Â
All Threads
Football Threads
Non Football Threads
Forum Archives
Old Forum Archives
Forum Stats
Terms of Use
Code Of Conduct
Privacy Policy
FAQ
About Us
Contact Us
Amazon.com
Roster
Depth Chart
Scouting Reports
Transactions
Player Salaries
Contact Info
Administration
Coaching Staff
Coaching History
Annual Records
Hall Of Fame
Retired Jerseys
Ring Of Honor
Schedule
Previews/Reviews
Standings (NFL.com)
Statistics (Giants.com)
Historical Stats
Free Agency
The Draft
Training Camp
Important Dates
Giant Of The Year Award
Articles
Glossary
Links
Login
Register
Activate User
Forgot Login Info
Home
Corner Forum
Gameday
Team
Team Building
Giants Info & History
Info/Links
Log In
Archived Thread
Giants have a 0% chance of winning on Monday Night
Keith
: 10/18/2018 10:47 am
No team with a QB named Eli has ever won a Monday night game while 1-5 against Atlanta. 0%
Also, this data is as of 1965, so it's possible its happened since then.
Link
- (
New Window
)
So its not
Â
dep026
: 10/18/2018 10:50 am :
link
technically zero?
#research
Â
Sneakers O'toole
: 10/18/2018 10:50 am :
link
.
.
Â
arcarsenal
: 10/18/2018 10:51 am :
link
Research!
that is some in depth research
Â
YAJ2112
: 10/18/2018 10:51 am :
link
thank you for your efforts!
The article of from 1965 YAJ, sue me.
Â
Keith
: 10/18/2018 10:52 am :
link
Let me konw if you find a more recent one. Maybe it has happened before, but its technically zero.
.
Â
Jints in Carolina
: 10/18/2018 10:53 am :
link
This is the thread of the week
Â
dep026
: 10/18/2018 10:54 am :
link
well done.
.
Â
arcarsenal
: 10/18/2018 10:55 am :
link
Technically the thread of the week, or....?
RE: .
Â
dep026
: 10/18/2018 10:55 am :
link
In comment
14134060
arcarsenal said:
Quote:
Technically the thread of the week, or....?
Its the thread of week, or...
there's no question mark at the end.
Imma go to Vegas with this one.
Â
George
: 10/18/2018 10:56 am :
link
Thanks for the tip.
All in?
Â
Mdgiantsfan
: 10/18/2018 10:56 am :
link
So you should bet next’s mortgage/rent payment on the Dirty Birds straight up😎
...
Â
Keith
: 10/18/2018 10:56 am :
link
Incredible.
Â
Mike in Long Beach
: 10/18/2018 10:57 am :
link
.
That's right...
Â
sr267
: 10/18/2018 11:01 am :
link
f*ck optimism!!!
Half of your statistics are 90%
Â
bradshaw44
: 10/18/2018 11:03 am :
link
accurate.
60% of the time, it works every time.
Â
Pete in MD
: 10/18/2018 11:08 am :
link
.
You sxdxca’d that but good
Â
Bill L
: 10/18/2018 11:14 am :
link
Kudos
This has has happened at least twice since 1965
Â
pjcas18
: 10/18/2018 11:17 am :
link
but technically it's still a 0% chance of winning.
statistically 0 is never 0. While I might agree with you in
Â
plato
: 10/18/2018 11:21 am :
link
conversation, having been through this statistical grind I can assure you that 0 is never predictive of 0
In this case 0 means a
Â
Sneakers O'toole
: 10/18/2018 11:27 am :
link
negative eleventy chance of winning
.
Â
arcarsenal
: 10/18/2018 11:31 am :
link
While we're here, can someone explain the difference between technically zero and
absolute
zero?
Absolute zero=diet vodka
Â
Sneakers O'toole
: 10/18/2018 11:34 am :
link
.
RE: .
Â
Mad Mike
: 10/18/2018 11:35 am :
link
In comment
14134123
arcarsenal said:
Quote:
While we're here, can someone explain the difference between technically zero and absolute zero?
At absolute zero the game couldn't even be played - we'd all be frozen to death. C'mon, try to stay on topic.
.
Â
arcarsenal
: 10/18/2018 11:38 am :
link
Can
Â
charlito
: 10/18/2018 12:13 pm :
link
I get a double cheeseburger without the cheese
TECHNICALLY ZERO!!!
Â
Larry in Pencilvania
: 10/18/2018 12:14 pm :
link
.
