reminder that after 6 games last year Alex Smith was the MVP of the league.

I am ok with taking the risk at this point. I get that things could change, but teams give up their draft based on watching a player play in a level below the pros; after six games, not only do the results show great promise, but most importantly, the eye test shows that this is the next "it" QB. I would make that trade in a second.
I posted about the interest in Mahomes leading up to that draft  
JonC : 10/17/2018 10:16 am : link
A week or two prior I was told if he were available, he was the Giants pick.

They gambled he would be available at their pick, and were ok with picking Engram otherwise. Chiefs traded up out of nowhere to get Mahomes.

McAdoo might have been dead on about the kid, but he also earned his pink slip along with Reese.
This falls into the "whatever" category  
Jimmy Googs : 10/17/2018 10:32 am : link
if being used to defend McAdoo. He had enough flaws that showed through. And its not like we lost a mastermind coach...

Focus on finding the next Mahomes in the draft...
RE: This falls into the  
Essex : 10/17/2018 11:44 am : link
In comment 14132547 Jimmy Googs said:
Quote:
if being used to defend McAdoo. He had enough flaws that showed through. And its not like we lost a mastermind coach...

Focus on finding the next Mahomes in the draft...

I think McAdoo got a bad rap here, including from me. He was wide eyed and honest about our most important position. I didn't like it at the time and I still think benching Eli for Geno was idiotic, but in the main McAdoo was right about Eli and sought to change that. His owners knew about that and cut him loose or threw him under the bus because of it. Was he abrasive? Yes. Was his offense to one-dimensional? Yes Was he Vince Lombardi? No. But,, you also have to be fair to the evidence and the evidence was that he diagnosed the problem correctly. It is aslo obvious he was not ok with Flowers. Before this season when they asked him how they thought the right side move would work, he was like can he "bend" on the right side better than the left side. The only difference, according to McAdoo, was that Eli would be able to see it now. So, my point is that McAdoo should never be confused with the coach whose name shall not be mentioned around here. If we did draft Mahomes and he replaced Eli with Mahomes last season, McAdoo is probably still the coach here and who knows how that would have ended. I thought he did a good to great job with little talent in 2016, a bad job with worse talent in 2017 (including the injuries). But never forget he lost his job primarily because the owner threw him under the bus on the Manning debacle.
Mahomes was drafted in the 2017 draft ...  
Manny in CA : 10/22/2018 12:55 pm : link

The Kansas City Chiefs selected Mahomes in the first round (10th overall) in the 2017 NFL Draft.[42] The Buffalo Bills traded the 10th overall pick to the Chiefs for their first round pick (27th) , third round pick, and the Chiefs' first round pick in the 2018 NFL Draft.

The New York Giants picked #23 in the first round (selecting Evan Engram).

None of the 2018 draft QBs was the equal of Mahomes (41 TDs/10 INTs at Texas Tech in 2006). Andy Reid knew it and so did McAdoo, THAT was the year to go after that elusive "Franchise QB). Reese blew it, big-time; I remember time very well.

There were more than a few BBIers (including me that begged for Mahomes). Just think what this team would be like - Mahomes, OBJ, Barkley on the field at the SAME time !!
RE: Mahomes was drafted in the 2017 draft ...  
ron mexico : 10/22/2018 12:58 pm : link
In comment 14139038 Manny in CA said:
Quote:

The Kansas City Chiefs selected Mahomes in the first round (10th overall) in the 2017 NFL Draft.[42] The Buffalo Bills traded the 10th overall pick to the Chiefs for their first round pick (27th) , third round pick, and the Chiefs' first round pick in the 2018 NFL Draft.

The New York Giants picked #23 in the first round (selecting Evan Engram).

None of the 2018 draft QBs was the equal of Mahomes (41 TDs/10 INTs at Texas Tech in 2006). Andy Reid knew it and so did McAdoo, THAT was the year to go after that elusive "Franchise QB). Reese blew it, big-time; I remember time very well.

There were more than a few BBIers (including me that begged for Mahomes). Just think what this team would be like - Mahomes, OBJ, Barkley on the field at the SAME time !!


well we would have to give up our 2018 #1 to get him so no barkley

Chiefs have drafted very well  
HomerJones45 : 10/22/2018 1:05 pm : link
They got Tyreke Hill in the fifth round and Hunt in the 3rd. They've had some really big hits in the draft.
RE: It would have required  
Nomad Crow on the Madison : 10/26/2018 11:57 am : link
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:
Quote:
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


it's a QB driven league; so for me it's yes.
Where is Ben McAdoo coaching now? Did Andy Reid hire him?  
Ira : 10/26/2018 12:17 pm : link
Is he back with Green Bay?
RE: Mahomes was drafted in the 2017 draft ...  
Sean : 10/26/2018 12:20 pm : link
In comment 14139038 Manny in CA said:
Quote:

The Kansas City Chiefs selected Mahomes in the first round (10th overall) in the 2017 NFL Draft.[42] The Buffalo Bills traded the 10th overall pick to the Chiefs for their first round pick (27th) , third round pick, and the Chiefs' first round pick in the 2018 NFL Draft.

The New York Giants picked #23 in the first round (selecting Evan Engram).

None of the 2018 draft QBs was the equal of Mahomes (41 TDs/10 INTs at Texas Tech in 2006). Andy Reid knew it and so did McAdoo, THAT was the year to go after that elusive "Franchise QB). Reese blew it, big-time; I remember time very well.