The doctor
Â
crick n NC
: 10/18/2018 12:39 pm :
link
Says he's got a fifty fifty chance, but there is only a ten percent chance of that
I think Keith is actually Norman Esiason
Â
Dinger
: 10/18/2018 12:48 pm :
link
He is infatuated with Eli....
RE: I think Keith is actually Norman Esiason
Â
Keith
: 10/18/2018 12:52 pm :
link
In comment
14134300
Dinger said:
Quote:
He is infatuated with Eli....
There is technically a 0% chance of this being accurate.
RE: This has has happened at least twice since 1965
Â
Mark C
: 10/18/2018 12:59 pm :
link
In comment
14134097
pjcas18 said:
Quote:
but technically it's still a 0% chance of winning.
So, you're saying there's still a chance?
RE: RE: This has has happened at least twice since 1965
Â
Larry in Pencilvania
: 10/18/2018 1:01 pm :
link
In comment
14134323
Mark C said:
Quote:
In comment 14134097 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
but technically it's still a 0% chance of winning.
So, you're saying there's still a chance?
Still a chance
Anyway,
Â
Mark C
: 10/18/2018 1:01 pm :
link
they say ninety percent of football is half mental.
I do remember Eli winning vs Falcons on a Monday night
Â
TommytheElephant
: 10/18/2018 1:14 pm :
link
With a long TD to plax (I think it was a post)
We won handily but were not 1-5
Either Harrington or Leftwich was QB
Â
TommytheElephant
: 10/18/2018 1:14 pm :
link
.
RE: Either Harrington or Leftwich was QB
Â
YAJ2112
: 10/18/2018 1:19 pm :
link
In comment
14134344
TommytheElephant said:
Quote:
.
2007, vs Harrington
Link
- (
New Window
)
That's it
Â
JerseyCityJoe
: 10/18/2018 3:50 pm :
link
I'm betting on the Giants.
This made me laugh.
Â
Tim in Eternal Blue
: 10/18/2018 3:58 pm :
link
Thank you.
Watch...
Â
BamaBlue
: 10/18/2018 4:17 pm :
link
the Giants will win -- thereby screwing us again.
Win or lose.....
Â
jsuds
: 10/18/2018 4:22 pm :
link
Time for Saquan to throw a TD pass to OBJ!
Just sat down and needed a laugh
Â
dep026
: 10/18/2018 10:35 pm :
link
And re-read this. Well done Keith.
I nominate as this as thread of the year.
RE: This is the thread of the week
Â
chopperhatch
: 10/18/2018 11:12 pm :
link
In comment
14134059
dep026 said:
Quote:
well done.
I just noticed that you on average annoint 5 threads a week as "the thread of the week." Lol. Just an observation.
At first I thought it was the drugs but then I realized that couldnt be the case because i cant afford any.
😎
RE: .
Â
chopperhatch
: 10/18/2018 11:14 pm :
link
In comment
14134123
arcarsenal said:
Quote:
While we're here, can someone explain the difference between technically zero and absolute zero?
Easy. Absolute zero is self explanatory, but a technical zero can be spun into a positive.
Boom. Idiots.
RE: RE: This is the thread of the week
Â
dep026
: 10/19/2018 7:00 am :
link
In comment
14135036
chopperhatch said:
Quote:
In comment 14134059 dep026 said:
Quote:
well done.
I just noticed that you on average annoint 5 threads a week as "the thread of the week." Lol. Just an observation.
At first I thought it was the drugs but then I realized that couldnt be the case because i cant afford any.
😎
I think your just jealous that I haven’t nominated any of yours yet :)
C'mon Man!
Â
section125
: 10/19/2018 7:34 am :
link
You can find a stat to support any position.
Its the thread of week, or...
there's no question mark at the end.
At absolute zero the game couldn't even be played - we'd all be frozen to death. C'mon, try to stay on topic.
There is technically a 0% chance of this being accurate.
So, you're saying there's still a chance?
Quote:
but technically it's still a 0% chance of winning.
So, you're saying there's still a chance?
Still a chance
We won handily but were not 1-5
2007, vs Harrington
Link - ( New Window )
I nominate as this as thread of the year.
I just noticed that you on average annoint 5 threads a week as "the thread of the week." Lol. Just an observation.
At first I thought it was the drugs but then I realized that couldnt be the case because i cant afford any.
😎
Easy. Absolute zero is self explanatory, but a technical zero can be spun into a positive.
Boom. Idiots.
Quote:
well done.
I just noticed that you on average annoint 5 threads a week as "the thread of the week." Lol. Just an observation.
At first I thought it was the drugs but then I realized that couldnt be the case because i cant afford any.
😎
I think your just jealous that I haven’t nominated any of yours yet :)