There were more than a few BBIers (including me that begged for Mahomes). Just think what this team would be like - Mahomes, OBJ, Barkley on the field at the SAME time !!


Um, how are they getting Barkley in your scenario?
RE: It would have required  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:27 pm : link
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:
Quote:
Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.


Are you kidding? If the Chiefs offered us Mahomes for Engram, Barkley, Hill, and Carter I'd happily pack their bags.
the revisionist history here is baffling  
Csonka : 10/26/2018 12:28 pm : link
Congrats to MacAdoo for recognizing Mahomes' talent. He was right. He was also an absolutely horrible coach. He lost the faith of the team, the media, and the fans. He was over his head.
McAdoo was better than Shurmur  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:29 pm : link
And I don't think it's close.
RE: the revisionist history here is baffling  
jeff57 : 10/26/2018 12:30 pm : link
In comment 14150082 Csonka said:
Quote:
Congrats to MacAdoo for recognizing Mahomes' talent. He was right. He was also an absolutely horrible coach. He lost the faith of the team, the media, and the fans. He was over his head.


Only Giants coach to have a winning season in the last 7 years. What does that say about the other two?
RE: RE: It would have required  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:30 pm : link
In comment 14150080 Go Terps said:
Quote:
In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.



Are you kidding? If the Chiefs offered us Mahomes for Engram, Barkley, Hill, and Carter I'd happily pack their bags.


You’re even further away from a rebuild. Getting rid of 3 quality players for 1 player at a position where he is doomed to fail is bad football.

RE: RE: RE: It would have required  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:31 pm : link
In comment 14150086 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14150080 Go Terps said:


Quote:


In comment 14130958 dep026 said:


Quote:


Our 2017 and 2018 first round picks and probably our 3rd from last year.

So Mahomes minus Engram/Barkley/Hill or Carter?

Yeah, um... no.



Are you kidding? If the Chiefs offered us Mahomes for Engram, Barkley, Hill, and Carter I'd happily pack their bags.



You’re even further away from a rebuild. Getting rid of 3 quality players for 1 player at a position where he is doomed to fail is bad football.


I don't think you're operating in reality.
Reality would be  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:35 pm : link
We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.
RE: Reality would be  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:38 pm : link
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:
Quote:
We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.


A mobile young quarterback with a cannon to throw in the move is a good start. I agree our line sucks, but Mahomes would be a lot more effective behind it than Eli has been.
RE: Reality would be  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:40 pm : link
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:
Quote:
We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.


That's a very short term view.

Eli wasn't a success when he took over.
RE: RE: Reality would be  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:42 pm : link
In comment 14150097 Go Terps said:
Quote:
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:


Quote:


We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.



A mobile young quarterback with a cannon to throw in the move is a good start. I agree our line sucks, but Mahomes would be a lot more effective behind it than Eli has been.


I am not disagreeing he would give us the opportunity to make more plays. But it would give us more holes to fill hence why I think the rebuild would be longer.
RE: RE: Reality would be  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:43 pm : link
In comment 14150105 ron mexico said:
Quote:
In comment 14150094 dep026 said:


Quote:


We would have no OLine, Wayne gallman, Rhett Ellison and a shitty defense with a young QB.

If that’s a recipe for success..... then we will agree to disagree.



That's a very short term view.

Eli wasn't a success when he took over.


Actually it’s the long term view. Trading away quality players for one player makes a rebuild longer.

Plus you guys are assuming success based of what he has done at KC.
The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
Go Terps : 10/26/2018 12:46 pm : link
especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.
so you were all for putting Darnold on this team with no Barkley  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:47 pm : link
but you wouldn't put Mahomes on it without Engram and Barkley?

I dont get it
RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:48 pm : link
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:
Quote:
especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.


thats why you make the trade - are we talking past each other?
RE: RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:49 pm : link
In comment 14150119 ron mexico said:
Quote:
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:


Quote:


especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.



thats why you make the trade - are we talking past each other?


nevermind this post - got you mixed up with Dep. We are saying the same thing

RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:50 pm : link
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:
Quote:
especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.


Goff
Watson
Wentz
Wilson

Seem like it doesn’t take decades to find the hot new QB. Again you’re assuming he would have the same chance to succeed here than he has in KC.
Plus Go Terps  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:52 pm : link
By the time Giants might be good again... you would have to pay astronomically to keep Mahomes. Something you’re totally against.
RE: RE: The players we'd be trading away are easily replaced,  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 12:55 pm : link
In comment 14150123 dep026 said:
Quote:
In comment 14150115 Go Terps said:


Quote:


especially Barkley. Finding a quarterback like Mahomes could take decades.



Goff
Watson
Wentz
Wilson

Seem like it doesn’t take decades to find the hot new QB. Again you’re assuming he would have the same chance to succeed here than he has in KC.


in this scenario, he is the same player. Success might not have come as quickly but he would still have the same skills.

And please save me the David Carr syndrome shit. Good players will rise above adversity.
I hate David Carr Syndrome  
dep026 : 10/26/2018 12:58 pm : link
But the reality is he would be getting hit more and often which will affect his overall performance. Not saying he becomes gun shy but the wow plays would decrease.
RE: Plus Go Terps  
ron mexico : 10/26/2018 1:03 pm : link
In comment 14150126 dep026 said:
Quote:
By the time Giants might be good again... you would have to pay astronomically to keep Mahomes. Something you’re totally against.


5 years is an eternity in todays NFL
The hidden genius of McAdoo  
HomerJones45 : 10/26/2018 1:26 pm : link
stayed very, very hidden.
Back to the Corner